Retrospective Comparison of Postinsertion Maintenances Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures Fabricated in a Predoctoral Clinic

Purpose A retrospective study to analyze the clinical performance of 3D printed complete dentures in edentulous patients compared with conventional complete dentures regarding postinsertion visits and patient reported outcomes. Material and Methods Electronic charts were reviewed to analyze 420 (max...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of prosthodontics 2021-05, Vol.30 (S2), p.158-162
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Tae Hyung, Huh, Jung Bo, Lee, Janet, Bae, Eun‐Bin, Park, Cheryl J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue S2
container_start_page 158
container_title Journal of prosthodontics
container_volume 30
creator Kim, Tae Hyung
Huh, Jung Bo
Lee, Janet
Bae, Eun‐Bin
Park, Cheryl J.
description Purpose A retrospective study to analyze the clinical performance of 3D printed complete dentures in edentulous patients compared with conventional complete dentures regarding postinsertion visits and patient reported outcomes. Material and Methods Electronic charts were reviewed to analyze 420 (maxilla 270, mandible 150) heat‐polymerized conventional complete dentures (CCD) inserted between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 and 217 (maxilla 130, mandible 86) 3D printed complete dentures (PCD) inserted between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018. Number of remakes, number of postinsertion adjustments, type and number of repairs, and patient reported complications were compared between two types of complete dentures. The frequency of denture repair and patient reported complications were analyzed using chi‐square of independence test. Results The frequency of pain and visible ulcer lesions in the maxilla was determined to be 46.67% with CCD and 36.15% in PCD (p = 0.047). There was no statistical significance in other items. The majority of esthetic concerns was dissatisfaction with the shape of dentures with CCD (4.67%) and they had statistically significant, less frequent, esthetic problems than PCD (11.63%) (p = 0.047). Conclusions Similar clinical performance was recorded between the two groups, but the overall pain and visible ulcer lesions were less in the printed complete dentures then the conventionally processed dentures. However, the esthetic aspect was better in conventionally processed complete dentures.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jopr.13322
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2477505862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2526732351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4232-159a05164b78b0c8c2c4ee6046c61cc302c5a2189e400542a3f99de6d0b9b49b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd9KHDEUxoNU1Fpv-gAl0JsirObv7OTSrtpWFBep4N2QyZyFLLPJmGQUn6Kv3DOu7UUvmnORcM7v--DkI-QjZyccz-k6DumESynEDjngWopZrczDO3wzbWZG8Yd98j7nNWOc65rvkX0pFZZkB-TXHZQU8wCu-Cegi7gZbPI5BhpXdBlz8SFDKh4bN9aHAsEGB5l-hfIMEFAQniBMc9tTGzoqz-kyTWD3atZDAXqOxJhQdWnb5J2dhj5QiyR00ZWYULzoffDuA9ld2T7D0dt9SO4vL34uvs-ub7_9WJxdz5wSuCDXxjLNK9XO65a52gmnACqmKldx5yQTTlvBawOKMa2ElStjOqg61ppWmVYeki9b3yHFxxFyaTY-O-h7GyCOuRFqPtdM15VA9PM_6DqOCfdFSotqLoXUHKnjLeXwO3OCVTMkv7HppeGsmWJqppia15gQ_vRmObYb6P6if3JBgG-BZ9_Dy3-smqvb5d3W9Dfp1J6n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2526732351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective Comparison of Postinsertion Maintenances Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures Fabricated in a Predoctoral Clinic</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kim, Tae Hyung ; Huh, Jung Bo ; Lee, Janet ; Bae, Eun‐Bin ; Park, Cheryl J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Hyung ; Huh, Jung Bo ; Lee, Janet ; Bae, Eun‐Bin ; Park, Cheryl J.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose A retrospective study to analyze the clinical performance of 3D printed complete dentures in edentulous patients compared with conventional complete dentures regarding postinsertion visits and patient reported outcomes. Material and Methods Electronic charts were reviewed to analyze 420 (maxilla 270, mandible 150) heat‐polymerized conventional complete dentures (CCD) inserted between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 and 217 (maxilla 130, mandible 86) 3D printed complete dentures (PCD) inserted between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018. Number of remakes, number of postinsertion adjustments, type and number of repairs, and patient reported complications were compared between two types of complete dentures. The frequency of denture repair and patient reported complications were analyzed using chi‐square of independence test. Results The frequency of pain and visible ulcer lesions in the maxilla was determined