A European snapshot of psychosocial characteristics and patients’ perspectives of faecal incontinence—do they correlate with current scoring systems?

Purpose To compare the current clinical scoring systems used to quantify the severity of symptoms of faecal incontinence (FI) to patients’ subjective scoring of parameters of psychosocial well-being. Methods Patients referred to six European centres for investigation or treatment of symptoms of FI b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of colorectal disease 2021-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1175-1180
Hauptverfasser: Creamer, Felicity, Orlando, Alessandra, Brunner, Maximillian, Buntzen, Steen, Dennis, Alexander, Gómez-Fernández, Laura, Handtrack, Claudia, Hanly, Ann, Matzel, Klaus E., Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz, Meurette, Guillaume, O’Connell, P. Ronan, Alonso, Cristina Pérez, Ribas, Yolanda, Rydningen, Mona, Wyart, Vincent, Vaizey, Carolynne J., Maeda, Yasuko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1180
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1175
container_title International journal of colorectal disease
container_volume 36
creator Creamer, Felicity
Orlando, Alessandra
Brunner, Maximillian
Buntzen, Steen
Dennis, Alexander
Gómez-Fernández, Laura
Handtrack, Claudia
Hanly, Ann
Matzel, Klaus E.
Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz
Meurette, Guillaume
O’Connell, P. Ronan
Alonso, Cristina Pérez
Ribas, Yolanda
Rydningen, Mona
Wyart, Vincent
Vaizey, Carolynne J.
Maeda, Yasuko
description Purpose To compare the current clinical scoring systems used to quantify the severity of symptoms of faecal incontinence (FI) to patients’ subjective scoring of parameters of psychosocial well-being. Methods Patients referred to six European centres for investigation or treatment of symptoms of FI between June 2017 and September 2019 completed a questionnaire that captured patient demographics, incontinence symptoms using St. Mark’s Incontinence score (SMIS) and ICIQ-B, psychological well-being (HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and social interaction (a three-item loneliness scale). Results Three hundred eighteen patients completed questionnaires (62 men, mean age 58.7). Sixty percent of the respondents were aged under 65. Median SMIS was 15 (11–18), ICIQ-B bowel pattern was 8 (6–11) and bowel control was 17 (13–22), similar across all demographic groups; however, younger patients were more likely to experience symptoms of depression and anxiety (HADS score > 10, 65.2% of patients age  = 65, p  = 0.03) with lower quality of life (ICIQ-B QoL, median score 19 (14–23)) vs age > = 65 (16 (11–21) ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00384-021-03836-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2477517979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714486968</galeid><sourcerecordid>A714486968</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-e39c3148232fcbd7d901d66d600773c06855df9b8a1df632a8bde143e7af6af23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1uFDEQhVsIRIbABVggS2zYdOKfHtu9QqMo_EiR2MDa8rjLGUc9duNyg2aXQ7DJ9XISPJlABELIC7tK3yuVn17TvGT0hFGqTpFSobuWctbWh5CtetQsWCd4y7jkj5sFZapvWb_UR80zxCtaa6m6p82REJ3QjOpFc7Mi53NOE9hIMNoJN6mQ5MmEO7dJmFywI3Ebm60rkAOW4JDYOJDJlgCx4O31DZkg4wSuhG-Ae7G34KosRJdiCRGig9vrH0MiZQM74lLOMNoC5HsoG-LmWsZCsPZDvCS4wwJbfPu8eeLtiPDi_j5uvrw7_3z2ob349P7j2eqidZ2WpQXRO8E6zQX3bj2ooadskHKQ1SElHJV6uRx8v9aWDV4KbvV6gGoSKOul9VwcN28Oc6ecvs6AxWwDOhhHGyHNaHin1LIaqfqKvv4LvUpzjnU7w5dc6k6yXj9Ql3YEE6JPpbq3H2pWinV1617uqZN_UPUMsA3VN_Ch9v8Q8IPA5YSYwZsph63NO8Oo2efBHPJgah7MXR6MqqJX9xvP6y0MvyW_AlABcQBw2rsP-eFL_xn7E65dxH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2526846198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A European snapshot of psychosocial characteristics and patients’ perspectives of faecal incontinence—do they correlate with current scoring systems?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)</source><creator>Creamer, Felicity ; Orlando, Alessandra ; Brunner, Maximillian ; Buntzen, Steen ; Dennis, Alexander ; Gómez-Fernández, Laura ; Handtrack, Claudia ; Hanly, Ann ; Matzel, Klaus E. ; Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz ; Meurette, Guillaume ; O’Connell, P. Ronan ; Alonso, Cristina Pérez ; Ribas, Yolanda ; Rydningen, Mona ; Wyart, Vincent ; Vaizey, Carolynne J. ; Maeda, Yasuko</creator><creatorcontrib>Creamer, Felicity ; Orlando, Alessandra ; Brunner, Maximillian ; Buntzen, Steen ; Dennis, Alexander ; Gómez-Fernández, Laura ; Handtrack, Claudia ; Hanly, Ann ; Matzel, Klaus E. ; Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz ; Meurette, Guillaume ; O’Connell, P. Ronan ; Alonso, Cristina Pérez ; Ribas, Yolanda ; Rydningen, Mona ; Wyart, Vincent ; Vaizey, Carolynne J. ; Maeda, Yasuko</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To compare the current clinical scoring systems used to quantify the severity of symptoms of faecal incontinence (FI) to patients’ subjective scoring of parameters of psychosocial well-being. Methods Patients referred to six European centres for investigation or treatment of symptoms of FI between June 2017 and September 2019 completed a questionnaire that captured patient demographics, incontinence symptoms using St. Mark’s Incontinence score (SMIS) and ICIQ-B, psychological well-being (HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and social interaction (a three-item loneliness scale). Results Three hundred eighteen patients completed questionnaires (62 men, mean age 58.7). Sixty percent of the respondents were aged under 65. Median SMIS was 15 (11–18), ICIQ-B bowel pattern was 8 (6–11) and bowel control was 17 (13–22), similar across all demographic groups; however, younger patients were more likely to experience symptoms of depression and anxiety (HADS score &gt; 10, 65.2% of patients age &lt; 65 vs 54.9% of those ages &gt; = 65, p  = 0.03) with lower quality of life (ICIQ-B QoL, median score 19 (14–23)) vs age &gt; = 65 (16 (11–21) ( p  &lt; 0.005)). On loneliness score 25.5% reported often feeling isolated from others. One of the most significant concerns by patients was the fear and embarrassment related to unpredictable episodes of incontinence. Conclusion The SMIS remains a useful tool for quantifying incontinence symptoms but may underestimate the psychosocial morbidity associated with unpredictable episodes of incontinence. Interventions aimed at decreasing anxiety and to address feelings of disgust may be helpful for a significant number of patients requiring treatment for FI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0179-1958</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03836-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33438108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Age ; Anxiety ; Care and treatment ; Demography ; Depression, Mental ; Fecal incontinence ; Gastroenterology ; Hepatology ; Incontinence ; Internal Medicine ; Intestine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mental depression ; Morbidity ; Original Article ; Patients ; Proctology ; Psychological aspects ; Quality of life ; Social aspects ; Surgery ; Well being</subject><ispartof>International journal of colorectal disease, 2021-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1175-1180</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-e39c3148232fcbd7d901d66d600773c06855df9b8a1df632a8bde143e7af6af23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-e39c3148232fcbd7d901d66d600773c06855df9b8a1df632a8bde143e7af6af23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4081-4741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00384-021-03836-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00384-021-03836-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33438108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Creamer, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner, Maximillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buntzen, Steen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Fernández, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handtrack, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanly, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzel, Klaus E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meurette, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, P. Ronan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Cristina Pérez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rydningen, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyart, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaizey, Carolynne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Yasuko</creatorcontrib><title>A European snapshot of psychosocial characteristics and patients’ perspectives of faecal incontinence—do they correlate with current scoring systems?