Detection and analysis of blood donors seropositive for syphilis

Background The increasing incidence of syphilis worldwide has called attention to the risk of transmission by transfusion. Aims To determine the prevalence of active syphilis in blood donors and characterise the serological profile of syphilis‐positive donors. Methods Samples positive for Treponema...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) England), 2021-04, Vol.31 (2), p.121-128
Hauptverfasser: Attie, Adriana, de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar, Witkin, Steven, Derriga, Juliana, Nishiya, Anna S., Ferreira, Jerenice E., Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier, Salles, Nanci, Facincani, Tila, Levi, Jose E., Sabino, Ester C., Rocha, Vanderson, Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo, Ferreira, Suzete C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 2
container_start_page 121
container_title Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)
container_volume 31
creator Attie, Adriana
de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar
Witkin, Steven
Derriga, Juliana
Nishiya, Anna S.
Ferreira, Jerenice E.
Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier
Salles, Nanci
Facincani, Tila
Levi, Jose E.
Sabino, Ester C.
Rocha, Vanderson
Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo
Ferreira, Suzete C.
description Background The increasing incidence of syphilis worldwide has called attention to the risk of transmission by transfusion. Aims To determine the prevalence of active syphilis in blood donors and characterise the serological profile of syphilis‐positive donors. Methods Samples positive for Treponema pallidum using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) during blood donor screening from 2017 to 2018 were tested by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) non‐treponemal test and for anti‐T. pallidum IgM by ELISA (Immunoassay Enzyme test for detection of IgM antibodies). The INNO‐LIA Syphilis test (Line Immuno Assay solid test for confirmation antibodies to Treponema pallidum) was performed as a confirmatory test on samples that were positive on ELISA‐IgM but negative on VDRL. ELISA‐IgM (+) samples were also tested for T. pallidum DNA in sera by real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results Of 248 542 samples screened, 1679 (0.67%) were positive for syphilis by CMIA. Further analysis was performed on 1144 (68.1%) of these samples. Of those tested, 16% were ELISA IgM(+)/VDRL(+), 16.5% were ELISA IgM(−)/VDRL(+), 4.1% were ELISA IgM(+)/VDRL(−), and 63.4% were ELISA IgM (−)/VDRL(−). The INNO‐LIA Syphilis test results were 33 (3%) positive, 2 (0.2%) undetermined and 12 (1%) negative. Of the 230 EIA‐IgM(+) samples (20.1%), 5 (2.2%) were PCR positive. The prevalence of active syphilis in 2017 and 2018 was 0.1% and 0.07%, respectively, and overall prevalence of serologic markers for syphilis was highest among male, unmarried, 25–34‐year‐olds with a high school education and who were first‐time donors. Conclusion There is a risk of transfusion‐transmitted syphilis in blood banks that exclusively use the VDRL test for donor screening, as is currently the situation in some Brazilian blood centres, as well as in other blood centres around the world.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/tme.12761
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480265739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2480265739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-5f341cc0200c5f612314fdfe14d1621a1d0e7b9f9945075ab07a15e55b31341f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4A-gHuHQLU6aftxAY3xIQ1zGOUrbRAS1zYg7UP89gQ5uWLJ8efzKfgg5BzqHUIu-1XNgWQoHZAo8FTGHJD8kU1qIPM5Elk_ICeIbpcBZwY7JhPMkpzRJpuT6Vve66q3rItXVoVUzoMXImahsnKuj2nXOY4Tau61D29sPHRnnIxy2r7axeEqOjGpQn-3njLzcrTbLh3j9fP-4vFnHFWcCYmF4AlVFGaWVMCmwcKKpjYakhpSBgprqrCxMUSSCZkKVNFMgtBAlh7Bp-Ixcjrlb7953GnvZWqx006hOux1KFj5iqch4EdCrEa28Q_TayK23rfKDBCq_hckgTP4IC-zFPnZXtrr-I38NBWAxAp-20cP_SXLztBojvwCUi3PJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2480265739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection and analysis of blood donors seropositive for syphilis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Attie, Adriana ; de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar ; Witkin, Steven ; Derriga, Juliana ; Nishiya, Anna S. ; Ferreira, Jerenice E. ; Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier ; Salles, Nanci ; Facincani, Tila ; Levi, Jose E. ; Sabino, Ester C. ; Rocha, Vanderson ; Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo ; Ferreira, Suzete C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Attie, Adriana ; de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar ; Witkin, Steven ; Derriga, Juliana ; Nishiya, Anna S. ; Ferreira, Jerenice E. ; Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier ; Salles, Nanci ; Facincani, Tila ; Levi, Jose E. ; Sabino, Ester C. ; Rocha, Vanderson ; Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo ; Ferreira, Suzete C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The increasing incidence of syphilis worldwide has called attention to the risk of transmission by transfusion. Aims To determine the prevalence of active syphilis in blood donors and characterise the serological profile of syphilis‐positive donors. Methods Samples positive for Treponema pallidum using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) during blood donor screening from 2017 to 2018 were tested by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) non‐treponemal test and for anti‐T. pallidum IgM by ELISA (Immunoassay Enzyme test for detection of IgM antibodies). The INNO‐LIA Syphilis test (Line Immuno Assay solid test for confirmation antibodies to Treponema pallidum) was performed as a confirmatory