A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake

To examine the relationship between the maximal power output (MPO) in an individualized 7 × 2-minute incremental (INCR) test, average power in a 2k (W2k) rowing ergometer test, and maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) and to develop a regression equation to predict V˙O2max. A total of 34 male club rowers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of sports physiology and performance 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.382-386
Hauptverfasser: Jensen, Kurt, Frydkjær, Morten, Jensen, Niels M B, Bannerholt, Lucas M, Gam, Søren
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 386
container_issue 3
container_start_page 382
container_title International journal of sports physiology and performance
container_volume 16
creator Jensen, Kurt
Frydkjær, Morten
Jensen, Niels M B
Bannerholt, Lucas M
Gam, Søren
description To examine the relationship between the maximal power output (MPO) in an individualized 7 × 2-minute incremental (INCR) test, average power in a 2k (W2k) rowing ergometer test, and maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) and to develop a regression equation to predict V˙O2max. A total of 34 male club rowers (age 18-30 y) performed a 2k and an INCR test in a Concept2 rowing ergometer to determine and compare MPO, W2k, and V˙O2max. No significant difference was found between V˙O2max measured during INCR or 2k test (P = .73). A very high correlation coefficient (r = .96) was found between MPO and V˙O2max and between W2k and V˙O2max (r = .93). Linear regression analyses were developed for predicting V˙O2max from MPO: (1) V˙O2max (mL·min-1) = 11.49 × MPO + 810 and V˙O2max from W2k: (2) V˙O2max = 10.96 × W2k + 1168. Cross-validation analyses were performed using an independent sample of 14 rowers. There was no difference between the mean predicted V˙O2max in the INCR test (4.41 L·min-1) or the 2k test (4.39 L·min-1) and the observed V˙O2max (4.40 L·min-1). Technical error of measurement was 3.1% and 3.6%, standard error of estimate was 0.136 and 0.157 mL·min-1, and validation coefficients (r) were .95 and .94 using Equation (1) and (2), respectively. A prediction model only including MPO or W2k explains 88% to 90% of the variability in V˙O2max and is suggested for practical use in male club rowers.
doi_str_mv 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0932
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475529550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2475529550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-340ea5aeef828e641c5d8d5cb3438cd8df22922cf1bc1ca84e03e7d97b82c8283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtPwkAURidGI4iu3ZkmbtxU5tFL2yVBfCQYjJH1ZDq9JcWWqTNthH_vIMjC1f0W574OIdeM3jPGxbBcuaa555SlIU0FPyF9BgAh5bE4PeYR9MiFcytKI4iAnpOeEBFlPBJ98jAOXtWmrFUVvJvvcr0MpnZpamzRBm_WtEabKmiNz5iXuj3C8812ietg0bTqEy_JWaEqh1eHOiCLx-nH5DmczZ9eJuNZqEXK2tAvRQUKsUh4gqOIaciTHHQmIpFoHwvOU851wTLNtEoipALjPI2zhGvfIgbkbj-3searQ9fKunQaq0qt0XRO8igG4CkA9ejtP3RlOrv210kOMQWWwEh4arintDXOWSxkY_17disZlTvB8lew3AmWO8G-4-Ywt8tqzI_8n1HxA5rIdhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2570518563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Human Kinetics Journals</source><creator>Jensen, Kurt ; Frydkjær, Morten ; Jensen, Niels M B ; Bannerholt, Lucas M ; Gam, Søren</creator><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kurt ; Frydkjær, Morten ; Jensen, Niels M B ; Bannerholt, Lucas M ; Gam, Søren</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the relationship between the maximal power output (MPO) in an individualized 7 × 2-minute incremental (INCR) test, average power in a 2k (W2k) rowing ergometer test, and maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) and to develop a regression equation to predict V˙O2max. A total of 34 male club rowers (age 18-30 y) performed a 2k and an INCR test in a Concept2 rowing ergometer to determine and compare MPO, W2k, and V˙O2max. No significant difference was found between V˙O2max measured during INCR or 2k test (P = .73). A very high correlation coefficient (r = .96) was found between MPO and V˙O2max and between W2k and V˙O2max (r = .93). Linear regression analyses were developed for predicting V˙O2max from MPO: (1) V˙O2max (mL·min-1) = 11.49 × MPO + 810 and V˙O2max from W2k: (2) V˙O2max = 10.96 × W2k + 1168. Cross-validation analyses were performed using an independent sample of 14 rowers. There was no difference between the mean predicted V˙O2max in the INCR test (4.41 L·min-1) or the 2k test (4.39 L·min-1) and the observed V˙O2max (4.40 L·min-1). Technical error of measurement was 3.1% and 3.6%, standard error of estimate was 0.136 and 0.157 mL·min-1, and validation coefficients (r) were .95 and .94 using Equation (1) and (2), respectively. A prediction model only including MPO or W2k explains 88% to 90% of the variability in V˙O2max and is suggested for practical use in male club rowers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-0265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-0273</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33401243</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Human Kinetics</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Ergometry ; Exercise Test ; Humans ; Male ; Oxygen ; Oxygen Consumption ; Regression Analysis ; Rowing ; Water Sports ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>International journal of sports physiology and performance, 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.382-386</ispartof><rights>Copyright Human Kinetics Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-340ea5aeef828e641c5d8d5cb3438cd8df22922cf1bc1ca84e03e7d97b82c8283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-340ea5aeef828e641c5d8d5cb3438cd8df22922cf1bc1ca84e03e7d97b82c8283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33401243$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frydkjær, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Niels M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bannerholt, Lucas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gam, Søren</creatorcontrib><title>A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake</title><title>International journal of sports physiology and performance</title><addtitle>Int J Sports Physiol Perform</addtitle><description>To examine the relationship between the maximal power output (MPO) in an individualized 7 × 2-minute incremental (INCR) test, average power in a 2k (W2k) rowing ergometer test, and maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) and to develop a regression equation to predict V˙O2max. A total of 34 male club rowers (age 18-30 y) performed a 2k and an INCR test in a Concept2 rowing ergometer to determine and compare MPO, W2k, and V˙O2max. No significant difference was found between V˙O2max measured during INCR or 2k test (P = .73). A very high correlation coefficient (r = .96) was found between MPO and V˙O2max and between W2k and V˙O2max (r = .93). Linear regression analyses were developed for predicting V˙O2max from MPO: (1) V˙O2max (mL·min-1) = 11.49 × MPO + 810 and V˙O2max from W2k: (2) V˙O2max = 10.96 × W2k + 1168. Cross-validation analyses were performed using an independent sample of 14 rowers. There was no difference between the mean predicted V˙O2max in the INCR test (4.41 L·min-1) or the 2k test (4.39 L·min-1) and the observed V˙O2max (4.40 L·min-1). Technical error of measurement was 3.1% and 3.6%, standard error of estimate was 0.136 and 0.157 mL·min-1, and validation coefficients (r) were .95 and .94 using Equation (1) and (2), respectively. A prediction model only including MPO or W2k explains 88% to 90% of the variability in V˙O2max and is suggested for practical use in male club rowers.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ergometry</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Rowing</subject><subject>Water Sports</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1555-0265</issn><issn>1555-0273</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtPwkAURidGI4iu3ZkmbtxU5tFL2yVBfCQYjJH1ZDq9JcWWqTNthH_vIMjC1f0W574OIdeM3jPGxbBcuaa555SlIU0FPyF9BgAh5bE4PeYR9MiFcytKI4iAnpOeEBFlPBJ98jAOXtWmrFUVvJvvcr0MpnZpamzRBm_WtEabKmiNz5iXuj3C8812ietg0bTqEy_JWaEqh1eHOiCLx-nH5DmczZ9eJuNZqEXK2tAvRQUKsUh4gqOIaciTHHQmIpFoHwvOU851wTLNtEoipALjPI2zhGvfIgbkbj-3searQ9fKunQaq0qt0XRO8igG4CkA9ejtP3RlOrv210kOMQWWwEh4arintDXOWSxkY_17disZlTvB8lew3AmWO8G-4-Ywt8tqzI_8n1HxA5rIdhw</recordid><startdate>20210301</startdate><enddate>20210301</enddate><creator>Jensen, Kurt</creator><creator>Frydkjær, Morten</creator><creator>Jensen, Niels