Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment

To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation. Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review. We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 yea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of otolaryngology 2021-05, Vol.42 (3), p.102901-102901, Article 102901
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Dong-Kee, Choi, Hosung, Lee, Hoseok, Hwang, Se Hwan, Kang, Jun Myung, Seo, Jae-Hyun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102901
container_issue 3
container_start_page 102901
container_title American journal of otolaryngology
container_volume 42
creator Kim, Dong-Kee
Choi, Hosung
Lee, Hoseok
Hwang, Se Hwan
Kang, Jun Myung
Seo, Jae-Hyun
description To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation. Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review. We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. The mean perforation size was 21.2 ± 8.6% of the TM area, and the mean air-bone gap (ABG) was 20.2 ± 8.6 dB HL on pure tone audiometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean ABG. Patients with a large ABG had a significantly larger TM perforation area and smaller mastoid volume. The TM perforation was most commonly located in the central section. However, regression analyses showed that the proportion of the perforated TM area was the only independent predictor of a large ABG (odds ratio, 1.053; 95% confidence interval, 1.022–1.085; p = 0.001). When we analyzed the frequencies in which hearing loss occurred due to TM perforation, we confirmed that hearing loss occurred mainly in the low-frequency range. In patients with TM perforation, conductive hearing loss occurs mainly at low frequencies and in proportion to the size of the TM perforation. •Conductive hearing loss by eardrum perforation occurs mainly at low frequencies.•In large eardrum perforations, hearing loss occurs even at high frequencies.•The degree of hearing loss is proportional to the size of the eardrum perforation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102901
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480743523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196070921000028</els_id><sourcerecordid>2480743523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f1217d33e38ed1a37da33d604aab08445d3553fa7f406113abe1482c880bc0903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMoM9dx_oFIwM0spteTj7bpRpBhRoUBNwruQpqcakrTXJP2wv335tLRhQshEAjPeXPOeQh5zWDPgDXvxr0JY1zingNn5Yl3wJ6RHasFrxRT35-THbCuqaCF7pK8zHkEACFFfUEuhZCq4dDuyHw_DGiXTONAl1M4mNlbGjD0ycxID5iGmMzi43xLg3duQoomUWuOfjnRY5zWgLfUzI4Gk5foHTW48bScn4X18w_qS65PAeflFXkxmCnj9dN9Rb493H-9-1Q9fvn4-e7DY2VFB0s1MM5aJwQKhY4Z0TojhGtAGtODkrJ2oq7FYNpBQsOYMD0yqbhVCnoLHYgrcrPlHlL8tWJedPDZ4jSVqeKaNZcK2rILLgr69h90jGuaS3ea10x1XSe7MyU3yqaYc8JBH5IPJp00A332oUe9-dBnH3rzUcrePIWvfUD3t-iPgAK83wAs2zh6TDpbj7NF51Pxol30___hN9dGnak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518999493</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, Dong-Kee ; Choi, Hosung ; Lee, Hoseok ; Hwang, Se Hwan ; Kang, Jun Myung ; Seo, Jae-Hyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Kee ; Choi, Hosung ; Lee, Hoseok ; Hwang, Se Hwan ; Kang, Jun Myung ; Seo, Jae-Hyun</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation. Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review. We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. The mean perforation size was 21.2 ± 8.6% of the TM area, and the mean air-bone gap (ABG) was 20.2 ± 8.6 dB HL on pure tone audiometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean ABG. Patients with a large ABG had a significantly larger TM perforation area and smaller mastoid volume. The TM perforation was most commonly located in the central section. However, regression analyses showed that the proportion of the perforated TM area was the only independent predictor of a large ABG (odds ratio, 1.053; 95% confidence interval, 1.022–1.085; p = 0.001). When we analyzed the frequencies in which hearing loss occurred due to TM perforation, we confirmed that hearing loss occurred mainly in the low-frequency range. In patients with TM perforation, conductive hearing loss occurs mainly at low frequencies and in proportion to the size of the TM perforation. •Conductive hearing loss by eardrum perforation occurs mainly at low frequencies.•In large eardrum perforations, hearing loss occurs even at high frequencies.•The degree of hearing loss is proportional to the size of the eardrum perforation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-818X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102901</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33486207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aeration ; Audiometry ; Conductive hearing loss ; Confidence intervals ; Ear diseases ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Frequency ranges ; Hearing ; Hearing loss ; Mastoid aeration ; Membranes ; Middle ear ; Middle ear volume ; Otolaryngology ; Perforation ; Regression analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Tympanic membrane ; Tympanic membrane perforation</subject><ispartof>American journal of otolaryngology, 2021-05, Vol.42 (3), p.102901-102901, Article 102901</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f1217d33e38ed1a37da33d604aab08445d3553fa7f406113abe1482c880bc0903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f1217d33e38ed1a37da33d604aab08445d3553fa7f406113abe1482c880bc0903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070921000028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33486207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Kee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Hosung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hoseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Se Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jun Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jae-Hyun</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment</title><title>American journal of otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation. Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review. We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. The mean perforation size was 21.2 ± 8.6% of the TM area, and the mean air-bone gap (ABG) was 20.2 ± 8.6 dB HL on pure tone audiometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean ABG. Patients with a large ABG had a significantly larger TM perforation area and smaller mastoid volume. The TM perforation was most commonly located in the central section. However, regression analyses showed that the proportion of the perforated TM area was the only independent predictor of a large ABG (odds ratio, 1.053; 95% confidence interval, 1.022–1.085; p = 0.001). When we analyzed the frequencies in which hearing loss occurred due to TM perforation, we confirmed that hearing loss occurred mainly in the low-frequency range. In patients with TM perforation, conductive hearing loss occurs mainly at low frequencies and in proportion to the size of the TM perforation. •Conductive hearing loss by eardrum perforation occurs mainly at low frequencies.