Biofluid Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review
Emerging evidence suggests that biofluid-based biomarkers have diagnostic and prognostic potential in traumatic brain injuries (TBI). However, owing to the lack of a conceptual framework or comprehensive review, it is difficult to visualize the breadth of materials that might be available. We conduc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurocritical care 2021-10, Vol.35 (2), p.559-572 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 572 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 559 |
container_title | Neurocritical care |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Edalatfar, Maryam Piri, Seyed Mohammad Mehrabinejad, Mohammad-Mehdi Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat Meknatkhah, Sogol Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza Kavyani, Zeinab Hajighadery, Abdolkarim Kaveh, Meysam Aryannejad, Armin Ghafouri, Mohammad Jamshidi, Elham Rezwanifar, Mohamad Mehdi Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen Bari, Ausaf Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi |
description | Emerging evidence suggests that biofluid-based biomarkers have diagnostic and prognostic potential in traumatic brain injuries (TBI). However, owing to the lack of a conceptual framework or comprehensive review, it is difficult to visualize the breadth of materials that might be available. We conducted a systematic scoping review to map and categorize the evidence regarding biofluid-based biochemical markers of TBI. A comprehensive search was undertaken in January 2019. Of 25,354 records identified through the literature search, 1036 original human studies were included. Five hundred forty biofluid biomarkers were extracted from included studies and classified into 19 distinct categories. Three categories of biomarkers including cytokines, coagulation tests, and nerve tissue proteins were investigated more than others and assessed in almost half of the studies (560, 515, and 502 from 1036 studies, respectively). S100 beta as the most common biomarker for TBI was tested in 21.2% of studies (220 articles). Cortisol was the only biomarker measured in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and saliva. The most common sampling time was at admission and within 24 h of injury. The included studies focused mainly on biomarkers from blood and central nervous system sources, the adult population, and severe and blunt injuries. The most common outcome measures used in studies were changes in biomarker concentration level, Glasgow coma scale, Glasgow outcome scale, brain computed tomography scan, and mortality rate. Biofluid biomarkers could be clinically helpful in the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. However, there was no single definitive biomarker with accurate characteristics. The present categorization would be a road map to investigate the biomarkers of the brain injury cascade separately and detect the most representative biomarker of each category. Also, this comprehensive categorization could provide a guiding framework to design combined panels of multiple biomarkers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12028-020-01173-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475528553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2920660950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4a787225660e9b289f7a786a0f105a3927ba93a4508b75a2b9895d2dd115e9d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQJDZsDGM7jmN2bcVTlZBoWVtO4lQpeRQ7AfXvcUkBiQUrjz1nrkcHoVMClwRAXDlCgcYYKGAgRDBM9tCQcB5hkBHZ39YhwZFkbICOnFsBUCEFP0QDxkJgPGZD9DgpmrzsiizwRaXtq7EuKOpgYXVX6bZIg4nV_v5Qrzq7uQ7GwXzjWtO35mmzLupl8GzeC_NxjA5yXTpzsjtH6OX2ZjG9x7Onu4fpeIZTJniLQy1iQSmPIjAyobHMhX-JNOQEuGaSikRLpkMOcSK4pomMJc9olhHCjcyAjdBFn7u2zVtnXKuqwqWmLHVtms4pGgrOacw58-j5H3TVdLb22ykqKfgVJN8G0p5KbeOcNbla28K72CgCamta9aaVN62-TCvih8520V1Smexn5FutB1gPON-ql8b-_v1P7CdWkIZM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920660950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biofluid Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Edalatfar, Maryam ; Piri, Seyed Mohammad ; Mehrabinejad, Mohammad-Mehdi ; Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat ; Meknatkhah, Sogol ; Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza ; Kavyani, Zeinab ; Hajighadery, Abdolkarim ; Kaveh, Meysam ; Aryannejad, Armin ; Ghafouri, Mohammad ; Jamshidi, Elham ; Rezwanifar, Mohamad Mehdi ; Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen ; Bari, Ausaf ; Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creator><creatorcontrib>Edalatfar, Maryam ; Piri, Seyed Mohammad ; Mehrabinejad, Mohammad-Mehdi ; Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat ; Meknatkhah, Sogol ; Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza ; Kavyani, Zeinab ; Hajighadery, Abdolkarim ; Kaveh, Meysam ; Aryannejad, Armin ; Ghafouri, Mohammad ; Jamshidi, Elham ; Rezwanifar, Mohamad Mehdi ; Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen ; Bari, Ausaf ; Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><description>Emerging evidence suggests that biofluid-based biomarkers have diagnostic and prognostic potential in traumatic brain injuries (TBI). However, owing to the lack of a conceptual framework or comprehensive review, it is difficult to visualize the breadth of materials that might be available. We conducted a systematic scoping review to map and categorize the evidence regarding biofluid-based biochemical markers of TBI. A comprehensive search was undertaken in January 2019. Of 25,354 records identified through the literature search, 1036 original human studies were included. Five hundred forty biofluid biomarkers were extracted from included studies and classified into 19 distinct categories. Three categories of biomarkers including cytokines, coagulation tests, and nerve tissue proteins were investigated more than others and assessed in almost half of the studies (560, 515, and 502 from 1036 studies, respectively). S100 beta as the most common biomarker for TBI was tested in 21.2% of studies (220 articles). Cortisol was the only biomarker measured in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and saliva. The most common sampling time was at admission and within 24 h of injury. The included studies focused mainly on biomarkers from blood and central nervous system sources, the adult population, and severe and blunt injuries. The most common outcome measures used in studies were changes in biomarker concentration level, Glasgow coma scale, Glasgow outcome scale, brain computed tomography scan, and mortality rate. Biofluid biomarkers could be clinically helpful in the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. However, there was no single definitive biomarker with accurate characteristics. The present categorization would be a road map to investigate the biomarkers of the brain injury cascade separately and detect the most representative biomarker of each category. Also, this comprehensive categorization could provide a guiding framework to design combined panels of multiple biomarkers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-0961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12028-020-01173-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33403583</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers ; Brain Injuries ; Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Critical Care Medicine ; Cytokines ; Glasgow Coma Scale ; Glasgow Outcome Scale ; Humans ; Intensive ; Internal Medicine ; Lavage ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metabolism ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; Proteins ; Review Article ; Traumatic brain injury ; Tumor necrosis factor-TNF ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Neurocritical care, 2021-10, Vol.35 (2), p.559-572</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2021</rights><rights>2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4a787225660e9b289f7a786a0f105a3927ba93a4508b75a2b9895d2dd115e9d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4a787225660e9b289f7a786a0f105a3927ba93a4508b75a2b9895d2dd115e9d03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7213-2107</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12028-020-01173-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920660950?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,21389,27924,27925,33530,33531,33744,33745,41488,42557,43659,43805,51319,64385,64387,64389,72341</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Edalatfar, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piri, Seyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrabinejad, Mohammad-Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meknatkhah, Sogol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavyani, Zeinab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajighadery, Abdolkarim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaveh, Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aryannejad, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafouri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezwanifar, Mohamad Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bari, Ausaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><title>Biofluid Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review</title><title>Neurocritical care</title><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><description>Emerging evidence suggests that biofluid-based biomarkers have diagnostic and prognostic potential in traumatic brain injuries (TBI). However, owing to the lack of a conceptual framework or comprehensive review, it is difficult to visualize the