Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations

Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of managed care 2021-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e16-e23
Hauptverfasser: Whittington, Melanie D, Ho, P Michael, Kirsh, Susan R, Kenney, Rachael R, Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey, Au, David H, Simonetti, Joseph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e23
container_issue 1
container_start_page e16
container_title The American journal of managed care
container_volume 27
creator Whittington, Melanie D
Ho, P Michael
Kirsh, Susan R
Kenney, Rachael R
Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey
Au, David H
Simonetti, Joseph
description Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation. Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016. Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link. e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who received an e-consult were significantly lower only in cardiology (5.2%), nephrology (9.3%), pulmonary (13.0%), and gastroenterology (14.3%). Electronic specialty consultations are a potential mechanism to reduce health care costs and promote the efficient use of health care resources.
doi_str_mv 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479708991</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3094444981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-ae76d52a5723f4fb82c379bcae92cdd336620350ddf19cd87bd307f83f1856e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwM6FILCwpts_xx4RQxZdUiQVmy7EdSJXEJXZA_e9JaWHglnvSvfd0-iF0TvAchODFtVm1dk4xJXMpC6EO0JQo4Dnlih6OGkuZY0rZBJ3EuMIYuGT8GE0AmCCMsym6WYSYsmg-6-4tZibGYGuTvMu-6vSe-cbb1Ieutllc-_HSpE1mQxeHJplUj-IUHVWmif5sv2fo9f7uZfGYL58fnha3y9wCFSk3XnBXUFMIChWrSkktCFVa4xW1zgFwTjEU2LmKKOukKB1gUUmoiCy4FzBDV7vedR8-Bh-TbutofdOYzochasqEElgqRUbr5T_rKgx9N36nASs2jpJbF965bB9i7H2l133dmn6jCdY_cPUWrt7C1T9wx8jFvngoW-_-Ar804RsSsHWx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3094444981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations</title><source>Research Library</source><source>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Research Library Prep</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Whittington, Melanie D ; Ho, P Michael ; Kirsh, Susan R ; Kenney, Rachael R ; Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey ; Au, David H ; Simonetti, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Melanie D ; Ho, P Michael ; Kirsh, Susan R ; Kenney, Rachael R ; Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey ; Au, David H ; Simonetti, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation. Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016. Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link. e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who received an e-consult were significantly lower only in cardiology (5.2%), nephrology (9.3%), pulmonary (13.0%), and gastroenterology (14.3%). Electronic specialty consultations are a potential mechanism to reduce health care costs and promote the efficient use of health care resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-0224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33471464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Cost control ; Diabetes ; Electronic health records ; Endocrinology ; Gastroenterology ; Generalized linear models ; Health administration ; Health care expenditures ; Health care policy ; Hematology ; Medicaid ; Nephrology ; Patients ; Primary care ; Urology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of managed care, 2021-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e16-e23</ispartof><rights>Copyright MultiMedia Healthcare Inc. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-ae76d52a5723f4fb82c379bcae92cdd336620350ddf19cd87bd307f83f1856e73</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3094444981?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12724,12753,21367,21371,27901,27902,33429,33430,33721,33722,34311,34312,36242,36243,43592,43781,44049,44380</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33471464$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Melanie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, P Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsh, Susan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Rachael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations</title><title>The American journal of managed care</title><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><description>Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation. Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016. Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link. e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who received an e-consult were significantly lower only in cardiology (5.2%), nephrology (9.3%), pulmonary (13.0%), and gastroenterology (14.3%). Electronic specialty consultations are a potential mechanism to reduce health care costs and promote the efficient use of health care resources.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1088-0224</issn><issn>1936-2692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwM6FILCwpts_xx4RQxZdUiQVmy7EdSJXEJXZA_e9JaWHglnvSvfd0-iF0TvAchODFtVm1dk4xJXMpC6EO0JQo4Dnlih6OGkuZY0rZBJ3EuMIYuGT8GE0AmCCMsym6WYSYsmg-6-4tZibGYGuTvMu-6vSe-cbb1Ieutllc-_HSpE1mQxeHJplUj-IUHVWmif5sv2fo9f7uZfGYL58fnha3y9wCFSk3XnBXUFMIChWrSkktCFVa4xW1zgFwTjEU2LmKKOukKB1gUUmoiCy4FzBDV7vedR8-Bh-TbutofdOYzochasqEElgqRUbr5T_rKgx9N36nASs2jpJbF965bB9i7H2l133dmn6jCdY_cPUWrt7C1T9wx8jFvngoW-_-Ar804RsSsHWx</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Whittington, Melanie D</creator><creator>Ho, P Michael</creator><creator>Kirsh, Susan R</creator><creator>Kenney, Rachael R</creator><creator>Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Au, David H</creator><creator>Simonetti, Joseph</creator><general>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88M</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations</title><author>Whittington, Melanie D ; Ho, P Michael ; Kirsh, Susan R ; Kenney, Rachael R ; Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey ; Au, David H ; Simonetti, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-ae76d52a5723f4fb82c379bcae92cdd336620350ddf19cd87bd307f83f1856e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whittington, Melanie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, P Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsh, Susan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Rachael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, David H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simonetti, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete - Professional Edition</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whittington, Melanie D</au><au>Ho, P Michael</au><au>Kirsh, Susan R</au><au>Kenney, Rachael R</au><au>Todd-Stenberg, Jeffrey</au><au>Au, David H</au><au>Simonetti, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e16</spage><epage>e23</epage><pages>e16-e23</pages><issn>1088-0224</issn><eissn>1936-2692</eissn><abstract>Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation. Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016. Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link. e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who received an e-consult were significantly lower only in cardiology (5.2%), nephrology (9.3%), pulmonary (13.0%), and gastroenterology (14.3%). Electronic specialty consultations are a potential mechanism to reduce health care costs and promote the efficient use of health care resources.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</pub><pmid>33471464</pmid><doi>10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-0224
ispartof The American journal of managed care, 2021-01, Vol.27 (1), p.e16-e23
issn 1088-0224
1936-2692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479708991
source Research Library; Research Library (Alumni Edition); Research Library Prep; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central
subjects Cardiology
Cost control
Diabetes
Electronic health records
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Generalized linear models
Health administration
Health care expenditures
Health care policy
Hematology
Medicaid
Nephrology
Patients
Primary care
Urology
title Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A01%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20savings%20associated%20with%20electronic%20specialty%20consultations&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20managed%20care&rft.au=Whittington,%20Melanie%20D&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e16&rft.epage=e23&rft.pages=e16-e23&rft.issn=1088-0224&rft.eissn=1936-2692&rft_id=info:doi/10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3094444981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3094444981&rft_id=info:pmid/33471464&rfr_iscdi=true