Project hyperopic power prediction: accuracy of 13 different concepts for intraocular lens calculation in short eyes
PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a patient cohort with short axial eye length to assess the performance of IOL power calculation schemes in strong hyperopes.MethodologyThe study was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective consecutive case series at...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2022-06, Vol.106 (6), p.795-801 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 801 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 795 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Wendelstein, Jascha Hoffmann, Peter Hirnschall, Nino Fischinger, Isaak Raphael Mariacher, Siegfried Wingert, Tina Langenbucher, Achim Bolz, Matthias |
description | PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a patient cohort with short axial eye length to assess the performance of IOL power calculation schemes in strong hyperopes.MethodologyThe study was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective consecutive case series at the Augen- und Laserklinik, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. Inclusion of patients after uneventful cataract surgery implanting either spherical (SA60AT) or aspheric (ZCB00) IOLs. Inclusion criteria were axial eye length 28.5 D. Lens constants were optimised on a separate patient cohort considering the full bandwidth of axial eye length. Data of one single eye per patient were randomly included. The outcome measures were: mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD and median prediction error and the percentage of eyes with an MAE within 0.25 D, 0.5 D, 0.75 D and 1.0 D.ResultsA total of 150 eyes from 150 patients were assessed. Okulix, PEARL-DGS, Kane and Castrop provided a statistically significantly smaller MAE compared with the Hoffer Q and SRK/T formulae.ConclusionIn our patient cohort with short axial eye length, the use of PEARL-DGS, Okulix, Kane or Castrop formulae showed the lowest MAE. The Castrop formula has not been published before, but will be disclosed with a ready-to-use Excel sheet as an addendum to this paper. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318272 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2482661043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2667240805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-99bd7fd72354385ba90b23309250f02f76cb7a7ee6154848c203da23a0926f253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1q3DAURkVoSaZJXiEIuunGrf4syd2V0CaFQLJo1kKWrxgb23IkmTJvX5lJ0tJN6Upc6XyfLhyEMCUfKeXyUzuEZZ_3dpzCWDHCSMWpZoqdoB0VUpcr1bxBO0KIqiiV9Ay9S2koI5NUnaIzzmsihG52KD_EMIDLeH9YIIald3gJPyHiJULXu9yH-TO2zq3RugMOHlOOu957iDBn7MLsYMkJ-xBxP-dog1tHG_EIc8LOjtu0dZRHnPYhZgwHSBforbdjgsvn8xw9fvv64_q2uru_-X795a5qBWe5apq2U75TjNeC67q1DWkZ56RhNfGEeSVdq6wCkLQWWmjHCO8s47YQ0rOan6MPx94lhqcVUjZTnxyMo50hrMkwoZmUlAhe0Pd_oUNY41y2MwVRTBBNtkJ9pFwMKUXwZon9ZOPBUGI2M-ZPM2YzY45mSvTq-YO1naB7Db6oKAA_Au00_E-t-J16XfmfsV9c16_R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667240805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Project hyperopic power prediction: accuracy of 13 different concepts for intraocular lens calculation in short eyes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wendelstein, Jascha ; Hoffmann, Peter ; Hirnschall, Nino ; Fischinger, Isaak Raphael ; Mariacher, Siegfried ; Wingert, Tina ; Langenbucher, Achim ; Bolz, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Wendelstein, Jascha ; Hoffmann, Peter ; Hirnschall, Nino ; Fischinger, Isaak Raphael ; Mariacher, Siegfried ; Wingert, Tina ; Langenbucher, Achim ; Bolz, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a patient cohort with short axial eye length to assess the performance of IOL power calculation schemes in strong hyperopes.MethodologyThe study was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective consecutive case series at the Augen- und Laserklinik, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. Inclusion of patients after uneventful cataract surgery implanting either spherical (SA60AT) or aspheric (ZCB00) IOLs. Inclusion criteria were axial eye length <21.5 mm and/or emmetropising IOL power >28.5 D. Lens constants were optimised on a separate patient cohort considering the full bandwidth of axial eye length. Data of one single eye per patient were randomly included. The outcome measures were: mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD and median prediction error and the percentage of eyes with an MAE within 0.25 D, 0.5 D, 0.75 D and 1.0 D.ResultsA total of 150 eyes from 150 patients were assessed. Okulix, PEARL-DGS, Kane and Castrop provided a statistically significantly smaller MAE compared with the Hoffer Q and SRK/T formulae.ConclusionIn our patient cohort with short axial eye length, the use of PEARL-DGS, Okulix, Kane or Castrop formulae showed the lowest MAE. The Castrop formula has not been published before, but will be disclosed with a ready-to-use Excel sheet as an addendum to this paper.