A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies
Gene regulatory network (GRN) is the important mechanism of maintaining life process, controlling biochemical reaction and regulating compound level, which plays an important role in various organisms and systems. Reconstructing GRN can help us to understand the molecular mechanism of organisms and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Briefings in bioinformatics 2021-09, Vol.22 (5) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Briefings in bioinformatics |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Zhao, Mengyuan He, Wenying Tang, Jijun Zou, Quan Guo, Fei |
description | Gene regulatory network (GRN) is the important mechanism of maintaining life process, controlling biochemical reaction and regulating compound level, which plays an important role in various organisms and systems. Reconstructing GRN can help us to understand the molecular mechanism of organisms and to reveal the essential rules of a large number of biological processes and reactions in organisms. Various outstanding network reconstruction algorithms use specific assumptions that affect prediction accuracy, in order to deal with the uncertainty of processing. In order to study why a certain method is more suitable for specific research problem or experimental data, we conduct research from model-based, information-based and machine learning-based method classifications. There are obviously different types of computational tools that can be generated to distinguish GRNs. Furthermore, we discuss several classical, representative and latest methods in each category to analyze core ideas, general steps, characteristics, etc. We compare the performance of state-of-the-art GRN reconstruction technologies on simulated networks and real networks under different scaling conditions. Through standardized performance metrics and common benchmarks, we quantitatively evaluate the stability of various methods and the sensitivity of the same algorithm applying to different scaling networks. The aim of this study is to explore the most appropriate method for a specific GRN, which helps biologists and medical scientists in discovering potential drug targets and identifying cancer biomarkers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bib/bbab009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487153791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2487153791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a706e19d42a159efae302ecab9609fbeda547edff2436d434a90d047fd42b2143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAYhC0EoqUwsSOPSCjUjp24HquKL6kSC8yR7bxuDald7CRV_z2pWpjuhudueBC6peSREsmm2ump1koTIs_QmHIhMk4Kfn7opcgKXrIRukrpi5CciBm9RCPGCiYLysdIz7EJm22ENfjkesChh9g72GHla2yia51RDYZeNZ1qXfA4WLwCDzjCqmtUG-Iee2h3IX5j5y1E8AZwC2btQxNWDtI1urCqSXBzygn6fH76WLxmy_eXt8V8mRlGRZspQUqgsua5ooUEq4CRHIzSsiTSaqhVwQXU1uaclTVnXElSEy7ssNA55WyC7o-_2xh-OkhttXHJQNMoD6FLVc5nghZMSDqgD0fUxJBSBFtto9uouK8oqQ5Sq0FqdZI60Hen405voP5n_yyyX1-9dfs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487153791</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies</title><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhao, Mengyuan ; He, Wenying ; Tang, Jijun ; Zou, Quan ; Guo, Fei</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mengyuan ; He, Wenying ; Tang, Jijun ; Zou, Quan ; Guo, Fei</creatorcontrib><description>Gene regulatory network (GRN) is the important mechanism of maintaining life process, controlling biochemical reaction and regulating compound level, which plays an important role in various organisms and systems. Reconstructing GRN can help us to understand the molecular mechanism of organisms and to reveal the essential rules of a large number of biological processes and reactions in organisms. Various outstanding network reconstruction algorithms use specific assumptions that affect prediction accuracy, in order to deal with the uncertainty of processing. In order to study why a certain method is more suitable for specific research problem or experimental data, we conduct research from model-based, information-based and machine learning-based method classifications. There are obviously different types of computational tools that can be generated to distinguish GRNs. Furthermore, we discuss several classical, representative and latest methods in each category to analyze core ideas, general steps, characteristics, etc. We compare the performance of state-of-the-art GRN reconstruction technologies on simulated networks and real networks under different scaling conditions. Through standardized performance metrics and common benchmarks, we quantitatively evaluate the stability of various methods and the sensitivity of the same algorithm applying to different scaling networks. The aim of this study is to explore the most appropriate method for a specific GRN, which helps biologists and medical scientists in discovering potential drug targets and identifying cancer biomarkers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33539514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021-09, Vol.22 (5)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a706e19d42a159efae302ecab9609fbeda547edff2436d434a90d047fd42b2143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a706e19d42a159efae302ecab9609fbeda547edff2436d434a90d047fd42b2143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mengyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Wenying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Fei</creatorcontrib><title>A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies</title><title>Briefings in bioinformatics</title><addtitle>Brief Bioinform</addtitle><description>Gene regulatory network (GRN) is the important mechanism of maintaining life process, controlling biochemical reaction and regulating compound