Values of hmF2 deduced from automatically scaled ionograms

The values of hmF2 deduced by real-height analysis of automatically scaled vertical incidence Digisonde ionograms have been compared with those obtained using simple methods based on routinely scaled ionospheric characteristics. Comparisons have been made for ionograms recorded at five stations duri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in space research 1987, Vol.7 (6), p.53-56
Hauptverfasser: McNamara, Leo F., Reinisch, Bodo W., Tang, Jane S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 56
container_issue 6
container_start_page 53
container_title Advances in space research
container_volume 7
creator McNamara, Leo F.
Reinisch, Bodo W.
Tang, Jane S.
description The values of hmF2 deduced by real-height analysis of automatically scaled vertical incidence Digisonde ionograms have been compared with those obtained using simple methods based on routinely scaled ionospheric characteristics. Comparisons have been made for ionograms recorded at five stations during low solar activity. The real-height analyses used Titheridge's program POLAN, while the simple methods used were those of Dudeney and Bilitza. Systematic discrepancies between the simple-model and POLAN values of hmF2 were found, with 15–20 km overestimates of hmF2 by the simple methods during the night. The majority of discrepancies lie between ±20 km. During the day, 80% of discrepancies lie between ±10 km. Significantly larger discrepancies can usually be attributed to special ionospheric conditions or ionograms, failure of the automatic scaling technique, or failure of one of the basic assumptions of the simple models.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0273-1177(87)90271-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_24778275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0273117787902717</els_id><sourcerecordid>24778275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-495f352b3b109e8a70bd6632818e15662a37c8fa68d11c5d30b92ea14884ba8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQgIMouK7-Aw89iOihmkkfk3gQZHFVWPCiXkOaphppmzVphf33pu7i0dMwzDevj5BToFdAobymDLMUAPGC46WIGaS4R2bAUaQgcr5PZn_IITkK4ZNSYIh0Rm7eVDuakLgm-eiWLKlNPWpTJ413XaLGwXVqsFq17SYJMcSKdb1796oLx-SgUW0wJ7s4J6_L-5fFY7p6fnha3K1SzVAMaS6KJitYlVVAheEKaVWXZcY4cANFWTKVoeaNKnkNoIs6o5VgRkHOeV4prrM5Od_OXXv3FW8dZGeDNm2reuPGIFmOyBkWEcy3oPYuBG8aufa2U34jgcpJlJwsyMmC5Ch_RUmMbWe7-Wp6sfGq1zb89WLJCgEiYrdbzMRfv63xMmhr-ijLeqMHWTv7_54fcUN6qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>24778275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Values of hmF2 deduced from automatically scaled ionograms</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McNamara, Leo F. ; Reinisch, Bodo W. ; Tang, Jane S.</creator><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Leo F. ; Reinisch, Bodo W. ; Tang, Jane S.</creatorcontrib><description>The values of hmF2 deduced by real-height analysis of automatically scaled vertical incidence Digisonde ionograms have been compared with those obtained using simple methods based on routinely scaled ionospheric characteristics. Comparisons have been made for ionograms recorded at five stations during low solar activity. The real-height analyses used Titheridge's program POLAN, while the simple methods used were those of Dudeney and Bilitza. Systematic discrepancies between the simple-model and POLAN values of hmF2 were found, with 15–20 km overestimates of hmF2 by the simple methods during the night. The majority of discrepancies lie between ±20 km. During the day, 80% of discrepancies lie between ±10 km. Significantly larger discrepancies can usually be attributed to special ionospheric conditions or ionograms, failure of the automatic scaling technique, or failure of one of the basic assumptions of the simple models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0273-1177(87)90271-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASRSDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Ionospheric structure (d, e, f and topside regions) ; Physics of the ionosphere</subject><ispartof>Advances in space research, 1987, Vol.7 (6), p.53-56</ispartof><rights>1987</rights><rights>1988 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-495f352b3b109e8a70bd6632818e15662a37c8fa68d11c5d30b92ea14884ba8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-495f352b3b109e8a70bd6632818e15662a37c8fa68d11c5d30b92ea14884ba8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(87)90271-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3537,4010,4036,4037,23911,23912,25121,27904,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=7625919$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Leo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, Bodo W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jane S.