Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction
To examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction. Retrospective, population-based study. All patients who underwent primary laser vision correction with a target of plano from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, at a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) Minn.), 2021-09, Vol.128 (9), p.1284-1291 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1291 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1284 |
container_title | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.) |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Schallhorn, Julie M. Schallhorn, Steven C. Hannan, Stephen J. |
description | To examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction.
Retrospective, population-based study.
All patients who underwent primary laser vision correction with a target of plano from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, at a large refractive surgery center.
Patients were asked to complete a PRO measure at the time of their preoperative and months 1 and 3 postoperative visits. Characteristics between patients who attended and did not attend the follow-up visits and completed and did not complete the PRO measure were compared. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of follow-up and completion of PRO measure. An inverse probability censoring weighted model was created to account for selective loss to follow-up and used to adjust the PRO satisfaction measure.
Completion of the PRO measure at 1 and 3 months.
A total of 37 043 patients were identified. Of these, 20 501 completed a 1-month postoperative PRO measure and 10 474 completed a 3-month postoperative PRO measure. Patients completing a PRO measure were more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preoperative PRO measure, and have had a preoperative hyperopic correction (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). For every line of postoperative uncorrected acuity worse than 20/16, the odds ratio of completing a PRO measure was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–1.36, P < 0.001) at 1 month and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.26–1.33, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487153441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016164202100083X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2487153441</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8ac71f029de74d86bb55449f6a99cde9fba9a98ae56b4249bb24017442957ece3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURi1UBAPtGyDkZTeZ2s7NjzdIMCoFaRAVaru1HOdGeJTEwXZA7PvgdTTQJdKV7cX5visfQs44W3PGy2-7tZse46NeCyb4mqXJ2QFZ8QJkBhXPP5FVwnhWgmDH5CSEHWOsLHM4Isd5XkDBK74if2-HSZtIXUcfsPPpaZ-R3s_RuAEDdSO9sjpQO9Jr1_fuJZsnqseWbtww9RhtAlL0p44Wx5g94OR8xPa9gN6hDrNPRbqL6OlWh3T-sWHJbZz3aJaKz-Sw033AL2_3Kfl9_f3X5ibb3v-43VxuMwOijlmtTcU7JmSLFbR12TRFASC7UktpWpRdo6WWtcaibECAbBoBjFcAQhYVGsxPydd97-Td04whqsEGg32vR3RzUALqihc5AE8o7FHjXQgeOzV5O2j_qjhTi3-1U3v_avGvWJqcpdj524a5GbD9H3oXnoCLPYDpn88WvQomqTPY2kWGap39eMM_YF6aIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2487153441</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schallhorn, Julie M. ; Schallhorn, Steven C. ; Hannan, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schallhorn, Julie M. ; Schallhorn, Steven C. ; Hannan, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>To examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction.
Retrospective, population-based study.
All patients who underwent primary laser vision correction with a target of plano from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, at a large refractive surgery center.
Patients were asked to complete a PRO measure at the time of their preoperative and months 1 and 3 postoperative visits. Characteristics between patients who attended and did not attend the follow-up visits and completed and did not complete the PRO measure were compared. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of follow-up and completion of PRO measure. An inverse probability censoring weighted model was created to account for selective loss to follow-up and used to adjust the PRO satisfaction measure.
Completion of the PRO measure at 1 and 3 months.
A total of 37 043 patients were identified. Of these, 20 501 completed a 1-month postoperative PRO measure and 10 474 completed a 3-month postoperative PRO measure. Patients completing a PRO measure were more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preoperative PRO measure, and have had a preoperative hyperopic correction (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). For every line of postoperative uncorrected acuity worse than 20/16, the odds ratio of completing a PRO measure was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–1.36, P < 0.001) at 1 month and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.26–1.33, P < 0.001) at 3 months. At 1 month, there was no difference between the raw and model-adjusted rates of satisfaction with vision, but at 3 months the adjusted rate was significantly higher than the raw rate.
Patients with worse objective visual outcomes were more likely to complete PRO measures in this population-based study. In a setting with loss to follow-up, PRO measures require methods to address missing data for correct interpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-6420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-4713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33545171</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Lasik ; patient reported outcomes ; patient satisfaction ; PRK ; Refractive Surgery</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2021-09, Vol.128 (9), p.1284-1291</ispartof><rights>2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8ac71f029de74d86bb55449f6a99cde9fba9a98ae56b4249bb24017442957ece3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8ac71f029de74d86bb55449f6a99cde9fba9a98ae56b4249bb24017442957ece3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33545171$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schallhorn, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schallhorn, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannan, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction</title><title>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</title><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><description>To examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction.
Retrospective, population-based study.
All patients who underwent primary laser vision correction with a target of plano from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, at a large refractive surgery center.
Patients were asked to complete a PRO measure at the time of their preoperative and months 1 and 3 postoperative visits. Characteristics between patients who attended and did not attend the follow-up visits and completed and did not complete the PRO measure were compared. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of follow-up and completion of PRO measure. An inverse probability censoring weighted model was created to account for selective loss to follow-up and used to adjust the PRO satisfaction measure.
Completion of the PRO measure at 1 and 3 months.
