Red blood cell transfusion in patients with anti‐Yta
Background Yta is a high frequency red blood cell (RBC) antigen, present in 99.7% of studied populations. It is extremely immunogenic, and when anti‐Yta is present, provision of Yt(a−) blood is often challenging. The objectives of our study were to assess the incidence and severity of acute hemolyti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2021-02, Vol.61 (2), p.379-384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 379 |
container_title | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Wong, Shu Min Cawthorne, Tanya Dennington, Peta M. Hong, Frank S. |
description | Background
Yta is a high frequency red blood cell (RBC) antigen, present in 99.7% of studied populations. It is extremely immunogenic, and when anti‐Yta is present, provision of Yt(a−) blood is often challenging. The objectives of our study were to assess the incidence and severity of acute hemolytic transfusion reactions to Yt(a+) donor RBCs in recipients with preformed anti‐Yta and to identify any patient factors associated with severe hemolytic reactions.
Study Design and Methods
Patients with anti‐Yta identified by the Red Cell Reference Laboratories of the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood over the past 20 years were included. Their transfusion records were collected via the referring laboratory to ascertain if any patients received RBC transfusion and if there was any evidence of transfusion reactions.
Results
Fifty‐two patients with anti‐Yta were identified; only 12 were confirmed to have received a RBC transfusion. Nine received Yt(a+) or untyped allogeneic RBCs, including four patients who received a total of 16 indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) crossmatch incompatible, likely Yt(a+) RBCs. None of the nine patients had documented acute hemolytic reactions.
Conclusion
There are limited published data describing the clinical significance of anti‐Yta. Based on our data, it appears that transfusing patients with anti‐Yta using incompatible crossmatched RBCs does not pose a significant risk of an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction when the antibody reaction strength is weak ≤2+ (0‐4) by IAT crossmatch. For strong examples of the antibody, in the absence of other assay data, such as the monocyte monolayer assay, Yt(a−) blood should continue to be sourced where possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/trf.16239 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2476124531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2476124531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1019-da91674cd24065e2dfdfd2c92dc405e0815dbfdff2d9e913163f30480877400b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYPvkHAi5e0M_snyR6lWBUKQqkHT8s2u8EtaRKzG0pvPoLP6JO4bT05c5hh-Bh-fITcIkww1jT01QQzyuQZGaFgeUqlFOdkBMAxRWT0klx5vwEAKgFHJFtak6zrtjVJaes6Cb1ufDV41zaJa5JOB2eb4JOdCx-JboL7-fp-D_qaXFS69vbmb47J2_xxNXtOF69PL7OHRdohoEyNlpjlvDSUQyYsNVVsWkpqSg7CQoHCrOOtokZaiQwzVjHgBRR5zgHWbEzuT3-7vv0crA9q6_whqG5sO3hFeZ4h5YJhRO_-oZt26JuYLlJFIShQTiM1PVE7V9u96nq31f1eIaiDPhX1qaM-tVrOjwv7BT-HY44</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488520242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Red blood cell transfusion in patients with anti‐Yta</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Wong, Shu Min ; Cawthorne, Tanya ; Dennington, Peta M. ; Hong, Frank S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Shu Min ; Cawthorne, Tanya ; Dennington, Peta M. ; Hong, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Yta is a high frequency red blood cell (RBC) antigen, present in 99.7% of studied populations. It is extremely immunogenic, and when anti‐Yta is present, provision of Yt(a−) blood is often challenging. The objectives of our study were to assess the incidence and severity of acute hemolytic transfusion reactions to Yt(a+) donor RBCs in recipients with preformed anti‐Yta and to identify any patient factors associated with severe hemolytic reactions.
Study Design and Methods
Patients with anti‐Yta identified by the Red Cell Reference Laboratories of the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood over the past 20 years were included. Their transfusion records were collected via the referring laboratory to ascertain if any patients received RBC transfusion and if there was any evidence of transfusion reactions.
Results
Fifty‐two patients with anti‐Yta were identified; only 12 were confirmed to have received a RBC transfusion. Nine received Yt(a+) or untyped allogeneic RBCs, including four patients who received a total of 16 indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) crossmatch incompatible, likely Yt(a+) RBCs. None of the nine patients had documented acute hemolytic reactions.
Conclusion
There are limited published data describing the clinical significance of anti‐Yta. Based on our data, it appears that transfusing patients with anti‐Yta using incompatible crossmatched RBCs does not pose a significant risk of an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction when the antibody reaction strength is weak ≤2+ (0‐4) by IAT crossmatch. For strong examples of the antibody, in the absence of other assay data, such as the monocyte monolayer assay, Yt(a−) blood should continue to be sourced where possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/trf.16239</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Antibodies ; Antigens ; anti‐Yta ; Blood ; Blood transfusion ; Coombs' test ; Erythrocytes ; hemolytic transfusion reaction ; Histocompatibility testing ; Immunogenicity ; Laboratories ; Monocytes ; Population studies ; RBC transfusion ; Transfusion</subject><ispartof>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021-02, Vol.61 (2), p.379-384</ispartof><rights>2021 AABB</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2520-6887</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftrf.16239$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftrf.16239$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Shu Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawthorne, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennington, Peta M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><title>Red blood cell transfusion in patients with anti‐Yta</title><title>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><description>Background
Yta is a high frequency red blood cell (RBC) antigen, present in 99.7% of studied populations. It is extremely immunogenic, and when anti‐Yta is present, provision of Yt(a−) blood is often challenging. The objectives of our study were to assess the incidence and severity of acute hemolytic transfusion reactions to Yt(a+) donor RBCs in recipients with preformed anti‐Yta and to identify any patient factors associated with severe hemolytic reactions.
