The limited role of ultrasound in the surgical assessment of solid pediatric breast lesions

Ultrasound (US) is an adjunct to history and clinical exam (CE) in the assessment of pediatric breast lesions. We sought to investigate the reliability of US and CE to predict final pathologic diameter (P). A single institutional retrospective analysis of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent breast...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical imaging 2021-06, Vol.74, p.100-105
Hauptverfasser: Granger, Caroline J., Hogan, Anthony R., Neville, Holly L., Thorson, Chad M., Perez, Eduardo A., Sola, Juan E., Brady, Ann-Christina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue
container_start_page 100
container_title Clinical imaging
container_volume 74
creator Granger, Caroline J.
Hogan, Anthony R.
Neville, Holly L.
Thorson, Chad M.
Perez, Eduardo A.
Sola, Juan E.
Brady, Ann-Christina
description Ultrasound (US) is an adjunct to history and clinical exam (CE) in the assessment of pediatric breast lesions. We sought to investigate the reliability of US and CE to predict final pathologic diameter (P). A single institutional retrospective analysis of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent breast mass resection was performed. Data was collected and analyzed using SPSS. 88 patients met inclusion criteria with an average age at surgery of 16 ± 1.5 years. No malignancies were encountered. The largest mean diameter measured by final pathology (MPØ) for all lesions was 4.1 ± 2.6 cm. Pathology encountered were fibroadenoma (83%, MPØ 3.7 ± 1.7 cm), juvenile fibroadenoma (10%, MPØ 7.0 ± 5.4 cm), and low-grade phyllodes tumor (3%, MPØ 6.2 ± 3.8 cm). 67 patients had documented CE measurement with a mean diameter of 3.4 ± 1.8 cm. 62 patients underwent US with a mean diameter of 3.3 ± 1.6 cm. US and CE were accurate in determining P by Cronbach Alpha reliability testing. US and CE are reliable measurements of P. The surgical utility of US when considering pediatric breast lesions is limited and should be individualized following pediatric surgical evaluation and CE. •Ultrasound and clinical exam reliably estimate the size of pediatric breast lesions.•Ultrasound is no better than clinical exam at predicting mass size.•Pediatric breast mass size is a common indication for surgery.•Clinical exam should be used over ultrasound for surgical pediatric breast masses.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.12.042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479423967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899707121000012</els_id><sourcerecordid>2516823566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-9dd5a4f8cc8b8dce33ad252dd4118f5e32e88edc4b741228bc3a245028b440503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpaTYffyEIcsnFW33Zlm8poW0KgV7SUw9ClsaJFtnaaORC_321bNJDLj3NMDzvzPAQcsnZljPefdptXQxLmO3jVjBRh2LLlHhHNlz3slFqGN6TDdPD0PSs5yfkFHHHanBQ_UdyIqXq2q7rNuTXwxPQGOZQwNOcItA00TWWbDGti6dhoaUSuObH4GykFhEQZ1jKAcQUg6d78MGWHBwdM1gsNAKGtOA5-TDZiHDxUs_Iz69fHm7vmvsf377ffr5vnFSyNIP3rVWTdk6P2juQ0nrRCu8V53pqQQrQGrxTY6-4EHp00grVstopxVomz8j1ce8-p-cVsJg5oIMY7QJpRSNUPyghh66v6NUbdJfWvNTvjGh5p4WsWirVHSmXE2KGyexzVZ3_GM7MQb_ZmVf95qDfcGGq_hq8fFm_jjP4f7FX3xW4OQJQffwOkA26AIurBjO4YnwK_7vxF29kmek</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2516823566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The limited role of ultrasound in the surgical assessment of solid pediatric breast lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Granger, Caroline J. ; Hogan, Anthony R. ; Neville, Holly L. ; Thorson, Chad M. ; Perez, Eduardo A. ; Sola, Juan E. ; Brady, Ann-Christina</creator><creatorcontrib>Granger, Caroline J. ; Hogan, Anthony R. ; Neville, Holly L. ; Thorson, Chad M. ; Perez, Eduardo A. ; Sola, Juan E. ; Brady, Ann-Christina</creatorcontrib><description>Ultrasound (US) is an adjunct to history and clinical exam (CE) in the assessment of pediatric breast lesions. We sought to investigate the reliability of US and CE to predict final pathologic diameter (P). A single institutional retrospective analysis of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent breast mass resection was performed. Data was collected and analyzed using SPSS. 88 patients met inclusion criteria with an average age at surgery of 16 ± 1.5 years. No malignancies were encountered. The largest mean diameter measured by final pathology (MPØ) for all lesions was 4.1 ± 2.6 cm. Pathology encountered were fibroadenoma (83%, MPØ 3.7 ± 1.7 cm), juvenile fibroadenoma (10%, MPØ 7.0 ± 5.4 cm), and low-grade phyllodes tumor (3%, MPØ 6.2 ± 3.8 cm). 