Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations
Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of managed care 2021-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e16-e23 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e23 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e16 |
container_title | The American journal of managed care |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Whittington, Melanie D Ho, P Michael Kirsh, Susan R Kenney, Rachael R Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey Au, David H Simonetti, Joseph |
description | Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation.
Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016.
Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link.
e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who received an e-consult were significantly lower only in cardiology (5.2%), nephrology (9.3%), pulmonary (13.0%), and gastroenterology (14.3%).
Electronic specialty consultations are a potential mechanism to reduce health care costs and promote the efficient use of health care resources. |
doi_str_mv | 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479708991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3094444981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-ae76d52a5723f4fb82c379bcae92cdd336620350ddf19cd87bd307f83f1856e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwM6FILCwpts_xx4RQxZdUiQVmy7EdSJXEJXZA_e9JaWHglnvSvfd0-iF0TvAchODFtVm1dk4xJXMpC6EO0JQo4Dnlih6OGkuZY0rZBJ3EuMIYuGT8GE0AmCCMsym6WYSYsmg-6-4tZibGYGuTvMu-6vSe-cbb1Ieutllc-_HSpE1mQxeHJplUj-IUHVWmif5sv2fo9f7uZfGYL58fnha3y9wCFSk3XnBXUFMIChWrSkktCFVa4xW1zgFwTjEU2LmKKOukKB1gUUmoiCy4FzBDV7vedR8-Bh-TbutofdOYzochasqEElgqRUbr5T_rKgx9N36nASs2jpJbF965bB9i7H2l133dmn6jCdY_cPUWrt7C1T9wx8jFvngoW-_-Ar804RsSsHWx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3094444981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations</title><source>Research Library</source><source>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Research Library Prep</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Whittington, Melanie D ; Ho, P Michael ; Kirsh, Susan R ; Kenney, Rachael R ; Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey ; Au, David H ; Simonetti, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Melanie D ; Ho, P Michael ; Kirsh, Susan R ; Kenney, Rachael R ; Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey ; Au, David H ; Simonetti, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation.
Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016.
Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link.
e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who received an e-consult were significantly lower only in cardiology (5.2%), nephrology (9.3%), pulmonary (13.0%), and gastroenterology (14.3%).
Electronic specialty consultations are a potential mechanism to reduce health care costs and promote the efficient use of health care resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-0224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33471464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Cost control ; Diabetes ; Electronic health records ; Endocrinology ; Gastroenterology ; Generalized linear models ; Health administration ; Health care expenditures ; Health care policy ; Hematology ; Medicaid ; Nephrology ; Patients ; Primary care ; Urology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of managed care, 2021-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e16-e23</ispartof><rights>Copyright MultiMedia Healthcare Inc. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-ae76d52a5723f4fb82c379bcae92cdd336620350ddf19cd87bd307f83f1856e73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3094444981?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12724,12753,21367,21371,27901,27902,33429,33430,33721,33722,34311,34312,36242,36243,43592,43781,44049,44380</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471464$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Melanie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, P Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsh, Susan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Rachael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations</title><title>The American journal of managed care</title><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><description>Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation.
Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016.
Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link.
e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who received an e-consult were significantly lower only in cardiology (5.2%), nephrology (9.3%), pulmonary (13.0%), and gastroenterology (14.3%).
Electronic specialty consultations are a potential mechanism to reduce health care costs and promote the efficient use of health care resources.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1088-0224</issn><issn>1936-2692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwM6FILCwpts_xx4RQxZdUiQVmy7EdSJXEJXZA_e9JaWHglnvSvfd0-iF0TvAchODFtVm1dk4xJXMpC6EO0JQo4Dnlih6OGkuZY0rZBJ3EuMIYuGT8GE0AmCCMsym6WYSYsmg-6-4tZibGYGuTvMu-6vSe-cbb1Ieutllc-_HSpE1mQxeHJplUj-IUHVWmif5sv2fo9f7uZfGYL58fnha3y9wCFSk3XnBXUFMIChWrSkktCFVa4xW1zgFwTjEU2LmKKOukKB1gUUmoiCy4FzBDV7vedR8-Bh-TbutofdOYzochasqEElgqRUbr5T_rKgx9N36nASs2jpJbF965bB9i7H2l133dmn6jCdY_cPUWrt7C1T9wx8jFvngoW-_-Ar804RsSsHWx</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Whittington, Melanie D</creator><creator>Ho, P Michael</creator><creator>Kirsh, Susan R</creator><creator>Kenney, Rachael R</creator><creator>Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Au, David H</creator><creator>Simonetti, Joseph</creator><general>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88M</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations</title><author>Whittington, Melanie D ; Ho, P Michael ; Kirsh, Susan R ; Kenney, Rachael R ; Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey ; Au, David H ; Simonetti, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-ae76d52a5723f4fb82c379bcae92cdd336620350ddf19cd87bd307f83f1856e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Melanie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, P Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsh, Susan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Rachael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete - Professional Edition</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittington, Melanie D</au><au>Ho, P Michael</au><au>Kirsh, Susan R</au><au>Kenney, Rachael R</au><au>Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey</au><au>Au, David H</au><au>Simonetti, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e16</spage><epage>e23</epage><pages>e16-e23</pages><issn>1088-0224</issn><eissn>1936-2692</eissn><abstract>Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation.
Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016.
Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link.
e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who received an e-consult were significantly lower only in cardiology (5.2%), nephrology (9.3%), pulmonary (13.0%), and gastroenterology (14.3%).
Electronic specialty consultations are a potential mechanism to reduce health care costs and promote the efficient use of health care resources.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</pub><pmid>33471464</pmid><doi>10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1088-0224 |
ispartof | The American journal of managed care, 2021-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e16-e23 |
issn | 1088-0224 1936-2692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479708991 |
source | Research Library; Research Library (Alumni Edition); Research Library Prep; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Cardiology Cost control Diabetes Electronic health records Endocrinology Gastroenterology Generalized linear models Health administration Health care expenditures Health care policy Hematology Medicaid Nephrology Patients Primary care Urology |
title | Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A01%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20savings%20associated%20with%20electronic%20specialty%20consultations&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20managed%20care&rft.au=Whittington,%20Melanie%20D&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e16&rft.epage=e23&rft.pages=e16-e23&rft.issn=1088-0224&rft.eissn=1936-2692&rft_id=info:doi/10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3094444981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3094444981&rft_id=info:pmid/33471464&rfr_iscdi=true |