Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the Cancer Prevention Study-II

Background Identifying risk factors for women at high risk of symptom-detected breast cancers that were missed by screening would enable targeting of enhanced screening regimens. To this end, we examined associations of breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection in screened women from the Cance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2021-04, Vol.186 (3), p.791-805
Hauptverfasser: Gaudet, Mia M., Deubler, Emily, Diver, W. Ryan, Puvanesarajah, Samantha, Patel, Alpa V., Gansler, Ted, Sherman, Mark E., Gapstur, Susan M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 805
container_issue 3
container_start_page 791
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 186
creator Gaudet, Mia M.
Deubler, Emily
Diver, W. Ryan
Puvanesarajah, Samantha
Patel, Alpa V.
Gansler, Ted
Sherman, Mark E.
Gapstur, Susan M.
description Background Identifying risk factors for women at high risk of symptom-detected breast cancers that were missed by screening would enable targeting of enhanced screening regimens. To this end, we examined associations of breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection in screened women from the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS)-II Nutrition Cohort. Methods Among 77,206 women followed for a median of 14.8 years, 2711 screen-detected and 1281 symptom-detected breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Multivariable-adjusted associations were estimated using joint Cox proportional hazards regression models with person-time calculated contingent on screening. Results Factors associated with higher risks of symptom-detected and screen-detected breast cancer included current combined hormone therapy (HT) use (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.48 and 1.45, 1.27–1.65, respectively) and history of benign breast disease (1.85, 1.64–2.08 and 1.43, 1.31–1.55, respectively). Current estrogen-only HT use was associated with symptom-detected (1.40, 1.15–1.71) but not screen-detected (0.95, 0.83–1.09) breast cancer. Higher risk of screen-detected but not symptom-detected breast cancer was observed for obese vs. normal body mass index (1.22, 1.01–1.48 and 0.76, 0.56–1.01, respectively), per 3 h/day sitting time (1.10, 1.04–1.16 and 0.97, 0.89–1.06, respectively), and ≥ 2 drinks per day vs. nondrinker (1.40, 1.16–1.69 and 1.27, 0.97–1.66, respectively). Conclusions Differences in risk factors for symptom-detected vs. screen-detected breast cancer were observed and most notably, use of combined and estrogen-only HT and a history of benign breast disease were associated with increased risk of symptomatic detected breast cancer. Impact If confirmed, these data suggest that such women may benefit from more intensive screening to facilitate early detection.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-020-06025-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475403002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A657376340</galeid><sourcerecordid>A657376340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-1ca259724b7730d902ae5166c93e1bdf9226ac21680dd0496fc5c19fc55012d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEokPhBVggS0iITeD6J_Z42Y4ojFQJJGBteeybmZTELrYDmrdv0hQKLNjYCx9_-u49VfWcwhsKoN5mCo3QNTCoQQJravagWtFG8Voxqh5WK6BS1XIN8qR6kvMVAGgF-nF1wjnXa6HUqmrPE9pciLPBYSKpy99Ia12JKZPdkQzRI4kt8VjQlS4GYocY9iS7hBjQk59xwEC6QMoByWYJ-ZTwB4Zb-nMZ_bHebp9Wj1rbZ3x2d59WXy_efdl8qC8_vt9uzi5rJ7goNXWWNVoxsVOKg9fALDZUSqc50p1vNWPSOkanmbwHoWXrGkf1dDZAmaf8tHq95F6n-H3EXMzQZYd9bwPGMRsmVCOAA7AJffkPehXHFKZ2hjWwpoIzDvfU3vZoutDGkqybQ82ZnFatJBcz9eoP6oC2L4cc-3HeQf4bZAvoUsw5YWuuUzfYdDQUzCzVLFLNJNXcSjVz0xd3TcfdgP73l18WJ4AvQJ6ewh7T_Sj_ib0B2oOpGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2508143230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the Cancer Prevention Study-II</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Gaudet, Mia M. ; Deubler, Emily ; Diver, W. Ryan ; Puvanesarajah, Samantha ; Patel, Alpa V. ; Gansler, Ted ; Sherman, Mark E. ; Gapstur, Susan M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gaudet, Mia M. ; Deubler, Emily ; Diver, W. Ryan ; Puvanesarajah, Samantha ; Patel, Alpa V. ; Gansler, Ted ; Sherman, Mark E. ; Gapstur, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Identifying risk factors for women at high risk of symptom-detected breast cancers that were missed by screening would enable targeting of enhanced screening regimens. To this end, we examined associations of breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection in screened women from the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS)-II Nutrition Cohort. Methods Among 77,206 women followed for a median of 14.8 years, 2711 screen-detected and 1281 symptom-detected breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Multivariable-adjusted associations were estimated using joint Cox proportional hazards regression models with person-time calculated contingent on screening. Results Factors associated with higher risks of symptom-detected and screen-detected breast cancer included current combined hormone therapy (HT) use (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.48 