Study Design and Methods
Patients with anti‐Yta identified by the Red Cell Reference Laboratories of the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood over the past 20 years were included. Their transfusion records were collected via the referring laboratory to ascertain if any patients received RBC transfusion and if there was any evidence of transfusion reactions.
Results
Fifty‐two patients with anti‐Yta were identified; only 12 were confirmed to have received a RBC transfusion. Nine received Yt(a+) or untyped allogeneic RBCs, including four patients who received a total of 16 indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) crossmatch incompatible, likely Yt(a+) RBCs. None of the nine patients had documented acute hemolytic reactions.
Conclusion
There are limited published data describing the clinical significance of anti‐Yta. Based on our data, it appears that transfusing patients with anti‐Yta using incompatible crossmatched RBCs does not pose a significant risk of an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction when the antibody reaction strength is weak ≤2+ (0‐4) by IAT crossmatch. For strong examples of the antibody, in the absence of other assay data, such as the monocyte monolayer assay, Yt(a−) blood should continue to be sourced where possible.</description><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>anti‐Yta</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>Coombs' test</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>hemolytic transfusion reaction</subject><subject>Histocompatibility testing</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Monocytes</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>RBC transfusion</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><issn>0041-1132</issn><issn>1537-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkM9Kw0AQhxdRsFYPvkHAi5e0M_snyR6lWBUKQqkHT8s2u8EtaRKzG0pvPoLP6JO4bT05c5hh-Bh-fITcIkww1jT01QQzyuQZGaFgeUqlFOdkBMAxRWT0klx5vwEAKgFHJFtak6zrtjVJaes6Cb1ufDV41zaJa5JOB2eb4JOdCx-JboL7-fp-D_qaXFS69vbmb47J2_xxNXtOF69PL7OHRdohoEyNlpjlvDSUQyYsNVVsWkpqSg7CQoHCrOOtokZaiQwzVjHgBRR5zgHWbEzuT3-7vv0crA9q6_whqG5sO3hFeZ4h5YJhRO_-oZt26JuYLlJFIShQTiM1PVE7V9u96nq31f1eIaiDPhX1qaM-tVrOjwv7BT-HY44</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Wong, Shu Min</creator><creator>Cawthorne, Tanya</creator><creator>Dennington, Peta M.</creator><creator>Hong, Frank S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-6887</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Red blood cell transfusion in patients with anti‐Yta</title><author>Wong, Shu Min ; Cawthorne, Tanya ; Dennington, Peta M. ; Hong, Frank S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1019-da91674cd24065e2dfdfd2c92dc405e0815dbfdff2d9e913163f30480877400b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>anti‐Yta</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>Coombs' test</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>hemolytic transfusion reaction</topic><topic>Histocompatibility testing</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Monocytes</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>RBC transfusion</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Shu Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawthorne, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennington, Peta M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Frank S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Shu Min</au><au>Cawthorne, Tanya</au><au>Dennington, Peta M.</au><au>Hong, Frank S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Red blood cell transfusion in patients with anti‐Yta</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>379</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>379-384</pages><issn>0041-1132</issn><eissn>1537-2995</eissn><abstract>Background
Yta is a high frequency red blood cell (RBC) antigen, present in 99.7% of studied populations. It is extremely immunogenic, and when anti‐Yta is present, provision of Yt(a−) blood is often challenging. The objectives of our study were to assess the incidence and severity of acute hemolytic transfusion reactions to Yt(a+) donor RBCs in recipients with preformed anti‐Yta and to identify any patient factors associated with severe hemolytic reactions.
Study Design and Methods
Patients with anti‐Yta identified by the Red Cell Reference Laboratories of the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood over the past 20 years were included. Their transfusion records were collected via the referring laboratory to ascertain if any patients received RBC transfusion and if there was any evidence of transfusion reactions.
Results
Fifty‐two patients with anti‐Yta were identified; only 12 were confirmed to have received a RBC transfusion. Nine received Yt(a+) or untyped allogeneic RBCs, including four patients who received a total of 16 indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) crossmatch incompatible, likely Yt(a+) RBCs. None of the nine patients had documented acute hemolytic reactions.
Conclusion
There are limited published data describing the clinical significance of anti‐Yta. Based on our data, it appears that transfusing patients with anti‐Yta using incompatible crossmatched RBCs does not pose a significant risk of an acute hemolytic transfusion reaction when the antibody reaction strength is weak ≤2+ (0‐4) by IAT crossmatch. For strong examples of the antibody, in the absence of other assay data, such as the monocyte monolayer assay, Yt(a−) blood should continue to be sourced where possible.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/trf.16239</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-6887</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1132 |
ispartof | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2021-02, Vol.61 (2), p.379-384 |
issn | 0041-1132 1537-2995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2476124531 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Antibodies Antigens anti‐Yta Blood Blood transfusion Coombs' test Erythrocytes hemolytic transfusion reaction Histocompatibility testing Immunogenicity Laboratories Monocytes Population studies RBC transfusion Transfusion |
title | Red blood cell transfusion in patients with anti‐Yta |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A12%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Red%20blood%20cell%20transfusion%20in%20patients%20with%20anti%E2%80%90Yta&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Wong,%20Shu%20Min&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=379&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=379-384&rft.issn=0041-1132&rft.eissn=1537-2995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/trf.16239&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2476124531%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488520242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |