Imaging in Renal Transplants: An Update

Renal transplantation has become the best treatment for the patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The surgical procedures, immunosuppressive regiments and patient follow-up have evolved especially in the last 10 years. However, the diagnosis for renal transplantation dysfunction remained the sa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in nuclear medicine 2021-07, Vol.51 (4), p.364-379
Hauptverfasser: Volkan-Salanci, Bilge, Erbas, Belkis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 379
container_issue 4
container_start_page 364
container_title Seminars in nuclear medicine
container_volume 51
creator Volkan-Salanci, Bilge
Erbas, Belkis
description Renal transplantation has become the best treatment for the patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The surgical procedures, immunosuppressive regiments and patient follow-up have evolved especially in the last 10 years. However, the diagnosis for renal transplantation dysfunction remained the same in these years. Serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by serum creatinine based equations are used in routine patient follow-up. Pelvic ultrasonography and color Doppler ultrasonography are used as a first-line imaging method. Assessment of allograft functions both qualitatively and quantitatively are possible using nuclear medicine procedures. Surgical complications, acute tubular necrosis, subacute and/or acute rejection, infections, toxicity due to immunosuppressive medications, complications relating the collecting system, chronic rejection are the main causes for renal function impairment. The imaging procedures can diagnose the worsening of renal transplant function; however, they still lack the ability to differentiate types of rejection as histopathology or differentiate rejection from other causes of allograft dysfunction. The transplant biopsy gives detailed diagnosis for allograft dysfunction, guide the treatment and therefore it is the preferred diagnostic choice in recent years. On recent years, literature on radionuclide imaging is focused on perfusion analysis for the early diagnosis of renal transplant dysfunction and prognostic use of perfusion parameters, and then this article will focus on these studies and their outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.12.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480752209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001299820301343</els_id><sourcerecordid>2480752209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8d308198970cb8ba42f896440cadf93c580ddffe8ea4ba728769da6985ecf3343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlb_guxNL1vz3E28afFRKAjSnkM2mS1b9mWyK_jvTWmLR08DM9-8PoQSgucEC_awmwdo2tHWDbg5xTSm6RwTcoamRAiZ8oyyczTFGJOUKiUn6CqEHcZUCCUu0YQxLkVkpuhu2Zht1W6Tqk0-oTV1svamDX1t2iE8Jk9tsumdGeAaXZSmDnBzjDO0eX1ZL97T1cfbcvG0Si3L-ZBKx7AkSqoc20IWhtNSqoxzbI0rFbNCYufKEiQYXpicyjxTzmRKCrBlvIrN0P1hbu-7rxHCoJsqWKjjPdCNQVMucS4oxSqi8oBa34XgodS9rxrjfzTBeq9J7_SfJr3XpAnVUVNsvT1uGYt97dR48hKB5wMA8dfvCrwOtoLWgqs82EG7rvp_yy9IkXxx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480752209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imaging in Renal Transplants: An Update</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Volkan-Salanci, Bilge ; Erbas, Belkis</creator><creatorcontrib>Volkan-Salanci, Bilge ; Erbas, Belkis</creatorcontrib><description>Renal transplantation has become the best treatment for the patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The surgical procedures, immunosuppressive regiments and patient follow-up have evolved especially in the last 10 years. However, the diagnosis for renal transplantation dysfunction remained the same in these years. Serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by serum creatinine based equations are used in routine patient follow-up. Pelvic ultrasonography and color Doppler ultrasonography are used as a first-line imaging method. Assessment of allograft functions both qualitatively and quantitatively are possible using nuclear medicine procedures. Surgical complications, acute tubular necrosis, subacute and/or acute rejection, infections, toxicity due to immunosuppressive medications, complications relating the collecting system, chronic rejection are the main causes for renal function impairment. The imaging procedures can diagnose the worsening of renal transplant function; however, they still lack the ability to differentiate types of rejection as histopathology or differentiate rejection from other causes of allograft dysfunction. The transplant biopsy gives detailed diagnosis for allograft dysfunction, guide the treatment and therefore it is the preferred diagnostic choice in recent years. On recent years, literature on radionuclide imaging is focused on perfusion analysis for the early diagnosis of renal transplant dysfunction and prognostic use of perfusion parameters, and then this article will focus on these studies and their outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-4623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.12.