The History of Writing Reflects the Effects of Education on Discourse Structure: Implications for Literacy, Orality, Psychosis and the Axial Age

Graph analysis detects psychosis and literacy acquisition. Bronze Age literature has been proposed to contain childish or psychotic features, which would only have matured during the Axial Age (∼800-200 BC), a putative boundary for contemporary mentality. Graph analysis of literary texts spanning ∼4...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in neuroscience and education 2020-12, Vol.21, p.100142-100142, Article 100142
Hauptverfasser: Pinheiro, Sylvia, Mota, Natália Bezerra, Sigman, Mariano, Fernández-Slezak, Diego, Guerreiro, Antonio, Tófoli, Luís Fernando, Cecchi, Guillermo, Copelli, Mauro, Ribeiro, Sidarta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100142
container_issue
container_start_page 100142
container_title Trends in neuroscience and education
container_volume 21
creator Pinheiro, Sylvia
Mota, Natália Bezerra
Sigman, Mariano
Fernández-Slezak, Diego
Guerreiro, Antonio
Tófoli, Luís Fernando
Cecchi, Guillermo
Copelli, Mauro
Ribeiro, Sidarta
description Graph analysis detects psychosis and literacy acquisition. Bronze Age literature has been proposed to contain childish or psychotic features, which would only have matured during the Axial Age (∼800-200 BC), a putative boundary for contemporary mentality. Graph analysis of literary texts spanning ∼4,500 years shows remarkable asymptotic changes over time. While lexical diversity, long-range recurrence and graph length increase away from randomness, short-range recurrence declines towards random levels. Bronze Age texts are structurally similar to oral reports from literate typical children and literate psychotic adults, but distinct from poetry, and from narratives by preliterate preschoolers or Amerindians. Text structure reconstitutes the “arrow-of-time”, converging to educated adult levels at the Axial Age onset. The educational pathways of oral and literate traditions are structurally divergent, with a decreasing range of recurrence in the former, and an increasing range of recurrence in the latter. Education is seemingly the driving force underlying discourse maturation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100142
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2483407759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2211949320300181</els_id><sourcerecordid>2483407759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-1bac9be09e0b9f8eae2311609a90f0b306da83f5569102af5a4dac6691a46c923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcFOGzEQtaqiBgE_wKHysYcmHdubTVz1EkEoSJFAEMTR8nrHwdFmndreqvkLPrkOm6KesEby88ybZ808Qs4ZjBiw8tt6lFyLIw58nwBW8A_kmHPGhrKQ4uN_eEDOYlxDPnICULJPZCCEAMFgckxels9Ir11MPuyot_QpuKy7ovdoGzQp0pTrc2tfca7P687o5HxLc1y6aHwXItKHFDqTuoDf6c1m27ieE6n1gS5cwqDN7iu9DbpxKYO7uDPPPrpIdVu_fjH743RDZys8JUdWNxHPDvcJebyaLy-uh4vbnzcXs8XQFABpyCptZIUgESppp6iRC8ZKkFqChUpAWeupsONxKRlwbce6qLUp80sXpZFcnJAvve42-F8dxqQ2eRpsGt2i76LixVQUMJmMZabynmqCjzGgVdvgNjrsFAO1N0Ot1d4MtTdD9Wbkps8H_a7aYP3W8m_1mfCjJ2Ce8rfDoKJx2BqsXcjbVrV37-n_BfKsm5s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2483407759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The History of Writing Reflects the Effects of Education on Discourse Structure: Implications for Literacy, Orality, Psychosis and the Axial Age</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pinheiro, Sylvia ; Mota, Natália Bezerra ; Sigman, Mariano ; Fernández-Slezak, Diego ; Guerreiro, Antonio ; Tófoli, Luís Fernando ; Cecchi, Guillermo ; Copelli, Mauro ; Ribeiro, Sidarta</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, Sylvia ; Mota, Natália Bezerra ; Sigman, Mariano ; Fernández-Slezak, Diego ; Guerreiro, Antonio ; Tófoli, Luís Fernando ; Cecchi, Guillermo ; Copelli, Mauro ; Ribeiro, Sidarta</creatorcontrib><description>Graph analysis detects psychosis and literacy acquisition. Bronze Age literature has been proposed to contain childish or psychotic features, which would only have matured during the Axial Age (∼800-200 BC), a putative boundary for contemporary mentality. Graph analysis of literary texts spanning ∼4,500 years shows remarkable asymptotic changes over time. While lexical diversity, long-range recurrence and graph length increase away from randomness, short-range recurrence declines towards random levels. Bronze Age texts are structurally similar to oral reports from literate typical children and literate psychotic adults, but distinct from poetry, and from narratives by preliterate preschoolers or Amerindians. Text structure