level, which plays an important role in various organisms and systems. Reconstructing GRN can help us to understand the molecular mechanism of organisms and to reveal the essential rules of a large number of biological processes and reactions in organisms. Various outstanding network reconstruction algorithms use specific assumptions that affect prediction accuracy, in order to deal with the uncertainty of processing. In order to study why a certain method is more suitable for specific research problem or experimental data, we conduct research from model-based, information-based and machine learning-based method classifications. There are obviously different types of computational tools that can be generated to distinguish GRNs. Furthermore, we discuss several classical, representative and latest methods in each category to analyze core ideas, general steps, characteristics, etc. We compare the performance of state-of-the-art GRN reconstruction technologies on simulated networks and real networks under different scaling conditions. Through standardized performance metrics and common benchmarks, we quantitatively evaluate the stability of various methods and the sensitivity of the same algorithm applying to different scaling networks. The aim of this study is to explore the most appropriate method for a specific GRN, which helps biologists and medical scientists in discovering potential drug targets and identifying cancer biomarkers.</description><issn>1467-5463</issn><issn>1477-4054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAYhC0EoqUwsSOPSCjUjp24HquKL6kSC8yR7bxuDald7CRV_z2pWpjuhudueBC6peSREsmm2ump1koTIs_QmHIhMk4Kfn7opcgKXrIRukrpi5CciBm9RCPGCiYLysdIz7EJm22ENfjkesChh9g72GHla2yia51RDYZeNZ1qXfA4WLwCDzjCqmtUG-Iee2h3IX5j5y1E8AZwC2btQxNWDtI1urCqSXBzygn6fH76WLxmy_eXt8V8mRlGRZspQUqgsua5ooUEq4CRHIzSsiTSaqhVwQXU1uaclTVnXElSEy7ssNA55WyC7o-_2xh-OkhttXHJQNMoD6FLVc5nghZMSDqgD0fUxJBSBFtto9uouK8oqQ5Sq0FqdZI60Hen405voP5n_yyyX1-9dfs</recordid><startdate>20210902</startdate><enddate>20210902</enddate><creator>Zhao, Mengyuan</creator><creator>He, Wenying</creator><creator>Tang, Jijun</creator><creator>Zou, Quan</creator><creator>Guo, Fei</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210902</creationdate><title>A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies</title><author>Zhao, Mengyuan ; He, Wenying ; Tang, Jijun ; Zou, Quan ; Guo, Fei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-a706e19d42a159efae302ecab9609fbeda547edff2436d434a90d047fd42b2143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Mengyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Wenying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Fei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Briefings in bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Mengyuan</au><au>He, Wenying</au><au>Tang, Jijun</au><au>Zou, Quan</au><au>Guo, Fei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies</atitle><jtitle>Briefings in bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Brief Bioinform</addtitle><date>2021-09-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>1467-5463</issn><eissn>1477-4054</eissn><abstract>Gene regulatory network (GRN) is the important mechanism of maintaining life process, controlling biochemical reaction and regulating compound level, which plays an important role in various organisms and systems. Reconstructing GRN can help us to understand the molecular mechanism of organisms and to reveal the essential rules of a large number of biological processes and reactions in organisms. Various outstanding network reconstruction algorithms use specific assumptions that affect prediction accuracy, in order to deal with the uncertainty of processing. In order to study why a certain method is more suitable for specific research problem or experimental data, we conduct research from model-based, information-based and machine learning-based method classifications. There are obviously different types of computational tools that can be generated to distinguish GRNs. Furthermore, we discuss several classical, representative and latest methods in each category to analyze core ideas, general steps, characteristics, etc. We compare the performance of state-of-the-art GRN reconstruction technologies on simulated networks and real networks under different scaling conditions. Through standardized performance metrics and common benchmarks, we quantitatively evaluate the stability of various methods and the sensitivity of the same algorithm applying to different scaling networks. The aim of this study is to explore the most appropriate method for a specific GRN, which helps biologists and medical scientists in discovering potential drug targets and identifying cancer biomarkers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33539514</pmid><doi>10.1093/bib/bbab009</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-5463 |
ispartof | Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021-09, Vol.22 (5) |
issn | 1467-5463 1477-4054 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487153791 |
source | Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
title | A comprehensive overview and critical evaluation of gene regulatory network inference technologies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A23%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comprehensive%20overview%20and%20critical%20evaluation%20of%20gene%20regulatory%20network%20inference%20technologies&rft.jtitle=Briefings%20in%20bioinformatics&rft.au=Zhao,%20Mengyuan&rft.date=2021-09-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=1467-5463&rft.eissn=1477-4054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbab009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487153791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487153791&rft_id=info:pmid/33539514&rfr_iscdi=true |