A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents
Background In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative. Objectives To identify characteristics and sensitization patt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contact dermatitis 2021-06, Vol.84 (6), p.407-418 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 418 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 407 |
container_title | Contact dermatitis |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Geier, Johannes Schubert, Steffen Schnuch, Axel Szliska, Christiane Weisshaar, Elke Kränke, Birger Werfel, Thomas Ruëff, Franziska Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia Buhl, Timo Baron, Jens Malte Grabbe, Jürgen Siedlecki, Katharina Strom, Kerstin Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer Worm, Margitta Simon, Dagmar Effendy, Isaak Dickel, Heinrich Fartasch, Manigé Vieluf, Dieter Beiteke, Ulrike Bauer, Andrea Koch, André Wagner, Nicola Dissemond, Joachim Gina, Michal Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun Jünger, Michael Kreft, Burkhard Witte, Jana Schäkel, Knut Löffler, Harald Pföhler, Claudia Schliemann, Sibylle Heine, Guido Spring, Philipp Treudler, Regina Nestoris, Stefan Recke, Andreas Becker, Detlef Schmieder, Astrid Pfützner, Wolfgang Stadler, Rudolf Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte Brockow, Knut Brehler, Randolf Baur, Vera Raap, Ulrike Skudlik, Christoph Prager, Welf Emmert, Steffen Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane Wilfinger, Daniel Forchhammer, Stephan Weiß, Johannes Trautmann, Axel Mechtel, Dirk Lang, Claudia |
description | Background
In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative.
Objectives
To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents.
Patients and Methods
Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790).
Results
Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I.
Conclusions
Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cod.13803 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2486158754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486158754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-eb05eed36ec02fe72cf776e9baf55237da5ab168c435b8a653ba38ccbec87bcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFOGzEQBmCrKioh7YEXQJZ6gcOCvV57zRGFQiMhcYGzZXtnI8PGDra3aW7tG_QZeRIMoQhVqi9z-ebXWD9C-5Qc0_JObOiOKZOEfUATKgipCGfiI5oQSnhFZct20V5Kd4RQ0dTyE9pljDPWSD5Bv8-wh4XO7gdgE0Hfd2HtcYaUsfNY4z7qRdTeAl66n3j--OvPKiT3wldlC3zGXYCEfcg4jgPgMGZsg8_aZqyHAeJig3PALqd3WQWk7PJY1tNntNPrIcGX1zlFtxffbmbfq6vry_ns7Kqyz8dWYAgH6JgAS-oe2tr2bSvg1Oie85q1nebaUCFtw7iRWnBmNJPWGrCyNdayKTrc5q5ieBjLB9XSJQvDoD2EMam6kYJy2fKm0K__0LswRl-uUzWvqWRctLyoo62yMaQUoVer6JY6bhQl6rkXVXpRL70Ue_CaOJoldG_ybxEFnGzB2g2w-X-Sml2fbyOfAHnymkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521835675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Geier, Johannes ; Schubert, Steffen ; Schnuch, Axel ; Szliska, Christiane ; Weisshaar, Elke ; Kränke, Birger ; Werfel, Thomas ; Ruëff, Franziska ; Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia ; Buhl, Timo ; Baron, Jens Malte ; Grabbe, Jürgen ; Siedlecki, Katharina ; Strom, Kerstin ; Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer ; Worm, Margitta ; Simon, Dagmar ; Effendy, Isaak ; Dickel, Heinrich ; Fartasch, Manigé ; Vieluf, Dieter ; Beiteke, Ulrike ; Bauer, Andrea ; Koch, André ; Wagner, Nicola ; Dissemond, Joachim ; Gina, Michal ; Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun ; Jünger, Michael ; Kreft, Burkhard ; Witte, Jana ; Schäkel, Knut ; Löffler, Harald ; Pföhler, Claudia ; Schliemann, Sibylle ; Heine, Guido ; Spring, Philipp ; Treudler, Regina ; Nestoris, Stefan ; Recke, Andreas ; Becker, Detlef ; Schmieder, Astrid ; Pfützner, Wolfgang ; Stadler, Rudolf ; Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte ; Brockow, Knut ; Brehler, Randolf ; Baur, Vera ; Raap, Ulrike ; Skudlik, Christoph ; Prager, Welf ; Emmert, Steffen ; Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane ; Wilfinger, Daniel ; Forchhammer, Stephan ; Weiß, Johannes ; Trautmann, Axel ; Mechtel, Dirk ; Lang, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Geier, Johannes ; Schubert, Steffen ; Schnuch, Axel ; Szliska, Christiane ; Weisshaar, Elke ; Kränke, Birger ; Werfel, Thomas ; Ruëff, Franziska ; Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia ; Buhl, Timo ; Baron, Jens Malte ; Grabbe, Jürgen ; Siedlecki, Katharina ; Strom, Kerstin ; Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer ; Worm, Margitta ; Simon, Dagmar ; Effendy, Isaak ; Dickel, Heinrich ; Fartasch, Manigé ; Vieluf, Dieter ; Beiteke, Ulrike ; Bauer, Andrea ; Koch, André ; Wagner, Nicola ; Dissemond, Joachim ; Gina, Michal ; Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun ; Jünger, Michael ; Kreft, Burkhard ; Witte, Jana ; Schäkel, Knut ; Löffler, Harald ; Pföhler, Claudia ; Schliemann, Sibylle ; Heine, Guido ; Spring, Philipp ; Treudler, Regina ; Nestoris, Stefan ; Recke, Andreas ; Becker, Detlef ; Schmieder, Astrid ; Pfützner, Wolfgang ; Stadler, Rudolf ; Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte ; Brockow, Knut ; Brehler, Randolf ; Baur, Vera ; Raap, Ulrike ; Skudlik, Christoph ; Prager, Welf ; Emmert, Steffen ; Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane ; Wilfinger, Daniel ; Forchhammer, Stephan ; Weiß, Johannes ; Trautmann, Axel ; Mechtel, Dirk ; Lang, Claudia ; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology ; for the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><description>Background