reconstitutes the “arrow-of-time”, converging to educated adult levels at the Axial Age onset. The educational pathways of oral and literate traditions are structurally divergent, with a decreasing range of recurrence in the former, and an increasing range of recurrence in the latter. Education is seemingly the driving force underlying discourse maturation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2211-9493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-9493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100142</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33303107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Axial Age ; Bronze Age ; Graph ; Indigenous ; Language evolution ; Literature</subject><ispartof>Trends in neuroscience and education, 2020-12, Vol.21, p.100142-100142, Article 100142</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-1bac9be09e0b9f8eae2311609a90f0b306da83f5569102af5a4dac6691a46c923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-1bac9be09e0b9f8eae2311609a90f0b306da83f5569102af5a4dac6691a46c923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2802-2001 ; 0000-0002-2986-3622</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33303107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mota, Natália Bezerra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigman, Mariano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Slezak, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerreiro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tófoli, Luís Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecchi, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copelli, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Sidarta</creatorcontrib><title>The History of Writing Reflects the Effects of Education on Discourse Structure: Implications for Literacy, Orality, Psychosis and the Axial Age</title><title>Trends in neuroscience and education</title><addtitle>Trends Neurosci Educ</addtitle><description>Graph analysis detects psychosis and literacy acquisition. Bronze Age literature has been proposed to contain childish or psychotic features, which would only have matured during the Axial Age (∼800-200 BC), a putative boundary for contemporary mentality. Graph analysis of literary texts spanning ∼4,500 years shows remarkable asymptotic changes over time. While lexical diversity, long-range recurrence and graph length increase away from randomness, short-range recurrence declines towards random levels. Bronze Age texts are structurally similar to oral reports from literate typical children and literate psychotic adults, but distinct from poetry, and from narratives by preliterate preschoolers or Amerindians. Text structure reconstitutes the “arrow-of-time”, converging to educated adult levels at the Axial Age onset. The educational pathways of oral and literate traditions are structurally divergent, with a decreasing range of recurrence in the former, and an increasing range of recurrence in the latter. Education is seemingly the driving force underlying discourse maturation.</description><subject>Axial Age</subject><subject>Bronze Age</subject><subject>Graph</subject><subject>Indigenous</subject><subject>Language evolution</subject><subject>Literature</subject><issn>2211-9493</issn><issn>2211-9493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcFOGzEQtaqiBgE_wKHysYcmHdubTVz1EkEoSJFAEMTR8nrHwdFmndreqvkLPrkOm6KesEby88ybZ808Qs4ZjBiw8tt6lFyLIw58nwBW8A_kmHPGhrKQ4uN_eEDOYlxDPnICULJPZCCEAMFgckxels9Ir11MPuyot_QpuKy7ovdoGzQp0pTrc2tfca7P687o5HxLc1y6aHwXItKHFDqTuoDf6c1m27ieE6n1gS5cwqDN7iu9DbpxKYO7uDPPPrpIdVu_fjH743RDZys8JUdWNxHPDvcJebyaLy-uh4vbnzcXs8XQFABpyCptZIUgESppp6iRC8ZKkFqChUpAWeupsONxKRlwbce6qLUp80sXpZFcnJAvve42-F8dxqQ2eRpsGt2i76LixVQUMJmMZabynmqCjzGgVdvgNjrsFAO1N0Ot1d4MtTdD9Wbkps8H_a7aYP3W8m_1mfCjJ2Ce8rfDoKJx2BqsXcjbVrV37-n_BfKsm5s</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Pinheiro, Sylvia</creator><creator>Mota, Natália Bezerra</creator><creator>Sigman, Mariano</creator><creator>Fernández-Slezak, Diego</creator><creator>Guerreiro, Antonio</creator><creator>Tófoli, Luís Fernando</creator><creator>Cecchi, Guillermo</creator><creator>Copelli, Mauro</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Sidarta</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-2001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2986-3622</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>The History of Writing Reflects the Effects of Education on Discourse Structure: Implications for Literacy, Orality, Psychosis and the Axial Age</title><author>Pinheiro, Sylvia ; Mota, Natália Bezerra ; Sigman, Mariano ; Fernández-Slezak, Diego ; Guerreiro, Antonio ; Tófoli, Luís Fernando ; Cecchi, Guillermo ; Copelli, Mauro ; Ribeiro, Sidarta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-1bac9be09e0b9f8eae2311609a90f0b306da83f5569102af5a4dac6691a46c923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Axial Age</topic><topic>Bronze Age</topic><topic>Graph</topic><topic>Indigenous</topic><topic>Language evolution</topic><topic>Literature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinheiro, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mota, Natália Bezerra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigman, Mariano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Slezak, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerreiro, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tófoli, Luís Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cecchi, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copelli, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Sidarta</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trends in neuroscience and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinheiro, Sylvia</au><au>Mota, Natália Bezerra</au><au>Sigman, Mariano</au><au>Fernández-Slezak, Diego</au><au>Guerreiro, Antonio</au><au>Tófoli, Luís Fernando</au><au>Cecchi, Guillermo</au><au>Copelli, Mauro</au><au>Ribeiro, Sidarta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The History of Writing Reflects the Effects of Education on Discourse Structure: Implications for Literacy, Orality, Psychosis and the Axial Age</atitle><jtitle>Trends in neuroscience and education</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Neurosci Educ</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><spage>100142</spage><epage>100142</epage><pages>100142-100142</pages><artnum>100142</artnum><issn>2211-9493</issn><eissn>2211-9493</eissn><abstract>Graph analysis detects psychosis and literacy acquisition. Bronze Age literature has been proposed to contain childish or psychotic features, which would only have matured during the Axial Age (∼800-200 BC), a putative boundary for contemporary mentality. Graph analysis of literary texts spanning ∼4,500 years shows remarkable asymptotic changes over time. While lexical diversity, long-range recurrence and graph length increase away from randomness, short-range recurrence declines towards random levels. Bronze Age texts are structurally similar to oral reports from literate typical children and literate psychotic adults, but distinct from poetry, and from narratives by preliterate preschoolers or Amerindians. Text structure reconstitutes the “arrow-of-time”, converging to educated adult levels at the Axial Age onset. The educational pathways of oral and literate traditions are structurally divergent, with a decreasing range of recurrence in the former, and an increasing range of recurrence in the latter. Education is seemingly the driving force underlying discourse maturation.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>33303107</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tine.2020.100142</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-2001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2986-3622</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2211-9493
ispartof Trends in neuroscience and education, 2020-12, Vol.21, p.100142-100142, Article 100142
issn 2211-9493
2211-9493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2483407759
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Axial Age
Bronze Age
Graph
Indigenous
Language evolution
Literature
title The History of Writing Reflects the Effects of Education on Discourse Structure: Implications for Literacy, Orality, Psychosis and the Axial Age
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A50%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20History%20of%20Writing%20Reflects%20the%20Effects%20of%20Education%20on%20Discourse%20Structure:%20Implications%20for%20Literacy,%20Orality,%20Psychosis%20and%20the%20Axial%20Age&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20neuroscience%20and%20education&rft.au=Pinheiro,%20Sylvia&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=100142&rft.epage=100142&rft.pages=100142-100142&rft.artnum=100142&rft.issn=2211-9493&rft.eissn=2211-9493&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tine.2020.100142&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2483407759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2483407759&rft_id=info:pmid/33303107&rft_els_id=S2211949320300181&rfr_iscdi=true