Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension

A broad mastoid extension limits cholesteatoma resection via a transmeatal approach including endoscopic ear surgery. Therefore, a preoperative diagnosis of mastoid extension is a the most critical factor to determine whether to perform mastoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the effi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Auris, nasus, larynx nasus, larynx, 2021-10, Vol.48 (5), p.846-851
Hauptverfasser: Baba, Akira, Kurihara, Sho, Fukuda, Takeshi, Yamauchi, Hideomi, Matsushima, Satoshi, Ikeda, Koshi, Kurokawa, Ryo, Ota, Yoshiaki, Takahashi, Masahiro, Sakurai, Yuika, Motegi, Masaomi, Komori, Manabu, Yamamoto, Kazuhisa, Yamamoto, Yutaka, Kojima, Hiromi, Ojiri, Hiroya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 851
container_issue 5
container_start_page 846
container_title Auris, nasus, larynx
container_volume 48
creator Baba, Akira
Kurihara, Sho
Fukuda, Takeshi
Yamauchi, Hideomi
Matsushima, Satoshi
Ikeda, Koshi
Kurokawa, Ryo
Ota, Yoshiaki
Takahashi, Masahiro
Sakurai, Yuika
Motegi, Masaomi
Komori, Manabu
Yamamoto, Kazuhisa
Yamamoto, Yutaka
Kojima, Hiromi
Ojiri, Hiroya
description A broad mastoid extension limits cholesteatoma resection via a transmeatal approach including endoscopic ear surgery. Therefore, a preoperative diagnosis of mastoid extension is a the most critical factor to determine whether to perform mastoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) and T1-weighted imaging in the evaluation of mastoid extension in cholesteatomas of the middle ear. Patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pretreatment evaluation before primary surgery for pars flaccida or tensa cholesteatoma, which revealed a high-signal intensity in the mastoid on T2-weighed imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Two board-certified radiologists retrospectively evaluated the extent of cholesteatomas on MRI with non-EPI DWI, non-EPI DWI- and T1-weighted axial imaging. The presence of a high signal intensity on non-EPI DWI or low or high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging in the mastoid was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative). A total of 59 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were evaluated. There were 37 M+ cases and 22 M- cases. High-signal intensity on non-EPI DWI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.82, whereas partial low-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.91 for detecting mastoid involvement. Complete high-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.89 for detecting non-involvement of the mastoid. The sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.96) of combined non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging evaluation were higher than those of with non-EPI DWI or T1-weighted imaging alone. The interobserver agreement for the presence of high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity on non-EPI DWI was very good at 0.82, that of a partial low-signal intensity area in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.76 and that of complete high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.67. The signal intensity on non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging of the mastoid could be used to accurately assess the extent of middle ear cholesteatoma, which could facilitate surgical treatment planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anl.2021.01.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479038220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0385814621000298</els_id><sourcerecordid>2479038220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-4ccc7bc9462ac513f3307bf7b7d5a724875169fee021ead4c98e743b6d2f79623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozvj4AW6kSzcd82rT4krEF4huxnVIk5uZDG0zJh0f_97UUXElXLhwOedwz4fQCcEzgkl5vpqpvp1RTMkMj4N30JRUos4JF-UummJWFXlFeDlBBzGuMMZMsHofTRjjJakKNkXm0fc56KVft6pXITPO2k10vs_ewC2WYDLXqYXrF5nqTTYn-dd5-HO3PmTJ30IcQA2-U1mn4uCdyeB9gH7MOkJ7VrURjr_3IXq-uZ5f3eUPT7f3V5cPueacDTnXWotG17ykSheEWcawaKxohCmUoLwSBSlrC5AKgzJc1xUIzprSUCvqkrJDdLbNXQf_skkPyc5FDW2qBn4TJeWiTkwoxUlKtlIdfIwBrFyH1Ch8SILlCFeuZIIrR7gSjzN6Tr_jN00H5tfxQzMJLrYCSCVfHQQZtYNeg3EB9CCNd__EfwKO-Ysx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2479038220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Baba, Akira ; Kurihara, Sho ; Fukuda, Takeshi ; Yamauchi, Hideomi ; Matsushima, Satoshi ; Ikeda, Koshi ; Kurokawa, Ryo ; Ota, Yoshiaki ; Takahashi, Masahiro ; Sakurai, Yuika ; Motegi, Masaomi ; Komori, Manabu ; Yamamoto, Kazuhisa ; Yamamoto, Yutaka ; Kojima, Hiromi ; Ojiri, Hiroya</creator><creatorcontrib>Baba, Akira ; Kurihara, Sho ; Fukuda, Takeshi ; Yamauchi, Hideomi ; Matsushima, Satoshi ; Ikeda, Koshi ; Kurokawa, Ryo ; Ota, Yoshiaki ; Takahashi, Masahiro ; Sakurai, Yuika ; Motegi, Masaomi ; Komori, Manabu ; Yamamoto, Kazuhisa ; Yamamoto, Yutaka ; Kojima, Hiromi ; Ojiri, Hiroya</creatorcontrib><description>A broad mastoid extension limits cholesteatoma resection via a transmeatal approach including endoscopic ear surgery. Therefore, a preoperative diagnosis of mastoid extension is a the most critical factor to determine whether to perform mastoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) and T1-weighted imaging in the evaluation of mastoid extension in cholesteatomas of the middle ear. Patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pretreatment evaluation before primary surgery for pars flaccida or tensa cholesteatoma, which revealed a high-signal intensity in the mastoid on T2-weighed imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Two board-certified radiologists retrospectively evaluated the extent of cholesteatomas on MRI with non-EPI DWI, non-EPI DWI- and T1-weighted axial imaging. The presence of a high signal intensity on non-EPI DWI or low or high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging in the mastoid was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative). A total of 59 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were evaluated. There were 37 M+ cases and 22 M- cases. High-signal intensity on non-EPI DWI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.82, whereas partial low-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.91 for detecting mastoid involvement. Complete high-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.89 for detecting non-involvement of the mastoid. The sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.96) of combined non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging evaluation were higher than those of with non-EPI DWI or T1-weighted imaging alone. The interobserver agreement for the presence of high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity on non-EPI DWI was very good at 0.82, that of a partial low-signal intensity area in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.76 and that of complete high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.67. The signal intensity on non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging of the mastoid could be used to accurately assess the extent of middle ear cholesteatoma, which could facilitate surgical treatment planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0385-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.01.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33461853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cholesteatoma ; Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - diagnostic imaging ; Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - surgery ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Mastoid ; Mastoid - diagnostic imaging ; Mastoid - surgery ; Mastoidectomy ; Middle Aged ; MRI ; Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging ; Otologic Surgical Procedures ; T1-weighte imaging</subject><ispartof>Auris, nasus, larynx, 2021-10, Vol.48 (5), p.846-851</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-4ccc7bc9462ac513f3307bf7b7d5a724875169fee021ead4c98e743b6d2f79623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-4ccc7bc9462ac513f3307bf7b7d5a724875169fee021ead4c98e743b6d2f79623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814621000298$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baba, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurihara, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamauchi, Hideomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsushima, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Koshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurokawa, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakurai, Yuika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motegi, Masaomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komori, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kazuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kojima, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojiri, Hiroya</creatorcontrib><title>Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension</title><title>Auris, nasus, larynx</title><addtitle>Auris Nasus Larynx</addtitle><description>A broad mastoid extension limits cholesteatoma resection via a transmeatal approach including endoscopic ear surgery. Therefore, a preoperative diagnosis of mastoid extension is a the most critical factor to determine whether to perform mastoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) and T1-weighted imaging in the evaluation of mastoid extension in cholesteatomas of the middle ear. Patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pretreatment evaluation before primary surgery for pars flaccida or tensa cholesteatoma, which revealed a high-signal intensity in the mastoid on T2-weighed imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Two