Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction

Adult spinal deformity patients treated operatively by long-segment instrumented spinal fusion are prone to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). A gradual transition in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal end of spinal instrumentation may reduce the incidence of PJK and PJ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2021-05, Vol.21 (5), p.855-864
Hauptverfasser: Doodkorte, Remco J.P., Roth, Alex K., Arts, Jacobus J., Lataster, L.M. Arno, van Rhijn, Lodewijk W., Willems, Paul C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 864
container_issue 5
container_start_page 855
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 21
creator Doodkorte, Remco J.P.
Roth, Alex K.
Arts, Jacobus J.
Lataster, L.M. Arno
van Rhijn, Lodewijk W.
Willems, Paul C.
description Adult spinal deformity patients treated operatively by long-segment instrumented spinal fusion are prone to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). A gradual transition in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal end of spinal instrumentation may reduce the incidence of PJK and PJF, however, previously evaluated techniques have not directly been compared. To determine the biomechanical characteristics of five different posterior spinal instrumentation techniques to achieve semirigid junctional fixation, or “topping-off,” between the rigid pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and the proximal uninstrumented spine. Biomechanical cadaveric study. Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric spine segments (T8–L3) were subjected to ex vivo pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation up to 5 Nm. The native condition, three-level PSF (T11–L2), PSF with supplemental transverse process hooks at T10 (TPH), and two sublaminar taping techniques (knotted and clamped) as one- (T10) or two-level (T9, T10) semirigid junctional fixation techniques were compared. The ROM and neutral zone (NZ) of the segments were normalized to the native condition. The linearity of the transition zones over three or four segments was determined through linear regression analysis. All techniques achieved a significantly reduced ROM at T10-T11 in flexion-extension and axial rotation relative to the PSF condition. Additionally, both two-level sublaminar taping techniques (CT2, KT2) had a significantly reduced ROM at T9-T10. One-level clamped sublaminar tape (CT1) had a significantly lower ROM and NZ compared with one-level knotted sublaminar tape (KT1) at T10-T11. Linear regression analysis showed the highest linear correlation between ROM and vertebral level for TPH and the lowest linear correlation for CT2. All studied semirigid junctional fixation techniques significantly reduced the ROM at the junctional levels and thus provide a more gradual transition than pedicle screws. TPH achieves the most linear transition over three vertebrae, whereas KT2 achieves that over four vertebrae. In contrast, CT2 effectively is a one-level semirigid junctional fixation technique with a shift in the upper rigid fixation level. Clamped sublaminar tape reduces the NZ greatly, whereas knotted sublaminar tape and TPH maintain a more physiologic NZ. Clinical validation is ultimately required to translate the biomechanics of various semirigid junctional fixation techniques into
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2481141153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943021000383</els_id><sourcerecordid>2481141153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-cf0c8c34e3177fd189553746ababcb94edcd8e157374243383879a406fdce11a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhU1paNK0b1CKlt34VrJkS94U2tA_CGSTrIUsjZq52NKtJIfkcfqmkXvT0lVhYAbxHY2OTtO8YXTHKBve73f5gAFg19GO7ehW8llzxpRULRt497zOfTe2o-D0tHmZ855SqiTrXjSnnIuRD4qdNb8-YVzA3pqA1szExuVgEuYYSPQkw4IJf6Aj-zXYgjFUxOO92UZSqizgzxUyKZEcEtxBKLXHe1wq96_E4LwmIMYXSKTcxmRsnNdlMokYt86FbFYq6MDHtGB5qA9JCX7rXzUn3swZXj_18-bmy-fri2_t5dXX7xcfL1srqCqt9dQqywVwJqV3TI19z6UYzGQmO40CnHUKWC_rYSc4V1zJ0Qg6eGeBMcPPm3fHe6uDzVTRC2YL82wCxDXrTijGBGM9r6g4ojbFnBN4fUjVc3rQjOotHL3Xx3D0Fo6mW8kqe_u0YZ0WcH9Ff9KowIcjANXnHULS2SIECw63z9Au4v83PALj9agR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2481141153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Doodkorte, Remco J.P. ; Roth, Alex K. ; Arts, Jacobus J. ; Lataster, L.M. Arno ; van Rhijn, Lodewijk W. ; Willems, Paul C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Doodkorte, Remco J.P. ; Roth, Alex K. ; Arts, Jacobus J. ; Lataster, L.M. Arno ; van Rhijn, Lodewijk W. ; Willems, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><description>Adult spinal deformity patients treated operatively by long-segment instrumented spinal fusion are prone to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). A gradual transition in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal end of spinal instrumentation may reduce the incidence of PJK and PJF, however, previously evaluated techniques have not directly been compared. To determine the biomechanical characteristics of five different posterior spinal instrumentation techniques to achieve semirigid junctional fixation, or “topping-off,” between the rigid pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and the proximal uninstrumented spine. Biomechanical cadaveric study. Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric spine segments (T8–L3) were subjected to ex vivo pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation up to 5 Nm. The native condition, three-level PSF (T11–L2), PSF with supplemental transverse process hooks at T10 (TPH), and two sublaminar taping techniques (knotted and clamped) as one- (T10) or two-level (T9, T10) semirigid junctional fixation techniques were compared. The ROM and neutral zone (NZ) of the segments were normalized to the native condition. The linearity of the transition zones over three or four segments was determined through linear regression analysis. All techniques achieved a significantly reduced ROM at T10-T11 in flexion-extension and axial rotation relative to the PSF condition. Additionally, both two-level sublaminar taping techniques (CT2, KT2) had a significantly reduced ROM at T9-T10. One-level clamped sublaminar tape (CT1) had a significantly lower ROM and NZ compared with one-level knotted sublaminar tape (KT1) at T10-T11. Linear regression analysis showed the highest linear correlation between ROM and vertebral level for TPH and the lowest linear correlation for CT2. All studied semirigid junctional fixation techniques significantly reduced the ROM at the junctional levels and thus provide a more gradual transition than pedicle screws. TPH achieves the most linear transition over three vertebrae, whereas KT2 achieves that over four vertebrae. In contrast, CT2 effectively is a one-level semirigid junctional fixation technique with a shift in the upper rigid fixation level. Clamped sublaminar tape reduces the NZ greatly, whereas knotted sublaminar tape and TPH maintain a more physiologic NZ. Clinical validation is ultimately required to translate the biomechanics of various semirigid junctional fixation techniques into the clinical goal of reducing the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure. The direct biomechanical comparison of multiple instrumentation techniques that aim to reduce the incidence of PJK after thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery provides a basis upon which clinical studies could be designed. Furthermore, the data provided in this study can be used to further analyze the biomechanical effects of the studied techniques using finite element models to better predict their post-operative effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33493681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult spinal deformity, Biomechanics, Proximal junctional kyphosis, Proximal junctional failure ; Semirigid, Topping-off</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2021-05, Vol.21 (5), p.855-864</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-cf0c8c34e3177fd189553746ababcb94edcd8e157374243383879a406fdce11a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-cf0c8c34e3177fd189553746ababcb94edcd8e157374243383879a406fdce11a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4121-8519 ; 0000-0001-5962-0843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33493681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doodkorte, Remco J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Alex K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arts, Jacobus J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lataster, L.M. Arno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rhijn, Lodewijk W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willems, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Adult spinal deformity patients treated operatively by long-segment instrumented spinal fusion are prone to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). A gradual transition in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal end of spinal instrumentation may reduce the incidence of PJK and PJF, however, previously evaluated techniques have not directly been compared. To determine the biomechanical characteristics of five different posterior spinal instrumentation techniques to achieve semirigid junctional fixation, or “topping-off,” between the rigid pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and the proximal uninstrumented spine. Biomechanical cadaveric study. Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric spine segments (T8–L3) were subjected to ex vivo pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation up to 5 Nm. The native condition, three-level PSF (T11–L2), PSF with supplemental transverse process hooks at T10 (TPH), and two sublaminar taping techniques (knotted and clamped) as one- (T10) or two-level (T9, T10) semirigid junctional fixation techniques were compared. The ROM and neutral zone (NZ) of the segments were normalized to the native condition. The linearity of the transition zones over three or four segments was determined through linear regression analysis. All techniques achieved a significantly reduced ROM at T10-T11 in flexion-extension and axial rotation relative to the PSF condition. Additionally, both two-level sublaminar taping techniques (CT2, KT2) had a significantly reduced ROM at T9-T10. One-level clamped sublaminar tape (CT1) had a significantly lower ROM and NZ compared with one-level knotted sublaminar tape (KT1) at T10-T11. Linear regression analysis showed the highest linear correlation between ROM and vertebral level for TPH and the lowest linear correlation for CT2. All studied semirigid junctional fixation techniques significantly reduced the ROM at the junctional levels and thus provide a more gradual transition than pedicle screws. TPH achieves the most linear transition over three vertebrae, whereas KT2 achieves that over four vertebrae. In contrast, CT2 effectively is a one-level semirigid junctional fixation technique with a shift in the upper rigid fixation level. Clamped sublaminar tape reduces the NZ greatly, whereas knotted sublaminar tape and TPH maintain a more physiologic NZ. Clinical validation is ultimately required to translate the biomechanics of various semirigid junctional fixation techniques into the clinical goal of reducing the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure. The direct biomechanical comparison of multiple instrumentation techniques that aim to reduce the incidence of PJK after thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery provides a basis upon which clinical studies could be designed. Furthermore, the data provided in this study can be used to further analyze the biomechanical effects of the studied techniques using finite element models to better predict their post-operative effectiveness.</description><subject>Adult spinal deformity, Biomechanics, Proximal junctional kyphosis, Proximal junctional failure</subject><subject>Semirigid, Topping-off</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhU1paNK0b1CKlt34VrJkS94U2tA_CGSTrIUsjZq52NKtJIfkcfqmkXvT0lVhYAbxHY2OTtO8YXTHKBve73f5gAFg19GO7ehW8llzxpRULRt497zOfTe2o-D0tHmZ855SqiTrXjSnnIuRD4qdNb8-YVzA3pqA1szExuVgEuYYSPQkw4IJf6Aj-zXYgjFUxOO92UZSqizgzxUyKZEcEtxBKLXHe1wq96_E4LwmIMYXSKTcxmRsnNdlMokYt86FbFYq6MDHtGB5qA9JCX7rXzUn3swZXj_18-bmy-fri2_t5dXX7xcfL1srqCqt9dQqywVwJqV3TI19z6UYzGQmO40CnHUKWC_rYSc4V1zJ0Qg6eGeBMcPPm3fHe6uDzVTRC2YL82wCxDXrTijGBGM9r6g4ojbFnBN4fUjVc3rQjOotHL3Xx3D0Fo6mW8kqe_u0YZ0WcH9Ff9KowIcjANXnHULS2SIECw63z9Au4v83PALj9agR</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Doodkorte, Remco J.P.