Determining the glycaemic responses of foods: conventional and emerging approaches
A low-glycaemic diet is crucial for those with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Information on the glycaemic index (GI) of different ingredients can help in designing novel food products for such target groups. This is because of the intricate dependency of material source, composition, food st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nutrition research reviews 2022-06, Vol.35 (1), p.1-27 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 27 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Nutrition research reviews |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Priyadarshini, S R Moses, J A Anandharamakrishnan, C |
description | A low-glycaemic diet is crucial for those with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Information on the glycaemic index (GI) of different ingredients can help in designing novel food products for such target groups. This is because of the intricate dependency of material source, composition, food structure and processing conditions, among other factors, on the glycaemic responses. Different approaches have been used to predict the GI of foods, and certain discrepancies exist because of factors such as inter-individual variation among human subjects. Besides other aspects, it is important to understand the mechanism of food digestion because an approach to predict GI must essentially mimic the complex processes in the human gastrointestinal tract. The focus of this work is to review the advances in various approaches for predicting the glycaemic responses to foods. This has been carried out by detailing conventional approaches, their merits and limitations, and the need to focus on emerging approaches. Given that no single approach can be generalised to all applications, the review emphasises the scope of deriving insights for improvements in methodologies. Reviewing the conventional and emerging approaches for the determination of GI in foods, this detailed work is intended to serve as a state-of-the-art resource for nutritionists who work on developing low-GI foods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0954422421000020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2484162096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0954422421000020</cupid><sourcerecordid>2672590297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b5180431e1a0be07bd68fd186fe26c691a1f21289fc82c4ac3d5f77019b918ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMo7rr6B3iRghcv1UzSNo03WT9BEPw4lzSd7HZpmzXpCvvfm7KrguJc5jC_9x7zCDkGeg4UxMULlWmSMJYwoGEY3SFjSEQaM0HpLhkP53i4j8iB94sBkZLvkxHnKQjJ2Zg8X2OPrq27uptF_RyjWbPWCttaRw790nYefWRNZKyt_GWkbfeBXV_bTjWR6qoIW3SzQauWS2eVnqM_JHtGNR6PtntC3m5vXqf38ePT3cP06jHWXPA-LlPIacIBQdESqSirLDcV5JlBlulMggLDgOXS6JzpRGlepUYICrKUkBvDJ-Rs4xuC31fo-6KtvcamUR3alS9YkieQMSqzgJ7-Qhd25cIPgcoES2UoRgQKNpR21nuHpli6ulVuXQAthsKLP4UHzcnWeVW2WH0rvhoOAN-aqrZ0dTXDn-z_bT8BqQ2Jkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2672590297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining the glycaemic responses of foods: conventional and emerging approaches</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Priyadarshini, S R ; Moses, J A ; Anandharamakrishnan, C</creator><creatorcontrib>Priyadarshini, S R ; Moses, J A ; Anandharamakrishnan, C</creatorcontrib><description>A low-glycaemic diet is crucial for those with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Information on the glycaemic index (GI) of different ingredients can help in designing novel food products for such target groups. This is because of the intricate dependency of material source, composition, food structure and processing conditions, among other factors, on the glycaemic responses. Different approaches have been used to predict the GI of foods, and certain discrepancies exist because of factors such as inter-individual variation among human subjects. Besides other aspects, it is important to understand the mechanism of food digestion because an approach to predict GI must essentially mimic the complex processes in the human gastrointestinal tract. The focus of this work is to review the advances in various approaches for predicting the glycaemic responses to foods. This has been carried out by detailing conventional approaches, their merits and limitations, and the need to focus on emerging approaches. Given that no single approach can be generalised to all applications, the review emphasises the scope of deriving insights for improvements in methodologies. Reviewing the conventional and emerging approaches for the determination of GI in foods, this detailed work is intended to serve as a state-of-the-art resource for nutritionists who work on developing low-GI foods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-4224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0954422421000020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33517932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular diseases ; Diabetes mellitus ; Food ; Food composition ; Food processing ; Food sources ; Gastrointestinal system ; Gastrointestinal tract ; Glycemic index ; Novel foods ; Nutrient deficiency</subject><ispartof>Nutrition research reviews, 2022-06, Vol.35 (1), p.1-27</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b5180431e1a0be07bd68fd186fe26c691a1f21289fc82c4ac3d5f77019b918ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b5180431e1a0be07bd68fd186fe26c691a1f21289fc82c4ac3d5f77019b918ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9599-5594 ; 0000-0002-5546-4481</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0954422421000020/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27922,27923,55626</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33517932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Priyadarshini, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moses, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anandharamakrishnan, C</creatorcontrib><title>Determining the glycaemic responses of foods: conventional and emerging approaches</title><title>Nutrition research reviews</title><addtitle>Nutr. Res. Rev</addtitle><description>A low-glycaemic diet is crucial for those with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Information on the glycaemic index (GI) of different ingredients can help in designing novel food products for such target groups. This is because of the intricate dependency of material source, composition, food structure and processing conditions, among other factors, on the glycaemic responses. Different approaches have been used to predict the GI of foods, and certain discrepancies exist because of factors such as inter-individual variation among human subjects. Besides other aspects, it is important to understand the mechanism of food digestion because an approach to predict GI must essentially mimic the complex processes in the human gastrointestinal tract. The focus of this work is to review the advances in various approaches for predicting the glycaemic responses to foods. This has been carried out by detailing conventional approaches, their merits and limitations, and the need to focus on emerging approaches. Given that no single approach can be generalised to all applications, the review emphasises the scope of deriving insights for improvements in methodologies. Reviewing the conventional and emerging approaches for the determination of GI in foods, this detailed work is intended to serve as a state-of-the-art resource for nutritionists who work on developing low-GI foods.</description><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food composition</subject><subject>Food processing</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal system</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal tract</subject><subject>Glycemic index</subject><subject>Novel foods</subject><subject>Nutrient deficiency</subject><issn>0954-4224</issn><issn>1475-2700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LxDAQxYMo7rr6B3iRghcv1UzSNo03WT9BEPw4lzSd7HZpmzXpCvvfm7KrguJc5jC_9x7zCDkGeg4UxMULlWmSMJYwoGEY3SFjSEQaM0HpLhkP53i4j8iB94sBkZLvkxHnKQjJ2Zg8X2OPrq27uptF_RyjWbPWCttaRw790nYefWRNZKyt_GWkbfeBXV_bTjWR6qoIW3SzQauWS2eVnqM_JHtGNR6PtntC3m5vXqf38ePT3cP06jHWXPA-LlPIacIBQdESqSirLDcV5JlBlulMggLDgOXS6JzpRGlepUYICrKUkBvDJ-Rs4xuC31fo-6KtvcamUR3alS9YkieQMSqzgJ7-Qhd25cIPgcoES2UoRgQKNpR21nuHpli6ulVuXQAthsKLP4UHzcnWeVW2WH0rvhoOAN-aqrZ0dTXDn-z_bT8BqQ2Jkw</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Priyadarshini, S R</creator><creator>Moses, J A</creator><creator>Anandharamakrishnan, C</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-5594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5546-4481</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Determining the glycaemic responses of foods: conventional and emerging approaches</title><author>Priyadarshini, S R ; Moses, J A ; Anandharamakrishnan, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-b5180431e1a0be07bd68fd186fe26c691a1f21289fc82c4ac3d5f77019b918ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food composition</topic><topic>Food processing</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal system</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal tract</topic><topic>Glycemic index</topic><topic>Novel foods</topic><topic>Nutrient deficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Priyadarshini, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moses, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anandharamakrishnan, C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition research reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Priyadarshini, S R</au><au>Moses, J A</au><au>Anandharamakrishnan, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining the glycaemic responses of foods: conventional and emerging approaches</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition research reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Nutr. Res. Rev</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>1-27</pages><issn>0954-4224</issn><eissn>1475-2700</eissn><abstract>A low-glycaemic diet is crucial for those with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Information on the glycaemic index (GI) of different ingredients can help in designing novel food products for such target groups. This is because of the intricate dependency of material source, composition, food structure and processing conditions, among other factors, on the glycaemic responses. Different approaches have been used to predict the GI of foods, and certain discrepancies exist because of factors such as inter-individual variation among human subjects. Besides other aspects, it is important to understand the mechanism of food digestion because an approach to predict GI must essentially mimic the complex processes in the human gastrointestinal tract. The focus of this work is to review the advances in various approaches for predicting the glycaemic responses to foods. This has been carried out by detailing conventional approaches, their merits and limitations, and the need to focus on emerging approaches. Given that no single approach can be generalised to all applications, the review emphasises the scope of deriving insights for improvements in methodologies. Reviewing the conventional and emerging approaches for the determination of GI in foods, this detailed work is intended to serve as a state-of-the-art resource for nutritionists who work on developing low-GI foods.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>33517932</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0954422421000020</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9599-5594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5546-4481</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-4224 |
ispartof | Nutrition research reviews, 2022-06, Vol.35 (1), p.1-27 |
issn | 0954-4224 1475-2700 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2484162096 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Cardiovascular diseases Diabetes mellitus Food Food composition Food processing Food sources Gastrointestinal system Gastrointestinal tract Glycemic index Novel foods Nutrient deficiency |
title | Determining the glycaemic responses of foods: conventional and emerging approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T18%3A26%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20the%20glycaemic%20responses%20of%20foods:%20conventional%20and%20emerging%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20research%20reviews&rft.au=Priyadarshini,%20S%20R&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=1-27&rft.issn=0954-4224&rft.eissn=1475-2700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0954422421000020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2672590297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2672590297&rft_id=info:pmid/33517932&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0954422421000020&rfr_iscdi=true |