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318272</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33504489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Axial Length, Eye ; Biometrics ; Biometry ; Clinical science ; Cornea ; Humans ; Hyperopia - surgery ; lens and zonules ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Optics ; Optics and Photonics ; optics and refraction ; Performance evaluation ; Phacoemulsification ; posterior chamber ; Refraction, Ocular ; Retrospective Studies ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Surgeons ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2022-06, Vol.106 (6), p.795-801</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-99bd7fd72354385ba90b23309250f02f76cb7a7ee6154848c203da23a0926f253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-99bd7fd72354385ba90b23309250f02f76cb7a7ee6154848c203da23a0926f253</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9175-6177 ; 0000-0002-1389-2605</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33504489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wendelstein, Jascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirnschall, Nino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischinger, Isaak Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariacher, Siegfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wingert, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenbucher, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolz, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Project hyperopic power prediction: accuracy of 13 different concepts for intraocular lens calculation in short eyes</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a patient cohort with short axial eye length to assess the performance of IOL power calculation schemes in strong hyperopes.MethodologyThe study was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective consecutive case series at the Augen- und Laserklinik, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. Inclusion of patients after uneventful cataract surgery implanting either spherical (SA60AT) or aspheric (ZCB00) IOLs. Inclusion criteria were axial eye length <21.5 mm and/or emmetropising IOL power >28.5 D. Lens constants were optimised on a separate patient cohort considering the full bandwidth of axial eye length. Data of one single eye per patient were randomly included. The outcome measures were: mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD and median prediction error and the percentage of eyes with an MAE within 0.25 D, 0.5 D, 0.75 D and 1.0 D.ResultsA total of 150 eyes from 150 patients were assessed. Okulix, PEARL-DGS, Kane and Castrop provided a statistically significantly smaller MAE compared with the Hoffer Q and SRK/T formulae.ConclusionIn our patient cohort with short axial eye length, the use of PEARL-DGS, Okulix, Kane or Castrop formulae showed the lowest MAE. The Castrop formula has not been published before, but will be disclosed with a ready-to-use Excel sheet as an addendum to this paper.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Axial Length, Eye</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Biometry</subject><subject>Clinical science</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperopia - surgery</subject><subject>lens and zonules</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Optics and Photonics</subject><subject>optics and refraction</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>posterior chamber</subject><subject>Refraction, Ocular</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1q3DAURkVoSaZJXiEIuunGrf4syd2V0CaFQLJo1kKWrxgb23IkmTJvX5lJ0tJN6Upc6XyfLhyEMCUfKeXyUzuEZZ_3dpzCWDHCSMWpZoqdoB0VUpcr1bxBO0KIqiiV9Ay9S2koI5NUnaIzzmsihG52KD_EMIDLeH9YIIald3gJPyHiJULXu9yH-TO2zq3RugMOHlOOu957iDBn7MLsYMkJ-xBxP-dog1tHG_EIc8LOjtu0dZRHnPYhZgwHSBforbdjgsvn8xw9fvv64_q2uru_-X795a5qBWe5apq2U75TjNeC67q1DWkZ56RhNfGEeSVdq6wCkLQWWmjHCO8s47YQ0rOan6MPx94lhqcVUjZTnxyMo50hrMkwoZmUlAhe0Pd_oUNY41y2MwVRTBBNtkJ9pFwMKUXwZon9ZOPBUGI2M-ZPM2YzY45mSvTq-YO1naB7Db6oKAA_Au00_E-t-J16XfmfsV9c16_R</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Wendelstein, Jascha</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Peter</creator><creator>Hirnschall, Nino</creator><creator>Fischinger, Isaak Raphael</creator><creator>Mariacher, Siegfried</creator><creator>Wingert, Tina</creator><creator>Langenbucher, Achim</creator><creator>Bolz, Matthias</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9175-6177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1389-2605</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Project hyperopic power prediction: accuracy of 13 different concepts for intraocular lens calculation in short eyes</title><author>Wendelstein, Jascha ; Hoffmann, Peter ; Hirnschall, Nino ; Fischinger, Isaak Raphael ; Mariacher, Siegfried ; Wingert, Tina ; Langenbucher, Achim ; Bolz, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-99bd7fd72354385ba90b23309250f02f76cb7a7ee6154848c203da23a0926f253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Axial Length, Eye</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Biometry</topic><topic>Clinical science</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperopia - surgery</topic><topic>lens and zonules</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Optics and Photonics</topic><topic>optics and refraction</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>posterior chamber</topic><topic>Refraction, Ocular</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wendelstein, Jascha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirnschall, Nino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischinger, Isaak Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariacher, Siegfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wingert, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langenbucher, Achim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolz, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wendelstein, Jascha</au><au>Hoffmann, Peter</au><au>Hirnschall, Nino</au><au>Fischinger, Isaak Raphael</au><au>Mariacher, Siegfried</au><au>Wingert, Tina</au><au>Langenbucher, Achim</au><au>Bolz, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Project hyperopic power prediction: accuracy of 13 different concepts for intraocular lens calculation in short eyes</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Br J Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>795</spage><epage>801</epage><pages>795-801</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><abstract>PurposeTo evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in a patient cohort with short axial eye length to assess the performance of IOL power calculation schemes in strong hyperopes.MethodologyThe study was a single centre, single surgeon retrospective consecutive case series at the Augen- und Laserklinik, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany. Inclusion of patients after uneventful cataract surgery implanting either spherical (SA60AT) or aspheric (ZCB00) IOLs. Inclusion criteria were axial eye length <21.5 mm and/or emmetropising IOL power >28.5 D. Lens constants were optimised on a separate patient cohort considering the full bandwidth of axial eye length. Data of one single eye per patient were randomly included. The outcome measures were: mean absolute prediction error (MAE), median absolute prediction error, mean prediction error with SD and median prediction error and the percentage of eyes with an MAE within 0.25 D, 0.5 D, 0.75 D and 1.0 D.ResultsA total of 150 eyes from 150 patients were assessed. Okulix, PEARL-DGS, Kane and Castrop provided a statistically significantly smaller MAE compared with the Hoffer Q and SRK/T formulae.ConclusionIn our patient cohort with short axial eye length, the use of PEARL-DGS, Okulix, Kane or Castrop formulae showed the lowest MAE. The Castrop formula has not been published before, but will be disclosed with a ready-to-use Excel sheet as an addendum to this paper.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>33504489</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318272</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9175-6177</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1389-2605</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2022-06, Vol.106 (6), p.795-801 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2482661043 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
subjects | Accuracy Axial Length, Eye Biometrics Biometry Clinical science Cornea Humans Hyperopia - surgery lens and zonules Lens Implantation, Intraocular Lenses, Intraocular Optics Optics and Photonics optics and refraction Performance evaluation Phacoemulsification posterior chamber Refraction, Ocular Retrospective Studies Software Statistical analysis Surgeons Surgery |
title | Project hyperopic power prediction: accuracy of 13 different concepts for intraocular lens calculation in short eyes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T11%3A49%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Project%20hyperopic%20power%20prediction:%20accuracy%20of%2013%20different%20concepts%20for%20intraocular%20lens%20calculation%20in%20short%20eyes&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Wendelstein,%20Jascha&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=795&rft.epage=801&rft.pages=795-801&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318272&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2667240805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667240805&rft_id=info:pmid/33504489&rfr_iscdi=true |