</title><title>International journal of colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Purpose To compare the current clinical scoring systems used to quantify the severity of symptoms of faecal incontinence (FI) to patients’ subjective scoring of parameters of psychosocial well-being. Methods Patients referred to six European centres for investigation or treatment of symptoms of FI between June 2017 and September 2019 completed a questionnaire that captured patient demographics, incontinence symptoms using St. Mark’s Incontinence score (SMIS) and ICIQ-B, psychological well-being (HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and social interaction (a three-item loneliness scale). Results Three hundred eighteen patients completed questionnaires (62 men, mean age 58.7). Sixty percent of the respondents were aged under 65. Median SMIS was 15 (11–18), ICIQ-B bowel pattern was 8 (6–11) and bowel control was 17 (13–22), similar across all demographic groups; however, younger patients were more likely to experience symptoms of depression and anxiety (HADS score &gt; 10, 65.2% of patients age &lt; 65 vs 54.9% of those ages &gt; = 65, p  = 0.03) with lower quality of life (ICIQ-B QoL, median score 19 (14–23)) vs age &gt; = 65 (16 (11–21) ( p  &lt; 0.005)). On loneliness score 25.5% reported often feeling isolated from others. One of the most significant concerns by patients was the fear and embarrassment related to unpredictable episodes of incontinence. Conclusion The SMIS remains a useful tool for quantifying incontinence symptoms but may underestimate the psychosocial morbidity associated with unpredictable episodes of incontinence. Interventions aimed at decreasing anxiety and to address feelings of disgust may be helpful for a significant number of patients requiring treatment for FI.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Fecal incontinence</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Incontinence</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>0179-1958</issn><issn>1432-1262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk1uFDEQhVsIRIbABVggS2zYdOKfHtu9QqMo_EiR2MDa8rjLGUc9duNyg2aXQ7DJ9XISPJlABELIC7tK3yuVn17TvGT0hFGqTpFSobuWctbWh5CtetQsWCd4y7jkj5sFZapvWb_UR80zxCtaa6m6p82REJ3QjOpFc7Mi53NOE9hIMNoJN6mQ5MmEO7dJmFywI3Ebm60rkAOW4JDYOJDJlgCx4O31DZkg4wSuhG-Ae7G34KosRJdiCRGig9vrH0MiZQM74lLOMNoC5HsoG-LmWsZCsPZDvCS4wwJbfPu8eeLtiPDi_j5uvrw7_3z2ob349P7j2eqidZ2WpQXRO8E6zQX3bj2ooadskHKQ1SElHJV6uRx8v9aWDV4KbvV6gGoSKOul9VwcN28Oc6ecvs6AxWwDOhhHGyHNaHin1LIaqfqKvv4LvUpzjnU7w5dc6k6yXj9Ql3YEE6JPpbq3H2pWinV1617uqZN_UPUMsA3VN_Ch9v8Q8IPA5YSYwZsph63NO8Oo2efBHPJgah7MXR6MqqJX9xvP6y0MvyW_AlABcQBw2rsP-eFL_xn7E65dxH0</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Creamer, Felicity</creator><creator>Orlando, Alessandra</creator><creator>Brunner, Maximillian</creator><creator>Buntzen, Steen</creator><creator>Dennis, Alexander</creator><creator>Gómez-Fernández, Laura</creator><creator>Handtrack, Claudia</creator><creator>Hanly, Ann</creator><creator>Matzel, Klaus E.</creator><creator>Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz</creator><creator>Meurette, Guillaume</creator><creator>O’Connell, P. Ronan</creator><creator>Alonso, Cristina Pérez</creator><creator>Ribas, Yolanda</creator><creator>Rydningen, Mona</creator><creator>Wyart, Vincent</creator><creator>Vaizey, Carolynne J.</creator><creator>Maeda, Yasuko</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4081-4741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>A European snapshot of psychosocial characteristics and patients’ perspectives of faecal incontinence—do they correlate with current scoring systems?</title><author>Creamer, Felicity ; Orlando, Alessandra ; Brunner, Maximillian ; Buntzen, Steen ; Dennis, Alexander ; Gómez-Fernández, Laura ; Handtrack, Claudia ; Hanly, Ann ; Matzel, Klaus E. ; Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz ; Meurette, Guillaume ; O’Connell, P. Ronan ; Alonso, Cristina Pérez ; Ribas, Yolanda ; Rydningen, Mona ; Wyart, Vincent ; Vaizey, Carolynne J. ; Maeda, Yasuko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-e39c3148232fcbd7d901d66d600773c06855df9b8a1df632a8bde143e7af6af23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Fecal incontinence</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Incontinence</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Creamer, Felicity</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner, Maximillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buntzen, Steen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Fernández, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handtrack, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanly, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matzel, Klaus E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meurette, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, P. Ronan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Cristina Pérez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas, Yolanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rydningen, Mona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyart, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaizey, Carolynne J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Yasuko</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Creamer, Felicity</au><au>Orlando, Alessandra</au><au>Brunner, Maximillian</au><au>Buntzen, Steen</au><au>Dennis, Alexander</au><au>Gómez-Fernández, Laura</au><au>Handtrack, Claudia</au><au>Hanly, Ann</au><au>Matzel, Klaus E.