Antibiotic prophylaxis for sagittal split ramus osteotomy using resorbable plate and screw fixation: a randomised trial to compare extended dual-agent and inpatient single-agent regimens
Resorbable materials are used to fix bony fragments after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), but to our knowledge, there is no clear regimen for antibiotic prophylaxis when such materials are used. The purpose of this study therefore was to compare inpatient single-agent and extended dual-agent...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery 2021-06, Vol.59 (5), p.586-591 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 591 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 586 |
container_title | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Moroi, A. Saito, Y. Takayama, A. Yoshizawa, K. Ueki, K. |
description | Resorbable materials are used to fix bony fragments after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), but to our knowledge, there is no clear regimen for antibiotic prophylaxis when such materials are used. The purpose of this study therefore was to compare inpatient single-agent and extended dual-agent antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) in patients after SSRO. This prospective study included 100 patients who underwent SSRO for deformities of the jaw. Cephalometric analysis was performed preoperatively, and at one month and one year postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups of 50 each. Group A was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively. Group B was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively, after which they were provided with oral amoxicillin for three days. Both groups were assessed for SSIs for one year postoperatively using the Clavien-Dindo classification. SSIs were documented in seven patients in Group A and six in Group B, with no significant difference between the groups. The two regimens had no significant association with SSI. In conclusion, our results suggest that the inpatient, single-agent, postoperative antibiotic regimen is sufficient to prevent SSI in patients who have SSRO with resorbable plate and screw fixation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.10.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2484235512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S026643562030574X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2484235512</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-97907bff351de81bd2ad4734abbcb70e49750b6b85bb61eb0058c9cf324728273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcmO1DAUtBCIaQa-AAn5yCWNlzgLEofRiE0aiQucLS8vjVuOHWwHun-Nr8OZaThysvxe1StVFUIvKdlTQrs3x70-xjnvGWHbZE8If4R2VHDW0LElj9GOsK5rWi66K_Qs5yMhRDAqnqIrzgUd-Ch26PdNKE67WJzBS4rL97NXJ5fxFBPO6uBKUR7nxbuCk5rXjGMuEEucz3jNLhxwghyTVtoDXrwqgFWwOJsEv_DkTqq4GN5iVcnBxtllsLgkV2-WiE2cF5UAw6lAsHVjV-UbdYBQ7q-4sFT-9tuUPFxWCQ5uhpCfoyeT8hleXN5r9O3D-6-3n5q7Lx8_397cNYaLsTRjP5JeT1O1bGGg2jJl2563SmujewLt2AuiOz0IrTsKuoY0mNFMnLU9G1jPr9Hrh7s1nx8r5CKrDwPeqwBxzZK1Q8u4EJRVKH-AmhRzTjDJJblZpbOkRG6lyaO8L01upW3DWlplvboIrHoG-4_zt6UKePcAgGrzp4Mks6m5GLAugSnSRvdfgT_fl67h</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2484235512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis for sagittal split ramus osteotomy using resorbable plate and screw fixation: a randomised trial to compare extended dual-agent and inpatient single-agent regimens</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moroi, A. ; Saito, Y. ; Takayama, A. ; Yoshizawa, K. ; Ueki, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moroi, A. ; Saito, Y. ; Takayama, A. ; Yoshizawa, K. ; Ueki, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Resorbable materials are used to fix bony fragments after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), but to our knowledge, there is no clear regimen for antibiotic prophylaxis when such materials are used. The purpose of this study therefore was to compare inpatient single-agent and extended dual-agent antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) in patients after SSRO. This prospective study included 100 patients who underwent SSRO for deformities of the jaw. Cephalometric analysis was performed preoperatively, and at one month and one year postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups of 50 each. Group A was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively. Group B was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively, after which they were provided with oral amoxicillin for three days. Both groups were assessed for SSIs for one year postoperatively using the Clavien-Dindo classification. SSIs were documented in seven patients in Group A and six in Group B, with no significant difference between the groups. The two regimens had no significant association with SSI. In conclusion, our results suggest that the inpatient, single-agent, postoperative antibiotic regimen is sufficient to prevent SSI in patients who have SSRO with resorbable plate and screw fixation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1940</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33518395</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>cefazolin ; Dentistry ; resorbable material ; sagittal split ramus osteotomy ; surgical site infection</subject><ispartof>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2021-06, Vol.59 (5), p.586-591</ispartof><rights>2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-97907bff351de81bd2ad4734abbcb70e49750b6b85bb61eb0058c9cf324728273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-97907bff351de81bd2ad4734abbcb70e49750b6b85bb61eb0058c9cf324728273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.10.