breadth of materials that might be available. We conducted a systematic scoping review to map and categorize the evidence regarding biofluid-based biochemical markers of TBI. A comprehensive search was undertaken in January 2019. Of 25,354 records identified through the literature search, 1036 original human studies were included. Five hundred forty biofluid biomarkers were extracted from included studies and classified into 19 distinct categories. Three categories of biomarkers including cytokines, coagulation tests, and nerve tissue proteins were investigated more than others and assessed in almost half of the studies (560, 515, and 502 from 1036 studies, respectively). S100 beta as the most common biomarker for TBI was tested in 21.2% of studies (220 articles). Cortisol was the only biomarker measured in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and saliva. The most common sampling time was at admission and within 24 h of injury. The included studies focused mainly on biomarkers from blood and central nervous system sources, the adult population, and severe and blunt injuries. The most common outcome measures used in studies were changes in biomarker concentration level, Glasgow coma scale, Glasgow outcome scale, brain computed tomography scan, and mortality rate. Biofluid biomarkers could be clinically helpful in the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. However, there was no single definitive biomarker with accurate characteristics. The present categorization would be a road map to investigate the biomarkers of the brain injury cascade separately and detect the most representative biomarker of each category. Also, this comprehensive categorization could provide a guiding framework to design combined panels of multiple biomarkers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Brain Injuries</subject><subject>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Cytokines</subject><subject>Glasgow Coma Scale</subject><subject>Glasgow Outcome Scale</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lavage</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><subject>Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>1541-6933</issn><issn>1556-0961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwAyxQJDZsDGM7jmN2bcVTlZBoWVtO4lQpeRQ7AfXvcUkBiQUrjz1nrkcHoVMClwRAXDlCgcYYKGAgRDBM9tCQcB5hkBHZ39YhwZFkbICOnFsBUCEFP0QDxkJgPGZD9DgpmrzsiizwRaXtq7EuKOpgYXVX6bZIg4nV_v5Qrzq7uQ7GwXzjWtO35mmzLupl8GzeC_NxjA5yXTpzsjtH6OX2ZjG9x7Onu4fpeIZTJniLQy1iQSmPIjAyobHMhX-JNOQEuGaSikRLpkMOcSK4pomMJc9olhHCjcyAjdBFn7u2zVtnXKuqwqWmLHVtms4pGgrOacw58-j5H3TVdLb22ykqKfgVJN8G0p5KbeOcNbla28K72CgCamta9aaVN62-TCvih8520V1Smexn5FutB1gPON-ql8b-_v1P7CdWkIZM</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Edalatfar, Maryam</creator><creator>Piri, Seyed Mohammad</creator><creator>Mehrabinejad, Mohammad-Mehdi</creator><creator>Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat</creator><creator>Meknatkhah, Sogol</creator><creator>Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza</creator><creator>Kavyani, Zeinab</creator><creator>Hajighadery, Abdolkarim</creator><creator>Kaveh, Meysam</creator><creator>Aryannejad, Armin</creator><creator>Ghafouri, Mohammad</creator><creator>Jamshidi, Elham</creator><creator>Rezwanifar, Mohamad Mehdi</creator><creator>Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen</creator><creator>Bari, Ausaf</creator><creator>Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7213-2107</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Biofluid Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review</title><author>Edalatfar, Maryam ; Piri, Seyed Mohammad ; Mehrabinejad, Mohammad-Mehdi ; Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat ; Meknatkhah, Sogol ; Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza ; Kavyani, Zeinab ; Hajighadery, Abdolkarim ; Kaveh, Meysam ; Aryannejad, Armin ; Ghafouri, Mohammad ; Jamshidi, Elham ; Rezwanifar, Mohamad Mehdi ; Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen ; Bari, Ausaf ; Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-4a787225660e9b289f7a786a0f105a3927ba93a4508b75a2b9895d2dd115e9d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Brain Injuries</topic><topic>Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Cytokines</topic><topic>Glasgow Coma Scale</topic><topic>Glasgow Outcome Scale</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lavage</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><topic>Tumor necrosis