In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative.
Objectives
To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents.
Patients and Methods
Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790).
Results
Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I.
Conclusions
Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cod.13803</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33533485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age composition ; Allergens ; Allergies ; amyl cinnamal ; breakdown test ; clinical epidemiology ; eugenol ; fragrance allergy ; Fragrance constituents ; fragrance mix I ; geraniol ; patch test concentration ; patch testing ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Contact dermatitis, 2021-06, Vol.84 (6), p.407-418</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-eb05eed36ec02fe72cf776e9baf55237da5ab168c435b8a653ba38ccbec87bcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-eb05eed36ec02fe72cf776e9baf55237da5ab168c435b8a653ba38ccbec87bcc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5725-7734 ; 0000-0002-5047-8948 ; 0000-0002-3139-129X ; 0000-0002-2359-2518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcod.13803$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcod.13803$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33533485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geier, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnuch, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szliska, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisshaar, Elke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kränke, Birger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werfel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruëff, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhl, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Jens Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabbe, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siedlecki, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strom, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worm, Margitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Effendy, Isaak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickel, Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fartasch, Manigé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieluf, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beiteke, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dissemond, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gina, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jünger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreft, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäkel, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löffler, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pföhler, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schliemann, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spring, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treudler, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestoris, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recke, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Detlef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmieder, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfützner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockow, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehler, Randolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raap, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skudlik, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prager, Welf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmert, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilfinger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forchhammer, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiß, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trautmann, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mechtel, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><title>A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents</title><title>Contact dermatitis</title><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><description>Background
In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative.
Objectives
To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents.
Patients and Methods
Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790).
Results
Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I.
