Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment

Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-expo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics 2022-04, Vol.28 (2), p.1227-1234
Hauptverfasser: Rocha, Clayton H., Lisboa, Gabriela, Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M., Rabelo, Camila M., Samelli, Alessandra G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1234
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1227
container_title International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics
container_volume 28
creator Rocha, Clayton H.
Lisboa, Gabriela
Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.
Rabelo, Camila M.
Samelli, Alessandra G.
description Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-exposed to noise group (CG). A free field system was used to emit monosyllables (65, 70 and 75 dB) and pink noise in different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (0, −5, −10 and −15). Results. In situations with HPDs, all groups showed a decrease in the percentage of correct responses with an increase in noise level. The HPD had little effect on speech intelligibility in the NIHLG and NG. Considering the effect caused by the HPD on speech intelligibility, it was observed that the group with the greatest loss was the CG for SNRs of −5, −10 and −15. Conclusion. Although speech intelligibility is influenced by the hearing threshold, the noise level and SNR are crucial for good speech intelligibility, either with or without an HPD. It is highlighted that the NG had worse results when compared with the CG, which may indicate changes in the auditory pathway resulting from continuous noise exposure, even in the absence of changes in the audiometric thresholds.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2481662758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2481662758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a7bddf78e80992de283f7cf78c496ef0e0a81190e953237bb8654e6b03a53ac03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9vFCEUgImxsWvrn6Dh6GXWB-wwjCdNU22TJl7aM2Hg0UVnhhXYNutfL5PdevQCyXvf-_UR8p7BmoGCT8sj2o1ac-BszZSCTopXZMVFJ5ueCXhNVgvTLNA5eZvzTwCx6aV8Q86FaIHzHlbk17X3aEum0dMtmhTmR7pLsdRYTNThU7BYkzPNO0S7pWEuOI7hMQxhDOXwmZYt0jDtYipmtri0CbMLT8HtzRj-oKMmZ8x5wrlckjNvxozvTv8Fefh2fX9109z9-H579fWusULK0phucM53ChX0PXfIlfCdrQFbt0cPCEYx1gP2rajXDoOS7QblAMK0wlgQF-TjsW895Pcec9FTyLaubWaM-6z5RjEpedeqirZH1KaYc0KvdylMJh00A73o0y-e9eJZnzzXug-nEfthQvev6kVsBb4cgTD7mCbzHNPodDGHMSafqqqQtfj_jL9cDI51</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2481662758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rocha, Clayton H. ; Lisboa, Gabriela ; Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M. ; Rabelo, Camila M. ; Samelli, Alessandra G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Clayton H. ; Lisboa, Gabriela ; Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M. ; Rabelo, Camila M. ; Samelli, Alessandra G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-exposed to noise group (CG). A free field system was used to emit monosyllables (65, 70 and 75 dB) and pink noise in different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (0, −5, −10 and −15). Results. In situations with HPDs, all groups showed a decrease in the percentage of correct responses with an increase in noise level. The HPD had little effect on speech intelligibility in the NIHLG and NG. Considering the effect caused by the HPD on speech intelligibility, it was observed that the group with the greatest loss was the CG for SNRs of −5, −10 and −15. Conclusion. Although speech intelligibility is influenced by the hearing threshold, the noise level and SNR are crucial for good speech intelligibility, either with or without an HPD. It is highlighted that the NG had worse results when compared with the CG, which may indicate changes in the auditory pathway resulting from continuous noise exposure, even in the absence of changes in the audiometric thresholds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-3548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-9130</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33502290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Audiometry ; ear-protective devices ; Hearing - physiology ; Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Noise ; occupational ; signal-to-noise ratio ; speech discrimination tests ; speech intelligibility ; Speech Intelligibility - physiology</subject><ispartof>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2022-04, Vol.28 (2), p.1227-1234</ispartof><rights>2021 Central Institute for Labour Protection - National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a7bddf78e80992de283f7cf78c496ef0e0a81190e953237bb8654e6b03a53ac03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a7bddf78e80992de283f7cf78c496ef0e0a81190e953237bb8654e6b03a53ac03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7164-8942 ; 0000-0003-4780-5423 ; 0000-0001-5431-8071 ; 0000-0001-5900-0564 ; 0000-0002-9087-323X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33502290$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Clayton H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisboa, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabelo, Camila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samelli, Alessandra G.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment</title><title>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</title><addtitle>Int J Occup Saf Ergon</addtitle><description>Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-exposed to noise group (CG). A free field system was used to emit monosyllables (65, 70 and 75 dB) and pink noise in different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (0, −5, −10 and −15). Results. In situations with HPDs, all groups showed a decrease in the percentage of correct responses with an increase in noise level. The HPD had little effect on speech intelligibility in the NIHLG and NG. Considering the effect caused by the HPD on speech intelligibility, it was observed that the group with the greatest loss was the CG for SNRs of −5, −10 and −15. Conclusion. Although speech intelligibility is influenced by the hearing threshold, the noise level and SNR are crucial for good speech intelligibility, either with or without an HPD. It is highlighted that the NG had worse results when compared with the CG, which may indicate changes in the auditory pathway resulting from continuous noise exposure, even in the absence of changes in the audiometric thresholds.