A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents

Background In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative. Objectives To identify characteristics and sensitization patt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contact dermatitis 2021-06, Vol.84 (6), p.407-418
Hauptverfasser: Geier, Johannes, Schubert, Steffen, Schnuch, Axel, Szliska, Christiane, Weisshaar, Elke, Kränke, Birger, Werfel, Thomas, Ruëff, Franziska, Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia, Buhl, Timo, Baron, Jens Malte, Grabbe, Jürgen, Siedlecki, Katharina, Strom, Kerstin, Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer, Worm, Margitta, Simon, Dagmar, Effendy, Isaak, Dickel, Heinrich, Fartasch, Manigé, Vieluf, Dieter, Beiteke, Ulrike, Bauer, Andrea, Koch, André, Wagner, Nicola, Dissemond, Joachim, Gina, Michal, Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun, Jünger, Michael, Kreft, Burkhard, Witte, Jana, Schäkel, Knut, Löffler, Harald, Pföhler, Claudia, Schliemann, Sibylle, Heine, Guido, Spring, Philipp, Treudler, Regina, Nestoris, Stefan, Recke, Andreas, Becker, Detlef, Schmieder, Astrid, Pfützner, Wolfgang, Stadler, Rudolf, Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte, Brockow, Knut, Brehler, Randolf, Baur, Vera, Raap, Ulrike, Skudlik, Christoph, Prager, Welf, Emmert, Steffen, Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane, Wilfinger, Daniel, Forchhammer, Stephan, Weiß, Johannes, Trautmann, Axel, Mechtel, Dirk, Lang, Claudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 418
container_issue 6
container_start_page 407
container_title Contact dermatitis
container_volume 84
creator Geier, Johannes
Schubert, Steffen
Schnuch, Axel
Szliska, Christiane
Weisshaar, Elke
Kränke, Birger
Werfel, Thomas
Ruëff, Franziska
Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia
Buhl, Timo
Baron, Jens Malte
Grabbe, Jürgen
Siedlecki, Katharina
Strom, Kerstin
Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer
Worm, Margitta
Simon, Dagmar
Effendy, Isaak
Dickel, Heinrich
Fartasch, Manigé
Vieluf, Dieter
Beiteke, Ulrike
Bauer, Andrea
Koch, André
Wagner, Nicola
Dissemond, Joachim
Gina, Michal
Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun
Jünger, Michael
Kreft, Burkhard
Witte, Jana
Schäkel, Knut
Löffler, Harald
Pföhler, Claudia
Schliemann, Sibylle
Heine, Guido
Spring, Philipp
Treudler, Regina
Nestoris, Stefan
Recke, Andreas
Becker, Detlef
Schmieder, Astrid
Pfützner, Wolfgang
Stadler, Rudolf
Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte
Brockow, Knut
Brehler, Randolf
Baur, Vera
Raap, Ulrike
Skudlik, Christoph
Prager, Welf
Emmert, Steffen
Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane
Wilfinger, Daniel
Forchhammer, Stephan
Weiß, Johannes
Trautmann, Axel
Mechtel, Dirk
Lang, Claudia
description Background In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative. Objectives To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790). Results Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I. Conclusions Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cod.13803
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2486158754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486158754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-eb05eed36ec02fe72cf776e9baf55237da5ab168c435b8a653ba38ccbec87bcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10cFOGzEQBmCrKioh7YEXQJZ6gcOCvV57zRGFQiMhcYGzZXtnI8PGDra3aW7tG_QZeRIMoQhVqi9z-ebXWD9C-5Qc0_JObOiOKZOEfUATKgipCGfiI5oQSnhFZct20V5Kd4RQ0dTyE9pljDPWSD5Bv8-wh4XO7gdgE0Hfd2HtcYaUsfNY4z7qRdTeAl66n3j--OvPKiT3wldlC3zGXYCEfcg4jgPgMGZsg8_aZqyHAeJig3PALqd3WQWk7PJY1tNntNPrIcGX1zlFtxffbmbfq6vry_ns7Kqyz8dWYAgH6JgAS-oe2tr2bSvg1Oie85q1nebaUCFtw7iRWnBmNJPWGrCyNdayKTrc5q5ieBjLB9XSJQvDoD2EMam6kYJy2fKm0K__0LswRl-uUzWvqWRctLyoo62yMaQUoVer6JY6bhQl6rkXVXpRL70Ue_CaOJoldG_ybxEFnGzB2g2w-X-Sml2fbyOfAHnymkQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2521835675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Geier, Johannes ; Schubert, Steffen ; Schnuch, Axel ; Szliska, Christiane ; Weisshaar, Elke ; Kränke, Birger ; Werfel, Thomas ; Ruëff, Franziska ; Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia ; Buhl, Timo ; Baron, Jens Malte ; Grabbe, Jürgen ; Siedlecki, Katharina ; Strom, Kerstin ; Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer ; Worm, Margitta ; Simon, Dagmar ; Effendy, Isaak ; Dickel, Heinrich ; Fartasch, Manigé ; Vieluf, Dieter ; Beiteke, Ulrike ; Bauer, Andrea ; Koch, André ; Wagner, Nicola ; Dissemond, Joachim ; Gina, Michal ; Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun ; Jünger, Michael ; Kreft, Burkhard ; Witte, Jana ; Schäkel, Knut ; Löffler, Harald ; Pföhler, Claudia ; Schliemann, Sibylle ; Heine, Guido ; Spring, Philipp ; Treudler, Regina ; Nestoris, Stefan ; Recke, Andreas ; Becker, Detlef ; Schmieder, Astrid ; Pfützner, Wolfgang ; Stadler, Rudolf ; Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte ; Brockow, Knut ; Brehler, Randolf ; Baur, Vera ; Raap, Ulrike ; Skudlik, Christoph ; Prager, Welf ; Emmert, Steffen ; Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane ; Wilfinger, Daniel ; Forchhammer, Stephan ; Weiß, Johannes ; Trautmann, Axel ; Mechtel, Dirk ; Lang, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Geier, Johannes ; Schubert, Steffen ; Schnuch, Axel ; Szliska, Christiane ; Weisshaar, Elke ; Kränke, Birger ; Werfel, Thomas ; Ruëff, Franziska ; Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia ; Buhl, Timo ; Baron, Jens Malte ; Grabbe, Jürgen ; Siedlecki, Katharina ; Strom, Kerstin ; Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer ; Worm, Margitta ; Simon, Dagmar ; Effendy, Isaak ; Dickel, Heinrich ; Fartasch, Manigé ; Vieluf, Dieter ; Beiteke, Ulrike ; Bauer, Andrea ; Koch, André ; Wagner, Nicola ; Dissemond, Joachim ; Gina, Michal ; Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun ; Jünger, Michael ; Kreft, Burkhard ; Witte, Jana ; Schäkel, Knut ; Löffler, Harald ; Pföhler, Claudia ; Schliemann, Sibylle ; Heine, Guido ; Spring, Philipp ; Treudler, Regina ; Nestoris, Stefan ; Recke, Andreas ; Becker, Detlef ; Schmieder, Astrid ; Pfützner, Wolfgang ; Stadler, Rudolf ; Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte ; Brockow, Knut ; Brehler, Randolf ; Baur, Vera ; Raap, Ulrike ; Skudlik, Christoph ; Prager, Welf ; Emmert, Steffen ; Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane ; Wilfinger, Daniel ; Forchhammer, Stephan ; Weiß, Johannes ; Trautmann, Axel ; Mechtel, Dirk ; Lang, Claudia ; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology ; for the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><description>Background In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative. Objectives To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790). Results Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I. Conclusions Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0105-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cod.13803</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33533485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age composition ; Allergens ; Allergies ; amyl cinnamal ; breakdown test ; clinical epidemiology ; eugenol ; fragrance allergy ; Fragrance constituents ; fragrance mix I ; geraniol ; patch test concentration ; patch testing ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Contact dermatitis, 2021-06, Vol.84 (6), p.407-418</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-eb05eed36ec02fe72cf776e9baf55237da5ab168c435b8a653ba38ccbec87bcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-eb05eed36ec02fe72cf776e9baf55237da5ab168c435b8a653ba38ccbec87bcc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5725-7734 ; 0000-0002-5047-8948 ; 0000-0002-3139-129X ; 0000-0002-2359-2518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcod.13803$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcod.13803$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33533485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geier, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnuch, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szliska, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisshaar, Elke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kränke, Birger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werfel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruëff, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhl, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Jens Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabbe, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siedlecki, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strom, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worm, Margitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Effendy, Isaak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickel, Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fartasch, Manigé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieluf, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beiteke, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dissemond, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gina, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jünger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreft, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäkel, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löffler, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pföhler, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schliemann, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spring, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treudler, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestoris, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recke, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Detlef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmieder, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfützner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockow, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehler, Randolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raap, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skudlik, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prager, Welf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmert, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilfinger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forchhammer, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiß, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trautmann, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mechtel, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><title>A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents</title><title>Contact dermatitis</title><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><description>Background In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative. Objectives To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790). Results Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I. Conclusions Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.</description><subject>Age composition</subject><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>amyl cinnamal</subject><subject>breakdown test</subject><subject>clinical epidemiology</subject><subject>eugenol</subject><subject>fragrance allergy</subject><subject>Fragrance constituents</subject><subject>fragrance mix I</subject><subject>geraniol</subject><subject>patch test concentration</subject><subject>patch testing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>0105-1873</issn><issn>1600-0536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp10cFOGzEQBmCrKioh7YEXQJZ6gcOCvV57zRGFQiMhcYGzZXtnI8PGDra3aW7tG_QZeRIMoQhVqi9z-ebXWD9C-5Qc0_JObOiOKZOEfUATKgipCGfiI5oQSnhFZct20V5Kd4RQ0dTyE9pljDPWSD5Bv8-wh4XO7gdgE0Hfd2HtcYaUsfNY4z7qRdTeAl66n3j--OvPKiT3wldlC3zGXYCEfcg4jgPgMGZsg8_aZqyHAeJig3PALqd3WQWk7PJY1tNntNPrIcGX1zlFtxffbmbfq6vry_ns7Kqyz8dWYAgH6JgAS-oe2tr2bSvg1Oie85q1nebaUCFtw7iRWnBmNJPWGrCyNdayKTrc5q5ieBjLB9XSJQvDoD2EMam6kYJy2fKm0K__0LswRl-uUzWvqWRctLyoo62yMaQUoVer6JY6bhQl6rkXVXpRL70Ue_CaOJoldG_ybxEFnGzB2g2w-X-Sml2fbyOfAHnymkQ</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Geier, Johannes</creator><creator>Schubert, Steffen</creator><creator>Schnuch, Axel</creator><creator>Szliska, Christiane</creator><creator>Weisshaar, Elke</creator><creator>Kränke, Birger</creator><creator>Werfel, Thomas</creator><creator>Ruëff, Franziska</creator><creator>Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia</creator><creator>Buhl, Timo</creator><creator>Baron, Jens Malte</creator><creator>Grabbe, Jürgen</creator><creator>Siedlecki, Katharina</creator><creator>Strom, Kerstin</creator><creator>Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer</creator><creator>Worm, Margitta</creator><creator>Simon, Dagmar</creator><creator>Effendy, Isaak</creator><creator>Dickel, Heinrich</creator><creator>Fartasch, Manigé</creator><creator>Vieluf, Dieter</creator><creator>Beiteke, Ulrike</creator><creator>Bauer, Andrea</creator><creator>Koch, André</creator><creator>Wagner, Nicola</creator><creator>Dissemond, Joachim</creator><creator>Gina, Michal</creator><creator>Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun</creator><creator>Jünger, Michael</creator><creator>Kreft, Burkhard</creator><creator>Witte, Jana</creator><creator>Schäkel, Knut</creator><creator>Löffler, Harald</creator><creator>Pföhler, Claudia</creator><creator>Schliemann, Sibylle</creator><creator>Heine, Guido</creator><creator>Spring, Philipp</creator><creator>Treudler, Regina</creator><creator>Nestoris, Stefan</creator><creator>Recke, Andreas</creator><creator>Becker, Detlef</creator><creator>Schmieder, Astrid</creator><creator>Pfützner, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Stadler, Rudolf</creator><creator>Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte</creator><creator>Brockow, Knut</creator><creator>Brehler, Randolf</creator><creator>Baur, Vera</creator><creator>Raap, Ulrike</creator><creator>Skudlik, Christoph</creator><creator>Prager, Welf</creator><creator>Emmert, Steffen</creator><creator>Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane</creator><creator>Wilfinger, Daniel</creator><creator>Forchhammer, Stephan</creator><creator>Weiß, Johannes</creator><creator>Trautmann, Axel</creator><creator>Mechtel, Dirk</creator><creator>Lang, Claudia</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5725-7734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-8948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-129X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-2518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents</title><author>Geier, Johannes ; Schubert, Steffen ; Schnuch, Axel ; Szliska, Christiane ; Weisshaar, Elke ; Kränke, Birger ; Werfel, Thomas ; Ruëff, Franziska ; Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia ; Buhl, Timo ; Baron, Jens Malte ; Grabbe, Jürgen ; Siedlecki, Katharina ; Strom, Kerstin ; Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer ; Worm, Margitta ; Simon, Dagmar ; Effendy, Isaak ; Dickel, Heinrich ; Fartasch, Manigé ; Vieluf, Dieter ; Beiteke, Ulrike ; Bauer, Andrea ; Koch, André ; Wagner, Nicola ; Dissemond, Joachim ; Gina, Michal ; Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun ; Jünger, Michael ; Kreft, Burkhard ; Witte, Jana ; Schäkel, Knut ; Löffler, Harald ; Pföhler, Claudia ; Schliemann, Sibylle ; Heine, Guido ; Spring, Philipp ; Treudler, Regina ; Nestoris, Stefan ; Recke, Andreas ; Becker, Detlef ; Schmieder, Astrid ; Pfützner, Wolfgang ; Stadler, Rudolf ; Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte ; Brockow, Knut ; Brehler, Randolf ; Baur, Vera ; Raap, Ulrike ; Skudlik, Christoph ; Prager, Welf ; Emmert, Steffen ; Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane ; Wilfinger, Daniel ; Forchhammer, Stephan ; Weiß, Johannes ; Trautmann, Axel ; Mechtel, Dirk ; Lang, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-eb05eed36ec02fe72cf776e9baf55237da5ab168c435b8a653ba38ccbec87bcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age composition</topic><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>amyl cinnamal</topic><topic>breakdown test</topic><topic>clinical epidemiology</topic><topic>eugenol</topic><topic>fragrance allergy</topic><topic>Fragrance constituents</topic><topic>fragrance mix I</topic><topic>geraniol</topic><topic>patch test concentration</topic><topic>patch testing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geier, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schnuch, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szliska, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisshaar, Elke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kränke, Birger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werfel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruëff, Franziska</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhl, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Jens Malte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabbe, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siedlecki, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strom, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worm, Margitta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Effendy, Isaak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickel, Heinrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fartasch, Manigé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieluf, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beiteke, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dissemond, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gina, Michal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jünger, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreft, Burkhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witte, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäkel, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löffler, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pföhler, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schliemann, Sibylle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heine, Guido</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spring, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treudler, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nestoris, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Recke, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Detlef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmieder, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfützner, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stadler, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brockow, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehler, Randolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raap, Ulrike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skudlik, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prager, Welf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmert, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilfinger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forchhammer, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiß, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trautmann, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mechtel, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lang, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geier, Johannes</au><au>Schubert, Steffen</au><au>Schnuch, Axel</au><au>Szliska, Christiane</au><au>Weisshaar, Elke</au><au>Kränke, Birger</au><au>Werfel, Thomas</au><au>Ruëff, Franziska</au><au>Schröder‐Kraft, Claudia</au><au>Buhl, Timo</au><au>Baron, Jens Malte</au><au>Grabbe, Jürgen</au><au>Siedlecki, Katharina</au><au>Strom, Kerstin</au><au>Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer</au><au>Worm, Margitta</au><au>Simon, Dagmar</au><au>Effendy, Isaak</au><au>Dickel, Heinrich</au><au>Fartasch, Manigé</au><au>Vieluf, Dieter</au><au>Beiteke, Ulrike</au><au>Bauer, Andrea</au><au>Koch, André</au><au>Wagner, Nicola</au><au>Dissemond, Joachim</au><au>Gina, Michal</au><au>Grunwald‐Delitz, Heidrun</au><au>Jünger, Michael</au><au>Kreft, Burkhard</au><au>Witte, Jana</au><au>Schäkel, Knut</au><au>Löffler, Harald</au><au>Pföhler, Claudia</au><au>Schliemann, Sibylle</au><au>Heine, Guido</au><au>Spring, Philipp</au><au>Treudler, Regina</au><au>Nestoris, Stefan</au><au>Recke, Andreas</au><au>Becker, Detlef</au><au>Schmieder, Astrid</au><au>Pfützner, Wolfgang</au><au>Stadler, Rudolf</au><au>Coras‐Stepanek, Brigitte</au><au>Brockow, Knut</au><au>Brehler, Randolf</au><au>Baur, Vera</au><au>Raap, Ulrike</au><au>Skudlik, Christoph</au><au>Prager, Welf</au><au>Emmert, Steffen</au><au>Rieker‐Schwienbacher, Juliane</au><au>Wilfinger, Daniel</au><au>Forchhammer, Stephan</au><au>Weiß, Johannes</au><au>Trautmann, Axel</au><au>Mechtel, Dirk</au><au>Lang, Claudia</au><aucorp>Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</aucorp><aucorp>for the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents</atitle><jtitle>Contact dermatitis</jtitle><addtitle>Contact Dermatitis</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>407</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>407-418</pages><issn>0105-1873</issn><eissn>1600-0536</eissn><abstract>Background In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false‐positive, or the breakdown test is false‐negative. Objectives To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and ≥1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790). Results Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non‐fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I. Conclusions Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false‐positive. There may be false‐negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33533485</pmid><doi>10.1111/cod.13803</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5725-7734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5047-8948</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-129X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-2518</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0105-1873
ispartof Contact dermatitis, 2021-06, Vol.84 (6), p.407-418
issn 0105-1873
1600-0536
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2486158754
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Age composition
Allergens
Allergies
amyl cinnamal
breakdown test
clinical epidemiology
eugenol
fragrance allergy
Fragrance constituents
fragrance mix I
geraniol
patch test concentration
patch testing
Patients
title A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I‐positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A59%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20negative%20breakdown%20test%20in%20a%20fragrance%20mix%20I%E2%80%90positive%20patient%20does%20not%20rule%20out%20contact%20allergy%20to%20its%20fragrance%20constituents&rft.jtitle=Contact%20dermatitis&rft.au=Geier,%20Johannes&rft.aucorp=Information%20Network%20of%20Departments%20of%20Dermatology&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=407&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=407-418&rft.issn=0105-1873&rft.eissn=1600-0536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cod.13803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2486158754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2521835675&rft_id=info:pmid/33533485&rfr_iscdi=true