Conclusions
Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.</description><subject>Age composition</subject><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>amyl cinnamal</subject><subject>breakdown test</subject><subject>clinical epidemiology</subject><subject>eugenol</subject><subject>fragrance allergy</subject><subject>Fragrance constituents</subject><subject>fragrance mix I</subject><subject>geraniol</subject><subject>patch test concentration</subject><subject>patch testing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cFOGzEQBmCrKioh7YEXQJZ6gcOCvV57zRGFQiMhcYGzZXtnI8PGDra3aW7tG_QZeRIMoQhVqi9z-ebXWD9C-5Qc0_JObOiOKZOEfUATKgipCGfiI5oQSnhFZct20V5Kd4RQ0dTyE9pljDPWSD5Bv8-wh4XO7gdgE0Hfd2HtcYaUsfNY4z7qRdTeAl66n3j--OvPKiT3wldlC3zGXYCEfcg4jgPgMGZsg8_aZqyHAeJig3PALqd3WQWk7PJY1tNntNPrIcGX1zlFtxffbmbfq6vry_ns7Kqyz8dWYAgH6JgAS-oe2tr2bSvg1Oie85q1nebaUCFtw7iRWnBmNJPWGrCyNdayKTrc5q5ieBjLB9XSJQvDoD2EMam6kYJy2fKm0K__0LswRl-uUzWvqWRctLyoo62yMaQUoVer6JY6bhQl6rkXVXpRL70Ue_CaOJoldG_ybxEFnGzB2g2w-X-Sml2fbyOfAHnymkQ</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Geier, Johannes</creator><creator>Schubert, Steffen</creator><creator>Schnuch, Axel</creator><creator>Szliska, Christiane</creator><creator>Weisshaar, Elke</creator><creator>Kränke, Birger</creator><creator>Werfel, Thomas</creator><creator>Ruëff, Franziska</creator><creator>Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia</creator><creator>Buhl, Timo</creator><creator>Baron, Jens Malte</creator><creator>Grabbe, Jürgen</creator><creator>Siedlecki, Katharina</creator><creator>Strom, Kerstin</creator><creator>Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer</creator><creator>Worm, Margitta</creator><creator>Simon, Dagmar</creator><creator>Effendy, Isaak</creator><creator>Dickel, Heinrich</creator><creator>Fartasch, Manigé</creator><creator>Vieluf, Dieter</creator><creator>Beiteke, Ulrike</creator><creator>Bauer, Andrea</creator><creator>Koch, André</creator><creator>Wagner, Nicola</creator><creator>Dissemond, Joachim</creator><creator>Gina, Michal</creator><creator>Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun</creator><creator>Jünger, Michael</creator><creator>Kreft, Burkhard</creator><creator>Witte, Jana</creator><creator>Schäkel, Knut</creator><creator>Löffler, Harald</creator><creator>Pföhler, Claudia</creator><creator>Schliemann, Sibylle</creator><creator>Heine, Guido</creator><creator>Spring, Philipp</creator><creator>Treudler, Regina</creator><creator>Nestoris, Stefan</creator><creator>Recke, Andreas</creator><creator>Becker, Detlef</creator><creator>Schmieder, Astrid</creator><creator>Pfützner, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Stadler, Rudolf</creator><creator>Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte</creator><creator>Brockow, Knut</creator><creator>Brehler, Randolf</creator><creator>Baur, Vera</creator><creator>Raap, Ulrike</creator><creator>Skudlik, Christoph</creator><creator>Prager, Welf</creator><creator>Emmert, Steffen</creator><creator>Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane</creator><creator>Wilfinger, Daniel</creator><creator>Forchhammer, Stephan</creator><creator>Weiß, Johannes</creator><creator>Trautmann, Axel</creator><creator>Mechtel, Dirk</creator><creator>Lang, Claudia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5725-7734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-8948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-129X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-2518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents</title><author>Geier, Johannes ; Schubert, Steffen ; Schnuch, Axel ; Szliska, Christiane ; Weisshaar, Elke ; Kränke, Birger ; Werfel, Thomas ; Ruëff, Franziska ; Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia ; Buhl, Timo ; Baron, Jens Malte ; Grabbe, Jürgen ; Siedlecki, Katharina ; Strom, Kerstin ; Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer ; Worm, Margitta ; Simon, Dagmar ; Effendy, Isaak ; Dickel, Heinrich ; Fartasch, Manigé ; Vieluf, Dieter ; Beiteke, Ulrike ; Bauer, Andrea ; Koch, André ; Wagner, Nicola ; Dissemond, Joachim ; Gina, Michal ; Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun ; Jünger, Michael ; Kreft, Burkhard ; Witte, Jana ; Schäkel, Knut ; Löffler, Harald ; Pföhler, Claudia ; Schliemann, Sibylle ; Heine, Guido ; Spring, Philipp ; Treudler, Regina ; Nestoris, Stefan ; Recke, Andreas ; Becker, Detlef ; Schmieder, Astrid ; Pfützner, Wolfgang ; Stadler, Rudolf ; Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte ; Brockow, Knut ; Brehler, Randolf ; Baur, Vera ; Raap, Ulrike ; Skudlik, Christoph ; Prager, Welf ; Emmert, Steffen ; Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane ; Wilfinger, Daniel ; Forchhammer, Stephan ; Weiß, Johannes ; Trautmann, Axel ; Mechtel, Dirk ; Lang, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-eb05eed36ec02fe72cf776e9baf55237da5ab168c435b8a653ba38ccbec87bcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age composition</topic><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>amyl cinnamal</topic><topic>breakdown test</topic><topic>clinical epidemiology</topic><topic>eugenol</topic><topic>fragrance allergy</topic><topic>Fragrance constituents</topic><topic>fragrance mix I</topic><topic>geraniol</topic><topic>patch test concentration</topic><topic>patch