to be 46.67% with CCD and 36.15% in PCD (p = 0.047). There was no statistical significance in other items. The majority of esthetic concerns was dissatisfaction with the shape of dentures with CCD (4.67%) and they had statistically significant, less frequent, esthetic problems than PCD (11.63%) (p = 0.047). Conclusions Similar clinical performance was recorded between the two groups, but the overall pain and visible ulcer lesions were less in the printed complete dentures then the conventionally processed dentures. However, the esthetic aspect was better in conventionally processed complete dentures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-849X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jopr.13322</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33434330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>3D Printed denture ; Dentistry ; Denture, Complete ; Dentures ; digital denture comparison ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Pain ; printed denture performance ; Printing, Three-Dimensional ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Ulcers</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontics, 2021-05, Vol.30 (S2), p.158-162</ispartof><rights>2021 by the American College of Prosthodontists</rights><rights>2021 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><rights>2021 American College of Prosthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4232-159a05164b78b0c8c2c4ee6046c61cc302c5a2189e400542a3f99de6d0b9b49b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4232-159a05164b78b0c8c2c4ee6046c61cc302c5a2189e400542a3f99de6d0b9b49b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6494-1868</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjopr.13322$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjopr.13322$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33434330$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huh, Jung Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Eun‐Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Cheryl J.</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective Comparison of Postinsertion Maintenances Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures Fabricated in a Predoctoral Clinic</title><title>Journal of prosthodontics</title><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><description>Purpose A retrospective study to analyze the clinical performance of 3D printed complete dentures in edentulous patients compared with conventional complete dentures regarding postinsertion visits and patient reported outcomes. Material and Methods Electronic charts were reviewed to analyze 420 (maxilla 270, mandible 150) heat‐polymerized conventional complete dentures (CCD) inserted between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 and 217 (maxilla 130, mandible 86) 3D printed complete dentures (PCD) inserted between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018. Number of remakes, number of postinsertion adjustments, type and number of repairs, and patient reported complications were compared between two types of complete dentures. The frequency of denture repair and patient reported complications were analyzed using chi‐square of independence test. Results The frequency of pain and visible ulcer lesions in the maxilla was determined to be 46.67% with CCD and 36.15% in PCD (p = 0.047). There was no statistical significance in other items. The majority of esthetic concerns was dissatisfaction with the shape of dentures with CCD (4.67%) and they had statistically significant, less frequent, esthetic problems than PCD (11.63%) (p = 0.047). Conclusions Similar clinical performance was recorded between the two groups, but the overall pain and visible ulcer lesions were less in the printed complete dentures then the conventionally processed dentures. However, the esthetic aspect was better in conventionally processed complete dentures.</description><subject>3D Printed denture</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture, Complete</subject><subject>Dentures</subject><subject>digital denture comparison</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>printed denture performance</subject><subject>Printing, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><issn>1059-941X</issn><issn>1532-849X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd9KHDEUxoNU1Fpv-gAl0JsirObv7OTSrtpWFBep4N2QyZyFLLPJmGQUn6Kv3DOu7UUvmnORcM7v--DkI-QjZyccz-k6DumESynEDjngWopZrczDO3wzbWZG8Yd98j7nNWOc65rvkX0pFZZkB-TXHZQU8wCu-Cegi7gZbPI5BhpXdBlz8SFDKh4bN9aHAsEGB5l-hfIMEFAQniBMc9tTGzoqz-kyTWD3atZDAXqOxJhQdWnb5J2dhj5QiyR00ZWYULzoffDuA9ld2T7D0dt9SO4vL34uvs-ub7_9WJxdz5wSuCDXxjLNK9XO65a52gmnACqmKldx5yQTTlvBawOKMa2ElStjOqg61ppWmVYeki9b3yHFxxFyaTY-O-h7GyCOuRFqPtdM15VA9PM_6DqOCfdFSotqLoXUHKnjLeXwO3OCVTMkv7HppeGsmWJqppia15gQ_vRmObYb6P6if3JBgG-BZ9_Dy3-smqvb5d3W9Dfp1J6n</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Kim, Tae Hyung</creator><creator>Huh, Jung Bo</creator><creator>Lee, Janet</creator><creator>Bae, Eun‐Bin</creator><creator>Park, Cheryl J.