and 1.45, 1.27–1.65, respectively) and history of benign breast disease (1.85, 1.64–2.08 and 1.43, 1.31–1.55, respectively). Current estrogen-only HT use was associated with symptom-detected (1.40, 1.15–1.71) but not screen-detected (0.95, 0.83–1.09) breast cancer. Higher risk of screen-detected but not symptom-detected breast cancer was observed for obese vs. normal body mass index (1.22, 1.01–1.48 and 0.76, 0.56–1.01, respectively), per 3 h/day sitting time (1.10, 1.04–1.16 and 0.97, 0.89–1.06, respectively), and ≥ 2 drinks per day vs. nondrinker (1.40, 1.16–1.69 and 1.27, 0.97–1.66, respectively). Conclusions Differences in risk factors for symptom-detected vs. screen-detected breast cancer were observed and most notably, use of combined and estrogen-only HT and a history of benign breast disease were associated with increased risk of symptomatic detected breast cancer. Impact If confirmed, these data suggest that such women may benefit from more intensive screening to facilitate early detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06025-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33398477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; Breast cancer ; Breast diseases ; Cancer ; Cancer research ; Diagnosis ; Disease prevention ; Epidemiology ; Estrogen ; Estrogens ; Health aspects ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Oncology ; Oncology, Experimental ; Prevention ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021-04, Vol.186 (3), p.791-805</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-1ca259724b7730d902ae5166c93e1bdf9226ac21680dd0496fc5c19fc55012d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-1ca259724b7730d902ae5166c93e1bdf9226ac21680dd0496fc5c19fc55012d13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6429-4007</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10549-020-06025-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10549-020-06025-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33398477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gaudet, Mia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deubler, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diver, W. Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puvanesarajah, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Alpa V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gansler, Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gapstur, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><title>Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the Cancer Prevention Study-II</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Background Identifying risk factors for women at high risk of symptom-detected breast cancers that were missed by screening would enable targeting of enhanced screening regimens. To this end, we examined associations of breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection in screened women from the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS)-II Nutrition Cohort. Methods Among 77,206 women followed for a median of 14.8 years, 2711 screen-detected and 1281 symptom-detected breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Multivariable-adjusted associations were estimated using joint Cox proportional hazards regression models with person-time calculated contingent on screening. Results Factors associated with higher risks of symptom-detected and screen-detected breast cancer included current combined hormone therapy (HT) use (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.48 and 1.45, 1.27–1.65, respectively) and history of benign breast disease (1.85, 1.64–2.08 and 1.43, 1.31–1.55, respectively). Current estrogen-only HT use was associated with symptom-detected (1.40, 1.15–1.71) but not screen-detected (0.95, 0.83–1.09) breast cancer. Higher risk of screen-detected but not symptom-detected breast cancer was observed for obese vs. normal body mass index (1.22, 1.01–1.48 and 0.76, 0.56–1.01, respectively), per 3 h/day sitting time (1.10, 1.04–1.16 and 0.97, 0.89–1.06, respectively), and ≥ 2 drinks per day vs. nondrinker (1.40, 1.16–1.69 and 1.27, 0.97–1.66, respectively). Conclusions Differences in risk factors for symptom-detected vs. screen-detected breast cancer were observed and most notably, use of combined and estrogen-only HT and a history of benign breast disease were associated with increased risk of symptomatic detected breast cancer. Impact If confirmed, these data suggest that such women may benefit from more intensive screening to facilitate early detection.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast diseases</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estrogen</subject><subject>Estrogens</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURiMEokPhBVggS0iITeD6J_Z42Y4ojFQJJGBteeybmZTELrYDmrdv0hQKLNjYCx9_-u49VfWcwhsKoN5mCo3QNTCoQQJravagWtFG8Voxqh5WK6BS1XIN8qR6kvMVAGgF-nF1wjnXa6HUqmrPE9pciLPBYSKpy99Ia12JKZPdkQzRI4kt8VjQlS4GYocY9iS7hBjQk59xwEC6QMoByWYJ-ZTwB4Zb-nMZ_bHebp9Wj1rbZ3x2d59WXy_efdl8qC8_vt9uzi5rJ7goNXWWNVoxsVOKg9fALDZUSqc50p1vNWPSOkanmbwHoWXrGkf1dDZAmaf8tHq95F6n-H3EXMzQZYd9bwPGMRsmVCOAA7AJffkPehXHFKZ2hjWwpoIzDvfU3vZoutDGkqybQ82ZnFatJBcz9eoP6oC2L4cc-3HeQf4bZAvoUsw5YWuuUzfYdDQUzCzVLFLNJNXcSjVz0xd3TcfdgP73l18WJ4AvQJ6ewh7T_Sj_ib0B2oOpGw</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Gaudet, Mia M.