Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment
Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-expo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics 2022-04, Vol.28 (2), p.1227-1234 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1234 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1227 |
container_title | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Rocha, Clayton H. Lisboa, Gabriela Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M. Rabelo, Camila M. Samelli, Alessandra G. |
description | Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-exposed to noise group (CG). A free field system was used to emit monosyllables (65, 70 and 75 dB) and pink noise in different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (0, −5, −10 and −15). Results. In situations with HPDs, all groups showed a decrease in the percentage of correct responses with an increase in noise level. The HPD had little effect on speech intelligibility in the NIHLG and NG. Considering the effect caused by the HPD on speech intelligibility, it was observed that the group with the greatest loss was the CG for SNRs of −5, −10 and −15. Conclusion. Although speech intelligibility is influenced by the hearing threshold, the noise level and SNR are crucial for good speech intelligibility, either with or without an HPD. It is highlighted that the NG had worse results when compared with the CG, which may indicate changes in the auditory pathway resulting from continuous noise exposure, even in the absence of changes in the audiometric thresholds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2481662758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2481662758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a7bddf78e80992de283f7cf78c496ef0e0a81190e953237bb8654e6b03a53ac03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9vFCEUgImxsWvrn6Dh6GXWB-wwjCdNU22TJl7aM2Hg0UVnhhXYNutfL5PdevQCyXvf-_UR8p7BmoGCT8sj2o1ac-BszZSCTopXZMVFJ5ueCXhNVgvTLNA5eZvzTwCx6aV8Q86FaIHzHlbk17X3aEum0dMtmhTmR7pLsdRYTNThU7BYkzPNO0S7pWEuOI7hMQxhDOXwmZYt0jDtYipmtri0CbMLT8HtzRj-oKMmZ8x5wrlckjNvxozvTv8Fefh2fX9109z9-H579fWusULK0phucM53ChX0PXfIlfCdrQFbt0cPCEYx1gP2rajXDoOS7QblAMK0wlgQF-TjsW895Pcec9FTyLaubWaM-6z5RjEpedeqirZH1KaYc0KvdylMJh00A73o0y-e9eJZnzzXug-nEfthQvev6kVsBb4cgTD7mCbzHNPodDGHMSafqqqQtfj_jL9cDI51</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2481662758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rocha, Clayton H. ; Lisboa, Gabriela ; Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M. ; Rabelo, Camila M. ; Samelli, Alessandra G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Clayton H. ; Lisboa, Gabriela ; Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M. ; Rabelo, Camila M. ; Samelli, Alessandra G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-exposed to noise group (CG). A free field system was used to emit monosyllables (65, 70 and 75 dB) and pink noise in different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (0, −5, −10 and −15). Results. In situations with HPDs, all groups showed a decrease in the percentage of correct responses with an increase in noise level. The HPD had little effect on speech intelligibility in the NIHLG and NG. Considering the effect caused by the HPD on speech intelligibility, it was observed that the group with the greatest loss was the CG for SNRs of −5, −10 and −15. Conclusion. Although speech intelligibility is influenced by the hearing threshold, the noise level and SNR are crucial for good speech intelligibility, either with or without an HPD. It is highlighted that the NG had worse results when compared with the CG, which may indicate changes in the auditory pathway resulting from continuous noise exposure, even in the absence of changes in the audiometric thresholds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-3548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33502290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Audiometry ; ear-protective devices ; Hearing - physiology ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control ; Humans ; Noise ; occupational ; signal-to-noise ratio ; speech discrimination tests ; speech intelligibility ; Speech Intelligibility - physiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2022-04, Vol.28 (2), p.1227-1234</ispartof><rights>2021 Central Institute for Labour Protection - National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a7bddf78e80992de283f7cf78c496ef0e0a81190e953237bb8654e6b03a53ac03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a7bddf78e80992de283f7cf78c496ef0e0a81190e953237bb8654e6b03a53ac03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7164-8942 ; 0000-0003-4780-5423 ; 0000-0001-5431-8071 ; 0000-0001-5900-0564 ; 0000-0002-9087-323X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33502290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Clayton H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisboa, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabelo, Camila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samelli, Alessandra G.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment</title><title>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</title><addtitle>Int J Occup Saf Ergon</addtitle><description>Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-exposed to noise group (CG). A free field system was used to emit monosyllables (65, 70 and 75 dB) and pink noise in different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (0, −5, −10 and −15). Results. In situations with HPDs, all groups showed a decrease in the percentage of correct responses with an increase in noise level. The HPD had little effect on speech intelligibility in the NIHLG and NG. Considering the effect caused by the HPD on speech intelligibility, it was observed that the group with the greatest loss was the CG for SNRs of −5, −10 and −15. Conclusion. Although speech intelligibility is influenced by the hearing threshold, the noise level and SNR are crucial for good speech intelligibility, either with or without an HPD. It is highlighted that the NG had worse results when compared with the CG, which may indicate changes in the auditory pathway resulting from continuous noise exposure, even in the absence of changes in the audiometric thresholds.