Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients’ choices
Purpose Women with cancer may desire fertility preservation (FP) prior to initiating cancer treatment, but undergoing FP may result in treatment delays. This study sought to determine whether such delays existed in our population and which factors were associated with patients’ decision to proceed w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2021-06, Vol.303 (6), p.1617-1623 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1623 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1617 |
container_title | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics |
container_volume | 303 |
creator | Kappy, Michelle Lieman, Harry J. Pollack, Staci Buyuk, Erkan |
description | Purpose
Women with cancer may desire fertility preservation (FP) prior to initiating cancer treatment, but undergoing FP may result in treatment delays. This study sought to determine whether such delays existed in our population and which factors were associated with patients’ decision to proceed with FP.
Methods
This was a historical cohort study performed at Montefiore Medical Center’s Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health. Reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer and consulted for FP were included. The main outcome measure was the number of days between FP consultation and cancer treatment initiation. Factors associated with patients’ decisions to proceed with FP were also analyzed.
Results
Thirty out of 51 women in our study underwent FP including embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), both oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, or GnRH agonist treatment. The majority of women who underwent FP chose embryo cryopreservation (36.7%), followed by oocyte cryopreservation (33.3%). Of the 20 patients with partners who underwent FP, 13 (65%) froze embryos. Only 4 of the 30 women who underwent FP had all, or a portion of their services, covered by insurance. The mean treatment delay was 18 days (
p
= 0.007), with a mean consultation to oncologic treatment gap of 23 ± 16.8 and 41.4 ± 25.9 days in the non-FP and FP groups, respectively.
Conclusion
Women with cancer diagnosis who underwent FP prior to initiating cancer treatment experienced a statistically significant delay in initiating cancer treatment. However, the clinical significance of this finding is unknown since FP treatments have not been associated with increased recurrence or mortality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00404-021-05985-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487158817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2520050816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4ea10e216f4945267aaab39d3df39a9560d80a1169df22d5224f47babd2729c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1OGzEUhS1U1AToC3SBLHXTzbTXf-MxO4RKqRSpG1hbjn0nTJR4BnuClB2v0dfrk9SQNEgsWPnI_s65Vz6EfGbwjQHo7xlAgqyAswqUaVQFR2TKpOAVaMY-kCmYZw21npCTnJcAjDdN_ZFMhFBSchBTEq4xjd2qG7d0SJgxPbqx6yNt-0S9ix4THcoNxjFf0DGhG9dF04UbMnUxUN_H3AVML65Mu3jA_z79of6-7zzmM3LculXGT_vzlNxd_7i9uqlmv3_-urqcVV5oNVYSHQPkrG6lkYrX2jk3FyaI0ArjjKohNOAYq01oOQ-Kc9lKPXfzwDU33ohT8nWXO6T-YYN5tOsue1ytXMR-ky2XjWaqaZgu6Jc36LLfpFi2s1xxAAUNqwvFd5RPfc4JWzukbu3S1jKwzx3YXQe2dGBfOrBQTOf76M18jeFg-f_pBRA7IJenuMD0Ovud2H94MpMZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2520050816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients’ choices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kappy, Michelle ; Lieman, Harry J. ; Pollack, Staci ; Buyuk, Erkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kappy, Michelle ; Lieman, Harry J. ; Pollack, Staci ; Buyuk, Erkan</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Women with cancer may desire fertility preservation (FP) prior to initiating cancer treatment, but undergoing FP may result in treatment delays. This study sought to determine whether such delays existed in our population and which factors were associated with patients’ decision to proceed with FP.
Methods
This was a historical cohort study performed at Montefiore Medical Center’s Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health. Reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer and consulted for FP were included. The main outcome measure was the number of days between FP consultation and cancer treatment initiation. Factors associated with patients’ decisions to proceed with FP were also analyzed.
Results
Thirty out of 51 women in our study underwent FP including embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), both oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, or GnRH agonist treatment. The majority of women who underwent FP chose embryo cryopreservation (36.7%), followed by oocyte cryopreservation (33.3%). Of the 20 patients with partners who underwent FP, 13 (65%) froze embryos. Only 4 of the 30 women who underwent FP had all, or a portion of their services, covered by insurance. The mean treatment delay was 18 days (
p
= 0.007), with a mean consultation to oncologic treatment gap of 23 ± 16.8 and 41.4 ± 25.9 days in the non-FP and FP groups, respectively.
Conclusion
Women with cancer diagnosis who underwent FP prior to initiating cancer treatment experienced a statistically significant delay in initiating cancer treatment. However, the clinical significance of this finding is unknown since FP treatments have not been associated with increased recurrence or mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-05985-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33544203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Cancer therapies ; Cohort Studies ; Cryopreservation ; Embryos ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertility Preservation ; Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Oocyte Retrieval ; Oocytes</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021-06, Vol.303 (6), p.1617-1623</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4ea10e216f4945267aaab39d3df39a9560d80a1169df22d5224f47babd2729c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4ea10e216f4945267aaab39d3df39a9560d80a1169df22d5224f47babd2729c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6083-4320</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-021-05985-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-021-05985-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33544203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kappy, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieman, Harry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollack, Staci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buyuk, Erkan</creatorcontrib><title>Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients’ choices</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Purpose
Women with cancer may desire fertility preservation (FP) prior to initiating cancer treatment, but undergoing FP may result in treatment delays. This study sought to determine whether such delays existed in our population and which factors were associated with patients’ decision to proceed with FP.