67 patients had documented CE measurement with a mean diameter of 3.4 ± 1.8 cm. 62 patients underwent US with a mean diameter of 3.3 ± 1.6 cm. US and CE were accurate in determining P by Cronbach Alpha reliability testing. US and CE are reliable measurements of P. The surgical utility of US when considering pediatric breast lesions is limited and should be individualized following pediatric surgical evaluation and CE. •Ultrasound and clinical exam reliably estimate the size of pediatric breast lesions.•Ultrasound is no better than clinical exam at predicting mass size.•Pediatric breast mass size is a common indication for surgery.•Clinical exam should be used over ultrasound for surgical pediatric breast masses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.12.042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33465666</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Aged ; Breast ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Child ; Clinical examination ; Decision making ; Diameters ; Fibroadenoma ; Humans ; Lesions ; Medical records ; Pathology ; Patients ; Pediatric breast mass ; Pediatrics ; Phyllodes Tumor ; Population ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 2021-06, Vol.74, p.100-105</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-9dd5a4f8cc8b8dce33ad252dd4118f5e32e88edc4b741228bc3a245028b440503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707121000012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465666$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Granger, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Anthony R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neville, Holly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorson, Chad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Eduardo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sola, Juan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, Ann-Christina</creatorcontrib><title>The limited role of ultrasound in the surgical assessment of solid pediatric breast lesions</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><description>Ultrasound (US) is an adjunct to history and clinical exam (CE) in the assessment of pediatric breast lesions. We sought to investigate the reliability of US and CE to predict final pathologic diameter (P). A single institutional retrospective analysis of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent breast mass resection was performed. Data was collected and analyzed using SPSS. 88 patients met inclusion criteria with an average age at surgery of 16 ± 1.5 years. No malignancies were encountered. The largest mean diameter measured by final pathology (MPØ) for all lesions was 4.1 ± 2.6 cm. Pathology encountered were fibroadenoma (83%, MPØ 3.7 ± 1.7 cm), juvenile fibroadenoma (10%, MPØ 7.0 ± 5.4 cm), and low-grade phyllodes tumor (3%, MPØ 6.2 ± 3.8 cm). 67 patients had documented CE measurement with a mean diameter of 3.4 ± 1.8 cm. 62 patients underwent US with a mean diameter of 3.3 ± 1.6 cm. US and CE were accurate in determining P by Cronbach Alpha reliability testing. US and CE are reliable measurements of P. The surgical utility of US when considering pediatric breast lesions is limited and should be individualized following pediatric surgical evaluation and CE. •Ultrasound and clinical exam reliably estimate the size of pediatric breast lesions.•Ultrasound is no better than clinical exam at predicting mass size.•Pediatric breast mass size is a common indication for surgery.•Clinical exam should be used over ultrasound for surgical pediatric breast masses.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinical examination</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Fibroadenoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatric breast mass</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Phyllodes Tumor</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpaTYffyEIcsnFW33Zlm8poW0KgV7SUw9ClsaJFtnaaORC_321bNJDLj3NMDzvzPAQcsnZljPefdptXQxLmO3jVjBRh2LLlHhHNlz3slFqGN6TDdPD0PSs5yfkFHHHanBQ_UdyIqXq2q7rNuTXwxPQGOZQwNOcItA00TWWbDGti6dhoaUSuObH4GykFhEQZ1jKAcQUg6d78MGWHBwdM1gsNAKGtOA5-TDZiHDxUs_Iz69fHm7vmvsf377ffr5vnFSyNIP3rVWTdk6P2juQ0nrRCu8V53pqQQrQGrxTY6-4EHp00grVstopxVomz8j1ce8-p-cVsJg5oIMY7QJpRSNUPyghh66v6NUbdJfWvNTvjGh5p4WsWirVHSmXE2KGyexzVZ3_GM7MQb_ZmVf95qDfcGGq_hq8fFm_jjP4f7FX3xW4OQJQffwOkA26AIurBjO4YnwK_7vxF29kmek</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Granger, Caroline J.</creator><creator>Hogan, Anthony R.</creator><creator>Neville, Holly L.</creator><creator>Thorson, Chad M.</creator><creator>Perez, Eduardo A.</creator><creator>Sola, Juan E.</creator><creator>Brady, Ann-Christina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>The limited role of ultrasound in the surgical assessment of solid pediatric breast lesions</title><author>Granger, Caroline J. ; Hogan, Anthony R. ; Neville, Holly L. ; Thorson, Chad M. ; Perez, Eduardo A. ; Sola, Juan E. ; Brady, Ann-Christina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-9dd5a4f8cc8b8dce33ad252dd4118f5e32e88edc4b741228bc3a245028b440503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinical examination</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Fibroadenoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatric breast mass</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Phyllodes Tumor</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Granger, Caroline J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Anthony R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neville, Holly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorson, Chad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Eduardo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sola, Juan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, Ann-Christina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Granger, Caroline J.</au><au>Hogan, Anthony R.</au><au>Neville, Holly L.</au><au>Thorson, Chad M.</au><au>Perez, Eduardo A.</au><au>Sola, Juan E.</au><au>Brady, Ann-Christina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The limited role of ultrasound in the surgical assessment of solid pediatric breast lesions</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>74</volume><spage>100</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>100-105</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><abstract>Ultrasound (US) is an adjunct to history and clinical exam (CE) in the assessment of pediatric breast lesions. We sought to investigate the reliability of US and CE to predict final pathologic diameter (P). A single institutional retrospective analysis of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent breast mass resection was performed. Data was collected and analyzed using SPSS. 88 patients met inclusion criteria with an average age at surgery of 16 ± 1.5 years. No malignancies were encountered. The largest mean diameter measured by final pathology (MPØ) for all lesions was 4.1 ± 2.6 cm. Pathology encountered were fibroadenoma (83%, MPØ 3.7 ± 1.7 cm), juvenile fibroadenoma (10%, MPØ 7.0 ± 5.4 cm), and low-grade phyllodes tumor (3%, MPØ 6.2 ± 3.8 cm). 67 patients had documented CE measurement with a mean diameter of 3.4 ± 1.8 cm. 62 patients underwent US with a mean diameter of 3.3 ± 1.6 cm. US and CE were accurate in determining P by Cronbach Alpha reliability testing. US and CE are reliable measurements of P. The surgical utility of US when considering pediatric breast lesions is limited and should be individualized following pediatric surgical evaluation and CE. •Ultrasound and clinical exam reliably estimate the size of pediatric breast lesions.•Ultrasound is no better than clinical exam at predicting mass size.•Pediatric breast mass size is a common indication for surgery.•Clinical exam should be used over ultrasound for surgical pediatric breast masses.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33465666</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.12.042</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-7071
ispartof Clinical imaging, 2021-06, Vol.74, p.100-105
issn 0899-7071
1873-4499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479423967
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Accuracy
Aged
Breast
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Child
Clinical examination
Decision making
Diameters
Fibroadenoma
Humans
Lesions
Medical records
Pathology
Patients
Pediatric breast mass
Pediatrics
Phyllodes Tumor
Population
Reliability analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Tumors
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound
title The limited role of ultrasound in the surgical assessment of solid pediatric breast lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T19%3A22%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20limited%20role%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20the%20surgical%20assessment%20of%20solid%20pediatric%20breast%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Granger,%20Caroline%20J.&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=74&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=100-105&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.12.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2516823566%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2516823566&rft_id=info:pmid/33465666&rft_els_id=S0899707121000012&rfr_iscdi=true