Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Study
This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic epidural in perioperative pain control for patients with cancer undergoing lung surgeries. Single blinded, randomized, controlled trial. The study was carried o...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2928-2936 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2936 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2928 |
| container_title | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Elsabeeny, Walaa Y. Ibrahim, Mostafa A. Shehab, Nahla N. Mohamed, Abdelrahman Wadod, Mohamed A. |
| description | This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic epidural in perioperative pain control for patients with cancer undergoing lung surgeries.
Single blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
The study was carried out at the National Cancer Institute in Cairo, Egypt.
Fifty-one patients with cancer.
Patients were allocated randomly into three groups: thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) group, serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) group, and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group.
Outcome measures were 24 hours postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), intraoperative rescue fentanyl consumption, perioperative heart rate, mean blood pressure (mean arterial pressure [MAP]), and total postoperative morphine consumption. VAS scores at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group at the postanesthesia care unit and 24 hours. VAS scores with cough were significantly higher in the SAPB group at eight and 24 hours. The first time to receive morphine was significantly longer in the TEA group. No patients in the TEA group required postoperative morphine, whereas 88.2% and 47.1% required morphine in the SAPB and ESPB groups, respectively, p < 0.001. In the TEA group, intraoperative MAP values were lower than the other two groups, p < 0.05.
Erector spinae plane block can be used as an effective and safe alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia and shows superior analgesic profile to serratus anterior plane block for patients with lung cancer undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.047 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480278159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S105307702031394X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2480278159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-23f3b7f1943d9e359f5c37bf27d4f69295c35694d19ba05848d49a0d86217bd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2O0zAUhS0EYn7gBVggL9mk-LeJEZtSlWGkkWZEB7aWY9-ASxIHO6lU3mjeEkftjMSGla_u_c65uj4IvaFkQYnk73eL3d6aBSMsN9iCiPIZOqeSs6ISjD3PdaYKUpbkDF2ktCOEUinLl-iMc1FxtlTn6GELMZpxSnjVjxB9iPiuNT3gT22wv7DpHd5EsGPubwffG_hn_B1iytL7nyEa6y3eDN5N0bTZzLQ_IHmDm9lxNh4g7_F7ONFhDN0B3xnf43XoxxjaD3iFv-aFofN_wD1221xux8kdXqEXjWkTvD69l-jb5839-ktxc3t1vV7dFJbL5Vgw3vC6bKgS3CngUjXS8rJuWOlEs1RMyZlTwlFVGyIrUTmhDHHVktGydopfondH3yGG3xOkUXc-WWjns8OUNBMVYWVF5YyyI2pjSClCo4foOxMPmhI9f77e6TkiPUekKdM5oix6e_Kf6g7ck-Qxkwx8PAKQr9x7iDpZD70F5-cktAv-f_5_AaSbpIo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480278159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Elsabeeny, Walaa Y. ; Ibrahim, Mostafa A. ; Shehab, Nahla N. ; Mohamed, Abdelrahman ; Wadod, Mohamed A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Elsabeeny, Walaa Y. ; Ibrahim, Mostafa A. ; Shehab, Nahla N. ; Mohamed, Abdelrahman ; Wadod, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic epidural in perioperative pain control for patients with cancer undergoing lung surgeries.
Single blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
The study was carried out at the National Cancer Institute in Cairo, Egypt.
Fifty-one patients with cancer.
Patients were allocated randomly into three groups: thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) group, serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) group, and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group.
Outcome measures were 24 hours postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), intraoperative rescue fentanyl consumption, perioperative heart rate, mean blood pressure (mean arterial pressure [MAP]), and total postoperative morphine consumption. VAS scores at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group at the postanesthesia care unit and 24 hours. VAS scores with cough were significantly higher in the SAPB group at eight and 24 hours. The first time to receive morphine was significantly longer in the TEA group. No patients in the TEA group required postoperative morphine, whereas 88.2% and 47.1% required morphine in the SAPB and ESPB groups, respectively, p < 0.001. In the TEA group, intraoperative MAP values were lower than the other two groups, p < 0.05.
Erector spinae plane block can be used as an effective and safe alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia and shows superior analgesic profile to serratus anterior plane block for patients with lung cancer undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.047</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33483269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analgesia, Epidural ; erector spinae plane block ; Humans ; lung cancer ; Nerve Block ; Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control ; serratus plane block ; thoracic epidural ; Thoracotomy</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2928-2936</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-23f3b7f1943d9e359f5c37bf27d4f69295c35694d19ba05848d49a0d86217bd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-23f3b7f1943d9e359f5c37bf27d4f69295c35694d19ba05848d49a0d86217bd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105307702031394X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33483269$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elsabeeny, Walaa Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Mostafa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shehab, Nahla N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Abdelrahman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadod, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><title>Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><title>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><description>This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic epidural in perioperative pain control for patients with cancer undergoing lung surgeries.
Single blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
The study was carried out at the National Cancer Institute in Cairo, Egypt.
Fifty-one patients with cancer.
Patients were allocated randomly into three groups: thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) group, serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) group, and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group.
