Comparison of instability resistance training, traditional resistance training and plyometric training on athletic performance parameters
The objective of the study was to compare traditional resistance, instability resistance, and plyometric training methods on measures of athletic performance in healthy subjects. Sixty five healthy, physically active male students were randomly assigned to the following groups: traditional resistanc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of complementary & integrative medicine 2021-01, Vol.18 (3), p.593-598 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 598 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 593 |
| container_title | Journal of complementary & integrative medicine |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Amar, Amit Kumar Nuhmani, Shibili Khan, Moazzam Hussain John, Melbin Kachanathu, Shaji John Kadyan, Gaurav Muaidi, Qassim I. |
| description | The objective of the study was to compare traditional resistance, instability resistance, and plyometric training methods on measures of athletic performance in healthy subjects.
Sixty five healthy, physically active male students were randomly assigned to the following groups: traditional resistance training (RT, n=22), instability training (IT, n=22), and plyometric training (PLY, n=21).Athletic performance parameters were assessed pre- and post-training using chair squat test, standing stork test, shuttle run test, t-test, and vertical jump test.
General linear univariate model with baseline as covariate (ANCOVA) was used for analyzing the change in outcome from baseline to post-treatment. Statistically significant improvement was observed in all the athletic performance parameters in all three groups after seven weeks of training (p-value |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/jcim-2019-0346 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487160353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2577816311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2913-e3de808d0e89f361cf913acbff1e203a9d8fddbc37aad057d2510a9950c1fbe83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU9v1DAQxS1ERZfClSOKxIUDKZ5MnNgSF7TiT6VKvcA5cuxx8SqJg50I7UfgW-OwhUpVTzPz9Js3sh9jr4BfggDx_mD8WFYcVMmxbp6wHQiBJcqaP2W7ClRdNlipc_Y8pQPnqLBqn7FzRFHXAusd-70P46yjT2Eqgiv8lBbd-8EvxyJS8nmaDBVL1H7y0-27rbN-8WHSw2NAoSdbzMMxjLREb-71bK-XHwMtWZwpuhDHv4v5ts4sxfSCnTk9JHp5Vy_Y98-fvu2_ltc3X672H69LUynAktCS5NJyksphA8ZlVZveOaCKo1ZWOmt7g63WlovWVgK4VkpwA64niRfs7cl3juHnSmnpRp8MDYOeKKypq2rZQsNRYEbfPEAPYY356ZkSbSuhQYBMXZ4oE0NKkVw3Rz_qeOyAd1tI3RZSt4XUbSHlhdd3tms_kv2P_0slAx9OwC895K-xdBvXY27uzz_uDBKFQvwDbhKllw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2577816311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of instability resistance training, traditional resistance training and plyometric training on athletic performance parameters</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Amar, Amit Kumar ; Nuhmani, Shibili ; Khan, Moazzam Hussain ; John, Melbin ; Kachanathu, Shaji John ; Kadyan, Gaurav ; Muaidi, Qassim I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Amar, Amit Kumar ; Nuhmani, Shibili ; Khan, Moazzam Hussain ; John, Melbin ; Kachanathu, Shaji John ; Kadyan, Gaurav ; Muaidi, Qassim I.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the study was to compare traditional resistance, instability resistance, and plyometric training methods on measures of athletic performance in healthy subjects.
Sixty five healthy, physically active male students were randomly assigned to the following groups: traditional resistance training (RT, n=22), instability training (IT, n=22), and plyometric training (PLY, n=21).Athletic performance parameters were assessed pre- and post-training using chair squat test, standing stork test, shuttle run test, t-test, and vertical jump test.
General linear univariate model with baseline as covariate (ANCOVA) was used for analyzing the change in outcome from baseline to post-treatment. Statistically significant improvement was observed in all the athletic performance parameters in all three groups after seven weeks of training (p-value<0.05). The highest change in chair squat test was reported for RT compared to IT (p-value<0.001) and PLY (p-value<0.001). The change in standing stork test among the IT group was substantially higher than that among RT (p-value=0.007) but did not significantly differ from that among the PLY (p-value=0.27). No statistically significant difference was observed in post-test values of vertical jump test among three groups. The highest change in t-test and shuttle run test was reported for PLY compared to IT (p-value<0.001) and RT (p-value<0.001).