test on samples that were positive on ELISA‐IgM but negative on VDRL. ELISA‐IgM (+) samples were also tested for T. pallidum DNA in sera by real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results Of 248 542 samples screened, 1679 (0.67%) were positive for syphilis by CMIA. Further analysis was performed on 1144 (68.1%) of these samples. Of those tested, 16% were ELISA IgM(+)/VDRL(+), 16.5% were ELISA IgM(−)/VDRL(+), 4.1% were ELISA IgM(+)/VDRL(−), and 63.4% were ELISA IgM (−)/VDRL(−). The INNO‐LIA Syphilis test results were 33 (3%) positive, 2 (0.2%) undetermined and 12 (1%) negative. Of the 230 EIA‐IgM(+) samples (20.1%), 5 (2.2%) were PCR positive. The prevalence of active syphilis in 2017 and 2018 was 0.1% and 0.07%, respectively, and overall prevalence of serologic markers for syphilis was highest among male, unmarried, 25–34‐year‐olds with a high school education and who were first‐time donors. Conclusion There is a risk of transfusion‐transmitted syphilis in blood banks that exclusively use the VDRL test for donor screening, as is currently the situation in some Brazilian blood centres, as well as in other blood centres around the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-7578</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tme.12761</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33480044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>blood donors ; IgM antibody ; syphilis ; Treponema pallidum ; VDRL</subject><ispartof>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2021-04, Vol.31 (2), p.121-128</ispartof><rights>2021 British Blood Transfusion Society</rights><rights>2021 British Blood Transfusion Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-5f341cc0200c5f612314fdfe14d1621a1d0e7b9f9945075ab07a15e55b31341f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-5f341cc0200c5f612314fdfe14d1621a1d0e7b9f9945075ab07a15e55b31341f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3557-2717 ; 0000-0002-8490-4634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftme.12761$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftme.12761$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Attie, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witkin, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derriga, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishiya, Anna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jerenice E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salles, Nanci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facincani, Tila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Jose E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabino, Ester C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Vanderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Suzete C.</creatorcontrib><title>Detection and analysis of blood donors seropositive for syphilis</title><title>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><description>Background The increasing incidence of syphilis worldwide has called attention to the risk of transmission by transfusion. Aims To determine the prevalence of active syphilis in blood donors and characterise the serological profile of syphilis‐positive donors. Methods Samples positive for Treponema pallidum using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) during blood donor screening from 2017 to 2018 were tested by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) non‐treponemal test and for anti‐T. pallidum IgM by ELISA (Immunoassay Enzyme test for detection of IgM antibodies). The INNO‐LIA Syphilis test (Line Immuno Assay solid test for confirmation antibodies to Treponema pallidum) was performed as a confirmatory test on samples that were positive on ELISA‐IgM but negative on VDRL. ELISA‐IgM (+) samples were also tested for T. pallidum DNA in sera by real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results Of 248 542 samples screened, 1679 (0.67%) were positive for syphilis by CMIA. Further analysis was performed on 1144 (68.1%) of these samples. Of those tested, 16% were ELISA IgM(+)/VDRL(+), 16.5% were ELISA IgM(−)/VDRL(+), 4.1% were ELISA IgM(+)/VDRL(−), and 63.4% were ELISA IgM (−)/VDRL(−). The INNO‐LIA Syphilis test results were 33 (3%) positive, 2 (0.2%) undetermined and 12 (1%) negative. Of the 230 EIA‐IgM(+) samples (20.1%), 5 (2.2%) were PCR positive. The prevalence of active syphilis in 2017 and 2018 was 0.1% and 0.07%, respectively, and overall prevalence of serologic markers for syphilis was highest among male, unmarried, 25–34‐year‐olds with a high school education and who were first‐time donors. Conclusion There is a risk of transfusion‐transmitted syphilis in blood banks that exclusively use the VDRL test for donor screening, as is currently the situation in some Brazilian blood centres, as well as in other blood centres around the world.</description><subject>blood donors</subject><subject>IgM antibody</subject><subject>syphilis</subject><subject>Treponema pallidum</subject><subject>VDRL</subject><issn>0958-7578</issn><issn>1365-3148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4A-gHuHQLU6aftxAY3xIQ1zGOUrbRAS1zYg7UP89gQ5uWLJ8efzKfgg5BzqHUIu-1XNgWQoHZAo8FTGHJD8kU1qIPM5Elk_ICeIbpcBZwY7JhPMkpzRJpuT6Vve66q3rItXVoVUzoMXImahsnKuj2nXOY4Tau61D29sPHRnnIxy2r7axeEqOjGpQn-3njLzcrTbLh3j9fP-4vFnHFWcCYmF4AlVFGaWVMCmwcKKpjYakhpSBgprqrCxMUSSCZkKVNFMgtBAlh7Bp-Ixcjrlb7953GnvZWqx006hOux1KFj5iqch4EdCrEa28Q_TayK23rfKDBCq_hckgTP4IC-zFPnZXtrr-I38NBWAxAp-20cP_SXLztBojvwCUi3PJ</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Attie, Adriana</creator><creator>de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar</creator><creator>Witkin, Steven</creator><creator>Derriga, Juliana</creator><creator>Nishiya, Anna S.</creator><creator>Ferreira, Jerenice E.