The effect of ultrasound cavitation in combination with cryolipolysis as a non-invasive selective procedure for abdominal fat reduction

Fat reduction and body contouring have become popular procedures in the cosmetic surgery industry over the past decade. There have been studies to replace invasive methods such as liposuction, with safer non-invasive procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a non-invasive combination therapy o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes & metabolic syndrome clinical research & reviews 2020-11, Vol.14 (6), p.2185-2189
Hauptverfasser: Khedmatgozar, Hamed, Yadegari, Mehran, Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin, Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel, Ghazavi, Hamed, Esmaily, Habibollah, Sajedeh yousefian, Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh, Mahsa amarlou, Bagherniya, Mohammad, Saghafi, Nafiseh, Sadeghi, Ramin, Ferns, Gordon A., Ghazizadeh, Hamideh, Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2189
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2185
container_title Diabetes & metabolic syndrome clinical research & reviews
container_volume 14
creator Khedmatgozar, Hamed
Yadegari, Mehran
Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin
Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel
Ghazavi, Hamed
Esmaily, Habibollah
Sajedeh yousefian
Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh
Mahsa amarlou
Bagherniya, Mohammad
Saghafi, Nafiseh
Sadeghi, Ramin
Ferns, Gordon A.
Ghazizadeh, Hamideh
Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid
description Fat reduction and body contouring have become popular procedures in the cosmetic surgery industry over the past decade. There have been studies to replace invasive methods such as liposuction, with safer non-invasive procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a non-invasive combination therapy of ultrasound cavitation and cryolipolysis on abdominal adipose tissue. This pilot interventional study comprised 90 female individuals aged 18-65-years-old who were recruited into one of three groups of 30 participants. Group 1 was treated with diet alone (the control group), group 2 with cryolipolysis and diet, and group 3 with a combination of ultrasound cavitation, cryolipolysis, and diet for 8 weeks. Anthropometric parameters were measured before, during, and after the trial included total body weight, body mass index(BMI), body fat mass, fat-free mass, and abdomen circumference. All three groups demonstrated significant reductions in each parameter at the end of the intervention (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.10.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475404196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1871402120304677</els_id><sourcerecordid>2475404196</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-58894f6c4d1168d1efc9db3be078a9873284c0ebb0f61f289d2a1e9cd6db48313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u3CAURlGVqJO_B-imYpmNp2CwDeqqipI2UqRskjXCcNEwsmEK9rTzBHnt4M60y0pI3AvfPYKD0CdK1pTQ9st2bfPvdU3qpV8Txj-gCyo6URHG-Nmfmlac1HSFLnPeEtI0spYf0YoxJpuukxfo7WUDGJwDM-Ho8DxMSec4B4uN3vtJTz4G7AM2cex9OLa__LTBJh3i4HdxOGSfsS4LhxgqH_Y6-z3gDENhLtUuRQN2ToBdTFj3No6FNGCnJ5zKhVmg1-jc6SHDzWm_Qq8P9y93P6qn5--Pd9-eKsMaNlWNEJK71nBLaSssBWek7VkPpBNaio7VghsCfU9cS10tpK01BWlsa3suGGVX6PbILa_6OUOe1OizgWHQAeKcVc27hhNOZVui9Bg1KeacwKld8qNOB0WJWvyrrSr-1eJ_OSr-y8znE37uR7D_Jv4KL4GvxwCUT-49JJWNh1AE-VR8KRv9f_DvAsaZhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475404196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of ultrasound cavitation in combination with cryolipolysis as a non-invasive selective procedure for abdominal fat reduction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Khedmatgozar, Hamed ; Yadegari, Mehran ; Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin ; Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel ; Ghazavi, Hamed ; Esmaily, Habibollah ; Sajedeh yousefian ; Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh ; Mahsa amarlou ; Bagherniya, Mohammad ; Saghafi, Nafiseh ; Sadeghi, Ramin ; Ferns, Gordon A. ; Ghazizadeh, Hamideh ; Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid</creator><creatorcontrib>Khedmatgozar, Hamed ; Yadegari, Mehran ; Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin ; Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel ; Ghazavi, Hamed ; Esmaily, Habibollah ; Sajedeh yousefian ; Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh ; Mahsa amarlou ; Bagherniya, Mohammad ; Saghafi, Nafiseh ; Sadeghi, Ramin ; Ferns, Gordon A. ; Ghazizadeh, Hamideh ; Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid</creatorcontrib><description>Fat reduction and body contouring have become popular procedures in the cosmetic surgery industry over the past decade. There have been studies to replace invasive methods such as liposuction, with safer non-invasive procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a non-invasive combination therapy of ultrasound cavitation and cryolipolysis on abdominal adipose tissue. This pilot interventional study comprised 90 female individuals aged 18-65-years-old who were recruited into one of three groups of 30 participants. Group 1 was treated with diet alone (the control group), group 2 with cryolipolysis and diet, and group 3 with a combination of ultrasound cavitation, cryolipolysis, and diet for 8 weeks. Anthropometric parameters were measured before, during, and after the trial included total body weight, body mass index(BMI), body fat mass, fat-free mass, and abdomen circumference. All three groups demonstrated significant reductions in each parameter at the end of the intervention (P &lt; 0.01). Apart from fat-free mass (P = 0.66), the combination therapy significantly reduced body fat mass, weight, BMI, and abdomen circumference compared to the control group (P &lt; 0.01). There was no significant difference between the combination therapy and cryolipolysis-alone groups. Treatment using a combination of cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation is no more effective in improving the anthropometric indices than cryolipolysis alone. •Cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation are both effective in fat reduction.