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-1868</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Retrospective Comparison of Postinsertion Maintenances Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures Fabricated in a Predoctoral Clinic</title><author>Kim, Tae Hyung ; Huh, Jung Bo ; Lee, Janet ; Bae, Eun‐Bin ; Park, Cheryl J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4232-159a05164b78b0c8c2c4ee6046c61cc302c5a2189e400542a3f99de6d0b9b49b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>3D Printed denture</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture, Complete</topic><topic>Dentures</topic><topic>digital denture comparison</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>printed denture performance</topic><topic>Printing, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Tae Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huh, Jung Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Eun‐Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Cheryl J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Tae Hyung</au><au>Huh, Jung Bo</au><au>Lee, Janet</au><au>Bae, Eun‐Bin</au><au>Park, Cheryl J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective Comparison of Postinsertion Maintenances Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures Fabricated in a Predoctoral Clinic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthodont</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>158</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>158-162</pages><issn>1059-941X</issn><eissn>1532-849X</eissn><abstract>Purpose A retrospective study to analyze the clinical performance of 3D printed complete dentures in edentulous patients compared with conventional complete dentures regarding postinsertion visits and patient reported outcomes. Material and Methods Electronic charts were reviewed to analyze 420 (maxilla 270, mandible 150) heat‐polymerized conventional complete dentures (CCD) inserted between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 and 217 (maxilla 130, mandible 86) 3D printed complete dentures (PCD) inserted between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018. Number of remakes, number of postinsertion adjustments, type and number of repairs, and patient reported complications were compared between two types of complete dentures. The frequency of denture repair and patient reported complications were analyzed using chi‐square of independence test. Results The frequency of pain and visible ulcer lesions in the maxilla was determined to be 46.67% with CCD and 36.15% in PCD (p = 0.047). There was no statistical significance in other items. The majority of esthetic concerns was dissatisfaction with the shape of dentures with CCD (4.67%) and they had statistically significant, less frequent, esthetic problems than PCD (11.63%) (p = 0.047). Conclusions Similar clinical performance was recorded between the two groups, but the overall pain and visible ulcer lesions were less in the printed complete dentures then the conventionally processed dentures. However, the esthetic aspect was better in conventionally processed complete dentures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33434330</pmid><doi>10.1111/jopr.13322</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-1868</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-941X
ispartof Journal of prosthodontics, 2021-05, Vol.30 (S2), p.158-162
issn 1059-941X
1532-849X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2477505862
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects 3D Printed denture
Dentistry
Denture, Complete
Dentures
digital denture comparison
Esthetics, Dental
Humans
Mandible
Maxilla
Pain
printed denture performance
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Retrospective Studies
Statistical analysis
Ulcers
title Retrospective Comparison of Postinsertion Maintenances Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures Fabricated in a Predoctoral Clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A52%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20Comparison%20of%20Postinsertion%20Maintenances%20Between%20Conventional%20and%203D%20Printed%20Complete%20Dentures%20Fabricated%20in%20a%20Predoctoral%20Clinic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Kim,%20Tae%20Hyung&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=158-162&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jopr.13322&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2526732351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2526732351&rft_id=info:pmid/33434330&rfr_iscdi=true