Etomidate Use for Rapid Sequence Intubation Is Not Associated With Nosocomial Infection

Introduction: Etomidate is commonly used for induction of anesthesia for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). It has little impact on hemodynamic status, making it a widely used agent. Due to the inhibition of cortisol production, etomidate causes adrenal suppression. The purpose of this study is to det...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmacy practice 2022-06, Vol.35 (3), p.383-387
Hauptverfasser: Hidalgo, Daniel Colon, Amin, Vishali, Hukku, Arushi, Kutlu, Kathryn, Rech, Megan A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 387
container_issue 3
container_start_page 383
container_title Journal of pharmacy practice
container_volume 35
creator Hidalgo, Daniel Colon
Amin, Vishali
Hukku, Arushi
Kutlu, Kathryn
Rech, Megan A.
description Introduction: Etomidate is commonly used for induction of anesthesia for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). It has little impact on hemodynamic status, making it a widely used agent. Due to the inhibition of cortisol production, etomidate causes adrenal suppression. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a correlation with etomidate use and the incidence of secondary infections. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients who received either etomidate or control (ketamine, propofol, or no agent) for RSI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of secondary infections. Secondary outcomes included number of mechanical ventilator-free days within 28 days, 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of intensive care unit stay. Results: A total of 434 patients were reviewed, of which 129 (29.7%) met the study criteria (n = 94 etomidate; n = 35 control). The incidence of secondary infection was numerically higher in the etomidate group compared with the control group, though this was not statistically significant (38.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.447). Also, though the secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the groups, the patients in the control group had a longer hospital stay (14.0 vs. 18.1, p = 0.20) and a longer ICU stay (11.0 vs. 14.1, p = 030). Furthermore, the etomidate group had a non-statistically significant higher incidence of bacteremia (8 vs. 0, p = 0.17) Conclusion: The use of etomidate was not associated with increased incidence of secondary infection. To fully understand the effects of etomidate use and its subsequent adrenal suppression, larger studies are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0897190020979610
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2483408196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0897190020979610</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2483408196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f39eac0fb79dc33c4e50ce48b5ef44e67cee893c65e439eca5cdd34307ba46063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMyGPLAE7duJ4rCo-KlUgAVVHy3Eu4CqJS-wM_Pc4amFAYjrd3e893T2ELim5oVSIW1JIQSUhKZFC5pQcoSnNGE2oZOIYTcd1Mu4n6Mz7beQoZ-kpmjDGSCqKYoo2d8G1ttIB8NoDrl2PX_TOVvgVPgfoDOBlF4ZSB-s6vPT4yQU8994ZGyUV3tjwEWexjy66iXANZmTP0UmtGw8XhzpD6_u7t8Vjsnp-WC7mq8QwJkJSMwnakLoUsooTwyEjBnhRZlBzDrkwAIVkJs-AR9TozFQV44yIUvOc5GyGrve-u97Fg31QrfUGmkZ34AavUl4wTgoqR5TsUdM773uo1a63re6_FCVqjFP9jTNKrg7uQ9lC9Sv4yS8CyR7w-h3U1g19F7_93_AbFwt9AQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2483408196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Etomidate Use for Rapid Sequence Intubation Is Not Associated With Nosocomial Infection</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Hidalgo, Daniel Colon ; Amin, Vishali ; Hukku, Arushi ; Kutlu, Kathryn ; Rech, Megan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo, Daniel Colon ; Amin, Vishali ; Hukku, Arushi ; Kutlu, Kathryn ; Rech, Megan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Etomidate is commonly used for induction of anesthesia for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). It has little impact on hemodynamic status, making it a widely used agent. Due to the inhibition of cortisol production, etomidate causes adrenal suppression. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a correlation with etomidate use and the incidence of secondary infections. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients who received either etomidate or control (ketamine, propofol, or no agent) for RSI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of secondary infections. Secondary outcomes included number of mechanical ventilator-free days within 28 days, 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of intensive care unit stay. Results: A total of 434 patients were reviewed, of which 129 (29.7%) met the study criteria (n = 94 etomidate; n = 35 control). The incidence of secondary infection was numerically higher in the etomidate group compared with the control group, though this was not statistically significant (38.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.447). Also, though the secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the groups, the patients in the control group had a longer hospital stay (14.0 vs. 18.1, p = 0.20) and a longer ICU stay (11.0 vs. 14.1, p = 030). Furthermore, the etomidate group had a non-statistically significant higher incidence of bacteremia (8 vs. 0, p = 0.17) Conclusion: The use of etomidate was not associated with increased incidence of secondary infection. To fully understand the effects of etomidate use and its subsequent adrenal suppression, larger studies are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-1900</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-1937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0897190020979610</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33302788</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of pharmacy practice, 2022-06, Vol.35 (3), p.383-387</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f39eac0fb79dc33c4e50ce48b5ef44e67cee893c65e439eca5cdd34307ba46063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f39eac0fb79dc33c4e50ce48b5ef44e67cee893c65e439eca5cdd34307ba46063</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2385-125X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0897190020979610$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0897190020979610$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33302788$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo, Daniel Colon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amin, Vishali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hukku, Arushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutlu, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rech, Megan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Etomidate Use for Rapid Sequence Intubation Is Not Associated With Nosocomial Infection</title><title>Journal of pharmacy practice</title><addtitle>J Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Introduction: Etomidate is commonly used for induction of anesthesia for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). It has little impact on hemodynamic status, making it a widely used agent. Due to the inhibition of cortisol production, etomidate causes adrenal suppression. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a correlation with etomidate use and the incidence of secondary infections. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients who received either etomidate or control (ketamine, propofol, or no agent) for RSI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of secondary infections. Secondary outcomes included number of mechanical ventilator-free days within 28 days, 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of intensive care unit stay. Results: A total of 434 patients were reviewed, of which 129 (29.7%) met the study criteria (n = 94 etomidate; n = 35 control). The incidence of secondary infection was numerically higher in the etomidate group compared with the control group, though this was not statistically significant (38.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.447). Also, though the secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the groups, the patients in the control group had a longer hospital stay (14.0 vs. 18.1, p = 0.20) and a longer ICU stay (11.0 vs. 14.1, p = 030). Furthermore, the etomidate group had a non-statistically significant higher incidence of bacteremia (8 vs. 0, p = 0.17) Conclusion: The use of etomidate was not associated with increased incidence of secondary infection. To fully understand the effects of etomidate use and its subsequent adrenal suppression, larger studies are needed.</description><issn>0897-1900</issn><issn>1531-1937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMyGPLAE7duJ4rCo-KlUgAVVHy3Eu4CqJS-wM_Pc4amFAYjrd3e893T2ELim5oVSIW1JIQSUhKZFC5pQcoSnNGE2oZOIYTcd1Mu4n6Mz7beQoZ-kpmjDGSCqKYoo2d8G1ttIB8NoDrl2PX_TOVvgVPgfoDOBlF4ZSB-s6vPT4yQU8994ZGyUV3tjwEWexjy66iXANZmTP0UmtGw8XhzpD6_u7t8Vjsnp-WC7mq8QwJkJSMwnakLoUsooTwyEjBnhRZlBzDrkwAIVkJs-AR9TozFQV44yIUvOc5GyGrve-u97Fg31QrfUGmkZ34AavUl4wTgoqR5TsUdM773uo1a63re6_FCVqjFP9jTNKrg7uQ9lC9Sv4yS8CyR7w-h3U1g19F7_93_AbFwt9AQ</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Hidalgo, Daniel Colon</creator><creator>Amin, Vishali</creator><creator>Hukku, Arushi</creator><creator>Kutlu, Kathryn</creator><creator>Rech, Megan A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-125X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Etomidate Use for Rapid Sequence Intubation Is Not Associated With Nosocomial Infection</title><author>Hidalgo, Daniel Colon ; Amin, Vishali ; Hukku, Arushi ; Kutlu, Kathryn ; Rech, Megan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f39eac0fb79dc33c4e50ce48b5ef44e67cee893c65e439eca5cdd34307ba46063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo, Daniel Colon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amin, Vishali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hukku, Arushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutlu, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rech, Megan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmacy practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hidalgo, Daniel Colon</au><au>Amin, Vishali</au><au>Hukku, Arushi</au><au>Kutlu, Kathryn</au><au>Rech, Megan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Etomidate Use for Rapid Sequence Intubation Is Not Associated With Nosocomial Infection</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmacy practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>383</spage><epage>387</epage><pages>383-387</pages><issn>0897-1900</issn><eissn>1531-1937</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Etomidate is commonly used for induction of anesthesia for rapid sequence intubation (RSI). It has little impact on hemodynamic status, making it a widely used agent. Due to the inhibition of cortisol production, etomidate causes adrenal suppression. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a correlation with etomidate use and the incidence of secondary infections. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of hospitalized patients who received either etomidate or control (ketamine, propofol, or no agent) for RSI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of secondary infections. Secondary outcomes included number of mechanical ventilator-free days within 28 days, 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and length of intensive care unit stay. Results: A total of 434 patients were reviewed, of which 129 (29.7%) met the study criteria (n = 94 etomidate; n = 35 control). The incidence of secondary infection was numerically higher in the etomidate group compared with the control group, though this was not statistically significant (38.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.447). Also, though the secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference between the groups, the patients in the control group had a longer hospital stay (14.0 vs. 18.1, p = 0.20) and a longer ICU stay (11.0 vs. 14.1, p = 030). Furthermore, the etomidate group had a non-statistically significant higher incidence of bacteremia (8 vs. 0, p = 0.17) Conclusion: The use of etomidate was not associated with increased incidence of secondary infection. To fully understand the effects of etomidate use and its subsequent adrenal suppression, larger studies are needed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33302788</pmid><doi>10.1177/0897190020979610</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2385-125X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0897-1900
ispartof Journal of pharmacy practice, 2022-06, Vol.35 (3), p.383-387
issn 0897-1900
1531-1937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2483408196
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Etomidate Use for Rapid Sequence Intubation Is Not Associated With Nosocomial Infection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A37%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Etomidate%20Use%20for%20Rapid%20Sequence%20Intubation%20Is%20Not%20Associated%20With%20Nosocomial%20Infection&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmacy%20practice&rft.au=Hidalgo,%20Daniel%20Colon&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=383&rft.epage=387&rft.pages=383-387&rft.issn=0897-1900&rft.eissn=1531-1937&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0897190020979610&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2483408196%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2483408196&rft_id=info:pmid/33302788&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0897190020979610&rfr_iscdi=true