Prospective Registry Trial Assessing the Use of Magnetic Seeds to Locate Clipped Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients
Background Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves locating and removing both clipped nodes and sentinel nodes for assessment of the axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by clinically node-positive breast cancer patients. Initial reports described radioactive seeds used for locali...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2021-08, Vol.28 (8), p.4277-4283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4283 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 4277 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Simons, Janine M. Scoggins, Marion E. Kuerer, Henry M. Krishnamurthy, Savitri Yang, Wei T. Sahin, Aysegul A. Shen, Yu Lin, Heather Bedrosian, Isabelle Mittendorf, Elizabeth A. Thompson, Alastair Lane, Deanna L. Hunt, Kelly K. Caudle, Abigail S. |
description | Background
Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves locating and removing both clipped nodes and sentinel nodes for assessment of the axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by clinically node-positive breast cancer patients. Initial reports described radioactive seeds used for localization, which makes the technique difficult to implement in some settings. This trial was performed to determine whether magnetic seeds can be used to locate clipped axillary lymph nodes for removal.
Methods
This prospective registry trial enrolled patients who had biopsy-proven node-positive disease with a clip placed in the node and treatment with NAC. A magnetic seed was placed under ultrasound guidance in the clipped node after NAC. All the patients underwent TAD.
Results
Magnetic seeds were placed in 50 patients by 17 breast radiologists. All the patients had successful seed placement at the first attempt (mean time for localization was 6.1 min; range 1–30 min). The final position of the magnetic seed was within the node (
n
= 44, 88%), in the cortex (
n
= 3, 6%), less than 3 mm from the node (
n
= 2, 4%), or by the clip when the node could not be adequately visualized (
n
= 1, 2%). The magnetic seed was retrieved at surgery from all the patients. In 49 (98%) of the 50 cases, the clip and magnetic seed were retrieved from the same node. Surgeons rated the transcutaneous and intraoperative localization as easy for 43 (86%) of the 50 cases. No device-related adverse events occurred.
Conclusions
Localization and selective removal of clipped nodes can be accomplished safely and effectively using magnetic seeds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-020-09542-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2476563982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2476563982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-4b65ce427ccbea1512cded31348b6c3fa66e85456ba2927504bf51b75eff6bae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiNERS_wAiyQJTZsQn13shxGhSJNSwXt2nKck2lGmTj4OJXyFjwyhilUYsHK1u_v_Lb8FcVrRt8zLtU5MiqFLCmnJa2V5OXyrDhhKkdSV-x53lNdlTXX6rg4RdxRyoyg6kVxLIRkhnF2Uvy4iQEn8Kl_APIVtj2muJDb2LuBrBABsR-3JN0DuUMgoSNXbjtC6j35BtAiSYFsgncJyHropwlach1aQLLqEkRyDcG1u_nBjYms72EfclF000K6EMmHCA5z7kaf0RuXehgTviyOOjcgvHpcz4q7jxe368ty8-XT5_VqU3rJ6lTKRisPkhvvG3BMMe5baAUTsmq0F53TGiollW4cr7lRVDadYo1R0HU5A3FWvDv0TjF8nwGT3ffoYRjcCGFGy6XRSou64hl9-w-6C3Mc8-ssV9IYwythMsUPlM8_ihE6O8V-7-JiGbW_fNmDL5t92d--7JKH3jxWz80e2r8jfwRlQBwAzEfjFuLT3f-p_QmXE6LR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2547772837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective Registry Trial Assessing the Use of Magnetic Seeds to Locate Clipped Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Simons, Janine M. ; Scoggins, Marion E. ; Kuerer, Henry M. ; Krishnamurthy, Savitri ; Yang, Wei T. ; Sahin, Aysegul A. ; Shen, Yu ; Lin, Heather ; Bedrosian, Isabelle ; Mittendorf, Elizabeth A. ; Thompson, Alastair ; Lane, Deanna L. ; Hunt, Kelly K. ; Caudle, Abigail S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simons, Janine M. ; Scoggins, Marion E. ; Kuerer, Henry M. ; Krishnamurthy, Savitri ; Yang, Wei T. ; Sahin, Aysegul A. ; Shen, Yu ; Lin, Heather ; Bedrosian, Isabelle ; Mittendorf, Elizabeth A. ; Thompson, Alastair ; Lane, Deanna L. ; Hunt, Kelly K. ; Caudle, Abigail S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves locating and removing both clipped nodes and sentinel nodes for assessment of the axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by clinically node-positive breast cancer patients. Initial reports described radioactive seeds used for localization, which makes the technique difficult to implement in some settings. This trial was performed to determine whether magnetic seeds can be used to locate clipped axillary lymph nodes for removal.
