Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study

Background Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients. Objective To identify healthcare prov...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2021-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2935-2942
Hauptverfasser: Miyashita, Jun, Kohno, Ayako, Shimizu, Sayaka, Kashiwazaki, Motohiro, Kamihiro, Noriki, Okawa, Kaoru, Fujisaki, Masami, Fukuhara, Shunichi, Yamamoto, Yosuke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2942
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2935
container_title Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM
container_volume 36
creator Miyashita, Jun
Kohno, Ayako
Shimizu, Sayaka
Kashiwazaki, Motohiro
Kamihiro, Noriki
Okawa, Kaoru
Fujisaki, Masami
Fukuhara, Shunichi
Yamamoto, Yosuke
description Background Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients. Objective To identify healthcare providers’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan. Design A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories. Participants The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan. Main Measures Percentages of physicians’ and nurses’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients’ illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified. Key Results From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11606-020-06524-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487156002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487156002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-7ea54632c51b4a8fa8d913ae5e54a57fc444fb5e9ab7a3e8afc1a22cfcf142753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1uEzEUhUcIREPhBVggS2yQ0IDtsccOC6Rq-GlRKypR1taN507iamKn9kygG8Rr8Ho8CU5Sws8CsfLC3zk6R-cWxUNGnzFK1fPEWE3rknJa0lpyUYpbxYRJLksmpup2MaFai1KrShwU91K6pJRVnOu7xUFVSaGkEpPiyzFCPywsRCTnMaxdizF9__qNnGO0uBpc8IkET4YFkgu3dH5OQkdOvBsc9OSoXYO3SJqtvAfvN8Arl-yY0lbqPHkHK_AvCJAz9xnb8gyHRWgT-TCM7fX94k4HfcIHN-9h8fHN64vmuDx9__akOTotrRR0KBWCFHXFrWQzAboD3U5ZBShRCpCqs0KIbiZxCjMFFWroLAPObWc7JriS1WHxcue7GmdLbC36IUJvVtEtIV6bAM78-ePdwszD2mihmWQiGzy5MYjhasQ0mGVuiX3ujGFMhgutmKwp5Rl9_Bd6Gcbocz3DpVI1VXSqM8V3lI0hpYjdPgyjZjOv2c1r8rxmO6_ZpHj0e4295OeeGXi6Az7hLHTJOszz7DFKaZ3bVNk33wLNtP5_unEDbM6hCaMfsrTaSVPG_Rzjr5L_yP8DgfLT0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2577607098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Miyashita, Jun ; Kohno, Ayako ; Shimizu, Sayaka ; Kashiwazaki, Motohiro ; Kamihiro, Noriki ; Okawa, Kaoru ; Fujisaki, Masami ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Yamamoto, Yosuke</creator><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Jun ; Kohno, Ayako ; Shimizu, Sayaka ; Kashiwazaki, Motohiro ; Kamihiro, Noriki ; Okawa, Kaoru ; Fujisaki, Masami ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Yamamoto, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><description>Background Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients. Objective To identify healthcare providers’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan. Design A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories. Participants The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan. Main Measures Percentages of physicians’ and nurses’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients’ illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified. Key Results From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses ( p  &lt; 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a “wise precaution,” while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient’s imminent death. Conclusions Physicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients’ health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers’ attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-8734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06524-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33547574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Advance directives ; General & Internal Medicine ; Health care ; Health Care Sciences & Services ; Illnesses ; Internal Medicine ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Medical personnel ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, General & Internal ; Mixed methods research ; Nurses ; Original Research ; Patients ; Physicians ; Science & Technology]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2021-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2935-2942</ispartof><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 2021</rights><rights>Society of General Internal Medicine 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>10</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000615131600010</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-7ea54632c51b4a8fa8d913ae5e54a57fc444fb5e9ab7a3e8afc1a22cfcf142753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-7ea54632c51b4a8fa8d913ae5e54a57fc444fb5e9ab7a3e8afc1a22cfcf142753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9387-0659 ; 0000-0001-9283-144X ; 0000-0001-7318-4742</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481514/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481514/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,39262,39263,41493,42562,51324,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33547574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohno, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Sayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwazaki, Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamihiro, Noriki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujisaki, Masami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study</title><title>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</title><addtitle>J GEN INTERN MED</addtitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><description>Background Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients. Objective To identify healthcare providers’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan. Design A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories. Participants The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan. Main Measures Percentages of physicians’ and nurses’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients’ illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified. Key Results From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses ( p  &lt; 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a “wise precaution,” while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient’s imminent death. Conclusions Physicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients’ health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers’ attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan.</description><subject>Advance directives</subject><subject>General &amp; Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Care Sciences &amp; Services</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, General &amp; Internal</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><issn>0884-8734</issn><issn>1525-1497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1uEzEUhUcIREPhBVggS2yQ0IDtsccOC6Rq-GlRKypR1taN507iamKn9kygG8Rr8Ho8CU5Sws8CsfLC3zk6R-cWxUNGnzFK1fPEWE3rknJa0lpyUYpbxYRJLksmpup2MaFai1KrShwU91K6pJRVnOu7xUFVSaGkEpPiyzFCPywsRCTnMaxdizF9__qNnGO0uBpc8IkET4YFkgu3dH5OQkdOvBsc9OSoXYO3SJqtvAfvN8Arl-yY0lbqPHkHK_AvCJAz9xnb8gyHRWgT-TCM7fX94k4HfcIHN-9h8fHN64vmuDx9__akOTotrRR0KBWCFHXFrWQzAboD3U5ZBShRCpCqs0KIbiZxCjMFFWroLAPObWc7JriS1WHxcue7GmdLbC36IUJvVtEtIV6bAM78-ePdwszD2mihmWQiGzy5MYjhasQ0mGVuiX3ujGFMhgutmKwp5Rl9_Bd6Gcbocz3DpVI1VXSqM8V3lI0hpYjdPgyjZjOv2c1r8rxmO6_ZpHj0e4295OeeGXi6Az7hLHTJOszz7DFKaZ3bVNk33wLNtP5_unEDbM6hCaMfsrTaSVPG_Rzjr5L_yP8DgfLT0g</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Miyashita, Jun</creator><creator>Kohno, Ayako</creator><creator>Shimizu, Sayaka</creator><creator>Kashiwazaki, Motohiro</creator><creator>Kamihiro, Noriki</creator><creator>Okawa, Kaoru</creator><creator>Fujisaki, Masami</creator><creator>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Yosuke</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-0659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-144X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7318-4742</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study</title><author>Miyashita, Jun ; Kohno, Ayako ; Shimizu, Sayaka ; Kashiwazaki, Motohiro ; Kamihiro, Noriki ; Okawa, Kaoru ; Fujisaki, Masami ; Fukuhara, Shunichi ; Yamamoto, Yosuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-7ea54632c51b4a8fa8d913ae5e54a57fc444fb5e9ab7a3e8afc1a22cfcf142753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Advance directives</topic><topic>General &amp; Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Care Sciences &amp; Services</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, General &amp; Internal</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miyashita, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohno, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Sayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwazaki, Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamihiro, Noriki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujisaki, Masami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shunichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miyashita, Jun</au><au>Kohno, Ayako</au><au>Shimizu, Sayaka</au><au>Kashiwazaki, Motohiro</au><au>Kamihiro, Noriki</au><au>Okawa, Kaoru</au><au>Fujisaki, Masami</au><au>Fukuhara, Shunichi</au><au>Yamamoto, Yosuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM</jtitle><stitle>J GEN INTERN MED</stitle><addtitle>J Gen Intern Med</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2935</spage><epage>2942</epage><pages>2935-2942</pages><issn>0884-8734</issn><eissn>1525-1497</eissn><abstract>Background Most adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients. Objective To identify healthcare providers’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan. Design A mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories. Participants The study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan. Main Measures Percentages of physicians’ and nurses’ willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients’ illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified. Key Results From 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses ( p  &lt; 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a “wise precaution,” while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient’s imminent death. Conclusions Physicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients’ health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers’ attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33547574</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11606-020-06524-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-0659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-144X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7318-4742</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-8734
ispartof Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2021-10, Vol.36 (10), p.2935-2942
issn 0884-8734
1525-1497
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487156002
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; PubMed Central; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Advance directives
General & Internal Medicine
Health care
Health Care Sciences & Services
Illnesses
Internal Medicine
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medical personnel
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine, General & Internal
Mixed methods research
Nurses
Original Research
Patients
Physicians
Science & Technology
title Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T23%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20Providers%E2%80%99%20Perceptions%20on%20the%20Timing%20of%20Initial%20Advance%20Care%20Planning%20Discussions%20in%20Japan:%20a%20Mixed-Methods%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20general%20internal%20medicine%20:%20JGIM&rft.au=Miyashita,%20Jun&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2935&rft.epage=2942&rft.pages=2935-2942&rft.issn=0884-8734&rft.eissn=1525-1497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11606-020-06524-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2487156002%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2577607098&rft_id=info:pmid/33547574&rfr_iscdi=true