</creator><creator>Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier</creator><creator>Salles, Nanci</creator><creator>Facincani, Tila</creator><creator>Levi, Jose E.</creator><creator>Sabino, Ester C.</creator><creator>Rocha, Vanderson</creator><creator>Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo</creator><creator>Ferreira, Suzete C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-2717</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-4634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Detection and analysis of blood donors seropositive for syphilis</title><author>Attie, Adriana ; de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar ; Witkin, Steven ; Derriga, Juliana ; Nishiya, Anna S. ; Ferreira, Jerenice E. ; Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier ; Salles, Nanci ; Facincani, Tila ; Levi, Jose E. ; Sabino, Ester C. ; Rocha, Vanderson ; Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo ; Ferreira, Suzete C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3251-5f341cc0200c5f612314fdfe14d1621a1d0e7b9f9945075ab07a15e55b31341f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>blood donors</topic><topic>IgM antibody</topic><topic>syphilis</topic><topic>Treponema pallidum</topic><topic>VDRL</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Attie, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witkin, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derriga, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishiya, Anna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Jerenice E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salles, Nanci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facincani, Tila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levi, Jose E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabino, Ester C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Vanderson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Suzete C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Attie, Adriana</au><au>de Almeida‐Neto, Cesar</au><au>Witkin, Steven</au><au>Derriga, Juliana</au><au>Nishiya, Anna S.</au><au>Ferreira, Jerenice E.</au><au>Costa, Natalia de Souza Xavier</au><au>Salles, Nanci</au><au>Facincani, Tila</au><au>Levi, Jose E.</au><au>Sabino, Ester C.</au><au>Rocha, Vanderson</au><au>Mendrone‐Jr, Alfredo</au><au>Ferreira, Suzete C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection and analysis of blood donors seropositive for syphilis</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfus Med</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>121-128</pages><issn>0958-7578</issn><eissn>1365-3148</eissn><abstract>Background The increasing incidence of syphilis worldwide has called attention to the risk of transmission by transfusion. Aims To determine the prevalence of active syphilis in blood donors and characterise the serological profile of syphilis‐positive donors. Methods Samples positive for Treponema pallidum using the chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) during blood donor screening from 2017 to 2018 were tested by the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) non‐treponemal test and for anti‐T. pallidum IgM by ELISA (Immunoassay Enzyme test for detection of IgM antibodies). The INNO‐LIA Syphilis test (Line Immuno Assay solid test for confirmation antibodies to Treponema pallidum) was performed as a confirmatory test on samples that were positive on ELISA‐IgM but negative on VDRL. ELISA‐IgM (+) samples were also tested for T. pallidum DNA in sera by real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results Of 248 542 samples screened, 1679 (0.67%) were positive for syphilis by CMIA. Further analysis was performed on 1144 (68.1%) of these samples. Of those tested, 16% were ELISA IgM(+)/VDRL(+), 16.5% were ELISA IgM(−)/VDRL(+), 4.1% were ELISA IgM(+)/VDRL(−), and 63.4% were ELISA IgM (−)/VDRL(−). The INNO‐LIA Syphilis test results were 33 (3%) positive, 2 (0.2%) undetermined and 12 (1%) negative. Of the 230 EIA‐IgM(+) samples (20.1%), 5 (2.2%) were PCR positive. The prevalence of active syphilis in 2017 and 2018 was 0.1% and 0.07%, respectively, and overall prevalence of serologic markers for syphilis was highest among male, unmarried, 25–34‐year‐olds with a high school education and who were first‐time donors. Conclusion There is a risk of transfusion‐transmitted syphilis in blood banks that exclusively use the VDRL test for donor screening, as is currently the situation in some Brazilian blood centres, as well as in other blood centres around the world.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33480044</pmid><doi>10.1111/tme.12761</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-2717</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8490-4634</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-7578
ispartof Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England), 2021-04, Vol.31 (2), p.121-128
issn 0958-7578
1365-3148
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2480265739
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects blood donors
IgM antibody
syphilis
Treponema pallidum
VDRL
title Detection and analysis of blood donors seropositive for syphilis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T09%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20and%20analysis%20of%20blood%20donors%20seropositive%20for%20syphilis&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20medicine%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Attie,%20Adriana&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=121-128&rft.issn=0958-7578&rft.eissn=1365-3148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tme.12761&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2480265739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2480265739&rft_id=info:pmid/33480044&rfr_iscdi=true