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33485623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2021-07, Vol.51 (4), p.364-379</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8d308198970cb8ba42f896440cadf93c580ddffe8ea4ba728769da6985ecf3343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8d308198970cb8ba42f896440cadf93c580ddffe8ea4ba728769da6985ecf3343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001299820301343$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33485623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Volkan-Salanci, Bilge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbas, Belkis</creatorcontrib><title>Imaging in Renal Transplants: An Update</title><title>Seminars in nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Renal transplantation has become the best treatment for the patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The surgical procedures, immunosuppressive regiments and patient follow-up have evolved especially in the last 10 years. However, the diagnosis for renal transplantation dysfunction remained the same in these years. Serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by serum creatinine based equations are used in routine patient follow-up. Pelvic ultrasonography and color Doppler ultrasonography are used as a first-line imaging method. Assessment of allograft functions both qualitatively and quantitatively are possible using nuclear medicine procedures. Surgical complications, acute tubular necrosis, subacute and/or acute rejection, infections, toxicity due to immunosuppressive medications, complications relating the collecting system, chronic rejection are the main causes for renal function impairment. The imaging procedures can diagnose the worsening of renal transplant function; however, they still lack the ability to differentiate types of rejection as histopathology or differentiate rejection from other causes of allograft dysfunction. The transplant biopsy gives detailed diagnosis for allograft dysfunction, guide the treatment and therefore it is the preferred diagnostic choice in recent years. On recent years, literature on radionuclide imaging is focused on perfusion analysis for the early diagnosis of renal transplant dysfunction and prognostic use of perfusion parameters, and then this article will focus on these studies and their outcome.</description><issn>0001-2998</issn><issn>1558-4623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlb_guxNL1vz3E28afFRKAjSnkM2mS1b9mWyK_jvTWmLR08DM9-8PoQSgucEC_awmwdo2tHWDbg5xTSm6RwTcoamRAiZ8oyyczTFGJOUKiUn6CqEHcZUCCUu0YQxLkVkpuhu2Zht1W6Tqk0-oTV1svamDX1t2iE8Jk9tsumdGeAaXZSmDnBzjDO0eX1ZL97T1cfbcvG0Si3L-ZBKx7AkSqoc20IWhtNSqoxzbI0rFbNCYufKEiQYXpicyjxTzmRKCrBlvIrN0P1hbu-7rxHCoJsqWKjjPdCNQVMucS4oxSqi8oBa34XgodS9rxrjfzTBeq9J7_SfJr3XpAnVUVNsvT1uGYt97dR48hKB5wMA8dfvCrwOtoLWgqs82EG7rvp_yy9IkXxx</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Volkan-Salanci, Bilge</creator><creator>Erbas, Belkis</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Imaging in Renal Transplants: An Update</title><author>Volkan-Salanci, Bilge ; Erbas, Belkis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-8d308198970cb8ba42f896440cadf93c580ddffe8ea4ba728769da6985ecf3343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Volkan-Salanci, Bilge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbas, Belkis</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Volkan-Salanci, Bilge</au><au>Erbas, Belkis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imaging in Renal Transplants: An Update</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>364</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>364-379</pages><issn>0001-2998</issn><eissn>1558-4623</eissn><abstract>Renal transplantation has become the best treatment for the patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The surgical procedures, immunosuppressive regiments and patient follow-up have evolved especially in the last 10 years. However, the diagnosis for renal transplantation dysfunction remained the same in these years. Serum creatinine levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by serum creatinine based equations are used in routine patient follow-up. Pelvic ultrasonography and color Doppler ultrasonography are used as a first-line imaging method. Assessment of allograft functions both qualitatively and quantitatively are possible using nuclear medicine procedures. Surgical complications, acute tubular necrosis, subacute and/or acute rejection, infections, toxicity due to immunosuppressive medications, complications relating the collecting system, chronic rejection are the main causes for renal function impairment. The imaging procedures can diagnose the worsening of renal transplant function; however, they still lack the ability to differentiate types of rejection as histopathology or differentiate rejection from other causes of allograft dysfunction. The transplant biopsy gives detailed diagnosis for allograft dysfunction, guide the treatment and therefore it is the preferred diagnostic choice in recent years. On recent years, literature on radionuclide imaging is focused on perfusion analysis for the early diagnosis of renal transplant dysfunction and prognostic use of perfusion parameters, and then this article will focus on these studies and their outcome.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33485623</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.12.011</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-2998
ispartof Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2021-07, Vol.51 (4), p.364-379
issn 0001-2998
1558-4623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480752209
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Imaging in Renal Transplants: An Update
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A00%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imaging%20in%20Renal%20Transplants:%20An%20Update&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Volkan-Salanci,%20Bilge&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=364&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=364-379&rft.issn=0001-2998&rft.eissn=1558-4623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.12.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480752209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480752209&rft_id=info:pmid/33485623&rft_els_id=S0001299820301343&rfr_iscdi=true