</creator><creator>Deubler, Emily</creator><creator>Diver, W. Ryan</creator><creator>Puvanesarajah, Samantha</creator><creator>Patel, Alpa V.</creator><creator>Gansler, Ted</creator><creator>Sherman, Mark E.</creator><creator>Gapstur, Susan M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-4007</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the Cancer Prevention Study-II</title><author>Gaudet, Mia M. ; Deubler, Emily ; Diver, W. Ryan ; Puvanesarajah, Samantha ; Patel, Alpa V. ; Gansler, Ted ; Sherman, Mark E. ; Gapstur, Susan M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-1ca259724b7730d902ae5166c93e1bdf9226ac21680dd0496fc5c19fc55012d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast diseases</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estrogen</topic><topic>Estrogens</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gaudet, Mia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deubler, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diver, W. Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puvanesarajah, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Alpa V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gansler, Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gapstur, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gaudet, Mia M.</au><au>Deubler, Emily</au><au>Diver, W. Ryan</au><au>Puvanesarajah, Samantha</au><au>Patel, Alpa V.</au><au>Gansler, Ted</au><au>Sherman, Mark E.</au><au>Gapstur, Susan M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the Cancer Prevention Study-II</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>186</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>805</epage><pages>791-805</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><abstract>Background Identifying risk factors for women at high risk of symptom-detected breast cancers that were missed by screening would enable targeting of enhanced screening regimens. To this end, we examined associations of breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection in screened women from the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS)-II Nutrition Cohort. Methods Among 77,206 women followed for a median of 14.8 years, 2711 screen-detected and 1281 symptom-detected breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Multivariable-adjusted associations were estimated using joint Cox proportional hazards regression models with person-time calculated contingent on screening. Results Factors associated with higher risks of symptom-detected and screen-detected breast cancer included current combined hormone therapy (HT) use (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.48 and 1.45, 1.27–1.65, respectively) and history of benign breast disease (1.85, 1.64–2.08 and 1.43, 1.31–1.55, respectively). Current estrogen-only HT use was associated with symptom-detected (1.40, 1.15–1.71) but not screen-detected (0.95, 0.83–1.09) breast cancer. Higher risk of screen-detected but not symptom-detected breast cancer was observed for obese vs. normal body mass index (1.22, 1.01–1.48 and 0.76, 0.56–1.01, respectively), per 3 h/day sitting time (1.10, 1.04–1.16 and 0.97, 0.89–1.06, respectively), and ≥ 2 drinks per day vs. nondrinker (1.40, 1.16–1.69 and 1.27, 0.97–1.66, respectively). Conclusions Differences in risk factors for symptom-detected vs. screen-detected breast cancer were observed and most notably, use of combined and estrogen-only HT and a history of benign breast disease were associated with increased risk of symptomatic detected breast cancer. Impact If confirmed, these data suggest that such women may benefit from more intensive screening to facilitate early detection.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33398477</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-020-06025-2</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6429-4007</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021-04, Vol.186 (3), p.791-805
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475403002
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Body mass index
Breast cancer
Breast diseases
Cancer
Cancer research
Diagnosis
Disease prevention
Epidemiology
Estrogen
Estrogens
Health aspects
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oncology
Oncology, Experimental
Prevention
Regression analysis
Risk factors
Womens health
title Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the Cancer Prevention Study-II
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T05%3A33%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breast%20cancer%20risk%20factors%20by%20mode%20of%20detection%20among%20screened%20women%20in%20the%20Cancer%20Prevention%20Study-II&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Gaudet,%20Mia%20M.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=805&rft.pages=791-805&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-020-06025-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA657376340%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2508143230&rft_id=info:pmid/33398477&rft_galeid=A657376340&rfr_iscdi=true