Methods
This was a historical cohort study performed at Montefiore Medical Center’s Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health. Reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer and consulted for FP were included. The main outcome measure was the number of days between FP consultation and cancer treatment initiation. Factors associated with patients’ decisions to proceed with FP were also analyzed.
Results
Thirty out of 51 women in our study underwent FP including embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), both oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, or GnRH agonist treatment. The majority of women who underwent FP chose embryo cryopreservation (36.7%), followed by oocyte cryopreservation (33.3%). Of the 20 patients with partners who underwent FP, 13 (65%) froze embryos. Only 4 of the 30 women who underwent FP had all, or a portion of their services, covered by insurance. The mean treatment delay was 18 days (
p
= 0.007), with a mean consultation to oncologic treatment gap of 23 ± 16.8 and 41.4 ± 25.9 days in the non-FP and FP groups, respectively.
Conclusion
Women with cancer diagnosis who underwent FP prior to initiating cancer treatment experienced a statistically significant delay in initiating cancer treatment. However, the clinical significance of this finding is unknown since FP treatments have not been associated with increased recurrence or mortality.</description><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation</subject><subject>Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Oocyte Retrieval</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1OGzEUhS1U1AToC3SBLHXTzbTXf-MxO4RKqRSpG1hbjn0nTJR4BnuClB2v0dfrk9SQNEgsWPnI_s65Vz6EfGbwjQHo7xlAgqyAswqUaVQFR2TKpOAVaMY-kCmYZw21npCTnJcAjDdN_ZFMhFBSchBTEq4xjd2qG7d0SJgxPbqx6yNt-0S9ix4THcoNxjFf0DGhG9dF04UbMnUxUN_H3AVML65Mu3jA_z79of6-7zzmM3LculXGT_vzlNxd_7i9uqlmv3_-urqcVV5oNVYSHQPkrG6lkYrX2jk3FyaI0ArjjKohNOAYq01oOQ-Kc9lKPXfzwDU33ohT8nWXO6T-YYN5tOsue1ytXMR-ky2XjWaqaZgu6Jc36LLfpFi2s1xxAAUNqwvFd5RPfc4JWzukbu3S1jKwzx3YXQe2dGBfOrBQTOf76M18jeFg-f_pBRA7IJenuMD0Ovud2H94MpMZ</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Kappy, Michelle</creator><creator>Lieman, Harry J.</creator><creator>Pollack, Staci</creator><creator>Buyuk, Erkan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-4320</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients’ choices</title><author>Kappy, Michelle ; Lieman, Harry J. ; Pollack, Staci ; Buyuk, Erkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4ea10e216f4945267aaab39d3df39a9560d80a1169df22d5224f47babd2729c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation</topic><topic>Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Oocyte Retrieval</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kappy, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieman, Harry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollack, Staci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buyuk, Erkan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kappy, Michelle</au><au>Lieman, Harry J.</au><au>Pollack, Staci</au><au>Buyuk, Erkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients’ choices</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>303</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1617</spage><epage>1623</epage><pages>1617-1623</pages><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Women with cancer may desire fertility preservation (FP) prior to initiating cancer treatment, but undergoing FP may result in treatment delays. This study sought to determine whether such delays existed in our population and which factors were associated with patients’ decision to proceed with FP.
Methods
This was a historical cohort study performed at Montefiore Medical Center’s Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health. Reproductive age women diagnosed with cancer and consulted for FP were included. The main outcome measure was the number of days between FP consultation and cancer treatment initiation. Factors associated with patients’ decisions to proceed with FP were also analyzed.
Results
Thirty out of 51 women in our study underwent FP including embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), both oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, or GnRH agonist treatment. The majority of women who underwent FP chose embryo cryopreservation (36.7%), followed by oocyte cryopreservation (33.3%). Of the 20 patients with partners who underwent FP, 13 (65%) froze embryos. Only 4 of the 30 women who underwent FP had all, or a portion of their services, covered by insurance. The mean treatment delay was 18 days (
p
= 0.007), with a mean consultation to oncologic treatment gap of 23 ± 16.8 and 41.4 ± 25.9 days in the non-FP and FP groups, respectively.
Conclusion
Women with cancer diagnosis who underwent FP prior to initiating cancer treatment experienced a statistically significant delay in initiating cancer treatment. However, the clinical significance of this finding is unknown since FP treatments have not been associated with increased recurrence or mortality.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33544203</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-021-05985-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-4320</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0932-0067 |
ispartof | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021-06, Vol.303 (6), p.1617-1623 |
issn | 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487158817 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Cancer therapies Cohort Studies Cryopreservation Embryos Endocrinology Female Fertility Fertility Preservation Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine Gynecology Human Genetics Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neoplasms - drug therapy Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery Oocyte Retrieval Oocytes |
title | Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients’ choices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A47%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fertility%20preservation%20for%20cancer%20patients:%20treatment%20gaps%20and%20considerations%20in%20patients%E2%80%99%20choices&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Kappy,%20Michelle&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=303&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1617&rft.epage=1623&rft.pages=1617-1623&rft.issn=0932-0067&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-021-05985-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2520050816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2520050816&rft_id=info:pmid/33544203&rfr_iscdi=true |