board-certified radiologists retrospectively evaluated the extent of cholesteatomas on MRI with non-EPI DWI, non-EPI DWI- and T1-weighted axial imaging. The presence of a high signal intensity on non-EPI DWI or low or high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging in the mastoid was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative). A total of 59 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were evaluated. There were 37 M+ cases and 22 M- cases. High-signal intensity on non-EPI DWI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.82, whereas partial low-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.91 for detecting mastoid involvement. Complete high-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.89 for detecting non-involvement of the mastoid. The sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.96) of combined non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging evaluation were higher than those of with non-EPI DWI or T1-weighted imaging alone. The interobserver agreement for the presence of high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity on non-EPI DWI was very good at 0.82, that of a partial low-signal intensity area in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.76 and that of complete high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.67. The signal intensity on non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging of the mastoid could be used to accurately assess the extent of middle ear cholesteatoma, which could facilitate surgical treatment planning.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cholesteatoma</subject><subject>Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - surgery</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mastoid</subject><subject>Mastoid - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mastoid - surgery</subject><subject>Mastoidectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging</subject><subject>Otologic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>T1-weighte imaging</subject><issn>0385-8146</issn><issn>1879-1476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozvj4AW6kSzcd82rT4krEF4huxnVIk5uZDG0zJh0f_97UUXElXLhwOedwz4fQCcEzgkl5vpqpvp1RTMkMj4N30JRUos4JF-UummJWFXlFeDlBBzGuMMZMsHofTRjjJakKNkXm0fc56KVft6pXITPO2k10vs_ewC2WYDLXqYXrF5nqTTYn-dd5-HO3PmTJ30IcQA2-U1mn4uCdyeB9gH7MOkJ7VrURjr_3IXq-uZ5f3eUPT7f3V5cPueacDTnXWotG17ykSheEWcawaKxohCmUoLwSBSlrC5AKgzJc1xUIzprSUCvqkrJDdLbNXQf_skkPyc5FDW2qBn4TJeWiTkwoxUlKtlIdfIwBrFyH1Ch8SILlCFeuZIIrR7gSjzN6Tr_jN00H5tfxQzMJLrYCSCVfHQQZtYNeg3EB9CCNd__EfwKO-Ysx</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Baba, Akira</creator><creator>Kurihara, Sho</creator><creator>Fukuda, Takeshi</creator><creator>Yamauchi, Hideomi</creator><creator>Matsushima, Satoshi</creator><creator>Ikeda, Koshi</creator><creator>Kurokawa, Ryo</creator><creator>Ota, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Takahashi, Masahiro</creator><creator>Sakurai, Yuika</creator><creator>Motegi, Masaomi</creator><creator>Komori, Manabu</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Kazuhisa</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Yutaka</creator><creator>Kojima, Hiromi</creator><creator>Ojiri, Hiroya</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension</title><author>Baba, Akira ; Kurihara, Sho ; Fukuda, Takeshi ; Yamauchi, Hideomi ; Matsushima, Satoshi ; Ikeda, Koshi ; Kurokawa, Ryo ; Ota, Yoshiaki ; Takahashi, Masahiro ; Sakurai, Yuika ; Motegi, Masaomi ; Komori, Manabu ; Yamamoto, Kazuhisa ; Yamamoto, Yutaka ; Kojima, Hiromi ; Ojiri, Hiroya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-4ccc7bc9462ac513f3307bf7b7d5a724875169fee021ead4c98e743b6d2f79623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cholesteatoma</topic><topic>Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - surgery</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mastoid</topic><topic>Mastoid - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mastoid - surgery</topic><topic>Mastoidectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging</topic><topic>Otologic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>T1-weighte imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baba, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurihara, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamauchi, Hideomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsushima, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Koshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurokawa, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ota, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakurai, Yuika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motegi, Masaomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komori, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Kazuhisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kojima, Hiromi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojiri, Hiroya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Auris, nasus, larynx</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baba, Akira</au><au>Kurihara, Sho</au><au>Fukuda, Takeshi</au><au>Yamauchi, Hideomi</au><au>Matsushima, Satoshi</au><au>Ikeda, Koshi</au><au>Kurokawa, Ryo</au><au>Ota, Yoshiaki</au><au>Takahashi, Masahiro</au><au>Sakurai, Yuika</au><au>Motegi, Masaomi</au><au>Komori, Manabu</au><au>Yamamoto, Kazuhisa</au><au>Yamamoto, Yutaka</au><au>Kojima, Hiromi</au><au>Ojiri, Hiroya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension</atitle><jtitle>Auris, nasus, larynx</jtitle><addtitle>Auris