Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment
To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation. Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review. We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 yea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of otolaryngology 2021-05, Vol.42 (3), p.102901-102901, Article 102901 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 102901 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 102901 |
container_title | American journal of otolaryngology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Kim, Dong-Kee Choi, Hosung Lee, Hoseok Hwang, Se Hwan Kang, Jun Myung Seo, Jae-Hyun |
description | To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation.
Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review.
We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. The mean perforation size was 21.2 ± 8.6% of the TM area, and the mean air-bone gap (ABG) was 20.2 ± 8.6 dB HL on pure tone audiometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean ABG. Patients with a large ABG had a significantly larger TM perforation area and smaller mastoid volume. The TM perforation was most commonly located in the central section. However, regression analyses showed that the proportion of the perforated TM area was the only independent predictor of a large ABG (odds ratio, 1.053; 95% confidence interval, 1.022–1.085; p = 0.001). When we analyzed the frequencies in which hearing loss occurred due to TM perforation, we confirmed that hearing loss occurred mainly in the low-frequency range.
In patients with TM perforation, conductive hearing loss occurs mainly at low frequencies and in proportion to the size of the TM perforation.
•Conductive hearing loss by eardrum perforation occurs mainly at low frequencies.•In large eardrum perforations, hearing loss occurs even at high frequencies.•The degree of hearing loss is proportional to the size of the eardrum perforation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102901 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480743523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196070921000028</els_id><sourcerecordid>2480743523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f1217d33e38ed1a37da33d604aab08445d3553fa7f406113abe1482c880bc0903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMoM9dx_oFIwM0spteTj7bpRpBhRoUBNwruQpqcakrTXJP2wv335tLRhQshEAjPeXPOeQh5zWDPgDXvxr0JY1zingNn5Yl3wJ6RHasFrxRT35-THbCuqaCF7pK8zHkEACFFfUEuhZCq4dDuyHw_DGiXTONAl1M4mNlbGjD0ycxID5iGmMzi43xLg3duQoomUWuOfjnRY5zWgLfUzI4Gk5foHTW48bScn4X18w_qS65PAeflFXkxmCnj9dN9Rb493H-9-1Q9fvn4-e7DY2VFB0s1MM5aJwQKhY4Z0TojhGtAGtODkrJ2oq7FYNpBQsOYMD0yqbhVCnoLHYgrcrPlHlL8tWJedPDZ4jSVqeKaNZcK2rILLgr69h90jGuaS3ea10x1XSe7MyU3yqaYc8JBH5IPJp00A332oUe9-dBnH3rzUcrePIWvfUD3t-iPgAK83wAs2zh6TDpbj7NF51Pxol30___hN9dGnak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518999493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, Dong-Kee ; Choi, Hosung ; Lee, Hoseok ; Hwang, Se Hwan ; Kang, Jun Myung ; Seo, Jae-Hyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Kee ; Choi, Hosung ; Lee, Hoseok ; Hwang, Se Hwan ; Kang, Jun Myung ; Seo, Jae-Hyun</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation.
Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review.
We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. The mean perforation size was 21.2 ± 8.6% of the TM area, and the mean air-bone gap (ABG) was 20.2 ± 8.6 dB HL on pure tone audiometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean ABG. Patients with a large ABG had a significantly larger TM perforation area and smaller mastoid volume. The TM perforation was most commonly located in the central section. However, regression analyses showed that the proportion of the perforated TM area was the only independent predictor of a large ABG (odds ratio, 1.053; 95% confidence interval, 1.022–1.085; p = 0.001). When we analyzed the frequencies in which hearing loss occurred due to TM perforation, we confirmed that hearing loss occurred mainly in the low-frequency range.
In patients with TM perforation, conductive hearing loss occurs mainly at low frequencies and in proportion to the size of the TM perforation.
•Conductive hearing loss by eardrum perforation occurs mainly at low frequencies.•In large eardrum perforations, hearing loss occurs even at high frequencies.•The degree of hearing loss is proportional to the size of the eardrum perforation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-818X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102901</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33486207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aeration ; Audiometry ; Conductive hearing loss ; Confidence intervals ; Ear diseases ; Ears & hearing ; Frequency ranges ; Hearing ; Hearing loss ; Mastoid aeration ; Membranes ; Middle ear ; Middle ear volume ; Otolaryngology ; Perforation ; Regression analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Tympanic membrane ; Tympanic membrane perforation</subject><ispartof>American journal of otolaryngology, 2021-05, Vol.42 (3), p.102901-102901, Article 102901</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f1217d33e38ed1a37da33d604aab08445d3553fa7f406113abe1482c880bc0903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f1217d33e38ed1a37da33d604aab08445d3553fa7f406113abe1482c880bc0903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070921000028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33486207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Kee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Hosung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hoseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Se Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jun Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jae-Hyun</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment</title><title>American journal of otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation.
Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review.
We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. The mean perforation size was 21.2 ± 8.6% of the TM area, and the mean air-bone gap (ABG) was 20.2 ± 8.6 dB HL on pure tone audiometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean ABG. Patients with a large ABG had a significantly larger TM perforation area and smaller mastoid volume. The TM perforation was most commonly located in the central section. However, regression analyses showed that the proportion of the perforated TM area was the only independent predictor of a large ABG (odds ratio, 1.053; 95% confidence interval, 1.022–1.085; p = 0.001). When we analyzed the frequencies in which hearing loss occurred due to TM perforation, we confirmed that hearing loss occurred mainly in the low-frequency range.