•In large eardrum perforations, hearing loss occurs even at high frequencies.•The degree of hearing loss is proportional to the size of the eardrum perforation.</description><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Conductive hearing loss</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Ear diseases</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Frequency ranges</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Mastoid aeration</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Middle ear</subject><subject>Middle ear volume</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Perforation</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tympanic membrane</subject><subject>Tympanic membrane perforation</subject><issn>0196-0709</issn><issn>1532-818X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMoM9dx_oFIwM0spteTj7bpRpBhRoUBNwruQpqcakrTXJP2wv335tLRhQshEAjPeXPOeQh5zWDPgDXvxr0JY1zingNn5Yl3wJ6RHasFrxRT35-THbCuqaCF7pK8zHkEACFFfUEuhZCq4dDuyHw_DGiXTONAl1M4mNlbGjD0ycxID5iGmMzi43xLg3duQoomUWuOfjnRY5zWgLfUzI4Gk5foHTW48bScn4X18w_qS65PAeflFXkxmCnj9dN9Rb493H-9-1Q9fvn4-e7DY2VFB0s1MM5aJwQKhY4Z0TojhGtAGtODkrJ2oq7FYNpBQsOYMD0yqbhVCnoLHYgrcrPlHlL8tWJedPDZ4jSVqeKaNZcK2rILLgr69h90jGuaS3ea10x1XSe7MyU3yqaYc8JBH5IPJp00A332oUe9-dBnH3rzUcrePIWvfUD3t-iPgAK83wAs2zh6TDpbj7NF51Pxol30___hN9dGnak</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Kim, Dong-Kee</creator><creator>Choi, Hosung</creator><creator>Lee, Hoseok</creator><creator>Hwang, Se Hwan</creator><creator>Kang, Jun Myung</creator><creator>Seo, Jae-Hyun</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment</title><author>Kim, Dong-Kee ; Choi, Hosung ; Lee, Hoseok ; Hwang, Se Hwan ; Kang, Jun Myung ; Seo, Jae-Hyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f1217d33e38ed1a37da33d604aab08445d3553fa7f406113abe1482c880bc0903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Conductive hearing loss</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Ear diseases</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Frequency ranges</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Mastoid aeration</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Middle ear</topic><topic>Middle ear volume</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Perforation</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tympanic membrane</topic><topic>Tympanic membrane perforation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Kee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Hosung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hoseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Se Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jun Myung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Jae-Hyun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dong-Kee</au><au>Choi, Hosung</au><au>Lee, Hoseok</au><au>Hwang, Se Hwan</au><au>Kang, Jun Myung</au><au>Seo, Jae-Hyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment</atitle><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>102901</spage><epage>102901</epage><pages>102901-102901</pages><artnum>102901</artnum><issn>0196-0709</issn><eissn>1532-818X</eissn><abstract>To investigate the effects of the location and size of tympanic membrane (TM) perforation and middle ear cavity volume on conductive hearing loss in patients with TM perforation. Data were collected via a retrospective medical chart review. We enrolled 128 patients with a mean age of 45.6 ± 10.1 years. The mean perforation size was 21.2 ± 8.6% of the TM area, and the mean air-bone gap (ABG) was 20.2 ± 8.6 dB HL on pure tone audiometry. Patients were divided into two groups based on mean ABG. Patients with a large ABG had a significantly larger TM perforation area and smaller mastoid volume. The TM perforation was most commonly located in the central section. However, regression analyses showed that the proportion of the perforated TM area was the only independent predictor of a large ABG (odds ratio, 1.053; 95% confidence interval, 1.022–1.085; p = 0.001). When we analyzed the frequencies in which hearing loss occurred due to TM perforation, we confirmed that hearing loss occurred mainly in the low-frequency range. In patients with TM perforation, conductive hearing loss occurs mainly at low frequencies and in proportion to the size of the TM perforation. •Conductive hearing loss by eardrum perforation occurs mainly at low frequencies.•In large eardrum perforations, hearing loss occurs even at high frequencies.•The degree of hearing loss is proportional to the size of the eardrum perforation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33486207</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102901</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0709
ispartof American journal of otolaryngology, 2021-05, Vol.42 (3), p.102901-102901, Article 102901
issn 0196-0709
1532-818X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480743523
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aeration
Audiometry
Conductive hearing loss
Confidence intervals
Ear diseases
Ears & hearing
Frequency ranges
Hearing
Hearing loss
Mastoid aeration
Membranes
Middle ear
Middle ear volume
Otolaryngology
Perforation
Regression analysis
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Tympanic membrane
Tympanic membrane perforation
title Effects of tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear cavity volume, and mastoid aeration on hearing impairment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T15%3A10%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20tympanic%20membrane%20perforation,%20middle%20ear%20cavity%20volume,%20and%20mastoid%20aeration%20on%20hearing%20impairment&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Kim,%20Dong-Kee&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=102901&rft.epage=102901&rft.pages=102901-102901&rft.artnum=102901&rft.issn=0196-0709&rft.eissn=1532-818X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102901&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480743523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518999493&rft_id=info:pmid/33486207&rft_els_id=S0196070921000028&rfr_iscdi=true