GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis of hospitalized patients presents satisfactory criterion validity: A prospective cohort study

Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized patients, but there is no universally accepted consensus regarding its diagnosis. Recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a new framework for the malnutrition diagnosis and until this moment there is scarce evidence rega...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.4366-4372
Hauptverfasser: Brito, Júlia Epping, Burgel, Camila Ferri, Lima, Júlia, Chites, Victória Silva, Saragiotto, Camila Becker, Rabito, Estela Iraci, Silva, Flávia Moraes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4372
container_issue 6
container_start_page 4366
container_title Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
container_volume 40
creator Brito, Júlia Epping
Burgel, Camila Ferri
Lima, Júlia
Chites, Victória Silva
Saragiotto, Camila Becker
Rabito, Estela Iraci
Silva, Flávia Moraes
description Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized patients, but there is no universally accepted consensus regarding its diagnosis. Recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a new framework for the malnutrition diagnosis and until this moment there is scarce evidence regarding its validity. This study aimed to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity of GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis in hospitalized patients. Prospective cohort study involving adult/elderly hospitalized patients. The malnutrition diagnoses according to Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and GLIM criteria were performed within 48 h of admission. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge to assess the length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Six months post discharge; the patients were contacted to collect the outcomes readmission and death. Agreement and accuracy tests, Cox and Logistic regression analysis were performed for testing criterion validity. 601 patients (55.7 ± 14.8 years, 51.3% men) were evaluated. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 33.9% and 41.6% of patients, by SGA and GLIM criteria, respectively. GLIM criteria presented a satisfactory accuracy, (AUC = 0.842; CI95% 0.807–0.877) with a sensitivity of 86.6%, and a specificity of 81.6%. The presence of malnutrition by GLIM criteria increased the chance of prolonged hospitalization by 1.76 (CI95% 1.23–2.52) times, and the risk of in-hospital deaths by 5.1 (CI95% 1.14–23.14) times. It was also associated with death within six months (RR = 3.96, CI95% 1.49–10.53). GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis presented satisfactory criterion validity and should be applied during clinical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480733506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261561421000194</els_id><sourcerecordid>2480733506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7b0b7e941ac1314e628127ece148b118625a119b2fd51925476c51d4b374e7443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9uEzEQhy0EomnhBTggH7ls8PjPehdxqSpoKwVxgbPltWepo8062N5I4QF4bhzSckQaydboN59mPkLeAFsDg_b9du2meVlzxmHNarH-GVmBEryBvhPPyYrxFhrVgrwglzlvGWNK6O4luRBCdloxuSK_bzf3X6hLoWAKlo4x0Z2t1FI7Ic7UB_tjjjlkGkf6EPM-FDuFX-jp3paAc8l0nzD__eTayaN1JabjE7IiDnXAh3L8QK9rtiLQlXBA6uJDTIXmsvjjK_JitFPG14_vFfn--dO3m7tm8_X2_uZ60zjJeWn0wAaNvQTrQIDElnfANToE2Q0AXcuVBegHPnoFPVdSt06Bl4PQErWU4oq8O3PrIj8XzMXsQnY4TXbGuGTDZce0EIq1NcrPUVd3zglHs09hZ9PRADMn_2ZrTv7Nyb9htVhfh94-8pdhh_7fyJPwGvh4DmC98hAwmeyqRoc-pOrF-Bj-x_8DrJGZUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480733506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis of hospitalized patients presents satisfactory criterion validity: A prospective cohort study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Brito, Júlia Epping ; Burgel, Camila Ferri ; Lima, Júlia ; Chites, Victória Silva ; Saragiotto, Camila Becker ; Rabito, Estela Iraci ; Silva, Flávia Moraes</creator><creatorcontrib>Brito, Júlia Epping ; Burgel, Camila Ferri ; Lima, Júlia ; Chites, Victória Silva ; Saragiotto, Camila Becker ; Rabito, Estela Iraci ; Silva, Flávia Moraes</creatorcontrib><description>Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized patients, but there is no universally accepted consensus regarding its diagnosis. Recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a new framework for the malnutrition diagnosis and until this moment there is scarce evidence regarding its validity. This study aimed to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity of GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis in hospitalized patients. Prospective cohort study involving adult/elderly hospitalized patients. The malnutrition diagnoses according to Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and GLIM criteria were performed within 48 h of admission. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge to assess the length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Six months post discharge; the patients were contacted to collect the outcomes readmission and death. Agreement and accuracy tests, Cox and Logistic regression analysis were performed for testing criterion validity. 601 patients (55.7 ± 14.8 years, 51.3% men) were evaluated. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 33.9% and 41.6% of patients, by SGA and GLIM criteria, respectively. GLIM criteria presented a satisfactory accuracy, (AUC = 0.842; CI95% 0.807–0.877) with a sensitivity of 86.6%, and a specificity of 81.6%. The presence of malnutrition by GLIM criteria increased the chance of prolonged hospitalization by 1.76 (CI95% 1.23–2.52) times, and the risk of in-hospital deaths by 5.1 (CI95% 1.14–23.14) times. It was also associated with death within six months (RR = 3.96, CI95% 1.49–10.53). GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis presented satisfactory criterion validity and should be applied during clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-5614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33487504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Hospital ; Length of stay ; Malnutrition ; Mortality ; Nutrition assessment</subject><ispartof>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.4366-4372</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7b0b7e941ac1314e628127ece148b118625a119b2fd51925476c51d4b374e7443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7b0b7e941ac1314e628127ece148b118625a119b2fd51925476c51d4b374e7443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brito, Júlia Epping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgel, Camila Ferri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Júlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chites, Victória Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saragiotto, Camila Becker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabito, Estela Iraci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Flávia Moraes</creatorcontrib><title>GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis of hospitalized patients presents satisfactory criterion validity: A prospective cohort study</title><title>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</title><addtitle>Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized patients, but there is no universally accepted consensus regarding its diagnosis. Recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a new framework for the malnutrition diagnosis and until this moment there is scarce evidence regarding its validity. This study aimed to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity of GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis in hospitalized patients. Prospective cohort study involving adult/elderly hospitalized patients. The malnutrition diagnoses according to Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and GLIM criteria were performed within 48 h of admission. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge to assess the length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Six months post discharge; the patients were contacted to collect the outcomes readmission and death. Agreement and accuracy tests, Cox and Logistic regression analysis were performed for testing criterion validity. 601 patients (55.7 ± 14.8 years, 51.3% men) were evaluated. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 33.9% and 41.6% of patients, by SGA and GLIM criteria, respectively. GLIM criteria presented a satisfactory accuracy, (AUC = 0.842; CI95% 0.807–0.877) with a sensitivity of 86.6%, and a specificity of 81.6%. The presence of malnutrition by GLIM criteria increased the chance of prolonged hospitalization by 1.76 (CI95% 1.23–2.52) times, and the risk of in-hospital deaths by 5.1 (CI95% 1.14–23.14) times. It was also associated with death within six months (RR = 3.96, CI95% 1.49–10.53). GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis presented satisfactory criterion validity and should be applied during clinical practice.</description><subject>Hospital</subject><subject>Length of stay</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nutrition assessment</subject><issn>0261-5614</issn><issn>1532-1983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9uEzEQhy0EomnhBTggH7ls8PjPehdxqSpoKwVxgbPltWepo8062N5I4QF4bhzSckQaydboN59mPkLeAFsDg_b9du2meVlzxmHNarH-GVmBEryBvhPPyYrxFhrVgrwglzlvGWNK6O4luRBCdloxuSK_bzf3X6hLoWAKlo4x0Z2t1FI7Ic7UB_tjjjlkGkf6EPM-FDuFX-jp3paAc8l0nzD__eTayaN1JabjE7IiDnXAh3L8QK9rtiLQlXBA6uJDTIXmsvjjK_JitFPG14_vFfn--dO3m7tm8_X2_uZ60zjJeWn0wAaNvQTrQIDElnfANToE2Q0AXcuVBegHPnoFPVdSt06Bl4PQErWU4oq8O3PrIj8XzMXsQnY4TXbGuGTDZce0EIq1NcrPUVd3zglHs09hZ9PRADMn_2ZrTv7Nyb9htVhfh94-8pdhh_7fyJPwGvh4DmC98hAwmeyqRoc-pOrF-Bj-x_8DrJGZUg</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Brito, Júlia