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33518395$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moroi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takayama, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshizawa, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueki, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis for sagittal split ramus osteotomy using resorbable plate and screw fixation: a randomised trial to compare extended dual-agent and inpatient single-agent regimens</title><title>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Resorbable materials are used to fix bony fragments after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), but to our knowledge, there is no clear regimen for antibiotic prophylaxis when such materials are used. The purpose of this study therefore was to compare inpatient single-agent and extended dual-agent antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) in patients after SSRO. This prospective study included 100 patients who underwent SSRO for deformities of the jaw. Cephalometric analysis was performed preoperatively, and at one month and one year postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups of 50 each. Group A was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively. Group B was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively, after which they were provided with oral amoxicillin for three days. Both groups were assessed for SSIs for one year postoperatively using the Clavien-Dindo classification. SSIs were documented in seven patients in Group A and six in Group B, with no significant difference between the groups. The two regimens had no significant association with SSI. In conclusion, our results suggest that the inpatient, single-agent, postoperative antibiotic regimen is sufficient to prevent SSI in patients who have SSRO with resorbable plate and screw fixation.</description><subject>cefazolin</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>resorbable material</subject><subject>sagittal split ramus osteotomy</subject><subject>surgical site infection</subject><issn>0266-4356</issn><issn>1532-1940</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcmO1DAUtBCIaQa-AAn5yCWNlzgLEofRiE0aiQucLS8vjVuOHWwHun-Nr8OZaThysvxe1StVFUIvKdlTQrs3x70-xjnvGWHbZE8If4R2VHDW0LElj9GOsK5rWi66K_Qs5yMhRDAqnqIrzgUd-Ch26PdNKE67WJzBS4rL97NXJ5fxFBPO6uBKUR7nxbuCk5rXjGMuEEucz3jNLhxwghyTVtoDXrwqgFWwOJsEv_DkTqq4GN5iVcnBxtllsLgkV2-WiE2cF5UAw6lAsHVjV-UbdYBQ7q-4sFT-9tuUPFxWCQ5uhpCfoyeT8hleXN5r9O3D-6-3n5q7Lx8_397cNYaLsTRjP5JeT1O1bGGg2jJl2563SmujewLt2AuiOz0IrTsKuoY0mNFMnLU9G1jPr9Hrh7s1nx8r5CKrDwPeqwBxzZK1Q8u4EJRVKH-AmhRzTjDJJblZpbOkRG6lyaO8L01upW3DWlplvboIrHoG-4_zt6UKePcAgGrzp4Mks6m5GLAugSnSRvdfgT_fl67h</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Moroi, A.</creator><creator>Saito, Y.</creator><creator>Takayama, A.</creator><creator>Yoshizawa, K.</creator><creator>Ueki, K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Antibiotic prophylaxis for sagittal split ramus osteotomy using resorbable plate and screw fixation: a randomised trial to compare extended dual-agent and inpatient single-agent regimens</title><author>Moroi, A. ; Saito, Y. ; Takayama, A. ; Yoshizawa, K. ; Ueki, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-97907bff351de81bd2ad4734abbcb70e49750b6b85bb61eb0058c9cf324728273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>cefazolin</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>resorbable material</topic><topic>sagittal split ramus osteotomy</topic><topic>surgical site infection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moroi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takayama, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshizawa, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueki, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moroi, A.</au><au>Saito, Y.</au><au>Takayama, A.</au><au>Yoshizawa, K.</au><au>Ueki, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic prophylaxis for sagittal split ramus osteotomy using resorbable plate and screw fixation: a randomised trial to compare extended dual-agent and inpatient single-agent regimens</atitle><jtitle>British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>586-591</pages><issn>0266-4356</issn><eissn>1532-1940</eissn><abstract>Resorbable materials are used to fix bony fragments after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), but to our knowledge, there is no clear regimen for antibiotic prophylaxis when such materials are used. The purpose of this study therefore was to compare inpatient single-agent and extended dual-agent antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) in patients after SSRO. This prospective study included 100 patients who underwent SSRO for deformities of the jaw. Cephalometric analysis was performed preoperatively, and at one month and one year postoperatively. Patients were divided into two groups of 50 each. Group A was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively. Group B was given cefazolin sodium 1g preoperatively and every eight hours for 48 hours postoperatively, after which they were provided with oral amoxicillin for three days. Both groups were assessed for SSIs for one year postoperatively using the Clavien-Dindo classification. SSIs were documented in seven patients in Group A and six in Group B, with no significant difference between the groups. The two regimens had no significant association with SSI. In conclusion, our results suggest that the inpatient, single-agent, postoperative antibiotic regimen is sufficient to prevent SSI in patients who have SSRO with resorbable plate and screw fixation.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33518395</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.10.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4356 |
ispartof | British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery, 2021-06, Vol.59 (5), p.586-591 |
issn | 0266-4356 1532-1940 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2484235512 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | cefazolin Dentistry resorbable material sagittal split ramus osteotomy surgical site infection |
title | Antibiotic prophylaxis for sagittal split ramus osteotomy using resorbable plate and screw fixation: a randomised trial to compare extended dual-agent and inpatient single-agent regimens |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T00%3A26%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20prophylaxis%20for%20sagittal%20split%20ramus%20osteotomy%20using%20resorbable%20plate%20and%20screw%20fixation:%20a%20randomised%20trial%20to%20compare%20extended%20dual-agent%20and%20inpatient%20single-agent%20regimens&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20oral%20&%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Moroi,%20A.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=586-591&rft.issn=0266-4356&rft.eissn=1532-1940&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2484235512%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2484235512&rft_id=info:pmid/33518395&rft_els_id=S026643562030574X&rfr_iscdi=true |