</au><au>Duyos, Arantxa Muñoz</au><au>Meurette, Guillaume</au><au>O’Connell, P. Ronan</au><au>Alonso, Cristina Pérez</au><au>Ribas, Yolanda</au><au>Rydningen, Mona</au><au>Wyart, Vincent</au><au>Vaizey, Carolynne J.</au><au>Maeda, Yasuko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A European snapshot of psychosocial characteristics and patients’ perspectives of faecal incontinence—do they correlate with current scoring systems?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of colorectal disease</jtitle><stitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</stitle><addtitle>Int J Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1175</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1175-1180</pages><issn>0179-1958</issn><eissn>1432-1262</eissn><abstract>Purpose To compare the current clinical scoring systems used to quantify the severity of symptoms of faecal incontinence (FI) to patients’ subjective scoring of parameters of psychosocial well-being. Methods Patients referred to six European centres for investigation or treatment of symptoms of FI between June 2017 and September 2019 completed a questionnaire that captured patient demographics, incontinence symptoms using St. Mark’s Incontinence score (SMIS) and ICIQ-B, psychological well-being (HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and social interaction (a three-item loneliness scale). Results Three hundred eighteen patients completed questionnaires (62 men, mean age 58.7). Sixty percent of the respondents were aged under 65. Median SMIS was 15 (11–18), ICIQ-B bowel pattern was 8 (6–11) and bowel control was 17 (13–22), similar across all demographic groups; however, younger patients were more likely to experience symptoms of depression and anxiety (HADS score &gt; 10, 65.2% of patients age &lt; 65 vs 54.9% of those ages &gt; = 65, p  = 0.03) with lower quality of life (ICIQ-B QoL, median score 19 (14–23)) vs age &gt; = 65 (16 (11–21) ( p  &lt; 0.005)). On loneliness score 25.5% reported often feeling isolated from others. One of the most significant concerns by patients was the fear and embarrassment related to unpredictable episodes of incontinence. Conclusion The SMIS remains a useful tool for quantifying incontinence symptoms but may underestimate the psychosocial morbidity associated with unpredictable episodes of incontinence. Interventions aimed at decreasing anxiety and to address feelings of disgust may be helpful for a significant number of patients requiring treatment for FI.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33438108</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00384-021-03836-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4081-4741</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0179-1958
ispartof International journal of colorectal disease, 2021-06, Vol.36 (6), p.1175-1180
issn 0179-1958
1432-1262
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2477517979
source SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)
subjects Age
Anxiety
Care and treatment
Demography
Depression, Mental
Fecal incontinence
Gastroenterology
Hepatology
Incontinence
Internal Medicine
Intestine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mental depression
Morbidity
Original Article
Patients
Proctology
Psychological aspects
Quality of life
Social aspects
Surgery
Well being
title A European snapshot of psychosocial characteristics and patients’ perspectives of faecal incontinence—do they correlate with current scoring systems?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20European%20snapshot%20of%20psychosocial%20characteristics%20and%20patients%E2%80%99%20perspectives%20of%20faecal%20incontinence%E2%80%94do%20they%20correlate%20with%20current%20scoring%20systems?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Creamer,%20Felicity&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1175&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1175-1180&rft.issn=0179-1958&rft.eissn=1432-1262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00384-021-03836-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714486968%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2526846198&rft_id=info:pmid/33438108&rft_galeid=A714486968&rfr_iscdi=true