Back‐fat thickness as a primary index reflecting the yield and overall acceptance of pork meat
Predicting aspects of lean meat yield and eating quality of pork based on some particular carcass traits become increasingly important from an economic profitability point of view. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between the back‐fat (BF) thickness with lean meat yield and meat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal science journal 2021-01, Vol.92 (1), p.e13515-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e13515 |
container_title | Animal science journal |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Hoa, Van‐Ba Seo, Hyun‐Woo Seong, Pil‐Nam Cho, Soo‐Hyun Kang, Sun‐Moon Kim, Yun‐Seok Moon, Sung‐Sil Choi, Yong‐Min Kim, Jin‐Hyoung Seol, Kuk‐Hwan |
description | Predicting aspects of lean meat yield and eating quality of pork based on some particular carcass traits become increasingly important from an economic profitability point of view. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between the back‐fat (BF) thickness with lean meat yield and meat quality traits of crossbred pigs. A total of 220 crossbred pigs [(Landrace × Yorkshire) ♀ × Duroc ♂] reared under identical conditions and harvested at 180 days old were slaughtered and screened for BF thickness. Four BF thickness groups: 12–15, 16–20, 21–25, and 26–30 mm were classified, and longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles from these groups were used to analyze meat quality characteristics. Results showed that increasing BF thickness decreased the lean meat yield and loin lean area. Increasing BF thickness up to 26–30 mm increased intramuscular fat content and pH of LD muscles. The LD muscles of the thicker BF (21–30 mm) groups received significantly higher flavor, juiciness, and overall acceptability scores than those of the thinner back‐fat (12–20 mm) groups. Overall, when all the pre‐harvest factors are kept the same, BF thickness could be considered as a primary index for predicting lean meat yield, and the minimal back‐fat thickness of 21–30 mm is required to improve the overall acceptability of pork meat. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/asj.13515 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2484157948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2484157948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-34ddd72a94c6bbe4718e04fa47d4d8bba94a1944c49ce5dbb8159eccaa703eb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9OGzEQh62qqIHQQ18AWeqlHDax12N2fQyo_FOkHgpnd9aeLZtsdtP1BsiNR-AZeRIMCRyQOhppLPnTTzMfY9-kGMlYYwyzkVRa6k9sV2YgEmFS8zm-FUCiDMgB2wthJoTMjNBf2EApnaYC0l325xjd_OnhscSe9zeVmzcUAsfYfNlVC-zWvGo83fOOyppcXzV_I0d8XVHtOTaet7fUYV1zdI6WPTaOeFvyZdvN-YKw32c7JdaBvm7nkF2f_rw6OU-mv84uTibTxCmtdKLAe5-laMAdFQVBJnMSUCJkHnxeFPEDpQFwYBxpXxS51IacQ8yEokKqIfuxyV127b8Vhd4uquCorrGhdhVsCjlInRnII_r9AzprV10Tt7NpZoxQCpSK1OGGcl0bQjzfboVYKeyLdhu121ftkT3YJq6KBfl38s1zBMYb4K6qaf3_JDv5fbmJfAZc-Iz6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2799033433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back‐fat thickness as a primary index reflecting the yield and overall acceptance of pork meat</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hoa, Van‐Ba ; Seo, Hyun‐Woo ; Seong, Pil‐Nam ; Cho, Soo‐Hyun ; Kang, Sun‐Moon ; Kim, Yun‐Seok ; Moon, Sung‐Sil ; Choi, Yong‐Min ; Kim, Jin‐Hyoung ; Seol, Kuk‐Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoa, Van‐Ba ; Seo, Hyun‐Woo ; Seong, Pil‐Nam ; Cho, Soo‐Hyun ; Kang, Sun‐Moon ; Kim, Yun‐Seok ; Moon, Sung‐Sil ; Choi, Yong‐Min ; Kim, Jin‐Hyoung ; Seol, Kuk‐Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>Predicting aspects of lean meat yield and eating quality of pork based on some particular carcass traits become increasingly important from an economic profitability point of view. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between the back‐fat (BF) thickness with lean meat yield and meat quality traits of crossbred pigs. A total of 220 crossbred pigs [(Landrace × Yorkshire) ♀ × Duroc ♂] reared under identical conditions and harvested at 180 days old were slaughtered and screened for BF thickness. Four BF thickness groups: 12–15, 16–20, 21–25, and 26–30 mm were classified, and longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles from these groups were used to analyze meat quality characteristics. Results showed that increasing BF thickness decreased the lean meat yield and loin lean area. Increasing BF thickness up to 26–30 mm increased intramuscular fat content and pH of LD muscles. The LD muscles of the thicker BF (21–30 mm) groups received significantly higher flavor, juiciness, and overall acceptability scores than those of the thinner back‐fat (12–20 mm) groups. Overall, when all the pre‐harvest factors are kept the same, BF thickness could be considered as a primary index for predicting lean meat yield, and the minimal back‐fat thickness of 21–30 mm is required to improve the overall acceptability of pork meat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1344-3941</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-0929</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/asj.13515</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33522042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology ; Adipose Tissue - metabolism ; Animals ; Back - anatomy & histology ; back‐fat thickness ; Body Fat Distribution ; Eating quality ; Economics ; Food Quality ; Hybridization, Genetic ; lean meat yield ; Meat ; Meat quality ; Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism ; Muscles ; Physical growth ; Pork ; Pork Meat - economics ; Profitability ; sensory attributes ; Swine ; Taste ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Animal science journal, 2021-01, Vol.92 (1), p.e13515-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 Japanese Society of Animal Science</rights><rights>2021 Japanese Society of Animal Science.