testing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geier, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnuch, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szliska, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisshaar, Elke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kränke, Birger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werfel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruëff, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhl, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Jens Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabbe, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siedlecki, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strom, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worm, Margitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Effendy, Isaak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickel, Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fartasch, Manigé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieluf, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beiteke, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dissemond, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gina, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jünger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreft, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäkel, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löffler, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pföhler, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schliemann, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spring, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treudler, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestoris, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recke, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Detlef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmieder, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfützner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockow, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehler, Randolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raap, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skudlik, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prager, Welf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmert, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilfinger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forchhammer, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiß, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trautmann, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mechtel, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geier, Johannes</au><au>Schubert, Steffen</au><au>Schnuch, Axel</au><au>Szliska, Christiane</au><au>Weisshaar, Elke</au><au>Kränke, Birger</au><au>Werfel, Thomas</au><au>Ruëff, Franziska</au><au>Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia</au><au>Buhl, Timo</au><au>Baron, Jens Malte</au><au>Grabbe, Jürgen</au><au>Siedlecki, Katharina</au><au>Strom, Kerstin</au><au>Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer</au><au>Worm, Margitta</au><au>Simon, Dagmar</au><au>Effendy, Isaak</au><au>Dickel, Heinrich</au><au>Fartasch, Manigé</au><au>Vieluf, Dieter</au><au>Beiteke, Ulrike</au><au>Bauer, Andrea</au><au>Koch, André</au><au>Wagner, Nicola</au><au>Dissemond, Joachim</au><au>Gina, Michal</au><au>Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun</au><au>Jünger, Michael</au><au>Kreft, Burkhard</au><au>Witte, Jana</au><au>Schäkel, Knut</au><au>Löffler, Harald</au><au>Pföhler, Claudia</au><au>Schliemann, Sibylle</au><au>Heine, Guido</au><au>Spring, Philipp</au><au>Treudler, Regina</au><au>Nestoris, Stefan</au><au>Recke, Andreas</au><au>Becker, Detlef</au><au>Schmieder, Astrid</au><au>Pfützner, Wolfgang</au><au>Stadler, Rudolf</au><au>Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte</au><au>Brockow, Knut</au><au>Brehler, Randolf</au><au>Baur, Vera</au><au>Raap, Ulrike</au><au>Skudlik, Christoph</au><au>Prager, Welf</au><au>Emmert, Steffen</au><au>Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane</au><au>Wilfinger, Daniel</au><au>Forchhammer, Stephan</au><au>Weiß, Johannes</au><au>Trautmann, Axel</au><au>Mechtel, Dirk</au><au>Lang, Claudia</au><aucorp>Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</aucorp><aucorp>for the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents</atitle><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>407-418</pages><issn>0105-1873</issn><eissn>1600-0536</eissn><abstract>Background
In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative.
Objectives
To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents.
Patients and Methods
Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790).
Results
Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I.
Conclusions
Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33533485</pmid><doi>10.1111/cod.13803</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5725-7734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-8948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-129X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-2518</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0105-1873 |
ispartof | Contact dermatitis, 2021-06, Vol.84 (6), p.407-418 |
issn | 0105-1873 1600-0536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2486158754 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals |
subjects | Age composition Allergens Allergies amyl cinnamal breakdown test clinical epidemiology eugenol fragrance allergy Fragrance constituents fragrance mix I geraniol patch test concentration patch testing Patients |
title | A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A59%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20negative%20breakdown%20test%20in%20a%20fragrance%20mix%20I%E2%80%90positive%20patient%20does%20not%20rule%20out%20contact%20allergy%20to%20its%20fragrance%20constituents&rft.jtitle=Contact%20dermatitis&rft.au=Geier,%20Johannes&rft.aucorp=Information%20Network%20of%20Departments%20of%20Dermatology&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=407-418&rft.issn=0105-1873&rft.eissn=1600-0536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cod.13803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2486158754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521835675&rft_id=info:pmid/33533485&rfr_iscdi=true |