Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions: An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized trials

Objective It is still debated if benefits associated with radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are due to the access site selection itself, operator expertise or other underlying mechanisms. Methods We searched PubMed, Embase, and meetin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben

Veröffentlicht in:	Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2021-06, Vol.97 (7), p.1387-1396
Hauptverfasser:	Chiarito, Mauro, Cao, Davide, Nicolas, Johny, Roumeliotis, Anastasios, Power, David, Chandiramani, Rishi, Sartori, Samantha, Camaj, Anton, Goel, Ridhima, Claessen, Bimmer E., Stefanini, Giulio G., Mehran, Roxana, Dangas, George
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Angiography Bleeding Cerebral infarction Clinical trials femoral access Femur Medical imaging Meta-analysis Mortality Myocardial infarction percutaneous coronary intervention radial access Site selection Stroke
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!