Nasus Larynx</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>846</spage><epage>851</epage><pages>846-851</pages><issn>0385-8146</issn><eissn>1879-1476</eissn><abstract>A broad mastoid extension limits cholesteatoma resection via a transmeatal approach including endoscopic ear surgery. Therefore, a preoperative diagnosis of mastoid extension is a the most critical factor to determine whether to perform mastoidectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging (non-EPI DWI) and T1-weighted imaging in the evaluation of mastoid extension in cholesteatomas of the middle ear. Patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pretreatment evaluation before primary surgery for pars flaccida or tensa cholesteatoma, which revealed a high-signal intensity in the mastoid on T2-weighed imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Two board-certified radiologists retrospectively evaluated the extent of cholesteatomas on MRI with non-EPI DWI, non-EPI DWI- and T1-weighted axial imaging. The presence of a high signal intensity on non-EPI DWI or low or high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging in the mastoid was evaluated. All cases were subclassified as M+ (surgically mastoid extension-positive) or M- (surgically mastoid extension-negative). A total of 59 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma were evaluated. There were 37 M+ cases and 22 M- cases. High-signal intensity on non-EPI DWI exhibited a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.82, whereas partial low-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.91 for detecting mastoid involvement. Complete high-signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging exhibited a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.89 for detecting non-involvement of the mastoid. The sensitivity (0.92) and specificity (0.96) of combined non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging evaluation were higher than those of with non-EPI DWI or T1-weighted imaging alone. The interobserver agreement for the presence of high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity on non-EPI DWI was very good at 0.82, that of a partial low-signal intensity area in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.76 and that of complete high-signal intensity in the mastoid cavity lesions on T1-weighted imaging was good, at 0.67. The signal intensity on non-EPI DWI and T1-weighted imaging of the mastoid could be used to accurately assess the extent of middle ear cholesteatoma, which could facilitate surgical treatment planning.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33461853</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anl.2021.01.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0385-8146
ispartof Auris, nasus, larynx, 2021-10, Vol.48 (5), p.846-851
issn 0385-8146
1879-1476
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2479038220
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Cholesteatoma
Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - diagnostic imaging
Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - surgery
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Endoscopy
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Mastoid
Mastoid - diagnostic imaging
Mastoid - surgery
Mastoidectomy
Middle Aged
MRI
Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging
Otologic Surgical Procedures
T1-weighte imaging
title Non-echoplanar diffusion weighed imaging and T1-weighted imaging for cholesteatoma mastoid extension
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T16%3A52%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-echoplanar%20diffusion%20weighed%20imaging%20and%20T1-weighted%20imaging%20for%20cholesteatoma%20mastoid%20extension&rft.jtitle=Auris,%20nasus,%20larynx&rft.au=Baba,%20Akira&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=846&rft.epage=851&rft.pages=846-851&rft.issn=0385-8146&rft.eissn=1879-1476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anl.2021.01.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2479038220%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2479038220&rft_id=info:pmid/33461853&rft_els_id=S0385814621000298&rfr_iscdi=true