Based on the findings of this study, it is suggested that IT and PLY can be included with traditional RT to improve various aspects of athletic performance in healthy physically active individuals. The current study will give an insight to athletes, coaches, and trainers regarding utilization of appropriate training methods in enhancing athletic performance. However, further research is required to establish the effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-6329</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-3840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/jcim-2019-0346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33544534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Athletes ; Athletic Performance ; athletic training ; conditioning ; Exercise physiology ; Humans ; Insight ; Jumping ; Male ; Muscle Strength ; Plyometric Exercise ; Resistance ; Resistance Training ; specificity principle ; sport performance ; Strength training ; Stretching ; Trainers</subject><ispartof>Journal of complementary & integrative medicine, 2021-01, Vol.18 (3), p.593-598</ispartof><rights>2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.</rights><rights>2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2913-e3de808d0e89f361cf913acbff1e203a9d8fddbc37aad057d2510a9950c1fbe83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2913-e3de808d0e89f361cf913acbff1e203a9d8fddbc37aad057d2510a9950c1fbe83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6330-2618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2019-0346/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2019-0346/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,66754,68538</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amar, Amit Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhmani, Shibili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Moazzam Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Melbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachanathu, Shaji John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadyan, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muaidi, Qassim I.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of instability resistance training, traditional resistance training and plyometric training on athletic performance parameters</title><title>Journal of complementary & integrative medicine</title><addtitle>J Complement Integr Med</addtitle><description>The objective of the study was to compare traditional resistance, instability resistance, and plyometric training methods on measures of athletic performance in healthy subjects.
Sixty five healthy, physically active male students were randomly assigned to the following groups: traditional resistance training (RT, n=22), instability training (IT, n=22), and plyometric training (PLY, n=21).Athletic performance parameters were assessed pre- and post-training using chair squat test, standing stork test, shuttle run test, t-test, and vertical jump test.
General linear univariate model with baseline as covariate (ANCOVA) was used for analyzing the change in outcome from baseline to post-treatment. Statistically significant improvement was observed in all the athletic performance parameters in all three groups after seven weeks of training (p-value<0.05). The highest change in chair squat test was reported for RT compared to IT (p-value<0.001) and PLY (p-value<0.001). The change in standing stork test among the IT group was substantially higher than that among RT (p-value=0.007) but did not significantly differ from that among the PLY (p-value=0.27). No statistically significant difference was observed in post-test values of vertical jump test among three groups. The highest change in t-test and shuttle run test was reported for PLY compared to IT (p-value<0.001) and RT (p-value<0.001).
Based on the findings of this study, it is suggested that IT and PLY can be included with traditional RT to improve various aspects of athletic performance in healthy physically active individuals. The current study will give an insight to athletes, coaches, and trainers regarding utilization of appropriate training methods in enhancing athletic performance. However, further research is required to establish the effectiveness.</description><subject>Athletes</subject><subject>Athletic Performance</subject><subject>athletic training</subject><subject>conditioning</subject><subject>Exercise physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insight</subject><subject>Jumping</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Strength</subject><subject>Plyometric Exercise</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Resistance Training</subject><subject>specificity principle</subject><subject>sport performance</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Stretching</subject><subject>Trainers</subject><issn>2194-6329</issn><issn>1553-3840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU9v1DAQxS1ERZfClSOKxIUDKZ5MnNgSF7TiT6VKvcA5cuxx8SqJg50I7UfgW-OwhUpVTzPz9Js3sh9jr4BfggDx_mD8WFYcVMmxbp6wHQiBJcqaP2W7ClRdNlipc_Y8pQPnqLBqn7FzRFHXAusd-70P46yjT2Eqgiv8lBbd-8EvxyJS8nmaDBVL1H7y0-27rbN-8WHSw2NAoSdbzMMxjLREb-71bK-XHwMtWZwpuhDHv4v5ts4sxfSCnTk9JHp5Vy_Y98-fvu2_ltc3X672H69LUynAktCS5NJyksphA8ZlVZveOaCKo1ZWOmt7g63WlovWVgK4VkpwA64niRfs7cl3juHnSmnpRp8MDYOeKKypq2rZQsNRYEbfPEAPYY356ZkSbSuhQYBMXZ4oE0NKkVw3Rz_qeOyAd1tI3RZSt4XUbSHlhdd3tms_kv2P_0slAx9OwC895K-xdBvXY27uzz_uDBKFQvwDbhKllw</recordid><startdate>20210129</startdate><enddate>20210129</enddate><creator>Amar, Amit Kumar</creator><creator>Nuhmani, Shibili</creator><creator>Khan, Moazzam Hussain</creator><creator>John, Melbin</creator><creator>Kachanathu, Shaji John</creator><creator>Kadyan, Gaurav</creator><creator>Muaidi, Qassim I.