Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors

Background Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.375-384
Hauptverfasser: Hamada, Yasuhiko, Tanaka, Kyosuke, Hattori, Aiji, Umeda, Yuhei, Yukimoto, Hiroki, Yamada, Reiko, Nakamura, Misaki, Miura, Hiroshi, Tsuboi, Junya, Katsurahara, Masaki, Horiki, Noriyuki, Takei, Yoshiyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 384
container_issue 1
container_start_page 375
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 36
creator Hamada, Yasuhiko
Tanaka, Kyosuke
Hattori, Aiji
Umeda, Yuhei
Yukimoto, Hiroki
Yamada, Reiko
Nakamura, Misaki
Miura, Hiroshi
Tsuboi, Junya
Katsurahara, Masaki
Horiki, Noriyuki
Takei, Yoshiyuki
description Background Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs. Methods We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively. Results The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2–60.0 months). Conclusions ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480754553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480754553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-cf2325b3d23862250b85708a41f8e855075536f33ed26b8e915fda40d9f54f7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kbmOFDEURS0EYpqBHyBAlkhICrzWEqIWMIiRSCC2XK7nbs9U2YWXQf2bfBHu7mERAZEDn7voXYSeU_KaEtK9SYSIVjSE0Yb0bGBN-wBtqOCsYYz2D9GGDJw0rBvEBXqS0g2p_EDlY3TBuRiYJO0G_djOzjujZ1yym10-4GAx-CkkE1ZncCrjUkxIFZhcSmCyCx6X5PwO5z3gNZhbyI2JoE8_C-R9mPB3l_dY46sQbj95ZwFrP-E1QlghVvAOMNzpuZw14-HvxDLnqFPwYRf1uj9gG-IpKR8jFvD52DDWIrWShxLDUWui8xUpS4jpKXpk9Zzg2f17ib6-f_dle9Vcf_7wcfv2ujG8k7WyZZzJkU-M9y2r1xh72ZFeC2p76KUknZS8tZzDxNqxh3o5O2lBpsFKYbuRX6JXZ981hm8FUlaLSwbmWXsIJSkm-uohqktFX_6D3oQSfW2nWEs7WcegtFLsTJkYUopg1RrdouNBUaKOi6vz4qourk6Lq7aKXtxb16Vg-i35NXEF-BlI9cvvIP7J_o_tT6jPvGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617592511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hamada, Yasuhiko ; Tanaka, Kyosuke ; Hattori, Aiji ; Umeda, Yuhei ; Yukimoto, Hiroki ; Yamada, Reiko ; Nakamura, Misaki ; Miura, Hiroshi ; Tsuboi, Junya ; Katsurahara, Masaki ; Horiki, Noriyuki ; Takei, Yoshiyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Yasuhiko ; Tanaka, Kyosuke ; Hattori, Aiji ; Umeda, Yuhei ; Yukimoto, Hiroki ; Yamada, Reiko ; Nakamura, Misaki ; Miura, Hiroshi ; Tsuboi, Junya ; Katsurahara, Masaki ; Horiki, Noriyuki ; Takei, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><description>Background Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs. Methods We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively. Results The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2–60.0 months). Conclusions ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33492506</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Colonoscopy ; Colorectal cancer ; Dissection ; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods ; Endoscopy ; Endosonography ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Humans ; Intestinal Mucosa - surgery ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastasis ; Methods ; Neuroendocrine tumors ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - etiology ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery ; Proctology ; Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Rectal Neoplasms - etiology ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.375-384</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-cf2325b3d23862250b85708a41f8e855075536f33ed26b8e915fda40d9f54f7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-cf2325b3d23862250b85708a41f8e855075536f33ed26b8e915fda40d9f54f7b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1402-7832</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33492506$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Kyosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umeda, Yuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yukimoto, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Reiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Misaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuboi, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsurahara, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horiki, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takei, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs. Methods We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively. Results The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2–60.0 months). Conclusions ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endosonography</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Mucosa - surgery</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine tumors</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - etiology</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kbmOFDEURS0EYpqBHyBAlkhICrzWEqIWMIiRSCC2XK7nbs9U2YWXQf2bfBHu7mERAZEDn7voXYSeU_KaEtK9SYSIVjSE0Yb0bGBN-wBtqOCsYYz2D9GGDJw0rBvEBXqS0g2p_EDlY3TBuRiYJO0G_djOzjujZ1yym10-4GAx-CkkE1ZncCrjUkxIFZhcSmCyCx6X5PwO5z3gNZhbyI2JoE8_C-R9mPB3l_dY46sQbj95ZwFrP-E1QlghVvAOMNzpuZw14-HvxDLnqFPwYRf1uj9gG-IpKR8jFvD52DDWIrWShxLDUWui8xUpS4jpKXpk9Zzg2f17ib6-f_dle9Vcf_7wcfv2ujG8k7WyZZzJkU-M9y2r1xh72ZFeC2p76KUknZS8tZzDxNqxh3o5O2lBpsFKYbuRX6JXZ981hm8FUlaLSwbmWXsIJSkm-uohqktFX_6D3oQSfW2nWEs7WcegtFLsTJkYUopg1RrdouNBUaKOi6vz4qourk6Lq7aKXtxb16Vg-i35NXEF-BlI9cvvIP7J_o_tT6jPvGo</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Hamada, Yasuhiko</creator><creator>Tanaka, Kyosuke</creator><creator>Hattori, Aiji</creator><creator>Umeda, Yuhei</creator><creator>Yukimoto, Hiroki</creator><creator>Yamada, Reiko</creator><creator>Nakamura, Misaki</creator><creator>Miura, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Tsuboi, Junya</creator><creator>Katsurahara, Masaki</creator><creator>Horiki, Noriyuki</creator><creator>Takei, Yoshiyuki</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1402-7832</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors</title><author>Hamada, Yasuhiko ; Tanaka, Kyosuke ; Hattori, Aiji ; Umeda, Yuhei ; Yukimoto, Hiroki ; Yamada, Reiko ; Nakamura, Misaki ; Miura, Hiroshi ; Tsuboi, Junya ; Katsurahara, Masaki ; Horiki, Noriyuki ; Takei, Yoshiyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-cf2325b3d23862250b85708a41f8e855075536f33ed26b8e915fda40d9f54f7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endosonography</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Mucosa - surgery</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine tumors</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - etiology</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamada, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Kyosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Aiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umeda, Yuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yukimoto, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Reiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Misaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuboi, Junya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsurahara, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horiki, Noriyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takei, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamada, Yasuhiko</au><au>Tanaka, Kyosuke</au><au>Hattori, Aiji</au><au>Umeda, Yuhei</au><au>Yukimoto, Hiroki</au><au>Yamada, Reiko</au><au>Nakamura, Misaki</au><au>Miura, Hiroshi</au><au>Tsuboi, Junya</au><au>Katsurahara, Masaki</au><au>Horiki, Noriyuki</au><au>Takei, Yoshiyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>375</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>375-384</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background Various endoscopic methods have been developed to remove small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method (ESD-PCM) with a HookKnife, following preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), for the treatment of rectal NETs. Methods We analyzed retrospectively consecutive patients who underwent ESD-PCM with a HookKnife for the removal of rectal NETs, with a size less than 10 mm, at Mie University Hospital between June 2015 and December 2019. All the rectal NETs were resected by ESD-PCM with a HookKnife. The R0 resection rate, procedure time, adverse event rate, diagnostic accuracy of tumor size and invasion depth evaluated by preoperative EUS, and follow-up outcome were evaluated retrospectively. Results The study group comprised 12 patients with 12 resected lesions. The median tumor size of the resected specimens was 5 mm and the size and invasion depth of each tumor was approximately equal to that predicted by preoperative EUS. R0 resection was achieved in all cases, without adverse events. The median procedure time was 50.5 min, which did not differ from previous studies. No recurrence was observed during the median follow-up period of 34.4 months (range, 5.2–60.0 months). Conclusions ESD-PCM with a HookKnife provides a favorable clinical utility for removing rectal NETs, with high R0 resection rate and good follow-up outcome. In addition, EUS is useful for evaluating preoperatively the size and invasion depth of rectal NETs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33492506</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1402-7832</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2022, Vol.36 (1), p.375-384
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480754553
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Colonoscopy
Colorectal cancer
Dissection
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection - methods
Endoscopy
Endosonography
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Humans
Intestinal Mucosa - surgery
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastasis
Methods
Neuroendocrine tumors
Neuroendocrine Tumors - diagnostic imaging
Neuroendocrine Tumors - etiology
Neuroendocrine Tumors - surgery
Proctology
Rectal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Rectal Neoplasms - etiology
Rectal Neoplasms - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic imaging
title Clinical utility of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the pocket-creation method with a HookKnife and preoperative evaluation by endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A11%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20utility%20of%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection%20using%20the%20pocket-creation%20method%20with%20a%20HookKnife%20and%20preoperative%20evaluation%20by%20endoscopic%20ultrasonography%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20rectal%20neuroendocrine%20tumors&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Hamada,%20Yasuhiko&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=375&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=375-384&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-021-08292-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480754553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617592511&rft_id=info:pmid/33492506&rfr_iscdi=true