Neonatal mortality in rural northern Ghana and the three delays model: are we focusing on the right delays?

Objective The Three Delays Model outlines, three common delays that lead to poor newborn outcomes: (i) recognising symptoms and deciding to seek care; (ii) getting to care and; (iii) receiving timely, high‐quality care. We gathered data for all newborn deaths within four districts in Ghana to explore how well the Three Delays Model explains outcomes. Methods In this cross‐sectional, observational study, trained field workers conducted verbal and social autopsies with the closest surviving relative (typically mothers) of all neonatal deaths across four districts in northern Ghana from September 2015 until April 2017. Data were collected using Survey CTO and analysed using StataSE 15.0. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were calculated for key variables. Results 247 newborn deaths were identified. Nearly 77% (190) of newborns who died were born at a health facility, and 48.9% (93) of those who died before discharge. Of the 149 newborns who were discharged or born at home, 71.8% (107) sought care at a facility for illness, and 72.9% (N = 78) of those did so within the same day of illness recognition. Of the 83 respondents who arranged for transportation, 82% (68) did so within 1 h. Newborns received prompt care but insufficient interventions – 25% or fewer received IV fluids, oral medications, antibiotics or oxygen. Conclusions These data suggest that women are following recommendations for safe delivery and prompt care‐seeking. In rural northern Ghana, behaviour change interventions focused on mothers and families may not be as pressing as interventions focused on the Third Delay – obtaining timely, high‐quality care.