Methods
This prospective registry trial enrolled patients who had biopsy-proven node-positive disease with a clip placed in the node and treatment with NAC. A magnetic seed was placed under ultrasound guidance in the clipped node after NAC. All the patients underwent TAD.
Results
Magnetic seeds were placed in 50 patients by 17 breast radiologists. All the patients had successful seed placement at the first attempt (mean time for localization was 6.1 min; range 1–30 min). The final position of the magnetic seed was within the node (
n
= 44, 88%), in the cortex (
n
= 3, 6%), less than 3 mm from the node (
n
= 2, 4%), or by the clip when the node could not be adequately visualized (
n
= 1, 2%). The magnetic seed was retrieved at surgery from all the patients. In 49 (98%) of the 50 cases, the clip and magnetic seed were retrieved from the same node. Surgeons rated the transcutaneous and intraoperative localization as easy for 43 (86%) of the 50 cases. No device-related adverse events occurred.
Conclusions
Localization and selective removal of clipped nodes can be accomplished safely and effectively using magnetic seeds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09542-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33417121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adverse events ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Breast Oncology ; Chemotherapy ; Localization ; Lymph nodes ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Oncology ; Patients ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2021-08, Vol.28 (8), p.4277-4283</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-4b65ce427ccbea1512cded31348b6c3fa66e85456ba2927504bf51b75eff6bae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-4b65ce427ccbea1512cded31348b6c3fa66e85456ba2927504bf51b75eff6bae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-020-09542-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-020-09542-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33417121$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simons, Janine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scoggins, Marion E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuerer, Henry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Savitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Aysegul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedrosian, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Alastair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Deanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Kelly K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caudle, Abigail S.</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective Registry Trial Assessing the Use of Magnetic Seeds to Locate Clipped Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves locating and removing both clipped nodes and sentinel nodes for assessment of the axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by clinically node-positive breast cancer patients. Initial reports described radioactive seeds used for localization, which makes the technique difficult to implement in some settings. This trial was performed to determine whether magnetic seeds can be used to locate clipped axillary lymph nodes for removal.
Methods
This prospective registry trial enrolled patients who had biopsy-proven node-positive disease with a clip placed in the node and treatment with NAC. A magnetic seed was placed under ultrasound guidance in the clipped node after NAC. All the patients underwent TAD.
Results
Magnetic seeds were placed in 50 patients by 17 breast radiologists. All the patients had successful seed placement at the first attempt (mean time for localization was 6.1 min; range 1–30 min). The final position of the magnetic seed was within the node (
n
= 44, 88%), in the cortex (
n
= 3, 6%), less than 3 mm from the node (
n
= 2, 4%), or by the clip when the node could not be adequately visualized (
n
= 1, 2%). The magnetic seed was retrieved at surgery from all the patients. In 49 (98%) of the 50 cases, the clip and magnetic seed were retrieved from the same node. Surgeons rated the transcutaneous and intraoperative localization as easy for 43 (86%) of the 50 cases. No device-related adverse events occurred.