•The combination therapy of Cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation is not more effective in fat reduction than cryolipolysis alone.•The results of this study can prevent imposing extra costs on patients because of selecting a combination therapy for fat removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1871-4021</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0334</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.10.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33395779</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adipose tissue ; Body contouring ; Combination therapy ; Cryolipolysis ; Fat reduction ; Ultrasound cavitation</subject><ispartof>Diabetes &amp; metabolic syndrome clinical research &amp; reviews, 2020-11, Vol.14 (6), p.2185-2189</ispartof><rights>2020 Diabetes India</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Diabetes India. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-58894f6c4d1168d1efc9db3be078a9873284c0ebb0f61f289d2a1e9cd6db48313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-58894f6c4d1168d1efc9db3be078a9873284c0ebb0f61f289d2a1e9cd6db48313</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6940-5220</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402120304677$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33395779$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khedmatgozar, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadegari, Mehran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazavi, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmaily, Habibollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajedeh yousefian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahsa amarlou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagherniya, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saghafi, Nafiseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferns, Gordon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazizadeh, Hamideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of ultrasound cavitation in combination with cryolipolysis as a non-invasive selective procedure for abdominal fat reduction</title><title>Diabetes &amp; metabolic syndrome clinical research &amp; reviews</title><addtitle>Diabetes Metab Syndr</addtitle><description>Fat reduction and body contouring have become popular procedures in the cosmetic surgery industry over the past decade. There have been studies to replace invasive methods such as liposuction, with safer non-invasive procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a non-invasive combination therapy of ultrasound cavitation and cryolipolysis on abdominal adipose tissue. This pilot interventional study comprised 90 female individuals aged 18-65-years-old who were recruited into one of three groups of 30 participants. Group 1 was treated with diet alone (the control group), group 2 with cryolipolysis and diet, and group 3 with a combination of ultrasound cavitation, cryolipolysis, and diet for 8 weeks. Anthropometric parameters were measured before, during, and after the trial included total body weight, body mass index(BMI), body fat mass, fat-free mass, and abdomen circumference. All three groups demonstrated significant reductions in each parameter at the end of the intervention (P &lt; 0.01). Apart from fat-free mass (P = 0.66), the combination therapy significantly reduced body fat mass, weight, BMI, and abdomen circumference compared to the control group (P &lt; 0.01). There was no significant difference between the combination therapy and cryolipolysis-alone groups. Treatment using a combination of cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation is no more effective in improving the anthropometric indices than cryolipolysis alone. •Cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation are both effective in fat reduction.•The combination therapy of Cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation is not more effective in fat reduction than cryolipolysis alone.•The results of this study can prevent imposing extra costs on patients because of selecting a combination therapy for fat removal.</description><subject>Adipose tissue</subject><subject>Body contouring</subject><subject>Combination therapy</subject><subject>Cryolipolysis</subject><subject>Fat reduction</subject><subject>Ultrasound cavitation</subject><issn>1871-4021</issn><issn>1878-0334</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u3CAURlGVqJO_B-imYpmNp2CwDeqqipI2UqRskjXCcNEwsmEK9rTzBHnt4M60y0pI3AvfPYKD0CdK1pTQ9st2bfPvdU3qpV8Txj-gCyo6URHG-Nmfmlac1HSFLnPeEtI0spYf0YoxJpuukxfo7WUDGJwDM-Ho8DxMSec4B4uN3vtJTz4G7AM2cex9OLa__LTBJh3i4HdxOGSfsS4LhxgqH_Y6-z3gDENhLtUuRQN2ToBdTFj3No6FNGCnJ5zKhVmg1-jc6SHDzWm_Qq8P9y93P6qn5--Pd9-eKsMaNlWNEJK71nBLaSssBWek7VkPpBNaio7VghsCfU9cS10tpK01BWlsa3suGGVX6PbILa_6OUOe1OizgWHQAeKcVc27hhNOZVui9Bg1KeacwKld8qNOB0WJWvyrrSr-1eJ_OSr-y8znE37uR7D_Jv4KL4GvxwCUT-49JJWNh1AE-VR8KRv9f_DvAsaZhw</recordid><startdate>202011</startdate><enddate>202011</enddate><creator>Khedmatgozar, Hamed</creator><creator>Yadegari, Mehran</creator><creator>Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin</creator><creator>Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel</creator><creator>Ghazavi, Hamed</creator><creator>Esmaily, Habibollah</creator><creator>Sajedeh yousefian</creator><creator>Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh</creator><creator>Mahsa amarlou</creator><creator>Bagherniya, Mohammad</creator><creator>Saghafi, Nafiseh</creator><creator>Sadeghi, Ramin</creator><creator>Ferns, Gordon A.