Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study
Background Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients. Objective To identify healthcare prov...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2021-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2935-2942 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2942 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2935 |
container_title | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Miyashita, Jun Kohno, Ayako Shimizu, Sayaka Kashiwazaki, Motohiro Kamihiro, Noriki Okawa, Kaoru Fujisaki, Masami Fukuhara, Shunichi Yamamoto, Yosuke |
description | Background
Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients.
Objective
To identify healthcare providers’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan.
Design
A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories.
Participants
The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan.
Main Measures
Percentages of physicians’ and nurses’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients’ illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified.
Key Results
From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11606-020-06524-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487156002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487156002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-7ea54632c51b4a8fa8d913ae5e54a57fc444fb5e9ab7a3e8afc1a22cfcf142753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1uEzEUhUcIREPhBVggS2yQ0IDtsccOC6Rq-GlRKypR1taN507iamKn9kygG8Rr8Ho8CU5Sws8CsfLC3zk6R-cWxUNGnzFK1fPEWE3rknJa0lpyUYpbxYRJLksmpup2MaFai1KrShwU91K6pJRVnOu7xUFVSaGkEpPiyzFCPywsRCTnMaxdizF9__qNnGO0uBpc8IkET4YFkgu3dH5OQkdOvBsc9OSoXYO3SJqtvAfvN8Arl-yY0lbqPHkHK_AvCJAz9xnb8gyHRWgT-TCM7fX94k4HfcIHN-9h8fHN64vmuDx9__akOTotrRR0KBWCFHXFrWQzAboD3U5ZBShRCpCqs0KIbiZxCjMFFWroLAPObWc7JriS1WHxcue7GmdLbC36IUJvVtEtIV6bAM78-ePdwszD2mihmWQiGzy5MYjhasQ0mGVuiX3ujGFMhgutmKwp5Rl9_Bd6Gcbocz3DpVI1VXSqM8V3lI0hpYjdPgyjZjOv2c1r8rxmO6_ZpHj0e4295OeeGXi6Az7hLHTJOszz7DFKaZ3bVNk33wLNtP5_unEDbM6hCaMfsrTaSVPG_Rzjr5L_yP8DgfLT0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2577607098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Miyashita, Jun ; Kohno, Ayako ; Shimizu, Sayaka ; Kashiwazaki, Motohiro ; Kamihiro, Noriki ; Okawa, Kaoru ; Fujisaki, Masami ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Yamamoto, Yosuke</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Jun ; Kohno, Ayako ; Shimizu, Sayaka ; Kashiwazaki, Motohiro ; Kamihiro, Noriki ; Okawa, Kaoru ; Fujisaki, Masami ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Yamamoto, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients.
Objective
To identify healthcare providers’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan.
Design
A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories.
Participants
The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan.
Main Measures
Percentages of physicians’ and nurses’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients’ illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified.
Key Results
From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses (
p
< 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a “wise precaution,” while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient’s imminent death.
Conclusions
Physicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients’ health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers’ attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06524-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33547574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Advance directives ; General & Internal Medicine ; Health care ; Health Care Sciences & Services ; Illnesses ; Internal Medicine ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, General & Internal ; Mixed methods research ; Nurses ; Original Research ; Patients ; Physicians ; Science & Technology]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2021-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2935-2942</ispartof><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 2021</rights><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>10</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000615131600010</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-7ea54632c51b4a8fa8d913ae5e54a57fc444fb5e9ab7a3e8afc1a22cfcf142753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-7ea54632c51b4a8fa8d913ae5e54a57fc444fb5e9ab7a3e8afc1a22cfcf142753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9387-0659 ; 0000-0001-9283-144X ; 0000-0001-7318-4742</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481514/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481514/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,39262,39263,41493,42562,51324,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33547574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohno, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Sayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwazaki, Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamihiro, Noriki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujisaki, Masami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>Background
Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients.
Objective
To identify healthcare providers’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan.
Design
A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories.
Participants
The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan.
Main Measures
Percentages of physicians’ and nurses’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients’ illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified.
Key Results
From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses (
p
< 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a “wise precaution,” while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient’s imminent death.
