Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional left ventricular global strain using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR

•CT feature tracking (FT) strain is a new technique to evaluate wall motion function.•Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) 3D- global strains are better than that of 2D- global strains in heart failure patients.•CCTA 3D- GLS can provide both reliable and interchangeable results for quantitative assessment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2021-02, Vol.135, p.109485-109485, Article 109485
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Rui, Fang, Zhe, Wang, Hongwei, Schoepf, U. Joseph, Emrich, Tilman, Giovagnoli, Dominic, Biles, Evan, Zhou, Zhen, Du, Zhiqiang, Liu, Tong, Xu, Lei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109485
container_issue
container_start_page 109485
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 135
creator Wang, Rui
Fang, Zhe
Wang, Hongwei
Schoepf, U. Joseph
Emrich, Tilman
Giovagnoli, Dominic
Biles, Evan
Zhou, Zhen
Du, Zhiqiang
Liu, Tong
Xu, Lei
description •CT feature tracking (FT) strain is a new technique to evaluate wall motion function.•Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) 3D- global strains are better than that of 2D- global strains in heart failure patients.•CCTA 3D- GLS can provide both reliable and interchangeable results for quantitative assessment of myocardial mechanical changes. The objective of this study was to investigate whether three dimentional (3D)- Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)- feature tracking (FT) can measure global myocardial strain of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with heart failure using cardiac MR (CMR) as reference. Consecutive patients (n = 44) with variable degrees of heart failure who underwent an ECG-gated CCTA and CMR within 24 h were included. Both modalities were compared for 2D/3D LV global radial strain (2D/3D-GRS), circumferential strain (2D/3D-GCS), longitudinal strain (2D/3D-GLS) and conventional functional parameters. Compared to CMR, CCTA-derived 3D-GLS and LVEF showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed a small bias (0.3 %) between CCTA-derived 3D-GLS and CMR 3D-GLS. Close correlations were observed between the two modalities regarding LV global strain (3D-GRS, r = 0.89; 3D-GCS, r = 0.86; 3D-GLS, r = 0.79, respectively, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109485
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475531227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X20306756</els_id><sourcerecordid>2475531227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8ca492258c4d9cd5240ee5690f2771fb5a085ddd63f00da1c2bb1e1361270bbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUuP0zAQthCILQu_AAn5yCXFj7hOkDigipe0CIEWiZvl2JPWVRKXsVPUP8bvwyW7HDnNaOZ7aOYj5Dlna8745tVhDQe0fi2YuEzaulEPyIo3WlRaC_2QrJgWrGJ18-OKPEnpwBhTdSsekyspa8Y5lyvy--tspxyyzeEE1E52OKeQaOxp3iNA5cMIUwqxLOgAfaYnmDIGNw8W6W6IXZmnjDZMdE5h2lEXsYDxXJrxOGfwNMcx7tAe9-eivwv3fWEci2uRS_RXyHu6B4uZ9jYMM8Jrui18iyHFaVnLW-os-mAd_fztKXnU2yHBs7t6Tb6_f3e7_VjdfPnwafv2pnJStblqnC0HC9W42rfOK1EzALVpWS-05n2nLGuU934je8a85U50HQcuN1xo1nUgr8nLRfeI8ecMKZsxJAfDYCeIczKi1kpJLoQuULlAHcaUEHpzxDCWTxjOzCUwczB_AzOXwMwSWGG9uDOYuxH8P859QgXwZgFAOfMUAE1y5WkOfEBw2fgY_mvwBwbmrQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475531227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional left ventricular global strain using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wang, Rui ; Fang, Zhe ; Wang, Hongwei ; Schoepf, U. Joseph ; Emrich, Tilman ; Giovagnoli, Dominic ; Biles, Evan ; Zhou, Zhen ; Du, Zhiqiang ; Liu, Tong ; Xu, Lei</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rui ; Fang, Zhe ; Wang, Hongwei ; Schoepf, U. Joseph ; Emrich, Tilman ; Giovagnoli, Dominic ; Biles, Evan ; Zhou, Zhen ; Du, Zhiqiang ; Liu, Tong ; Xu, Lei</creatorcontrib><description>•CT feature tracking (FT) strain is a new technique to evaluate wall motion function.•Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) 3D- global strains are better than that of 2D- global strains in heart failure patients.•CCTA 3D- GLS can provide both reliable and interchangeable results for quantitative assessment of myocardial mechanical changes. The objective of this study was to investigate whether three dimentional (3D)- Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)- feature tracking (FT) can measure global myocardial strain of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with heart failure using cardiac MR (CMR) as reference. Consecutive patients (n = 44) with variable degrees of heart failure who underwent an ECG-gated CCTA and CMR within 24 h were included. Both modalities were compared for 2D/3D LV global radial strain (2D/3D-GRS), circumferential strain (2D/3D-GCS), longitudinal strain (2D/3D-GLS) and conventional functional parameters. Compared to CMR, CCTA-derived 3D-GLS and LVEF showed no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed a small bias (0.3 %) between CCTA-derived 3D-GLS and CMR 3D-GLS. Close correlations were observed between the two modalities regarding LV global strain (3D-GRS, r = 0.89; 3D-GCS, r = 0.86; 3D-GLS, r = 0.79, respectively, p &lt; 0.001 for all). However, CCTA-derived 3D-GRS and 3D-GCS were statistically different compared with CMR. CCTA-derived 3D-GLS had an inverse correlation with CCTA-LVEF(r=-0.75, p &lt; 0.05). Intraobserver agreements for CCTA-derived 3D-global strain were good (ICC = 0.856 for 3D-GLS, ICC = 0.741 for 3D-GCS and ICC = 0.762 for 3D-GRS). 