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-34ddd72a94c6bbe4718e04fa47d4d8bba94a1944c49ce5dbb8159eccaa703eb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-34ddd72a94c6bbe4718e04fa47d4d8bba94a1944c49ce5dbb8159eccaa703eb13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9997-5507</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fasj.13515$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fasj.13515$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoa, Van‐Ba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Hyun‐Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seong, Pil‐Nam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo‐Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sun‐Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yun‐Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Sung‐Sil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yong‐Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin‐Hyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seol, Kuk‐Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>Back‐fat thickness as a primary index reflecting the yield and overall acceptance of pork meat</title><title>Animal science journal</title><addtitle>Anim Sci J</addtitle><description>Predicting aspects of lean meat yield and eating quality of pork based on some particular carcass traits become increasingly important from an economic profitability point of view. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between the back‐fat (BF) thickness with lean meat yield and meat quality traits of crossbred pigs. A total of 220 crossbred pigs [(Landrace × Yorkshire) ♀ × Duroc ♂] reared under identical conditions and harvested at 180 days old were slaughtered and screened for BF thickness. Four BF thickness groups: 12–15, 16–20, 21–25, and 26–30 mm were classified, and longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles from these groups were used to analyze meat quality characteristics. Results showed that increasing BF thickness decreased the lean meat yield and loin lean area. Increasing BF thickness up to 26–30 mm increased intramuscular fat content and pH of LD muscles. The LD muscles of the thicker BF (21–30 mm) groups received significantly higher flavor, juiciness, and overall acceptability scores than those of the thinner back‐fat (12–20 mm) groups. Overall, when all the pre‐harvest factors are kept the same, BF thickness could be considered as a primary index for predicting lean meat yield, and the minimal back‐fat thickness of 21–30 mm is required to improve the overall acceptability of pork meat.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - metabolism</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Back - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>back‐fat thickness</subject><subject>Body Fat Distribution</subject><subject>Eating quality</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Food Quality</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>lean meat yield</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat quality</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Pork Meat - economics</subject><subject>Profitability</subject><subject>sensory attributes</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>1344-3941</issn><issn>1740-0929</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9OGzEQh62qqIHQQ18AWeqlHDax12N2fQyo_FOkHgpnd9aeLZtsdtP1BsiNR-AZeRIMCRyQOhppLPnTTzMfY9-kGMlYYwyzkVRa6k9sV2YgEmFS8zm-FUCiDMgB2wthJoTMjNBf2EApnaYC0l325xjd_OnhscSe9zeVmzcUAsfYfNlVC-zWvGo83fOOyppcXzV_I0d8XVHtOTaet7fUYV1zdI6WPTaOeFvyZdvN-YKw32c7JdaBvm7nkF2f_rw6OU-mv84uTibTxCmtdKLAe5-laMAdFQVBJnMSUCJkHnxeFPEDpQFwYBxpXxS51IacQ8yEokKqIfuxyV127b8Vhd4uquCorrGhdhVsCjlInRnII_r9AzprV10Tt7NpZoxQCpSK1OGGcl0bQjzfboVYKeyLdhu121ftkT3YJq6KBfl38s1zBMYb4K6qaf3_JDv5fbmJfAZc-Iz6</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Hoa, Van‐Ba</creator><creator>Seo, Hyun‐Woo</creator><creator>Seong, Pil‐Nam</creator><creator>Cho, Soo‐Hyun</creator><creator>Kang, Sun‐Moon</creator><creator>Kim, Yun‐Seok</creator><creator>Moon, Sung‐Sil</creator><creator>Choi, Yong‐Min</creator><creator>Kim, Jin‐Hyoung</creator><creator>Seol, Kuk‐Hwan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9997-5507</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Back‐fat thickness as a primary index reflecting the yield and overall acceptance of pork meat</title><author>Hoa, Van‐Ba ; Seo, Hyun‐Woo ; Seong, Pil‐Nam ; Cho, Soo‐Hyun ; Kang, Sun‐Moon ; Kim, Yun‐Seok ; Moon, Sung‐Sil ; Choi, Yong‐Min ; Kim, Jin‐Hyoung ; Seol, Kuk‐Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-34ddd72a94c6bbe4718e04fa47d4d8bba94a1944c49ce5dbb8159eccaa703eb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - metabolism</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Back - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>back‐fat thickness</topic><topic>Body Fat Distribution</topic><topic>Eating quality</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Food Quality</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>lean meat yield</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat quality</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Pork Meat - economics</topic><topic>Profitability</topic><topic>sensory attributes</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoa, Van‐Ba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Hyun‐Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seong, Pil‐Nam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Soo‐Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sun‐Moon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yun‐Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moon, Sung‐Sil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yong‐Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin‐Hyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seol, Kuk‐Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal science journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoa, Van‐Ba</au><au>Seo, Hyun‐Woo</au><au>Seong, Pil‐Nam</au><au>Cho, Soo‐Hyun</au><au>Kang, Sun‐Moon</au><au>Kim, Yun‐Seok</au><au>Moon, Sung‐Sil</au><au>Choi, Yong‐Min</au><au>Kim, Jin‐Hyoung</au><au>Seol, Kuk‐Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back‐fat thickness as a primary index reflecting the yield and overall acceptance of pork meat</atitle><jtitle>Animal science journal</jtitle><addtitle>Anim Sci J</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e13515</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e13515-n/a</pages><issn>1344-3941</issn><eissn>1740-0929</eissn><abstract>Predicting aspects of lean meat yield and eating quality of pork based on some particular carcass traits become increasingly important from an economic profitability point of view. The present study aimed to determine the relationship between the back‐fat (BF) thickness with lean meat yield and meat quality traits of crossbred pigs. A total of 220 crossbred pigs [(Landrace × Yorkshire) ♀ × Duroc ♂] reared under identical conditions and harvested at 180 days old were slaughtered and screened for BF thickness. Four BF thickness groups: 12–15, 16–20, 21–25, and 26–30 mm were classified, and longissimus dorsi (LD) muscles from these groups were used to analyze meat quality characteristics. Results showed that increasing BF thickness decreased the lean meat yield and loin lean area. Increasing BF thickness up to 26–30 mm increased intramuscular fat content and pH of LD muscles. The LD muscles of the thicker BF (21–30 mm) groups received significantly higher flavor, juiciness, and overall acceptability scores than those of the thinner back‐fat (12–20 mm) groups. Overall, when all the pre‐harvest factors are kept the same, BF thickness could be considered as a primary index for predicting lean meat yield, and the minimal back‐fat thickness of 21–30 mm is required to improve the overall acceptability of pork meat.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33522042</pmid><doi>10.1111/asj.13515</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9997-5507</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1344-3941 |
ispartof | Animal science journal, 2021-01, Vol.92 (1), p.e13515-n/a |
issn | 1344-3941 1740-0929 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2484157948 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acceptability Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology Adipose Tissue - metabolism Animals Back - anatomy & histology back‐fat thickness Body Fat Distribution Eating quality Economics Food Quality Hybridization, Genetic lean meat yield Meat Meat quality Muscle, Skeletal - metabolism Muscles Physical growth Pork Pork Meat - economics Profitability sensory attributes Swine Taste Thickness |
title | Back‐fat thickness as a primary index reflecting the yield and overall acceptance of pork meat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A04%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back%E2%80%90fat%20thickness%20as%20a%20primary%20index%20reflecting%20the%20yield%20and%20overall%20acceptance%20of%20pork%20meat&rft.jtitle=Animal%20science%20journal&rft.au=Hoa,%20Van%E2%80%90Ba&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e13515&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e13515-n/a&rft.issn=1344-3941&rft.eissn=1740-0929&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/asj.13515&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2484157948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2799033433&rft_id=info:pmid/33522042&rfr_iscdi=true |