The complete story of less than complete responses: The evolution and application of acute myeloid leukemia clinical responses
Complete remission (CR) has long been the critical therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, “less than CR” responses have been and continue to be proposed to define clinically meaningful post-therapy outcomes. These responses include CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), CR with i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Blood reviews 2021-07, Vol.48, p.100806-100806, Article 100806 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100806 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 100806 |
container_title | Blood reviews |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Shallis, Rory M. Pollyea, Daniel A. Zeidan, Amer M. |
description | Complete remission (CR) has long been the critical therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, “less than CR” responses have been and continue to be proposed to define clinically meaningful post-therapy outcomes. These responses include CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and, most recently, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), which has been introduced and subsequently used for regulatory approval. However, the clinical benefits associated with “less than CR” responses have primarily been evaluated in the context of intensive therapies. In an era with sophisticated measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments, including flow-based, cytogenetic and molecular techniques, and an increase in “targeted”, non-intensive therapies, the clinical value of responses that are “less than CR” must be reevaluated. Improvements in the rate of CR has not always led to improvements in OS among older patients. As such, MRD techniques might help define a more stringent response criterion (MRD-negative CR) that might better correlate with OS and should be incorporated in future clinical trials. Here we discuss the evolution of CR and “less than CR” responses, data regarding their clinical benefits, and considerations relevant to response assessments with newer therapies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100806 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2486140869</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0268960X21000126</els_id><sourcerecordid>2486140869</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-65d660f1fe9527e05928f4e1198f3f4e29de1e717a218cc605cc82fe58e519073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9rFDEYh4Modlv9Ah5kjoLMmjezySTipSxWhYKXCt5CNvMOzZqZjEmmshc_u9nO2t7EU_49z4_kF0JeAV0DBfFuv975iGtGGZQNKql4QlbAG1aDkPCUrCgTslaCfj8j5yntKaWqEe1zctY0vAEQakV-39xiZcMwecxYpRzioQp95TGlKt-a8fEsYprCmDC9r44O3gU_ZxfGyoxdZabJO2vu10U3di7GcEAfXFfC5h84OFNZ78ZC-cesF-RZb3zCl6fxgny7-niz_Vxff_30ZXt5XduGi1wL3glBe-hRcdYi5YrJfoMASvZNmTDVIWALrWEgrRWUWytZj1wiB0Xb5oK8WXKnGH7OmLIeXLLovRkxzEmzjRSwoVKogrIFtTGkFLHXU3SDiQcNVB9713t97F0fe9dL70V6fcqfdwN2D8rfogvwdgF-4S70yTocLT5g5WeEgHKJTZkBLbT8f3rr8n3x2zCPuagfFhVLnXcOoz7pnYtos-6C-9dD_gBrW7Zd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486140869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The complete story of less than complete responses: The evolution and application of acute myeloid leukemia clinical responses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Shallis, Rory M. ; Pollyea, Daniel A. ; Zeidan, Amer M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shallis, Rory M. ; Pollyea, Daniel A. ; Zeidan, Amer M.</creatorcontrib><description>Complete remission (CR) has long been the critical therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, “less than CR” responses have been and continue to be proposed to define clinically meaningful post-therapy outcomes. These responses include CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and, most recently, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), which has been introduced and subsequently used for regulatory approval. However, the clinical benefits associated with “less than CR” responses have primarily been evaluated in the context of intensive therapies. In an era with sophisticated measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments, including flow-based, cytogenetic and molecular techniques, and an increase in “targeted”, non-intensive therapies, the clinical value of responses that are “less than CR” must be reevaluated. Improvements in the rate of CR has not always led to improvements in OS among older patients. As such, MRD techniques might help define a more stringent response criterion (MRD-negative CR) that might better correlate with OS and should be incorporated in future clinical trials. Here we discuss the evolution of CR and “less than CR” responses, data regarding their clinical benefits, and considerations relevant to response assessments with newer therapies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-960X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100806</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33531169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>EDINBURGH: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia ; AML ; Clinical Decision-Making ; CRh ; CRi ; CRp ; Disease Management ; Disease Susceptibility ; Hematology ; Humans ; Incomplete ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - etiology ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - therapy ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Partial ; Prognosis ; Remission ; Remission Induction ; Response ; Science & Technology ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Blood reviews, 2021-07, Vol.48, p.100806-100806, Article 100806</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>17</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000661248400010</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-65d660f1fe9527e05928f4e1198f3f4e29de1e717a218cc605cc82fe58e519073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-65d660f1fe9527e05928f4e1198f3f4e29de1e717a218cc605cc82fe58e519073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2021.100806$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,39265,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33531169$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shallis, Rory M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollyea, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeidan, Amer M.