</description><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>ear-protective devices</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>occupational</subject><subject>signal-to-noise ratio</subject><subject>speech discrimination tests</subject><subject>speech intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility - physiology</subject><issn>1080-3548</issn><issn>2376-9130</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9vFCEUgImxsWvrn6Dh6GXWB-wwjCdNU22TJl7aM2Hg0UVnhhXYNutfL5PdevQCyXvf-_UR8p7BmoGCT8sj2o1ac-BszZSCTopXZMVFJ5ueCXhNVgvTLNA5eZvzTwCx6aV8Q86FaIHzHlbk17X3aEum0dMtmhTmR7pLsdRYTNThU7BYkzPNO0S7pWEuOI7hMQxhDOXwmZYt0jDtYipmtri0CbMLT8HtzRj-oKMmZ8x5wrlckjNvxozvTv8Fefh2fX9109z9-H579fWusULK0phucM53ChX0PXfIlfCdrQFbt0cPCEYx1gP2rajXDoOS7QblAMK0wlgQF-TjsW895Pcec9FTyLaubWaM-6z5RjEpedeqirZH1KaYc0KvdylMJh00A73o0y-e9eJZnzzXug-nEfthQvev6kVsBb4cgTD7mCbzHNPodDGHMSafqqqQtfj_jL9cDI51</recordid><startdate>20220403</startdate><enddate>20220403</enddate><creator>Rocha, Clayton H.</creator><creator>Lisboa, Gabriela</creator><creator>Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.</creator><creator>Rabelo, Camila M.</creator><creator>Samelli, Alessandra G.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-8942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-5423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5431-8071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5900-0564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-323X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220403</creationdate><title>Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment</title><author>Rocha, Clayton H. ; Lisboa, Gabriela ; Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M. ; Rabelo, Camila M. ; Samelli, Alessandra G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-a7bddf78e80992de283f7cf78c496ef0e0a81190e953237bb8654e6b03a53ac03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>ear-protective devices</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>occupational</topic><topic>signal-to-noise ratio</topic><topic>speech discrimination tests</topic><topic>speech intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Clayton H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisboa, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabelo, Camila M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samelli, Alessandra G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocha, Clayton H.</au><au>Lisboa, Gabriela</au><au>Padilha, Fernanda Y. O. M. M.</au><au>Rabelo, Camila M.</au><au>Samelli, Alessandra G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment</atitle><jtitle>International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Occup Saf Ergon</addtitle><date>2022-04-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1227</spage><epage>1234</epage><pages>1227-1234</pages><issn>1080-3548</issn><eissn>2376-9130</eissn><abstract>Objectives. This study aimed to compare speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protection devices (HPDs). Methods. Fifty-one workers were distributed into three groups: noise-induced hearing loss group (NIHLG), normally hearing noise-exposed group (NG) and normally hearing non-exposed to noise group (CG). A free field system was used to emit monosyllables (65, 70 and 75 dB) and pink noise in different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) (0, −5, −10 and −15). Results. In situations with HPDs, all groups showed a decrease in the percentage of correct responses with an increase in noise level. The HPD had little effect on speech intelligibility in the NIHLG and NG. Considering the effect caused by the HPD on speech intelligibility, it was observed that the group with the greatest loss was the CG for SNRs of −5, −10 and −15. Conclusion. Although speech intelligibility is influenced by the hearing threshold, the noise level and SNR are crucial for good speech intelligibility, either with or without an HPD. It is highlighted that the NG had worse results when compared with the CG, which may indicate changes in the auditory pathway resulting from continuous noise exposure, even in the absence of changes in the audiometric thresholds.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>33502290</pmid><doi>10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-8942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-5423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5431-8071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5900-0564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-323X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1080-3548
ispartof International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics, 2022-04, Vol.28 (2), p.1227-1234
issn 1080-3548
2376-9130
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2481662758
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Audiometry
ear-protective devices
Hearing - physiology
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced - prevention & control
Humans
Noise
occupational
signal-to-noise ratio
speech discrimination tests
speech intelligibility
Speech Intelligibility - physiology
title Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20hearing%20protector%20devices%20on%20speech%20intelligibility:%20the%20importance%20of%20individualized%20assessment&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20occupational%20safety%20and%20ergonomics&rft.au=Rocha,%20Clayton%20H.&rft.date=2022-04-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1227&rft.epage=1234&rft.pages=1227-1234&rft.issn=1080-3548&rft.eissn=2376-9130&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2481662758%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2481662758&rft_id=info:pmid/33502290&rfr_iscdi=true