Automated E-Counseling for Chronic Heart Failure: CHF-CePPORT Trial

International task force statements advocate telehealth programs to promote health-related quality of life for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). To that end, we evaluated the efficacy and usability of an automated e-counseling program. This Canadian multi-site double-blind randomized trial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Heart failure 2021-01, Vol.14 (1), p.e007073-e007073
Hauptverfasser: Nolan, Robert P., Ross, Heather J., Farkouh, Michael E., Huszti, Ella, Chan, Sammy, Toma, Mustafa, D’Antono, Bianca, White, Michel, Thomas, Scott, Barr, Susan I., Perreault, Sylvie, McDonald, Michael, Zieroth, Shelley, Isaac, Debra, Wielgosz, Andreas, Mielniczuk, Lisa Marie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:International task force statements advocate telehealth programs to promote health-related quality of life for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). To that end, we evaluated the efficacy and usability of an automated e-counseling program. This Canadian multi-site double-blind randomized trial assessed whether usual care plus either internet-based e-counseling (motivational and cognitive-behavioral tools for CHF self-care) or e-based conventional CHF self-care education (e-UC) improved 12-month Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS). Secondary outcomes included program engagement (total logon weeks, logons, and logon hours), total CHF self-care behaviors, diet (fruit and vegetable servings), 6-minute walk test, and 4-day step count. The association between program engagement and health-related quality of life was assessed using KCCQ-OS tertiles. We enrolled 231 patients, median age =59.5 years, 22% female, and elevated median KCCQ-OS=83.0 (interquartile range, 68-93). KCCQ-OS increase ≥5 points was not more prevalent for e-counseling, n=29 (29.6%) versus e-UC, n=32 (34.0%), =0.51. E-Counseling versus e-UC increased total logon weeks ( =0.02), logon hours ( =0.001), and logons (
ISSN:1941-3297
1941-3289
1941-3297
DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007073