M B</creator><creator>Bannerholt, Lucas M</creator><creator>Gam, Søren</creator><general>Human Kinetics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210301</creationdate><title>A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake</title><author>Jensen, Kurt ; Frydkjær, Morten ; Jensen, Niels M B ; Bannerholt, Lucas M ; Gam, Søren</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-340ea5aeef828e641c5d8d5cb3438cd8df22922cf1bc1ca84e03e7d97b82c8283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ergometry</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Rowing</topic><topic>Water Sports</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kurt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frydkjær, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Niels M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bannerholt, Lucas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gam, Søren</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports physiology and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jensen, Kurt</au><au>Frydkjær, Morten</au><au>Jensen, Niels M B</au><au>Bannerholt, Lucas M</au><au>Gam, Søren</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports physiology and performance</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Sports Physiol Perform</addtitle><date>2021-03-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>382-386</pages><issn>1555-0265</issn><eissn>1555-0273</eissn><abstract>To examine the relationship between the maximal power output (MPO) in an individualized 7 × 2-minute incremental (INCR) test, average power in a 2k (W2k) rowing ergometer test, and maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) and to develop a regression equation to predict V˙O2max. A total of 34 male club rowers (age 18-30 y) performed a 2k and an INCR test in a Concept2 rowing ergometer to determine and compare MPO, W2k, and V˙O2max. No significant difference was found between V˙O2max measured during INCR or 2k test (P = .73). A very high correlation coefficient (r = .96) was found between MPO and V˙O2max and between W2k and V˙O2max (r = .93). Linear regression analyses were developed for predicting V˙O2max from MPO: (1) V˙O2max (mL·min-1) = 11.49 × MPO + 810 and V˙O2max from W2k: (2) V˙O2max = 10.96 × W2k + 1168. Cross-validation analyses were performed using an independent sample of 14 rowers. There was no difference between the mean predicted V˙O2max in the INCR test (4.41 L·min-1) or the 2k test (4.39 L·min-1) and the observed V˙O2max (4.40 L·min-1). Technical error of measurement was 3.1% and 3.6%, standard error of estimate was 0.136 and 0.157 mL·min-1, and validation coefficients (r) were .95 and .94 using Equation (1) and (2), respectively. A prediction model only including MPO or W2k explains 88% to 90% of the variability in V˙O2max and is suggested for practical use in male club rowers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Human Kinetics</pub><pmid>33401243</pmid><doi>10.1123/ijspp.2019-0932</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1555-0265
ispartof International journal of sports physiology and performance, 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.382-386
issn 1555-0265
1555-0273
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475529550
source MEDLINE; Human Kinetics Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Ergometry
Exercise Test
Humans
Male
Oxygen
Oxygen Consumption
Regression Analysis
Rowing
Water Sports
Young Adult
title A Maximal Rowing Ergometer Protocol to Predict Maximal Oxygen Uptake
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A11%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Maximal%20Rowing%20Ergometer%20Protocol%20to%20Predict%20Maximal%20Oxygen%20Uptake&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20physiology%20and%20performance&rft.au=Jensen,%20Kurt&rft.date=2021-03-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=382-386&rft.issn=1555-0265&rft.eissn=1555-0273&rft_id=info:doi/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0932&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475529550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2570518563&rft_id=info:pmid/33401243&rfr_iscdi=true