</creatorcontrib><title>Values of hmF2 deduced from automatically scaled ionograms</title><title>Advances in space research</title><description>The values of hmF2 deduced by real-height analysis of automatically scaled vertical incidence Digisonde ionograms have been compared with those obtained using simple methods based on routinely scaled ionospheric characteristics. Comparisons have been made for ionograms recorded at five stations during low solar activity. The real-height analyses used Titheridge's program POLAN, while the simple methods used were those of Dudeney and Bilitza. Systematic discrepancies between the simple-model and POLAN values of hmF2 were found, with 15–20 km overestimates of hmF2 by the simple methods during the night. The majority of discrepancies lie between ±20 km. During the day, 80% of discrepancies lie between ±10 km. Significantly larger discrepancies can usually be attributed to special ionospheric conditions or ionograms, failure of the automatic scaling technique, or failure of one of the basic assumptions of the simple models.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Ionospheric structure (d, e, f and topside regions)</subject><subject>Physics of the ionosphere</subject><issn>0273-1177</issn><issn>1879-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQgIMouK7-Aw89iOihmkkfk3gQZHFVWPCiXkOaphppmzVphf33pu7i0dMwzDevj5BToFdAobymDLMUAPGC46WIGaS4R2bAUaQgcr5PZn_IITkK4ZNSYIh0Rm7eVDuakLgm-eiWLKlNPWpTJ413XaLGwXVqsFq17SYJMcSKdb1796oLx-SgUW0wJ7s4J6_L-5fFY7p6fnha3K1SzVAMaS6KJitYlVVAheEKaVWXZcY4cANFWTKVoeaNKnkNoIs6o5VgRkHOeV4prrM5Od_OXXv3FW8dZGeDNm2reuPGIFmOyBkWEcy3oPYuBG8aufa2U34jgcpJlJwsyMmC5Ch_RUmMbWe7-Wp6sfGq1zb89WLJCgEiYrdbzMRfv63xMmhr-ijLeqMHWTv7_54fcUN6qg</recordid><startdate>1987</startdate><enddate>1987</enddate><creator>McNamara, Leo F.</creator><creator>Reinisch, Bodo W.</creator><creator>Tang, Jane S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1987</creationdate><title>Values of hmF2 deduced from automatically scaled ionograms</title><author>McNamara, Leo F. ; Reinisch, Bodo W. ; Tang, Jane S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279t-495f352b3b109e8a70bd6632818e15662a37c8fa68d11c5d30b92ea14884ba8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Ionospheric structure (d, e, f and topside regions)</topic><topic>Physics of the ionosphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNamara, Leo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, Bodo W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jane S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Advances in space research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNamara, Leo F.</au><au>Reinisch, Bodo W.</au><au>Tang, Jane S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Values of hmF2 deduced from automatically scaled ionograms</atitle><jtitle>Advances in space research</jtitle><date>1987</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>53-56</pages><issn>0273-1177</issn><eissn>1879-1948</eissn><coden>ASRSDW</coden><abstract>The values of hmF2 deduced by real-height analysis of automatically scaled vertical incidence Digisonde ionograms have been compared with those obtained using simple methods based on routinely scaled ionospheric characteristics. Comparisons have been made for ionograms recorded at five stations during low solar activity. The real-height analyses used Titheridge's program POLAN, while the simple methods used were those of Dudeney and Bilitza. Systematic discrepancies between the simple-model and POLAN values of hmF2 were found, with 15–20 km overestimates of hmF2 by the simple methods during the night. The majority of discrepancies lie between ±20 km. During the day, 80% of discrepancies lie between ±10 km. Significantly larger discrepancies can usually be attributed to special ionospheric conditions or ionograms, failure of the automatic scaling technique, or failure of one of the basic assumptions of the simple models.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/0273-1177(87)90271-7</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1177
ispartof Advances in space research, 1987, Vol.7 (6), p.53-56
issn 0273-1177
1879-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_24778275
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Ionospheric structure (d, e, f and topside regions)
Physics of the ionosphere
title Values of hmF2 deduced from automatically scaled ionograms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T05%3A11%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Values%20of%20hmF2%20deduced%20from%20automatically%20scaled%20ionograms&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20space%20research&rft.au=McNamara,%20Leo%20F.&rft.date=1987&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=53-56&rft.issn=0273-1177&rft.eissn=1879-1948&rft.coden=ASRSDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0273-1177(87)90271-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E24778275%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=24778275&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0273117787902717&rfr_iscdi=true