Conclusions
Localization and selective removal of clipped nodes can be accomplished safely and effectively using magnetic seeds.</description><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Oncology</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiNERS_wAiyQJTZsQn13shxGhSJNSwXt2nKck2lGmTj4OJXyFjwyhilUYsHK1u_v_Lb8FcVrRt8zLtU5MiqFLCmnJa2V5OXyrDhhKkdSV-x53lNdlTXX6rg4RdxRyoyg6kVxLIRkhnF2Uvy4iQEn8Kl_APIVtj2muJDb2LuBrBABsR-3JN0DuUMgoSNXbjtC6j35BtAiSYFsgncJyHropwlach1aQLLqEkRyDcG1u_nBjYms72EfclF000K6EMmHCA5z7kaf0RuXehgTviyOOjcgvHpcz4q7jxe368ty8-XT5_VqU3rJ6lTKRisPkhvvG3BMMe5baAUTsmq0F53TGiollW4cr7lRVDadYo1R0HU5A3FWvDv0TjF8nwGT3ffoYRjcCGFGy6XRSou64hl9-w-6C3Mc8-ssV9IYwythMsUPlM8_ihE6O8V-7-JiGbW_fNmDL5t92d--7JKH3jxWz80e2r8jfwRlQBwAzEfjFuLT3f-p_QmXE6LR</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Simons, Janine M.</creator><creator>Scoggins, Marion E.</creator><creator>Kuerer, Henry M.</creator><creator>Krishnamurthy, Savitri</creator><creator>Yang, Wei T.</creator><creator>Sahin, Aysegul A.</creator><creator>Shen, Yu</creator><creator>Lin, Heather</creator><creator>Bedrosian, Isabelle</creator><creator>Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Thompson, Alastair</creator><creator>Lane, Deanna L.</creator><creator>Hunt, Kelly K.</creator><creator>Caudle, Abigail S.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Prospective Registry Trial Assessing the Use of Magnetic Seeds to Locate Clipped Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients</title><author>Simons, Janine M. ; Scoggins, Marion E. ; Kuerer, Henry M. ; Krishnamurthy, Savitri ; Yang, Wei T. ; Sahin, Aysegul A. ; Shen, Yu ; Lin, Heather ; Bedrosian, Isabelle ; Mittendorf, Elizabeth A. ; Thompson, Alastair ; Lane, Deanna L. ; Hunt, Kelly K. ; Caudle, Abigail S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-4b65ce427ccbea1512cded31348b6c3fa66e85456ba2927504bf51b75eff6bae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Oncology</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simons, Janine M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scoggins, Marion E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuerer, Henry M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnamurthy, Savitri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Wei T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahin, Aysegul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedrosian, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Alastair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Deanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Kelly K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caudle, Abigail S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simons, Janine M.</au><au>Scoggins, Marion E.</au><au>Kuerer, Henry M.</au><au>Krishnamurthy, Savitri</au><au>Yang, Wei T.</au><au>Sahin, Aysegul A.</au><au>Shen, Yu</au><au>Lin, Heather</au><au>Bedrosian, Isabelle</au><au>Mittendorf, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Thompson, Alastair</au><au>Lane, Deanna L.</au><au>Hunt, Kelly K.</au><au>Caudle, Abigail S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective Registry Trial Assessing the Use of Magnetic Seeds to Locate Clipped Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>4277</spage><epage>4283</epage><pages>4277-4283</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background
Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) involves locating and removing both clipped nodes and sentinel nodes for assessment of the axillary response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by clinically node-positive breast cancer patients. Initial reports described radioactive seeds used for localization, which makes the technique difficult to implement in some settings. This trial was performed to determine whether magnetic seeds can be used to locate clipped axillary lymph nodes for removal.
Methods
This prospective registry trial enrolled patients who had biopsy-proven node-positive disease with a clip placed in the node and treatment with NAC. A magnetic seed was placed under ultrasound guidance in the clipped node after NAC. All the patients underwent TAD.
Results
Magnetic seeds were placed in 50 patients by 17 breast radiologists. All the patients had successful seed placement at the first attempt (mean time for localization was 6.1 min; range 1–30 min). The final position of the magnetic seed was within the node (
n
= 44, 88%), in the cortex (
n
= 3, 6%), less than 3 mm from the node (
n
= 2, 4%), or by the clip when the node could not be adequately visualized (
n
= 1, 2%). The magnetic seed was retrieved at surgery from all the patients. In 49 (98%) of the 50 cases, the clip and magnetic seed were retrieved from the same node. Surgeons rated the transcutaneous and intraoperative localization as easy for 43 (86%) of the 50 cases. No device-related adverse events occurred.
Conclusions
Localization and selective removal of clipped nodes can be accomplished safely and effectively using magnetic seeds.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>33417121</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-020-09542-y</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2021-08, Vol.28 (8), p.4277-4283 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2476563982 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adverse events Biopsy Breast cancer Breast Oncology Chemotherapy Localization Lymph nodes Medicine Medicine & Public Health Oncology Patients Surgery Surgical Oncology |
title | Prospective Registry Trial Assessing the Use of Magnetic Seeds to Locate Clipped Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A36%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20Registry%20Trial%20Assessing%20the%20Use%20of%20Magnetic%20Seeds%20to%20Locate%20Clipped%20Nodes%20After%20Neoadjuvant%20Chemotherapy%20for%20Breast%20Cancer%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Simons,%20Janine%20M.&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=4277&rft.epage=4283&rft.pages=4277-4283&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-020-09542-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2476563982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2547772837&rft_id=info:pmid/33417121&rfr_iscdi=true |