</creator><creator>Roth, Alex K.</creator><creator>Arts, Jacobus J.</creator><creator>Lataster, L.M. Arno</creator><creator>van Rhijn, Lodewijk W.</creator><creator>Willems, Paul C.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-8519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-0843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction</title><author>Doodkorte, Remco J.P. ; Roth, Alex K. ; Arts, Jacobus J. ; Lataster, L.M. Arno ; van Rhijn, Lodewijk W. ; Willems, Paul C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-cf0c8c34e3177fd189553746ababcb94edcd8e157374243383879a406fdce11a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult spinal deformity, Biomechanics, Proximal junctional kyphosis, Proximal junctional failure</topic><topic>Semirigid, Topping-off</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doodkorte, Remco J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Alex K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arts, Jacobus J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lataster, L.M. Arno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rhijn, Lodewijk W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willems, Paul C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doodkorte, Remco J.P.</au><au>Roth, Alex K.</au><au>Arts, Jacobus J.</au><au>Lataster, L.M. Arno</au><au>van Rhijn, Lodewijk W.</au><au>Willems, Paul C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>855</spage><epage>864</epage><pages>855-864</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Adult spinal deformity patients treated operatively by long-segment instrumented spinal fusion are prone to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF). A gradual transition in range of motion (ROM) at the proximal end of spinal instrumentation may reduce the incidence of PJK and PJF, however, previously evaluated techniques have not directly been compared. To determine the biomechanical characteristics of five different posterior spinal instrumentation techniques to achieve semirigid junctional fixation, or “topping-off,” between the rigid pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and the proximal uninstrumented spine. Biomechanical cadaveric study. Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric spine segments (T8–L3) were subjected to ex vivo pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation up to 5 Nm. The native condition, three-level PSF (T11–L2), PSF with supplemental transverse process hooks at T10 (TPH), and two sublaminar taping techniques (knotted and clamped) as one- (T10) or two-level (T9, T10) semirigid junctional fixation techniques were compared. The ROM and neutral zone (NZ) of the segments were normalized to the native condition. The linearity of the transition zones over three or four segments was determined through linear regression analysis. All techniques achieved a significantly reduced ROM at T10-T11 in flexion-extension and axial rotation relative to the PSF condition. Additionally, both two-level sublaminar taping techniques (CT2, KT2) had a significantly reduced ROM at T9-T10. One-level clamped sublaminar tape (CT1) had a significantly lower ROM and NZ compared with one-level knotted sublaminar tape (KT1) at T10-T11. Linear regression analysis showed the highest linear correlation between ROM and vertebral level for TPH and the lowest linear correlation for CT2. All studied semirigid junctional fixation techniques significantly reduced the ROM at the junctional levels and thus provide a more gradual transition than pedicle screws. TPH achieves the most linear transition over three vertebrae, whereas KT2 achieves that over four vertebrae. In contrast, CT2 effectively is a one-level semirigid junctional fixation technique with a shift in the upper rigid fixation level. Clamped sublaminar tape reduces the NZ greatly, whereas knotted sublaminar tape and TPH maintain a more physiologic NZ. Clinical validation is ultimately required to translate the biomechanics of various semirigid junctional fixation techniques into the clinical goal of reducing the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure. The direct biomechanical comparison of multiple instrumentation techniques that aim to reduce the incidence of PJK after thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery provides a basis upon which clinical studies could be designed. Furthermore, the data provided in this study can be used to further analyze the biomechanical effects of the studied techniques using finite element models to better predict their post-operative effectiveness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33493681</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.017</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4121-8519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-0843</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2021-05, Vol.21 (5), p.855-864
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2481141153
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult spinal deformity, Biomechanics, Proximal junctional kyphosis, Proximal junctional failure
Semirigid, Topping-off
title Biomechanical comparison of semirigid junctional fixation techniques to prevent proximal junctional failure after thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity correction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A31%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20comparison%20of%20semirigid%20junctional%20fixation%20techniques%20to%20prevent%20proximal%20junctional%20failure%20after%20thoracolumbar%20adult%20spinal%20deformity%20correction&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Doodkorte,%20Remco%20J.P.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=855&rft.epage=864&rft.pages=855-864&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2481141153%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2481141153&rft_id=info:pmid/33493681&rft_els_id=S1529943021000383&rfr_iscdi=true