Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
Background Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.375-384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 375 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Hamada, Yasuhiko Tanaka, Kyosuke Hattori, Aiji Umeda, Yuhei Yukimoto, Hiroki Yamada, Reiko Nakamura, Misaki Miura, Hiroshi Tsuboi, Junya Katsurahara, Masaki Horiki, Noriyuki Takei, Yoshiyuki |
description | Background
Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs.
Methods
We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively.
Results
The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2–60.0 months).
Conclusions
ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480754553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480754553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-cf2325b3d23862250b85708a41f8e855075536f33ed26b8e915fda40d9f54f7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbmOFDEURS0EYpqBHyBAlkhICrzWEqIWMIiRSCC2XK7nbs9U2YWXQf2bfBHu7mERAZEDn7voXYSeU_KaEtK9SYSIVjSE0Yb0bGBN-wBtqOCsYYz2D9GGDJw0rBvEBXqS0g2p_EDlY3TBuRiYJO0G_djOzjujZ1yym10-4GAx-CkkE1ZncCrjUkxIFZhcSmCyCx6X5PwO5z3gNZhbyI2JoE8_C-R9mPB3l_dY46sQbj95ZwFrP-E1QlghVvAOMNzpuZw14-HvxDLnqFPwYRf1uj9gG-IpKR8jFvD52DDWIrWShxLDUWui8xUpS4jpKXpk9Zzg2f17ib6-f_dle9Vcf_7wcfv2ujG8k7WyZZzJkU-M9y2r1xh72ZFeC2p76KUknZS8tZzDxNqxh3o5O2lBpsFKYbuRX6JXZ981hm8FUlaLSwbmWXsIJSkm-uohqktFX_6D3oQSfW2nWEs7WcegtFLsTJkYUopg1RrdouNBUaKOi6vz4qourk6Lq7aKXtxb16Vg-i35NXEF-BlI9cvvIP7J_o_tT6jPvGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617592511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hamada, Yasuhiko ; Tanaka, Kyosuke ; Hattori, Aiji ; Umeda, Yuhei ; Yukimoto, Hiroki ; Yamada, Reiko ; Nakamura, Misaki ; Miura, Hiroshi ; Tsuboi, Junya ; Katsurahara, Masaki ; Horiki, Noriyuki ; Takei, Yoshiyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Yasuhiko ; Tanaka, Kyosuke ; Hattori, Aiji ; Umeda, Yuhei ; Yukimoto, Hiroki ; Yamada, Reiko ; Nakamura, Misaki ; Miura, Hiroshi ; Tsuboi, Junya ; Katsurahara, Masaki ; Horiki, Noriyuki ; Takei, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs.
Methods
We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively.
Results
The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2–60.0 months).
Conclusions
ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33492506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal cancer ; Dissection ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods ; Endoscopy ; Endosonography ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Intestinal Mucosa - surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastasis ; Methods ; Neuroendocrine tumors ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - etiology ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery ; Proctology ; Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Rectal Neoplasms - etiology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.375-384</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-cf2325b3d23862250b85708a41f8e855075536f33ed26b8e915fda40d9f54f7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-cf2325b3d23862250b85708a41f8e855075536f33ed26b8e915fda40d9f54f7b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1402-7832</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33492506$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Kyosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umeda, Yuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yukimoto, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Reiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Misaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuboi, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsurahara, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horiki, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takei, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs.
Methods
We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively.
Results
The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2–60.0 months).
Conclusions
ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endosonography</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine tumors</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - etiology</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbmOFDEURS0EYpqBHyBAlkhICrzWEqIWMIiRSCC2XK7nbs9U2YWXQf2bfBHu7mERAZEDn7voXYSeU_KaEtK9SYSIVjSE0Yb0bGBN-wBtqOCsYYz2D9GGDJw0rBvEBXqS0g2p_EDlY3TBuRiYJO0G_djOzjujZ1yym10-4GAx-CkkE1ZncCrjUkxIFZhcSmCyCx6X5PwO5z3gNZhbyI2JoE8_C-R9mPB3l_dY46sQbj95ZwFrP-E1QlghVvAOMNzpuZw14-HvxDLnqFPwYRf1uj9gG-IpKR8jFvD52DDWIrWShxLDUWui8xUpS4jpKXpk9Zzg2f17ib6-f_dle9Vcf_7wcfv2ujG8k7WyZZzJkU-M9y2r1xh72ZFeC2p76KUknZS8tZzDxNqxh3o5O2lBpsFKYbuRX6JXZ981hm8FUlaLSwbmWXsIJSkm-uohqktFX_6D3oQSfW2nWEs7WcegtFLsTJkYUopg1RrdouNBUaKOi6vz4qourk6Lq7aKXtxb16Vg-i35NXEF-BlI9cvvIP7J_o_tT6jPvGo</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Hamada, Yasuhiko</creator><creator>Tanaka, Kyosuke</creator><creator>Hattori, Aiji</creator><creator>Umeda, Yuhei</creator><creator>Yukimoto, Hiroki</creator><creator>Yamada, Reiko</creator><creator>Nakamura, Misaki</creator><creator>Miura, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Tsuboi, Junya</creator><creator>Katsurahara, Masaki</creator><creator>Horiki, Noriyuki</creator><creator>Takei, Yoshiyuki</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1402-7832</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors</title><author>Hamada, Yasuhiko ; Tanaka, Kyosuke ; Hattori, Aiji ; Umeda, Yuhei ; Yukimoto, Hiroki ; Yamada, Reiko ; Nakamura, Misaki ; Miura, Hiroshi ; Tsuboi, Junya ; Katsurahara, Masaki ; Horiki, Noriyuki ; Takei, Yoshiyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-cf2325b3d23862250b85708a41f8e855075536f33ed26b8e915fda40d9f54f7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endosonography</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine tumors</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - etiology</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Kyosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umeda, Yuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yukimoto, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Reiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Misaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuboi, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsurahara, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horiki, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takei, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamada, Yasuhiko</au><au>Tanaka, Kyosuke</au><au>Hattori, Aiji</au><au>Umeda, Yuhei</au><au>Yukimoto, Hiroki</au><au>Yamada, Reiko</au><au>Nakamura, Misaki</au><au>Miura, Hiroshi</au><au>Tsuboi, Junya</au><au>Katsurahara, Masaki</au><au>Horiki, Noriyuki</au><au>Takei, Yoshiyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>375-384</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs.
Methods
We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively.
Results
The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2–60.0 months).
Conclusions
ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33492506</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1402-7832</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.375-384 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480754553 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Colonoscopy Colorectal cancer Dissection Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods Endoscopy Endosonography Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Humans Intestinal Mucosa - surgery Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastasis Methods Neuroendocrine tumors Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging Neuroendocrine Tumors - etiology Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery Proctology Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Rectal Neoplasms - etiology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Retrospective Studies Surgery Treatment Outcome Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A11%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20utility%20of%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection%20using%20the%20pocket-creation%20method%20with%20a%20HookKnife%20and%20preoperative%20evaluation%20by%20endoscopic%20ultrasonography%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20rectal%20neuroendocrine%20tumors&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Hamada,%20Yasuhiko&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=375-384&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480754553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617592511&rft_id=info:pmid/33492506&rfr_iscdi=true |