</creatorcontrib><title>The complete story of less than complete responses: The evolution and application of acute myeloid leukemia clinical responses</title><title>Blood reviews</title><addtitle>BLOOD REV</addtitle><addtitle>Blood Rev</addtitle><description>Complete remission (CR) has long been the critical therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, “less than CR” responses have been and continue to be proposed to define clinically meaningful post-therapy outcomes. These responses include CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and, most recently, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), which has been introduced and subsequently used for regulatory approval. However, the clinical benefits associated with “less than CR” responses have primarily been evaluated in the context of intensive therapies. In an era with sophisticated measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments, including flow-based, cytogenetic and molecular techniques, and an increase in “targeted”, non-intensive therapies, the clinical value of responses that are “less than CR” must be reevaluated. Improvements in the rate of CR has not always led to improvements in OS among older patients. As such, MRD techniques might help define a more stringent response criterion (MRD-negative CR) that might better correlate with OS and should be incorporated in future clinical trials. Here we discuss the evolution of CR and “less than CR” responses, data regarding their clinical benefits, and considerations relevant to response assessments with newer therapies.</description><subject>Acute myeloid leukemia</subject><subject>AML</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>CRh</subject><subject>CRi</subject><subject>CRp</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Disease Susceptibility</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incomplete</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - etiology</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - therapy</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Partial</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Response</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0268-960X</issn><issn>1532-1681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9rFDEYh4Modlv9Ah5kjoLMmjezySTipSxWhYKXCt5CNvMOzZqZjEmmshc_u9nO2t7EU_49z4_kF0JeAV0DBfFuv975iGtGGZQNKql4QlbAG1aDkPCUrCgTslaCfj8j5yntKaWqEe1zctY0vAEQakV-39xiZcMwecxYpRzioQp95TGlKt-a8fEsYprCmDC9r44O3gU_ZxfGyoxdZabJO2vu10U3di7GcEAfXFfC5h84OFNZ78ZC-cesF-RZb3zCl6fxgny7-niz_Vxff_30ZXt5XduGi1wL3glBe-hRcdYi5YrJfoMASvZNmTDVIWALrWEgrRWUWytZj1wiB0Xb5oK8WXKnGH7OmLIeXLLovRkxzEmzjRSwoVKogrIFtTGkFLHXU3SDiQcNVB9713t97F0fe9dL70V6fcqfdwN2D8rfogvwdgF-4S70yTocLT5g5WeEgHKJTZkBLbT8f3rr8n3x2zCPuagfFhVLnXcOoz7pnYtos-6C-9dD_gBrW7Zd</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Shallis, Rory M.</creator><creator>Pollyea, Daniel A.</creator><creator>Zeidan, Amer M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>The complete story of less than complete responses: The evolution and application of acute myeloid leukemia clinical responses</title><author>Shallis, Rory M. ; Pollyea, Daniel A. ; Zeidan, Amer M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-65d660f1fe9527e05928f4e1198f3f4e29de1e717a218cc605cc82fe58e519073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acute myeloid leukemia</topic><topic>AML</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>CRh</topic><topic>CRi</topic><topic>CRp</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Disease Susceptibility</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incomplete</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - etiology</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - therapy</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Partial</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Response</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shallis, Rory M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollyea, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeidan, Amer M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Blood reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shallis, Rory M.</au><au>Pollyea, Daniel A.</au><au>Zeidan, Amer M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The complete story of less than complete responses: The evolution and application of acute myeloid leukemia clinical responses</atitle><jtitle>Blood reviews</jtitle><stitle>BLOOD REV</stitle><addtitle>Blood Rev</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><spage>100806</spage><epage>100806</epage><pages>100806-100806</pages><artnum>100806</artnum><issn>0268-960X</issn><eissn>1532-1681</eissn><abstract>Complete remission (CR) has long been the critical therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, “less than CR” responses have been and continue to be proposed to define clinically meaningful post-therapy outcomes. These responses include CR with incomplete recovery (CRi), CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) and, most recently, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), which has been introduced and subsequently used for regulatory approval. However, the clinical benefits associated with “less than CR” responses have primarily been evaluated in the context of intensive therapies. In an era with sophisticated measurable residual disease (MRD) assessments, including flow-based, cytogenetic and molecular techniques, and an increase in “targeted”, non-intensive therapies, the clinical value of responses that are “less than CR” must be reevaluated. Improvements in the rate of CR has not always led to improvements in OS among older patients. As such, MRD techniques might help define a more stringent response criterion (MRD-negative CR) that might better correlate with OS and should be incorporated in future clinical trials. Here we discuss the evolution of CR and “less than CR” responses, data regarding their clinical benefits, and considerations relevant to response assessments with newer therapies.</abstract><cop>EDINBURGH</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33531169</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.blre.2021.100806</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-960X |
ispartof | Blood reviews, 2021-07, Vol.48, p.100806-100806, Article 100806 |
issn | 0268-960X 1532-1681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2486140869 |
source | MEDLINE; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Acute myeloid leukemia AML Clinical Decision-Making CRh CRi CRp Disease Management Disease Susceptibility Hematology Humans Incomplete Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - diagnosis Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - etiology Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - therapy Life Sciences & Biomedicine Partial Prognosis Remission Remission Induction Response Science & Technology Treatment Outcome |
title | The complete story of less than complete responses: The evolution and application of acute myeloid leukemia clinical responses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T06%3A52%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20complete%20story%20of%20less%20than%20complete%20responses:%20The%20evolution%20and%20application%20of%20acute%20myeloid%20leukemia%20clinical%20responses&rft.jtitle=Blood%20reviews&rft.au=Shallis,%20Rory%20M.&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=48&rft.spage=100806&rft.epage=100806&rft.pages=100806-100806&rft.artnum=100806&rft.issn=0268-960X&rft.eissn=1532-1681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.blre.2021.100806&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2486140869%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486140869&rft_id=info:pmid/33531169&rft_els_id=S0268960X21000126&rfr_iscdi=true |