Outcome measures were 24 hours postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), intraoperative rescue fentanyl consumption, perioperative heart rate, mean blood pressure (mean arterial pressure [MAP]), and total postoperative morphine consumption. VAS scores at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group at the postanesthesia care unit and 24 hours. VAS scores with cough were significantly higher in the SAPB group at eight and 24 hours. The first time to receive morphine was significantly longer in the TEA group. No patients in the TEA group required postoperative morphine, whereas 88.2% and 47.1% required morphine in the SAPB and ESPB groups, respectively, p < 0.001. In the TEA group, intraoperative MAP values were lower than the other two groups, p < 0.05.
Erector spinae plane block can be used as an effective and safe alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia and shows superior analgesic profile to serratus anterior plane block for patients with lung cancer undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy.</description><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>erector spinae plane block</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>lung cancer</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</subject><subject>serratus plane block</subject><subject>thoracic epidural</subject><subject>Thoracotomy</subject><issn>1053-0770</issn><issn>1532-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2O0zAUhS0EYn7gBVggL9mk-LeJEZtSlWGkkWZEB7aWY9-ASxIHO6lU3mjeEkftjMSGla_u_c65uj4IvaFkQYnk73eL3d6aBSMsN9iCiPIZOqeSs6ISjD3PdaYKUpbkDF2ktCOEUinLl-iMc1FxtlTn6GELMZpxSnjVjxB9iPiuNT3gT22wv7DpHd5EsGPubwffG_hn_B1iytL7nyEa6y3eDN5N0bTZzLQ_IHmDm9lxNh4g7_F7ONFhDN0B3xnf43XoxxjaD3iFv-aFofN_wD1221xux8kdXqEXjWkTvD69l-jb5839-ktxc3t1vV7dFJbL5Vgw3vC6bKgS3CngUjXS8rJuWOlEs1RMyZlTwlFVGyIrUTmhDHHVktGydopfondH3yGG3xOkUXc-WWjns8OUNBMVYWVF5YyyI2pjSClCo4foOxMPmhI9f77e6TkiPUekKdM5oix6e_Kf6g7ck-Qxkwx8PAKQr9x7iDpZD70F5-cktAv-f_5_AaSbpIo</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Elsabeeny, Walaa Y.</creator><creator>Ibrahim, Mostafa A.</creator><creator>Shehab, Nahla N.</creator><creator>Mohamed, Abdelrahman</creator><creator>Wadod, Mohamed A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><author>Elsabeeny, Walaa Y. ; Ibrahim, Mostafa A. ; Shehab, Nahla N. ; Mohamed, Abdelrahman ; Wadod, Mohamed A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-23f3b7f1943d9e359f5c37bf27d4f69295c35694d19ba05848d49a0d86217bd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>erector spinae plane block</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>lung cancer</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control</topic><topic>serratus plane block</topic><topic>thoracic epidural</topic><topic>Thoracotomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elsabeeny, Walaa Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Mostafa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shehab, Nahla N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Abdelrahman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadod, Mohamed A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elsabeeny, Walaa Y.</au><au>Ibrahim, Mostafa A.</au><au>Shehab, Nahla N.</au><au>Mohamed, Abdelrahman</au><au>Wadod, Mohamed A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2928</spage><epage>2936</epage><pages>2928-2936</pages><issn>1053-0770</issn><eissn>1532-8422</eissn><abstract>This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block versus thoracic epidural in perioperative pain control for patients with cancer undergoing lung surgeries.
Single blinded, randomized, controlled trial.
The study was carried out at the National Cancer Institute in Cairo, Egypt.
Fifty-one patients with cancer.
Patients were allocated randomly into three groups: thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) group, serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) group, and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) group.
Outcome measures were 24 hours postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), intraoperative rescue fentanyl consumption, perioperative heart rate, mean blood pressure (mean arterial pressure [MAP]), and total postoperative morphine consumption. VAS scores at rest were significantly lower in the TEA group at the postanesthesia care unit and 24 hours. VAS scores with cough were significantly higher in the SAPB group at eight and 24 hours. The first time to receive morphine was significantly longer in the TEA group. No patients in the TEA group required postoperative morphine, whereas 88.2% and 47.1% required morphine in the SAPB and ESPB groups, respectively, p < 0.001. In the TEA group, intraoperative MAP values were lower than the other two groups, p < 0.05.
Erector spinae plane block can be used as an effective and safe alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia and shows superior analgesic profile to serratus anterior plane block for patients with lung cancer undergoing posterolateral thoracotomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33483269</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.047</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1053-0770 |
| ispartof | Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2928-2936 |
| issn | 1053-0770 1532-8422 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480278159 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Analgesia, Epidural erector spinae plane block Humans lung cancer Nerve Block Pain, Postoperative - diagnosis Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control serratus plane block thoracic epidural Thoracotomy |
| title | Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Perioperative Thoracotomy Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A22%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serratus%20Anterior%20Plane%20Block%20and%20Erector%20Spinae%20Plane%20Block%20Versus%20Thoracic%20Epidural%20Analgesia%20for%20Perioperative%20Thoracotomy%20Pain%20Control:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiothoracic%20and%20vascular%20anesthesia&rft.au=Elsabeeny,%20Walaa%20Y.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2928&rft.epage=2936&rft.pages=2928-2936&rft.issn=1053-0770&rft.eissn=1532-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.047&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480278159%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480278159&rft_id=info:pmid/33483269&rft_els_id=S105307702031394X&rfr_iscdi=true |