In patients with TM perforation, conductive hearing loss occurs mainly at low frequencies and in proportion to the size of the TM perforation.
•Conductive hearing loss by eardrum perforation occurs mainly at low frequencies.•In large eardrum perforations, hearing loss occurs even at high frequencies.•The degree of hearing loss is proportional to the size of the eardrum perforation.</description><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Conductive hearing loss</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Ear diseases</subject><subject>Ears & hearing</subject><subject>Frequency ranges</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Mastoid aeration</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Middle ear</subject><subject>Middle ear volume</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Perforation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tympanic membrane</subject><subject>Tympanic membrane perforation</subject><issn>0196-0709</issn><issn>1532-818X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMoM9dx_oFIwM0spteTj7bpRpBhRoUBNwruQpqcakrTXJP2wv335tLRhQshEAjPeXPOeQh5zWDPgDXvxr0JY1zingNn5Yl3wJ6RHasFrxRT35-THbCuqaCF7pK8zHkEACFFfUEuhZCq4dDuyHw_DGiXTONAl1M4mNlbGjD0ycxID5iGmMzi43xLg3duQoomUWuOfjnRY5zWgLfUzI4Gk5foHTW48bScn4X18w_qS65PAeflFXkxmCnj9dN9Rb493H-9-1Q9fvn4-e7DY2VFB0s1MM5aJwQKhY4Z0TojhGtAGtODkrJ2oq7FYNpBQsOYMD0yqbhVCnoLHYgrcrPlHlL8tWJedPDZ4jSVqeKaNZcK2rILLgr69h90jGuaS3ea10x1XSe7MyU3yqaYc8JBH5IPJp00A332oUe9-dBnH3rzUcrePIWvfUD3t-iPgAK83wAs2zh6TDpbj7NF51Pxol30___hN9dGnak</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Kim, Dong-Kee</creator><creator>Choi, Hosung</creator><creator>Lee, Hoseok</creator><creator>Hwang, Se Hwan</creator><creator>Kang, Jun Myung</creator><creator>Seo, Jae-Hyun</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment</title><author>Kim, Dong-Kee ; Choi, Hosung ; Lee, Hoseok ; Hwang, Se Hwan ; Kang, Jun Myung ; Seo, Jae-Hyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f1217d33e38ed1a37da33d604aab08445d3553fa7f406113abe1482c880bc0903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Conductive hearing loss</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Ear diseases</topic><topic>Ears & hearing</topic><topic>Frequency ranges</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Mastoid aeration</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Middle ear</topic><topic>Middle ear volume</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Perforation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tympanic membrane</topic><topic>Tympanic membrane perforation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Kee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Hosung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hoseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Se Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jun Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jae-Hyun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dong-Kee</au><au>Choi, Hosung</au><au>Lee, Hoseok</au><au>Hwang, Se Hwan</au><au>Kang, Jun Myung</au><au>Seo, Jae-Hyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment</atitle><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>102901</spage><epage>102901</epage><pages>102901-102901</pages><artnum>102901</artnum><issn>0196-0709</issn><eissn>1532-818X</eissn><abstract>To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation.
Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review.
We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. The mean perforation size was 21.2 ± 8.6% of the TM area, and the mean air-bone gap (ABG) was 20.2 ± 8.6 dB HL on pure tone audiometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean ABG. Patients with a large ABG had a significantly larger TM perforation area and smaller mastoid volume. The TM perforation was most commonly located in the central section. However, regression analyses showed that the proportion of the perforated TM area was the only independent predictor of a large ABG (odds ratio, 1.053; 95% confidence interval, 1.022–1.085; p = 0.001). When we analyzed the frequencies in which hearing loss occurred due to TM perforation, we confirmed that hearing loss occurred mainly in the low-frequency range.
In patients with TM perforation, conductive hearing loss occurs mainly at low frequencies and in proportion to the size of the TM perforation.
•Conductive hearing loss by eardrum perforation occurs mainly at low frequencies.•In large eardrum perforations, hearing loss occurs even at high frequencies.•The degree of hearing loss is proportional to the size of the eardrum perforation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33486207</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102901</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-0709 |
ispartof | American journal of otolaryngology, 2021-05, Vol.42 (3), p.102901-102901, Article 102901 |
issn | 0196-0709 1532-818X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480743523 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aeration Audiometry Conductive hearing loss Confidence intervals Ear diseases Ears & hearing Frequency ranges Hearing Hearing loss Mastoid aeration Membranes Middle ear Middle ear volume Otolaryngology Perforation Regression analysis Statistical analysis Surgery Tympanic membrane Tympanic membrane perforation |
title | Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T15%3A10%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20tympanic%20membrane%20perforation,%20middle%20ear%20cavity%20volume,%20and%20mastoid%20aeration%20on%20hearing%20impairment&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Kim,%20Dong-Kee&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=102901&rft.epage=102901&rft.pages=102901-102901&rft.artnum=102901&rft.issn=0196-0709&rft.eissn=1532-818X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102901&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480743523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518999493&rft_id=info:pmid/33486207&rft_els_id=S0196070921000028&rfr_iscdi=true |