factor-TNF</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Edalatfar, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piri, Seyed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehrabinejad, Mohammad-Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meknatkhah, Sogol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavyani, Zeinab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajighadery, Abdolkarim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaveh, Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aryannejad, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghafouri, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamshidi, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezwanifar, Mohamad Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bari, Ausaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Edalatfar, Maryam</au><au>Piri, Seyed Mohammad</au><au>Mehrabinejad, Mohammad-Mehdi</au><au>Mousavi, Monireh-Sadat</au><au>Meknatkhah, Sogol</au><au>Fattahi, Mohammad-Reza</au><au>Kavyani, Zeinab</au><au>Hajighadery, Abdolkarim</au><au>Kaveh, Meysam</au><au>Aryannejad, Armin</au><au>Ghafouri, Mohammad</au><au>Jamshidi, Elham</au><au>Rezwanifar, Mohamad Mehdi</au><au>Sadeghi-Naini, Mohsen</au><au>Bari, Ausaf</au><au>Sharif-Alhoseini, Mahdi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biofluid Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review</atitle><jtitle>Neurocritical care</jtitle><stitle>Neurocrit Care</stitle><addtitle>Neurocrit Care</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>559</spage><epage>572</epage><pages>559-572</pages><issn>1541-6933</issn><eissn>1556-0961</eissn><abstract>Emerging evidence suggests that biofluid-based biomarkers have diagnostic and prognostic potential in traumatic brain injuries (TBI). However, owing to the lack of a conceptual framework or comprehensive review, it is difficult to visualize the breadth of materials that might be available. We conducted a systematic scoping review to map and categorize the evidence regarding biofluid-based biochemical markers of TBI. A comprehensive search was undertaken in January 2019. Of 25,354 records identified through the literature search, 1036 original human studies were included. Five hundred forty biofluid biomarkers were extracted from included studies and classified into 19 distinct categories. Three categories of biomarkers including cytokines, coagulation tests, and nerve tissue proteins were investigated more than others and assessed in almost half of the studies (560, 515, and 502 from 1036 studies, respectively). S100 beta as the most common biomarker for TBI was tested in 21.2% of studies (220 articles). Cortisol was the only biomarker measured in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and saliva. The most common sampling time was at admission and within 24 h of injury. The included studies focused mainly on biomarkers from blood and central nervous system sources, the adult population, and severe and blunt injuries. The most common outcome measures used in studies were changes in biomarker concentration level, Glasgow coma scale, Glasgow outcome scale, brain computed tomography scan, and mortality rate. Biofluid biomarkers could be clinically helpful in the diagnosis and prognosis of TBI. However, there was no single definitive biomarker with accurate characteristics. The present categorization would be a road map to investigate the biomarkers of the brain injury cascade separately and detect the most representative biomarker of each category. Also, this comprehensive categorization could provide a guiding framework to design combined panels of multiple biomarkers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33403583</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12028-020-01173-1</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7213-2107</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1541-6933 |
ispartof | Neurocritical care, 2021-10, Vol.35 (2), p.559-572 |
issn | 1541-6933 1556-0961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475528553 |
source | MEDLINE; ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Adult Biomarkers Brain Injuries Brain Injuries, Traumatic - diagnosis Cerebrospinal fluid Critical Care Medicine Cytokines Glasgow Coma Scale Glasgow Outcome Scale Humans Intensive Internal Medicine Lavage Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metabolism Neurology Neurosurgery Proteins Review Article Traumatic brain injury Tumor necrosis factor-TNF Urine |
title | Biofluid Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Scoping Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A17%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biofluid%20Biomarkers%20in%20Traumatic%20Brain%20Injury:%20A%20Systematic%20Scoping%20Review&rft.jtitle=Neurocritical%20care&rft.au=Edalatfar,%20Maryam&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=559&rft.epage=572&rft.pages=559-572&rft.issn=1541-6933&rft.eissn=1556-0961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12028-020-01173-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2920660950%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920660950&rft_id=info:pmid/33403583&rfr_iscdi=true |