The role of gut microbiota in bone homeostasis
The effect of the gut microbiota (GM) and its metabolite on bone health is termed the gut-bone axis. Multiple studies have elucidated the mechanisms but findings vary greatly. A systematic review was performed to analyze current animal models and explore the effect of GM on bone. Literature search w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bone & joint research 2021-01, Vol.10 (1), p.51-59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 59 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | Bone & joint research |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Li, Jie Ho, Wing Tung Percy Liu, Chaoran Chow, Simon Kwoon-Ho Ip, Margaret Yu, Jun Wong, Hei Sunny Cheung, Wing-Hoi Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu Wong, Ronald Man Yeung |
description | The effect of the gut microbiota (GM) and its metabolite on bone health is termed the gut-bone axis. Multiple studies have elucidated the mechanisms but findings vary greatly. A systematic review was performed to analyze current animal models and explore the effect of GM on bone.
Literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase databases. Information on the types and strains of animals, induction of osteoporosis, intervention strategies, determination of GM, assessment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality, and key findings were extracted.
A total of 30 studies were included, of which six studies used rats and 24 studies used mice. Osteoporosis or bone loss was induced in 14 studies. Interventions included ten with probiotics, three with prebiotics, nine with antibiotics, two with short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), six with vitamins and proteins, two with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and one with neuropeptide Y1R antagonist. In general, probiotics, prebiotics, nutritional interventions, and TCM were found to reverse the GM dysbiosis and rescue bone loss.
Despite the positive therapeutic effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and nutritional or pharmaceutical interventions on osteoporosis, there is still a critical knowledge gap regarding the role of GM in rescuing bone loss and its related pathways. Cite this article:
2021;10(1):51-59. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1302/2046-3758.101.BJR-2020-0273.R1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2478584537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2478584537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-d72c54e36515b9d1079d2a393080ff1c1256b2da26298c6a896396a8c8df13f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj0tLxDAYRYMozjDOX5CsxE1rki9Jk6UOjg8GhKH7kubhVNpmbNqF_96Co3g35y4OFy5CN5TkFAi7Y4TLDAqhckpo_vC6zxhhJCOsgHxPz9DyTzj_1xdondIHmSMVl0RdogUA50pJvUR5efB4iK3HMeD3acRdY4dYN3E0uOlxHXuPD7HzMY0mNekKXQTTJr8-cYXK7WO5ec52b08vm_tdZkHzMXMFs4J7kIKKWjtKCu2YAQ1EkRCopUzImjnDJNPKSqO0BD3DKhcoBFih25_Z4xA_J5_GqmuS9W1reh-nVDFeKKG4gGJWr0_qVHfeVceh6czwVf1ehG-Qc1SO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2478584537</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of gut microbiota in bone homeostasis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Li, Jie ; Ho, Wing Tung Percy ; Liu, Chaoran ; Chow, Simon Kwoon-Ho ; Ip, Margaret ; Yu, Jun ; Wong, Hei Sunny ; Cheung, Wing-Hoi ; Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu ; Wong, Ronald Man Yeung</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Jie ; Ho, Wing Tung Percy ; Liu, Chaoran ; Chow, Simon Kwoon-Ho ; Ip, Margaret ; Yu, Jun ; Wong, Hei Sunny ; Cheung, Wing-Hoi ; Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu ; Wong, Ronald Man Yeung</creatorcontrib><description>The effect of the gut microbiota (GM) and its metabolite on bone health is termed the gut-bone axis. Multiple studies have elucidated the mechanisms but findings vary greatly. A systematic review was performed to analyze current animal models and explore the effect of GM on bone.
Literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase databases. Information on the types and strains of animals, induction of osteoporosis, intervention strategies, determination of GM, assessment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality, and key findings were extracted.
A total of 30 studies were included, of which six studies used rats and 24 studies used mice. Osteoporosis or bone loss was induced in 14 studies. Interventions included ten with probiotics, three with prebiotics, nine with antibiotics, two with short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), six with vitamins and proteins, two with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and one with neuropeptide Y1R antagonist. In general, probiotics, prebiotics, nutritional interventions, and TCM were found to reverse the GM dysbiosis and rescue bone loss.
Despite the positive therapeutic effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and nutritional or pharmaceutical interventions on osteoporosis, there is still a critical knowledge gap regarding the role of GM in rescuing bone loss and its related pathways. Cite this article:
2021;10(1):51-59.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-3758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-3758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.101.BJR-2020-0273.R1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33448869</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Bone & joint research, 2021-01, Vol.10 (1), p.51-59</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-d72c54e36515b9d1079d2a393080ff1c1256b2da26298c6a896396a8c8df13f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0662-9697</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,862,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33448869$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Wing Tung Percy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chaoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Simon Kwoon-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ip, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Hei Sunny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Wing-Hoi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ronald Man Yeung</creatorcontrib><title>The role of gut microbiota in bone homeostasis</title><title>Bone & joint research</title><addtitle>Bone Joint Res</addtitle><description>The effect of the gut microbiota (GM) and its metabolite on bone health is termed the gut-bone axis. Multiple studies have elucidated the mechanisms but findings vary greatly. A systematic review was performed to analyze current animal models and explore the effect of GM on bone.
Literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase databases. Information on the types and strains of animals, induction of osteoporosis, intervention strategies, determination of GM, assessment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality, and key findings were extracted.
A total of 30 studies were included, of which six studies used rats and 24 studies used mice. Osteoporosis or bone loss was induced in 14 studies. Interventions included ten with probiotics, three with prebiotics, nine with antibiotics, two with short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), six with vitamins and proteins, two with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and one with neuropeptide Y1R antagonist. In general, probiotics, prebiotics, nutritional interventions, and TCM were found to reverse the GM dysbiosis and rescue bone loss.
Despite the positive therapeutic effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and nutritional or pharmaceutical interventions on osteoporosis, there is still a critical knowledge gap regarding the role of GM in rescuing bone loss and its related pathways. Cite this article:
2021;10(1):51-59.</description><issn>2046-3758</issn><issn>2046-3758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNj0tLxDAYRYMozjDOX5CsxE1rki9Jk6UOjg8GhKH7kubhVNpmbNqF_96Co3g35y4OFy5CN5TkFAi7Y4TLDAqhckpo_vC6zxhhJCOsgHxPz9DyTzj_1xdondIHmSMVl0RdogUA50pJvUR5efB4iK3HMeD3acRdY4dYN3E0uOlxHXuPD7HzMY0mNekKXQTTJr8-cYXK7WO5ec52b08vm_tdZkHzMXMFs4J7kIKKWjtKCu2YAQ1EkRCopUzImjnDJNPKSqO0BD3DKhcoBFih25_Z4xA_J5_GqmuS9W1reh-nVDFeKKG4gGJWr0_qVHfeVceh6czwVf1ehG-Qc1SO</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Li, Jie</creator><creator>Ho, Wing Tung Percy</creator><creator>Liu, Chaoran</creator><creator>Chow, Simon Kwoon-Ho</creator><creator>Ip, Margaret</creator><creator>Yu, Jun</creator><creator>Wong, Hei Sunny</creator><creator>Cheung, Wing-Hoi</creator><creator>Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu</creator><creator>Wong, Ronald Man Yeung</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0662-9697</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>The role of gut microbiota in bone homeostasis</title><author>Li, Jie ; Ho, Wing Tung Percy ; Liu, Chaoran ; Chow, Simon Kwoon-Ho ; Ip, Margaret ; Yu, Jun ; Wong, Hei Sunny ; Cheung, Wing-Hoi ; Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu ; Wong, Ronald Man Yeung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-d72c54e36515b9d1079d2a393080ff1c1256b2da26298c6a896396a8c8df13f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Wing Tung Percy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chaoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Simon Kwoon-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ip, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Hei Sunny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Wing-Hoi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Ronald Man Yeung</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bone & joint research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Jie</au><au>Ho, Wing Tung Percy</au><au>Liu, Chaoran</au><au>Chow, Simon Kwoon-Ho</au><au>Ip, Margaret</au><au>Yu, Jun</au><au>Wong, Hei Sunny</au><au>Cheung, Wing-Hoi</au><au>Sung, Joseph Jao Yiu</au><au>Wong, Ronald Man Yeung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of gut microbiota in bone homeostasis</atitle><jtitle>Bone & joint research</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Joint Res</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>51-59</pages><issn>2046-3758</issn><eissn>2046-3758</eissn><abstract>The effect of the gut microbiota (GM) and its metabolite on bone health is termed the gut-bone axis. Multiple studies have elucidated the mechanisms but findings vary greatly. A systematic review was performed to analyze current animal models and explore the effect of GM on bone.
Literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase databases. Information on the types and strains of animals, induction of osteoporosis, intervention strategies, determination of GM, assessment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality, and key findings were extracted.
A total of 30 studies were included, of which six studies used rats and 24 studies used mice. Osteoporosis or bone loss was induced in 14 studies. Interventions included ten with probiotics, three with prebiotics, nine with antibiotics, two with short-chain fatty acid (SCFA), six with vitamins and proteins, two with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and one with neuropeptide Y1R antagonist. In general, probiotics, prebiotics, nutritional interventions, and TCM were found to reverse the GM dysbiosis and rescue bone loss.
Despite the positive therapeutic effect of probiotics, prebiotics, and nutritional or pharmaceutical interventions on osteoporosis, there is still a critical knowledge gap regarding the role of GM in rescuing bone loss and its related pathways. Cite this article:
2021;10(1):51-59.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>33448869</pmid><doi>10.1302/2046-3758.101.BJR-2020-0273.R1</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0662-9697</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2046-3758 |
ispartof | Bone & joint research, 2021-01, Vol.10 (1), p.51-59 |
issn | 2046-3758 2046-3758 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2478584537 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
title | The role of gut microbiota in bone homeostasis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A02%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20gut%20microbiota%20in%20bone%20homeostasis&rft.jtitle=Bone%20&%20joint%20research&rft.au=Li,%20Jie&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=51-59&rft.issn=2046-3758&rft.eissn=2046-3758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/2046-3758.101.BJR-2020-0273.R1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2478584537%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2478584537&rft_id=info:pmid/33448869&rfr_iscdi=true |