2D global strain showed statistical differences between the two modalities (p<0.05 for all), but close correlations were observed regarding 2D LV global strain (2D-GRS, r = 0.80; 2D-GCS, r = 0.81; 2D-GLS, r = 0.81, respectively, p &lt; 0.001 for all). The average radiation dose-long-product (DLP) of CCTA was 387.86 ± 89.3 mGy*cm. CCTA-derived 3D-GLS can provide both reliable and interchangeable results for quantitative assessment of myocardial mechanical changes in HF patients compared to CMR with good intra-observer agreement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109485</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33401113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cardiac CT ; Cardiac MR ; Computed Tomography Angiography ; Heart ; Heart failure ; Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging ; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Myocardial deformation ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Reproducibility of Results ; Ventricular Function, Left</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2021-02, Vol.135, p.109485-109485, Article 109485</ispartof><rights>2020</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8ca492258c4d9cd5240ee5690f2771fb5a085ddd63f00da1c2bb1e1361270bbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8ca492258c4d9cd5240ee5690f2771fb5a085ddd63f00da1c2bb1e1361270bbe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5843-2178 ; 0000-0002-5806-5363 ; 0000-0002-6164-5641 ; 0000-0002-8499-0448</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109485$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33401113$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoepf, U. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emrich, Tilman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovagnoli, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biles, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lei</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional left ventricular global strain using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•CT feature tracking (FT) strain is a new technique to evaluate wall motion function.•Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) 3D- global strains are better than that of 2D- global strains in heart failure patients.•CCTA 3D- GLS can provide both reliable and interchangeable results for quantitative assessment of myocardial mechanical changes. The objective of this study was to investigate whether three dimentional (3D)- Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)- feature tracking (FT) can measure global myocardial strain of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with heart failure using cardiac MR (CMR) as reference. Consecutive patients (n = 44) with variable degrees of heart failure who underwent an ECG-gated CCTA and CMR within 24 h were included. Both modalities were compared for 2D/3D LV global radial strain (2D/3D-GRS), circumferential strain (2D/3D-GCS), longitudinal strain (2D/3D-GLS) and conventional functional parameters. Compared to CMR, CCTA-derived 3D-GLS and LVEF showed no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed a small bias (0.3 %) between CCTA-derived 3D-GLS and CMR 3D-GLS. Close correlations were observed between the two modalities regarding LV global strain (3D-GRS, r = 0.89; 3D-GCS, r = 0.86; 3D-GLS, r = 0.79, respectively, p &lt; 0.001 for all). However, CCTA-derived 3D-GRS and 3D-GCS were statistically different compared with CMR. CCTA-derived 3D-GLS had an inverse correlation with CCTA-LVEF(r=-0.75, p &lt; 0.05). Intraobserver agreements for CCTA-derived 3D-global strain were good (ICC = 0.856 for 3D-GLS, ICC = 0.741 for 3D-GCS and ICC = 0.762 for 3D-GRS). 2D global strain showed statistical differences between the two modalities (p<0.05 for all), but close correlations were observed regarding 2D LV global strain (2D-GRS, r = 0.80; 2D-GCS, r = 0.81; 2D-GLS, r = 0.81, respectively, p &lt; 0.001 for all). The average radiation dose-long-product (DLP) of CCTA was 387.86 ± 89.3 mGy*cm. CCTA-derived 3D-GLS can provide both reliable and interchangeable results for quantitative assessment of myocardial mechanical changes in HF patients compared to CMR with good intra-observer agreement.</description><subject>Cardiac CT</subject><subject>Cardiac MR</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Myocardial deformation</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUuP0zAQthCILQu_AAn5yCXFj7hOkDigipe0CIEWiZvl2JPWVRKXsVPUP8bvwyW7HDnNaOZ7aOYj5Dlna8745tVhDQe0fi2YuEzaulEPyIo3WlRaC_2QrJgWrGJ18-OKPEnpwBhTdSsekyspa8Y5lyvy--tspxyyzeEE1E52OKeQaOxp3iNA5cMIUwqxLOgAfaYnmDIGNw8W6W6IXZmnjDZMdE5h2lEXsYDxXJrxOGfwNMcx7tAe9-eivwv3fWEci2uRS_RXyHu6B4uZ9jYMM8Jrui18iyHFaVnLW-os-mAd_fztKXnU2yHBs7t6Tb6_f3e7_VjdfPnwafv2pnJStblqnC0HC9W42rfOK1EzALVpWS-05n2nLGuU934je8a85U50HQcuN1xo1nUgr8nLRfeI8ecMKZsxJAfDYCeIczKi1kpJLoQuULlAHcaUEHpzxDCWTxjOzCUwczB_AzOXwMwSWGG9uDOYuxH8P859QgXwZgFAOfMUAE1y5WkOfEBw2fgY_mvwBwbmrQw</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Wang, Rui</creator><creator>Fang, Zhe</creator><creator>Wang, Hongwei</creator><creator>Schoepf, U. Joseph</creator><creator>Emrich, Tilman</creator><creator>Giovagnoli, Dominic</creator><creator>Biles, Evan</creator><creator>Zhou, Zhen</creator><creator>Du, Zhiqiang</creator><creator>Liu, Tong</creator><creator>Xu, Lei</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5843-2178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-5363</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6164-5641</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-0448</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional left ventricular global strain using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR</title><author>Wang, Rui ; Fang, Zhe ; Wang, Hongwei ; Schoepf, U. Joseph ; Emrich, Tilman ; Giovagnoli, Dominic ; Biles, Evan ; Zhou, Zhen ; Du, Zhiqiang ; Liu, Tong ; Xu, Lei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-8ca492258c4d9cd5240ee5690f2771fb5a085ddd63f00da1c2bb1e1361270bbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cardiac CT</topic><topic>Cardiac MR</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Myocardial deformation</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hongwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoepf, U. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emrich, Tilman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovagnoli, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biles, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Rui</au><au>Fang, Zhe</au><au>Wang, Hongwei</au><au>Schoepf, U. Joseph</au><au>Emrich, Tilman</au><au>Giovagnoli, Dominic</au><au>Biles, Evan</au><au>Zhou, Zhen</au><au>Du, Zhiqiang</au><au>Liu, Tong</au><au>Xu, Lei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional left ventricular global strain using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>135</volume><spage>109485</spage><epage>109485</epage><pages>109485-109485</pages><artnum>109485</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•CT feature tracking (FT) strain is a new technique to evaluate wall motion function.•Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) 3D- global strains are better than that of 2D- global strains in heart failure patients.•CCTA 3D- GLS can provide both reliable and interchangeable results for quantitative assessment of myocardial mechanical changes. The objective of this study was to investigate whether three dimentional (3D)- Coronary CT angiography (CCTA)- feature tracking (FT) can measure global myocardial strain of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with heart failure using cardiac MR (CMR) as reference. Consecutive patients (n = 44) with variable degrees of heart failure who underwent an ECG-gated CCTA and CMR within 24 h were included. Both modalities were compared for 2D/3D LV global radial strain (2D/3D-GRS), circumferential strain (2D/3D-GCS), longitudinal strain (2D/3D-GLS) and conventional functional parameters. Compared to CMR, CCTA-derived 3D-GLS and LVEF showed no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05). Bland-Altman plots showed a small bias (0.3 %) between CCTA-derived 3D-GLS and CMR 3D-GLS. Close correlations were observed between the two modalities regarding LV global strain (3D-GRS, r = 0.89; 3D-GCS, r = 0.86; 3D-GLS, r = 0.79, respectively, p &lt; 0.001 for all). However, CCTA-derived 3D-GRS and 3D-GCS were statistically different compared with CMR. CCTA-derived 3D-GLS had an inverse correlation with CCTA-LVEF(r=-0.75, p &lt; 0.05). Intraobserver agreements for CCTA-derived 3D-global strain were good (ICC = 0.856 for 3D-GLS, ICC = 0.741 for 3D-GCS and ICC = 0.762 for 3D-GRS). 2D global strain showed statistical differences between the two modalities (p<0.05 for all), but close correlations were observed regarding 2D LV global strain (2D-GRS, r = 0.80; 2D-GCS, r = 0.81; 2D-GLS, r = 0.81, respectively, p &lt; 0.001 for all). The average radiation dose-long-product (DLP) of CCTA was 387.86 ± 89.3 mGy*cm. CCTA-derived 3D-GLS can provide both reliable and interchangeable results for quantitative assessment of myocardial mechanical changes in HF patients compared to CMR with good intra-observer agreement.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33401113</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109485</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5843-2178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-5363</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6164-5641</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-0448</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2021-02, Vol.135, p.109485-109485, Article 109485
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475531227
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Cardiac CT
Cardiac MR
Computed Tomography Angiography
Heart
Heart failure
Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging
Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Myocardial deformation
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Ventricular Function, Left
title Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional left ventricular global strain using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A21%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20analysis%20of%20three-dimensional%20left%20ventricular%20global%20strain%20using%20coronary%20computed%20tomography%20angiography%20in%20patients%20with%20heart%20failure:%20Comparison%20with%203T%20cardiac%20MR&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Wang,%20Rui&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=135&rft.spage=109485&rft.epage=109485&rft.pages=109485-109485&rft.artnum=109485&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109485&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475531227%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475531227&rft_id=info:pmid/33401113&rft_els_id=S0720048X20306756&rfr_iscdi=true