Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous “freeze-dried sulfonated human normal immunoglobulin (GGS)” in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON). Study design Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Methods Patients with stero...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of ophthalmology 2021, Vol.65 (1), p.122-132
Hauptverfasser: Mimura, Osamu, Ishikawa, Hitoshi, Kezuka, Takeshi, Shikishima, Keigo, Suzuki, Tone, Nakamura, Makoto, Chuman, Hideki, Inoue, Kenji, Kimura, Akiko, Yamagami, Akiko, Mihoya, Maki, Nakao, Yuzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 1
container_start_page 122
container_title Japanese journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 65
creator Mimura, Osamu
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Kezuka, Takeshi
Shikishima, Keigo
Suzuki, Tone
Nakamura, Makoto
Chuman, Hideki
Inoue, Kenji
Kimura, Akiko
Yamagami, Akiko
Mihoya, Maki
Nakao, Yuzo
description Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous “freeze-dried sulfonated human normal immunoglobulin (GGS)” in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON). Study design Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Methods Patients with steroid-resistant acute ON were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous GGS (GGS group) or intravenous methylprednisolone (steroid pulse [SP] group). Visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), mean deviation (MD) value of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and critical flicker fusion frequency were measured as efficacy endpoints; adverse events (AEs) were assessed as the safety endpoint. Results Thirty-two patients (16 patients/group) received the study drugs. The primary endpoint, change in logMAR at week 2 compared to baseline, showed no statistically significant intergroup difference. However, compared with the SP group, change in the GGS group was increasingly indicative of visual improvement, with least squares mean difference of > 0.3 logMAR. On post-hoc analyses, the percentage of patients in the GGS and SP groups with improvement by ≥ 0.3 logMAR at week 2 were 75.0% and 31.3%, respectively. Changes in MD values at week 2 compared to baseline were 9.258  ±  8.296 (mean ± standard deviation) dB and 3.175  ±  6.167 dB in the GGS and SP groups, respectively. These results showed statistically significant intergroup differences (visual acuity improvement, P = 0.032; change in MD values, P = 0.030). No clinically significant AEs were observed. Conclusion Our results suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin could be a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for prompt treatment of steroid-resistant acute ON. Trial registration: JapicCTI-132080.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10384-020-00790-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479422376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2479422376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-cb75dc2242b2ae284d7e4037da2eacaa4de8cbb90adfd682b3b6d5b1c08a25133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcuOFSEQhonROMfRF3BhSNy4GBQK-uZuMvHSySRudN2Bps7IhIaWi8n4ED6z6Blj4qqo4uOvon5Cngv-WnA-vMmCy1ExDpy1dOJsekAOoheSAaj-ITlwDoJ1ouvOyJOcbznnCiQ8JmdSqn4aYDyQn3MoSX_HEGumbttqiDc-mupdoCWhLhuGQo8x0VwwRWdZwuxy0a0a9-JWGrAmV1x-SzXdqm-l9gLTBbWxGo_MNCl7QZMONm7uB7bzGlvT6D1aun_VGek8z02_2run5NFR-4zP7uM5-fL-3eerj-z604f56vKa7SBkYasZOru2X4IBjTAqO6DicrAaUK9aK4vjaszEtT3afgQjTW87I1Y-auiElOfk1Ul3T_FbxVyWzeUVvdcB2yYWUMOkAOTQN_Tlf-htrCm06Ro1KsGhn7pGvbinqtnQLntym053y99NN0CegNyuwg2mfzKCL7_9XE5-Ls3P5Y-fyyR_AcTllCE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2484102695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mimura, Osamu ; Ishikawa, Hitoshi ; Kezuka, Takeshi ; Shikishima, Keigo ; Suzuki, Tone ; Nakamura, Makoto ; Chuman, Hideki ; Inoue, Kenji ; Kimura, Akiko ; Yamagami, Akiko ; Mihoya, Maki ; Nakao, Yuzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Mimura, Osamu ; Ishikawa, Hitoshi ; Kezuka, Takeshi ; Shikishima, Keigo ; Suzuki, Tone ; Nakamura, Makoto ; Chuman, Hideki ; Inoue, Kenji ; Kimura, Akiko ; Yamagami, Akiko ; Mihoya, Maki ; Nakao, Yuzo</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous “freeze-dried sulfonated human normal immunoglobulin (GGS)” in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON). Study design Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Methods Patients with steroid-resistant acute ON were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous GGS (GGS group) or intravenous methylprednisolone (steroid pulse [SP] group). Visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), mean deviation (MD) value of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and critical flicker fusion frequency were measured as efficacy endpoints; adverse events (AEs) were assessed as the safety endpoint. Results Thirty-two patients (16 patients/group) received the study drugs. The primary endpoint, change in logMAR at week 2 compared to baseline, showed no statistically significant intergroup difference. However, compared with the SP group, change in the GGS group was increasingly indicative of visual improvement, with least squares mean difference of &gt; 0.3 logMAR. On post-hoc analyses, the percentage of patients in the GGS and SP groups with improvement by ≥ 0.3 logMAR at week 2 were 75.0% and 31.3%, respectively. Changes in MD values at week 2 compared to baseline were 9.258  ±  8.296 (mean ± standard deviation) dB and 3.175  ±  6.167 dB in the GGS and SP groups, respectively. These results showed statistically significant intergroup differences (visual acuity improvement, P = 0.032; change in MD values, P = 0.030). No clinically significant AEs were observed. Conclusion Our results suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin could be a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for prompt treatment of steroid-resistant acute ON. Trial registration: JapicCTI-132080.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-5155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-2246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10384-020-00790-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33469728</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Adverse events ; Clinical Investigation ; Critical flicker fusion ; Double-blind studies ; Flicker fusion ; Immunoglobulins ; Intravenous administration ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Methylprednisolone ; Neuritis ; Ophthalmology ; Optic neuritis ; Safety ; Statistical analysis ; Steroids ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021, Vol.65 (1), p.122-132</ispartof><rights>Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2021</rights><rights>Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-cb75dc2242b2ae284d7e4037da2eacaa4de8cbb90adfd682b3b6d5b1c08a25133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10384-020-00790-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10384-020-00790-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469728$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mimura, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kezuka, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shikishima, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Tone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuman, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagami, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihoya, Maki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakao, Yuzo</creatorcontrib><title>Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study</title><title>Japanese journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Jpn J Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous “freeze-dried sulfonated human normal immunoglobulin (GGS)” in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON). Study design Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Methods Patients with steroid-resistant acute ON were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous GGS (GGS group) or intravenous methylprednisolone (steroid pulse [SP] group). Visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), mean deviation (MD) value of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and critical flicker fusion frequency were measured as efficacy endpoints; adverse events (AEs) were assessed as the safety endpoint. Results Thirty-two patients (16 patients/group) received the study drugs. The primary endpoint, change in logMAR at week 2 compared to baseline, showed no statistically significant intergroup difference. However, compared with the SP group, change in the GGS group was increasingly indicative of visual improvement, with least squares mean difference of &gt; 0.3 logMAR. On post-hoc analyses, the percentage of patients in the GGS and SP groups with improvement by ≥ 0.3 logMAR at week 2 were 75.0% and 31.3%, respectively. Changes in MD values at week 2 compared to baseline were 9.258  ±  8.296 (mean ± standard deviation) dB and 3.175  ±  6.167 dB in the GGS and SP groups, respectively. These results showed statistically significant intergroup differences (visual acuity improvement, P = 0.032; change in MD values, P = 0.030). No clinically significant AEs were observed. Conclusion Our results suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin could be a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for prompt treatment of steroid-resistant acute ON. Trial registration: JapicCTI-132080.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Clinical Investigation</subject><subject>Critical flicker fusion</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Flicker fusion</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Intravenous administration</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone</subject><subject>Neuritis</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Optic neuritis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>0021-5155</issn><issn>1613-2246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcuOFSEQhonROMfRF3BhSNy4GBQK-uZuMvHSySRudN2Bps7IhIaWi8n4ED6z6Blj4qqo4uOvon5Cngv-WnA-vMmCy1ExDpy1dOJsekAOoheSAaj-ITlwDoJ1ouvOyJOcbznnCiQ8JmdSqn4aYDyQn3MoSX_HEGumbttqiDc-mupdoCWhLhuGQo8x0VwwRWdZwuxy0a0a9-JWGrAmV1x-SzXdqm-l9gLTBbWxGo_MNCl7QZMONm7uB7bzGlvT6D1aun_VGek8z02_2run5NFR-4zP7uM5-fL-3eerj-z604f56vKa7SBkYasZOru2X4IBjTAqO6DicrAaUK9aK4vjaszEtT3afgQjTW87I1Y-auiElOfk1Ul3T_FbxVyWzeUVvdcB2yYWUMOkAOTQN_Tlf-htrCm06Ro1KsGhn7pGvbinqtnQLntym053y99NN0CegNyuwg2mfzKCL7_9XE5-Ls3P5Y-fyyR_AcTllCE</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Mimura, Osamu</creator><creator>Ishikawa, Hitoshi</creator><creator>Kezuka, Takeshi</creator><creator>Shikishima, Keigo</creator><creator>Suzuki, Tone</creator><creator>Nakamura, Makoto</creator><creator>Chuman, Hideki</creator><creator>Inoue, Kenji</creator><creator>Kimura, Akiko</creator><creator>Yamagami, Akiko</creator><creator>Mihoya, Maki</creator><creator>Nakao, Yuzo</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study</title><author>Mimura, Osamu ; Ishikawa, Hitoshi ; Kezuka, Takeshi ; Shikishima, Keigo ; Suzuki, Tone ; Nakamura, Makoto ; Chuman, Hideki ; Inoue, Kenji ; Kimura, Akiko ; Yamagami, Akiko ; Mihoya, Maki ; Nakao, Yuzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-cb75dc2242b2ae284d7e4037da2eacaa4de8cbb90adfd682b3b6d5b1c08a25133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Clinical Investigation</topic><topic>Critical flicker fusion</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Flicker fusion</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Intravenous administration</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone</topic><topic>Neuritis</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Optic neuritis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mimura, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kezuka, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shikishima, Keigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Tone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuman, Hideki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamagami, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihoya, Maki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakao, Yuzo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mimura, Osamu</au><au>Ishikawa, Hitoshi</au><au>Kezuka, Takeshi</au><au>Shikishima, Keigo</au><au>Suzuki, Tone</au><au>Nakamura, Makoto</au><au>Chuman, Hideki</au><au>Inoue, Kenji</au><au>Kimura, Akiko</au><au>Yamagami, Akiko</au><au>Mihoya, Maki</au><au>Nakao, Yuzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Jpn J Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Jpn J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>122-132</pages><issn>0021-5155</issn><eissn>1613-2246</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous “freeze-dried sulfonated human normal immunoglobulin (GGS)” in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON). Study design Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Methods Patients with steroid-resistant acute ON were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous GGS (GGS group) or intravenous methylprednisolone (steroid pulse [SP] group). Visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), mean deviation (MD) value of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and critical flicker fusion frequency were measured as efficacy endpoints; adverse events (AEs) were assessed as the safety endpoint. Results Thirty-two patients (16 patients/group) received the study drugs. The primary endpoint, change in logMAR at week 2 compared to baseline, showed no statistically significant intergroup difference. However, compared with the SP group, change in the GGS group was increasingly indicative of visual improvement, with least squares mean difference of &gt; 0.3 logMAR. On post-hoc analyses, the percentage of patients in the GGS and SP groups with improvement by ≥ 0.3 logMAR at week 2 were 75.0% and 31.3%, respectively. Changes in MD values at week 2 compared to baseline were 9.258  ±  8.296 (mean ± standard deviation) dB and 3.175  ±  6.167 dB in the GGS and SP groups, respectively. These results showed statistically significant intergroup differences (visual acuity improvement, P = 0.032; change in MD values, P = 0.030). No clinically significant AEs were observed. Conclusion Our results suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin could be a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for prompt treatment of steroid-resistant acute ON. Trial registration: JapicCTI-132080.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>33469728</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10384-020-00790-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-5155
ispartof Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021, Vol.65 (1), p.122-132
issn 0021-5155
1613-2246
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479422376
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acuity
Adverse events
Clinical Investigation
Critical flicker fusion
Double-blind studies
Flicker fusion
Immunoglobulins
Intravenous administration
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methylprednisolone
Neuritis
Ophthalmology
Optic neuritis
Safety
Statistical analysis
Steroids
Visual acuity
title Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T12%3A27%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intravenous%20immunoglobulin%20treatment%20for%20steroid-resistant%20optic%20neuritis:%20a%20multicenter,%20double-blind,%20randomized,%20controlled%20phase%20III%20study&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Mimura,%20Osamu&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=122-132&rft.issn=0021-5155&rft.eissn=1613-2246&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10384-020-00790-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2479422376%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2484102695&rft_id=info:pmid/33469728&rfr_iscdi=true