Conclusions
Physicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients’ health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers’ attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan.</description><subject>Advance directives</subject><subject>General & Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Care Sciences & Services</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, General & Internal</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1uEzEUhUcIREPhBVggS2yQ0IDtsccOC6Rq-GlRKypR1taN507iamKn9kygG8Rr8Ho8CU5Sws8CsfLC3zk6R-cWxUNGnzFK1fPEWE3rknJa0lpyUYpbxYRJLksmpup2MaFai1KrShwU91K6pJRVnOu7xUFVSaGkEpPiyzFCPywsRCTnMaxdizF9__qNnGO0uBpc8IkET4YFkgu3dH5OQkdOvBsc9OSoXYO3SJqtvAfvN8Arl-yY0lbqPHkHK_AvCJAz9xnb8gyHRWgT-TCM7fX94k4HfcIHN-9h8fHN64vmuDx9__akOTotrRR0KBWCFHXFrWQzAboD3U5ZBShRCpCqs0KIbiZxCjMFFWroLAPObWc7JriS1WHxcue7GmdLbC36IUJvVtEtIV6bAM78-ePdwszD2mihmWQiGzy5MYjhasQ0mGVuiX3ujGFMhgutmKwp5Rl9_Bd6Gcbocz3DpVI1VXSqM8V3lI0hpYjdPgyjZjOv2c1r8rxmO6_ZpHj0e4295OeeGXi6Az7hLHTJOszz7DFKaZ3bVNk33wLNtP5_unEDbM6hCaMfsrTaSVPG_Rzjr5L_yP8DgfLT0g</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Miyashita, Jun</creator><creator>Kohno, Ayako</creator><creator>Shimizu, Sayaka</creator><creator>Kashiwazaki, Motohiro</creator><creator>Kamihiro, Noriki</creator><creator>Okawa, Kaoru</creator><creator>Fujisaki, Masami</creator><creator>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Yosuke</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-0659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-144X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7318-4742</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study</title><author>Miyashita, Jun ; Kohno, Ayako ; Shimizu, Sayaka ; Kashiwazaki, Motohiro ; Kamihiro, Noriki ; Okawa, Kaoru ; Fujisaki, Masami ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Yamamoto, Yosuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-7ea54632c51b4a8fa8d913ae5e54a57fc444fb5e9ab7a3e8afc1a22cfcf142753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Advance directives</topic><topic>General & Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Care Sciences & Services</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, General & Internal</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohno, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Sayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwazaki, Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamihiro, Noriki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujisaki, Masami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyashita, Jun</au><au>Kohno, Ayako</au><au>Shimizu, Sayaka</au><au>Kashiwazaki, Motohiro</au><au>Kamihiro, Noriki</au><au>Okawa, Kaoru</au><au>Fujisaki, Masami</au><au>Fukuhara, Shunichi</au><au>Yamamoto, Yosuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2935</spage><epage>2942</epage><pages>2935-2942</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>Background
Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients.
Objective
To identify healthcare providers’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan.
Design
A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories.
Participants
The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan.
Main Measures
Percentages of physicians’ and nurses’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients’ illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified.
Key Results
From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses (
p
< 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a “wise precaution,” while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient’s imminent death.
Conclusions
Physicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients’ health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers’ attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33547574</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-020-06524-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-0659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-144X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7318-4742</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-8734 |
ispartof | Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2021-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2935-2942 |
issn | 0884-8734 1525-1497 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487156002 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; PubMed Central; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Advance directives General & Internal Medicine Health care Health Care Sciences & Services Illnesses Internal Medicine Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medical personnel Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, General & Internal Mixed methods research Nurses Original Research Patients Physicians Science & Technology |
title | Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T23%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20Providers%E2%80%99%20Perceptions%20on%20the%20Timing%20of%20Initial%20Advance%20Care%20Planning%20Discussions%20in%20Japan:%20a%20Mixed-Methods%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Miyashita,%20Jun&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2935&rft.epage=2942&rft.pages=2935-2942&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-020-06524-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2487156002%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2577607098&rft_id=info:pmid/33547574&rfr_iscdi=true |