A total of 37 043 patients were identified. Of these, 20 501 completed a 1-month postoperative PRO measure and 10 474 completed a 3-month postoperative PRO measure. Patients completing a PRO measure were more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preoperative PRO measure, and have had a preoperative hyperopic correction (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). For every line of postoperative uncorrected acuity worse than 20/16, the odds ratio of completing a PRO measure was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–1.36, P < 0.001) at 1 month and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.26–1.33, P < 0.001) at 3 months. At 1 month, there was no difference between the raw and model-adjusted rates of satisfaction with vision, but at 3 months the adjusted rate was significantly higher than the raw rate.
Patients with worse objective visual outcomes were more likely to complete PRO measures in this population-based study. In a setting with loss to follow-up, PRO measures require methods to address missing data for correct interpretation.</description><subject>Lasik</subject><subject>patient reported outcomes</subject><subject>patient satisfaction</subject><subject>PRK</subject><subject>Refractive Surgery</subject><issn>0161-6420</issn><issn>1549-4713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1O3DAURi1UBAPtGyDkZTeZ2s7NjzdIMCoFaRAVaru1HOdGeJTEwXZA7PvgdTTQJdKV7cX5visfQs44W3PGy2-7tZse46NeCyb4mqXJ2QFZ8QJkBhXPP5FVwnhWgmDH5CSEHWOsLHM4Isd5XkDBK74if2-HSZtIXUcfsPPpaZ-R3s_RuAEDdSO9sjpQO9Jr1_fuJZsnqseWbtww9RhtAlL0p44Wx5g94OR8xPa9gN6hDrNPRbqL6OlWh3T-sWHJbZz3aJaKz-Sw033AL2_3Kfl9_f3X5ibb3v-43VxuMwOijlmtTcU7JmSLFbR12TRFASC7UktpWpRdo6WWtcaibECAbBoBjFcAQhYVGsxPydd97-Td04whqsEGg32vR3RzUALqihc5AE8o7FHjXQgeOzV5O2j_qjhTi3-1U3v_avGvWJqcpdj524a5GbD9H3oXnoCLPYDpn88WvQomqTPY2kWGap39eMM_YF6aIQ</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Schallhorn, Julie M.</creator><creator>Schallhorn, Steven C.</creator><creator>Hannan, Stephen J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction</title><author>Schallhorn, Julie M. ; Schallhorn, Steven C. ; Hannan, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-8ac71f029de74d86bb55449f6a99cde9fba9a98ae56b4249bb24017442957ece3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Lasik</topic><topic>patient reported outcomes</topic><topic>patient satisfaction</topic><topic>PRK</topic><topic>Refractive Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schallhorn, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schallhorn, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannan, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schallhorn, Julie M.</au><au>Schallhorn, Steven C.</au><au>Hannan, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.)</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmology</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1284</spage><epage>1291</epage><pages>1284-1291</pages><issn>0161-6420</issn><eissn>1549-4713</eissn><abstract>To examine factors contributing to completion of a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in patients undergoing laser vision correction.
Retrospective, population-based study.
All patients who underwent primary laser vision correction with a target of plano from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016, at a large refractive surgery center.
Patients were asked to complete a PRO measure at the time of their preoperative and months 1 and 3 postoperative visits. Characteristics between patients who attended and did not attend the follow-up visits and completed and did not complete the PRO measure were compared. A logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of follow-up and completion of PRO measure. An inverse probability censoring weighted model was created to account for selective loss to follow-up and used to adjust the PRO satisfaction measure.
Completion of the PRO measure at 1 and 3 months.
A total of 37 043 patients were identified. Of these, 20 501 completed a 1-month postoperative PRO measure and 10 474 completed a 3-month postoperative PRO measure. Patients completing a PRO measure were more likely to be older, be female, have had photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), have completed a preoperative PRO measure, and have had a preoperative hyperopic correction (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). For every line of postoperative uncorrected acuity worse than 20/16, the odds ratio of completing a PRO measure was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30–1.36, P < 0.001) at 1 month and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.26–1.33, P < 0.001) at 3 months. At 1 month, there was no difference between the raw and model-adjusted rates of satisfaction with vision, but at 3 months the adjusted rate was significantly higher than the raw rate.
Patients with worse objective visual outcomes were more likely to complete PRO measures in this population-based study. In a setting with loss to follow-up, PRO measures require methods to address missing data for correct interpretation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33545171</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.030</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-6420 |
ispartof | Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2021-09, Vol.128 (9), p.1284-1291 |
issn | 0161-6420 1549-4713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2487153441 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Lasik patient reported outcomes patient satisfaction PRK Refractive Surgery |
title | Impact of Refractive Outcomes on Bias in Follow-up and Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Laser Vision Correction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A05%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Refractive%20Outcomes%20on%20Bias%20in%20Follow-up%20and%20Completion%20of%20Patient-Reported%20Outcome%20Measures%20after%20Laser%20Vision%20Correction&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmology%20(Rochester,%20Minn.)&rft.au=Schallhorn,%20Julie%20M.&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1284&rft.epage=1291&rft.pages=1284-1291&rft.issn=0161-6420&rft.eissn=1549-4713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.01.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2487153441%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2487153441&rft_id=info:pmid/33545171&rft_els_id=S016164202100083X&rfr_iscdi=true |