</creator><creator>Ghazizadeh, Hamideh</creator><creator>Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6940-5220</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202011</creationdate><title>The effect of ultrasound cavitation in combination with cryolipolysis as a non-invasive selective procedure for abdominal fat reduction</title><author>Khedmatgozar, Hamed ; Yadegari, Mehran ; Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin ; Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel ; Ghazavi, Hamed ; Esmaily, Habibollah ; Sajedeh yousefian ; Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh ; Mahsa amarlou ; Bagherniya, Mohammad ; Saghafi, Nafiseh ; Sadeghi, Ramin ; Ferns, Gordon A. ; Ghazizadeh, Hamideh ; Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-58894f6c4d1168d1efc9db3be078a9873284c0ebb0f61f289d2a1e9cd6db48313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adipose tissue</topic><topic>Body contouring</topic><topic>Combination therapy</topic><topic>Cryolipolysis</topic><topic>Fat reduction</topic><topic>Ultrasound cavitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khedmatgozar, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadegari, Mehran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazavi, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmaily, Habibollah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sajedeh yousefian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahsa amarlou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagherniya, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saghafi, Nafiseh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferns, Gordon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazizadeh, Hamideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetes &amp; metabolic syndrome clinical research &amp; reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khedmatgozar, Hamed</au><au>Yadegari, Mehran</au><au>Khodadadegan, Mohammad Amin</au><au>Khodabandeh, Atieh Kamel</au><au>Ghazavi, Hamed</au><au>Esmaily, Habibollah</au><au>Sajedeh yousefian</au><au>Badpeyma, Mohaddeseh</au><au>Mahsa amarlou</au><au>Bagherniya, Mohammad</au><au>Saghafi, Nafiseh</au><au>Sadeghi, Ramin</au><au>Ferns, Gordon A.</au><au>Ghazizadeh, Hamideh</au><au>Ghayour-Mobarhan, Majid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of ultrasound cavitation in combination with cryolipolysis as a non-invasive selective procedure for abdominal fat reduction</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes &amp; metabolic syndrome clinical research &amp; reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Metab Syndr</addtitle><date>2020-11</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2185</spage><epage>2189</epage><pages>2185-2189</pages><issn>1871-4021</issn><eissn>1878-0334</eissn><abstract>Fat reduction and body contouring have become popular procedures in the cosmetic surgery industry over the past decade. There have been studies to replace invasive methods such as liposuction, with safer non-invasive procedures. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a non-invasive combination therapy of ultrasound cavitation and cryolipolysis on abdominal adipose tissue. This pilot interventional study comprised 90 female individuals aged 18-65-years-old who were recruited into one of three groups of 30 participants. Group 1 was treated with diet alone (the control group), group 2 with cryolipolysis and diet, and group 3 with a combination of ultrasound cavitation, cryolipolysis, and diet for 8 weeks. Anthropometric parameters were measured before, during, and after the trial included total body weight, body mass index(BMI), body fat mass, fat-free mass, and abdomen circumference. All three groups demonstrated significant reductions in each parameter at the end of the intervention (P &lt; 0.01). Apart from fat-free mass (P = 0.66), the combination therapy significantly reduced body fat mass, weight, BMI, and abdomen circumference compared to the control group (P &lt; 0.01). There was no significant difference between the combination therapy and cryolipolysis-alone groups. Treatment using a combination of cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation is no more effective in improving the anthropometric indices than cryolipolysis alone. •Cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation are both effective in fat reduction.•The combination therapy of Cryolipolysis and ultrasound cavitation is not more effective in fat reduction than cryolipolysis alone.•The results of this study can prevent imposing extra costs on patients because of selecting a combination therapy for fat removal.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33395779</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.dsx.2020.10.034</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6940-5220</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1871-4021
ispartof Diabetes & metabolic syndrome clinical research & reviews, 2020-11, Vol.14 (6), p.2185-2189
issn 1871-4021
1878-0334
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475404196
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adipose tissue
Body contouring
Combination therapy
Cryolipolysis
Fat reduction
Ultrasound cavitation
title The effect of ultrasound cavitation in combination with cryolipolysis as a non-invasive selective procedure for abdominal fat reduction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A39%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20ultrasound%20cavitation%20in%20combination%20with%20cryolipolysis%20as%20a%20non-invasive%20selective%20procedure%20for%20abdominal%20fat%20reduction&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20&%20metabolic%20syndrome%20clinical%20research%20&%20reviews&rft.au=Khedmatgozar,%20Hamed&rft.date=2020-11&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2185&rft.epage=2189&rft.pages=2185-2189&rft.issn=1871-4021&rft.eissn=1878-0334&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.10.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475404196%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475404196&rft_id=info:pmid/33395779&rft_els_id=S1871402120304677&rfr_iscdi=true