Epping</creator><creator>Burgel, Camila Ferri</creator><creator>Lima, Júlia</creator><creator>Chites, Victória Silva</creator><creator>Saragiotto, Camila Becker</creator><creator>Rabito, Estela Iraci</creator><creator>Silva, Flávia Moraes</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis of hospitalized patients presents satisfactory criterion validity: A prospective cohort study</title><author>Brito, Júlia Epping ; Burgel, Camila Ferri ; Lima, Júlia ; Chites, Victória Silva ; Saragiotto, Camila Becker ; Rabito, Estela Iraci ; Silva, Flávia Moraes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-7b0b7e941ac1314e628127ece148b118625a119b2fd51925476c51d4b374e7443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Hospital</topic><topic>Length of stay</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nutrition assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brito, Júlia Epping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgel, Camila Ferri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Júlia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chites, Victória Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saragiotto, Camila Becker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabito, Estela Iraci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Flávia Moraes</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brito, Júlia Epping</au><au>Burgel, Camila Ferri</au><au>Lima, Júlia</au><au>Chites, Victória Silva</au><au>Saragiotto, Camila Becker</au><au>Rabito, Estela Iraci</au><au>Silva, Flávia Moraes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis of hospitalized patients presents satisfactory criterion validity: A prospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4366</spage><epage>4372</epage><pages>4366-4372</pages><issn>0261-5614</issn><eissn>1532-1983</eissn><abstract>Malnutrition is prevalent among hospitalized patients, but there is no universally accepted consensus regarding its diagnosis. Recently, the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) proposed a new framework for the malnutrition diagnosis and until this moment there is scarce evidence regarding its validity. This study aimed to evaluate the concurrent and predictive validity of GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis in hospitalized patients. Prospective cohort study involving adult/elderly hospitalized patients. The malnutrition diagnoses according to Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and GLIM criteria were performed within 48 h of admission. Patients were followed up until hospital discharge to assess the length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Six months post discharge; the patients were contacted to collect the outcomes readmission and death. Agreement and accuracy tests, Cox and Logistic regression analysis were performed for testing criterion validity. 601 patients (55.7 ± 14.8 years, 51.3% men) were evaluated. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 33.9% and 41.6% of patients, by SGA and GLIM criteria, respectively. GLIM criteria presented a satisfactory accuracy, (AUC = 0.842; CI95% 0.807–0.877) with a sensitivity of 86.6%, and a specificity of 81.6%. The presence of malnutrition by GLIM criteria increased the chance of prolonged hospitalization by 1.76 (CI95% 1.23–2.52) times, and the risk of in-hospital deaths by 5.1 (CI95% 1.14–23.14) times. It was also associated with death within six months (RR = 3.96, CI95% 1.49–10.53). GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis presented satisfactory criterion validity and should be applied during clinical practice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33487504</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-5614
ispartof Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021-06, Vol.40 (6), p.4366-4372
issn 0261-5614
1532-1983
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480733506
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Hospital
Length of stay
Malnutrition
Mortality
Nutrition assessment
title GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis of hospitalized patients presents satisfactory criterion validity: A prospective cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T08%3A37%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GLIM%20criteria%20for%20malnutrition%20diagnosis%20of%20hospitalized%20patients%20presents%20satisfactory%20criterion%20validity:%20A%20prospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nutrition%20(Edinburgh,%20Scotland)&rft.au=Brito,%20J%C3%BAlia%20Epping&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4366&rft.epage=4372&rft.pages=4366-4372&rft.issn=0261-5614&rft.eissn=1532-1983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480733506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480733506&rft_id=info:pmid/33487504&rft_els_id=S0261561421000194&rfr_iscdi=true