</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-2618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210129</creationdate><title>Comparison of instability resistance training, traditional resistance training and plyometric training on athletic performance parameters</title><author>Amar, Amit Kumar ; Nuhmani, Shibili ; Khan, Moazzam Hussain ; John, Melbin ; Kachanathu, Shaji John ; Kadyan, Gaurav ; Muaidi, Qassim I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2913-e3de808d0e89f361cf913acbff1e203a9d8fddbc37aad057d2510a9950c1fbe83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Athletes</topic><topic>Athletic Performance</topic><topic>athletic training</topic><topic>conditioning</topic><topic>Exercise physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insight</topic><topic>Jumping</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Strength</topic><topic>Plyometric Exercise</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Resistance Training</topic><topic>specificity principle</topic><topic>sport performance</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Stretching</topic><topic>Trainers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amar, Amit Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuhmani, Shibili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Moazzam Hussain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Melbin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachanathu, Shaji John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadyan, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muaidi, Qassim I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of complementary & integrative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amar, Amit Kumar</au><au>Nuhmani, Shibili</au><au>Khan, Moazzam Hussain</au><au>John, Melbin</au><au>Kachanathu, Shaji John</au><au>Kadyan, Gaurav</au><au>Muaidi, Qassim I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of instability resistance training, traditional resistance training and plyometric training on athletic performance parameters</atitle><jtitle>Journal of complementary & integrative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Complement Integr Med</addtitle><date>2021-01-29</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>593-598</pages><issn>2194-6329</issn><eissn>1553-3840</eissn><abstract>The objective of the study was to compare traditional resistance, instability resistance, and plyometric training methods on measures of athletic performance in healthy subjects.
Sixty five healthy, physically active male students were randomly assigned to the following groups: traditional resistance training (RT, n=22), instability training (IT, n=22), and plyometric training (PLY, n=21).Athletic performance parameters were assessed pre- and post-training using chair squat test, standing stork test, shuttle run test, t-test, and vertical jump test.
General linear univariate model with baseline as covariate (ANCOVA) was used for analyzing the change in outcome from baseline to post-treatment. Statistically significant improvement was observed in all the athletic performance parameters in all three groups after seven weeks of training (p-value<0.05). The highest change in chair squat test was reported for RT compared to IT (p-value<0.001) and PLY (p-value<0.001). The change in standing stork test among the IT group was substantially higher than that among RT (p-value=0.007) but did not significantly differ from that among the PLY (p-value=0.27). No statistically significant difference was observed in post-test values of vertical jump test among three groups. The highest change in t-test and shuttle run test was reported for PLY compared to IT (p-value<0.001) and RT (p-value<0.001).
Based on the findings of this study, it is suggested that IT and PLY can be included with traditional RT to improve various aspects of athletic performance in healthy physically active individuals. The current study will give an insight to athletes, coaches, and trainers regarding utilization of appropriate training methods in enhancing athletic performance. However, further research is required to establish the effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><pmid>33544534</pmid><doi>10.1515/jcim-2019-0346</doi><tpages>06</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6330-2618</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2194-6329 |
| ispartof | Journal of complementary & integrative medicine, 2021-01, Vol.18 (3), p.593-598 |
| issn | 2194-6329 1553-3840 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487160353 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); De Gruyter journals |
| subjects | Athletes Athletic Performance athletic training conditioning Exercise physiology Humans Insight Jumping Male Muscle Strength Plyometric Exercise Resistance Resistance Training specificity principle sport performance Strength training Stretching Trainers |
| title | Comparison of instability resistance training, traditional resistance training and plyometric training on athletic performance parameters |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T20%3A09%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20instability%20resistance%20training,%20traditional%20resistance%20training%20and%20plyometric%20training%20on%20athletic%20performance%20parameters&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20complementary%20&%20integrative%20medicine&rft.au=Amar,%20Amit%20Kumar&rft.date=2021-01-29&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=593-598&rft.issn=2194-6329&rft.eissn=1553-3840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/jcim-2019-0346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2577816311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2577816311&rft_id=info:pmid/33544534&rfr_iscdi=true |