</description><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>ear-protective devices</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>occupational</subject><subject>signal-to-noise ratio</subject><subject>speech discrimination tests</subject><subject>speech intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility - physiology</subject><issn>1080-3548</issn><issn>2376-9130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9vFCEUgImxsWvrn6Dh6GXWB-wwjCdNU22TJl7aM2Hg0UVnhhXYNutfL5PdevQCyXvf-_UR8p7BmoGCT8sj2o1ac-BszZSCTopXZMVFJ5ueCXhNVgvTLNA5eZvzTwCx6aV8Q86FaIHzHlbk17X3aEum0dMtmhTmR7pLsdRYTNThU7BYkzPNO0S7pWEuOI7hMQxhDOXwmZYt0jDtYipmtri0CbMLT8HtzRj-oKMmZ8x5wrlckjNvxozvTv8Fefh2fX9109z9-H579fWusULK0phucM53ChX0PXfIlfCdrQFbt0cPCEYx1gP2rajXDoOS7QblAMK0wlgQF-TjsW895Pcec9FTyLaubWaM-6z5RjEpedeqirZH1KaYc0KvdylMJh00A73o0y-e9eJZnzzXug-nEfthQvev6kVsBb4cgTD7mCbzHNPodDGHMSafqqqQtfj_jL9cDI51</recordid><startdate>20220403</startdate><enddate>20220403</enddate><creator>Rocha, Clayton H.</creator><creator>Lisboa, Gabriela</creator><creator>Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.</creator><creator>Rabelo, Camila M.</creator><creator>Samelli, Alessandra G.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-8942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-5423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5431-8071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5900-0564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-323X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220403</creationdate><title>Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment</title><author>Rocha, Clayton H. ; Lisboa, Gabriela ; Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M. ; Rabelo, Camila M. ; Samelli, Alessandra G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a7bddf78e80992de283f7cf78c496ef0e0a81190e953237bb8654e6b03a53ac03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>ear-protective devices</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>occupational</topic><topic>signal-to-noise ratio</topic><topic>speech discrimination tests</topic><topic>speech intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Clayton H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisboa, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabelo, Camila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samelli, Alessandra G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocha, Clayton H.</au><au>Lisboa, Gabriela</au><au>Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.</au><au>Rabelo, Camila M.</au><au>Samelli, Alessandra G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment</atitle><jtitle>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Occup Saf Ergon</addtitle><date>2022-04-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1227</spage><epage>1234</epage><pages>1227-1234</pages><issn>1080-3548</issn><eissn>2376-9130</eissn><abstract>Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-exposed to noise group (CG). A free field system was used to emit monosyllables (65, 70 and 75 dB) and pink noise in different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (0, −5, −10 and −15). Results. In situations with HPDs, all groups showed a decrease in the percentage of correct responses with an increase in noise level. The HPD had little effect on speech intelligibility in the NIHLG and NG. Considering the effect caused by the HPD on speech intelligibility, it was observed that the group with the greatest loss was the CG for SNRs of −5, −10 and −15. Conclusion. Although speech intelligibility is influenced by the hearing threshold, the noise level and SNR are crucial for good speech intelligibility, either with or without an HPD. It is highlighted that the NG had worse results when compared with the CG, which may indicate changes in the auditory pathway resulting from continuous noise exposure, even in the absence of changes in the audiometric thresholds.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>33502290</pmid><doi>10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-8942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-5423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5431-8071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5900-0564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-323X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1080-3548 |
ispartof | International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2022-04, Vol.28 (2), p.1227-1234 |
issn | 1080-3548 2376-9130 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2481662758 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Audiometry ear-protective devices Hearing - physiology Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control Humans Noise occupational signal-to-noise ratio speech discrimination tests speech intelligibility Speech Intelligibility - physiology |
title | Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20hearing%20protector%20devices%20on%20speech%20intelligibility:%20the%20importance%20of%20individualized%20assessment&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20occupational%20safety%20and%20ergonomics&rft.au=Rocha,%20Clayton%20H.&rft.date=2022-04-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1227&rft.epage=1234&rft.pages=1227-1234&rft.issn=1080-3548&rft.eissn=2376-9130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2481662758%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2481662758&rft_id=info:pmid/33502290&rfr_iscdi=true |