Computational power of cognition

The debate concerning the computational powers of the various manifestations of neural networks continues without the benefit of a common theoretical foundation. This paper addresses the question of relative computational power in five categories; the Turing machine, the digital computer, the neural...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neural networks 1988-01, Vol.1 (suppl.), p.210-210
1. Verfasser: Pilgrim, R A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue suppl.
container_start_page 210
container_title Neural networks
container_volume 1
creator Pilgrim, R A
description The debate concerning the computational powers of the various manifestations of neural networks continues without the benefit of a common theoretical foundation. This paper addresses the question of relative computational power in five categories; the Turing machine, the digital computer, the neural network, physical systems, and the mind/brain. The explicit and implied decisions one makes when assuming an equivalence or a difference in power between these elements are discussed. Initially a motivation for the study of computational power is presented which begins with the apparent failure of the Turing test to resolve certain aspects of the mind/machine dilemma. The classical arguments concerning the capabilities and limitations of each of the five categories of computing devices are summarized in an attempt to separate the logically-valid positions from those based on emotional appeal.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0893-6080(88)90247-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_24826261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>24826261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-8b153ce235a044e62aa7919894fc92851c17ee1f3b5bb25512fa152ef0e3b90d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhbNQcBz9By66El1U782ryVIGXzDgRmF2IY03Ummb2rSI_17riKsDh48D32HsDOEKAfU1GCtKDQYujLm0wGVV7g7Y6r8-Ysc5vwOANlKsWLFJ3TBPfmpS79tiSJ80FikWIb31zVKesMPo20ynf7lmL3e3z5uHcvt0_7i52ZYBpZxKU6MSgbhQHqQkzb2vLFpjZQyWG4UBKyKMolZ1zZVCHj0qThFI1BZexZqd73eHMX3MlCfXNTlQ2_qe0pwdl4ZrrvEHlHswjCnnkaIbxqbz45dDcMsFbnF1i6szxv1e4HbiG_CJT9o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>24826261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational power of cognition</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pilgrim, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>Pilgrim, R A</creatorcontrib><description>The debate concerning the computational powers of the various manifestations of neural networks continues without the benefit of a common theoretical foundation. This paper addresses the question of relative computational power in five categories; the Turing machine, the digital computer, the neural network, physical systems, and the mind/brain. The explicit and implied decisions one makes when assuming an equivalence or a difference in power between these elements are discussed. Initially a motivation for the study of computational power is presented which begins with the apparent failure of the Turing test to resolve certain aspects of the mind/machine dilemma. The classical arguments concerning the capabilities and limitations of each of the five categories of computing devices are summarized in an attempt to separate the logically-valid positions from those based on emotional appeal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-6080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0893-6080(88)90247-X</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Neural networks, 1988-01, Vol.1 (suppl.), p.210-210</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pilgrim, R A</creatorcontrib><title>Computational power of cognition</title><title>Neural networks</title><description>The debate concerning the computational powers of the various manifestations of neural networks continues without the benefit of a common theoretical foundation. This paper addresses the question of relative computational power in five categories; the Turing machine, the digital computer, the neural network, physical systems, and the mind/brain. The explicit and implied decisions one makes when assuming an equivalence or a difference in power between these elements are discussed. Initially a motivation for the study of computational power is presented which begins with the apparent failure of the Turing test to resolve certain aspects of the mind/machine dilemma. The classical arguments concerning the capabilities and limitations of each of the five categories of computing devices are summarized in an attempt to separate the logically-valid positions from those based on emotional appeal.</description><issn>0893-6080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAUhbNQcBz9By66El1U782ryVIGXzDgRmF2IY03Ummb2rSI_17riKsDh48D32HsDOEKAfU1GCtKDQYujLm0wGVV7g7Y6r8-Ysc5vwOANlKsWLFJ3TBPfmpS79tiSJ80FikWIb31zVKesMPo20ynf7lmL3e3z5uHcvt0_7i52ZYBpZxKU6MSgbhQHqQkzb2vLFpjZQyWG4UBKyKMolZ1zZVCHj0qThFI1BZexZqd73eHMX3MlCfXNTlQ2_qe0pwdl4ZrrvEHlHswjCnnkaIbxqbz45dDcMsFbnF1i6szxv1e4HbiG_CJT9o</recordid><startdate>198801</startdate><enddate>198801</enddate><creator>Pilgrim, R A</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198801</creationdate><title>Computational power of cognition</title><author>Pilgrim, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-8b153ce235a044e62aa7919894fc92851c17ee1f3b5bb25512fa152ef0e3b90d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pilgrim, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Neural networks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pilgrim, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational power of cognition</atitle><jtitle>Neural networks</jtitle><date>1988-01</date><risdate>1988</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>suppl.</issue><spage>210</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>210-210</pages><issn>0893-6080</issn><abstract>The debate concerning the computational powers of the various manifestations of neural networks continues without the benefit of a common theoretical foundation. This paper addresses the question of relative computational power in five categories; the Turing machine, the digital computer, the neural network, physical systems, and the mind/brain. The explicit and implied decisions one makes when assuming an equivalence or a difference in power between these elements are discussed. Initially a motivation for the study of computational power is presented which begins with the apparent failure of the Turing test to resolve certain aspects of the mind/machine dilemma. The classical arguments concerning the capabilities and limitations of each of the five categories of computing devices are summarized in an attempt to separate the logically-valid positions from those based on emotional appeal.</abstract><doi>10.1016/0893-6080(88)90247-X</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-6080
ispartof Neural networks, 1988-01, Vol.1 (suppl.), p.210-210
issn 0893-6080
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_24826261
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Computational power of cognition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T06%3A19%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20power%20of%20cognition&rft.jtitle=Neural%20networks&rft.au=Pilgrim,%20R%20A&rft.date=1988-01&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=suppl.&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=210-210&rft.issn=0893-6080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0893-6080(88)90247-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E24826261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=24826261&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true