Differences in Soil Microbial Community Composition Between Suppressive and Root Rot-Conducive in Tobacco Fields
Soil microorganism has a profound influence on planting growth and disease suppression. However, the difference in microbial community structure between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil and the mechanism of controlling soil-borne diseases by microorganisms in suppressive soil were not clear....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current microbiology 2021-02, Vol.78 (2), p.624-633 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 633 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 624 |
| container_title | Current microbiology |
| container_volume | 78 |
| creator | Ding, Yaru Chen, Yulan Lin, Zhengquan Tuo, Yangyang Li, Hongli Wang, Yan |
| description | Soil microorganism has a profound influence on planting growth and disease suppression. However, the difference in microbial community structure between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil and the mechanism of controlling soil-borne diseases by microorganisms in suppressive soil were not clear. To provide a theoretical foundation for prevention and control of root rot, this paper investigated the change of community structure in rhizosphere soil between suppressive and root rot-conducive tobacco fields. Soil samples were collected during before transplanting, vigorous growing period, and mature period of the tobacco, and bacteria and fungi were analyzed using 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA gene sequencing, respectively. Results showed that bacteria were more sensitive to the change between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil, and fungi were more sensitive to the change of different tobacco growth periods. Compared with conducive soil, tobacco suppressive soil can resist the invasion of pathogens, especially fungi, by regulating soil microbial community structure, and the potential pathogen
Boeremia
was always lower.
Fusarium,
the root rot pathogen, decreased rapidly in the mature period in suppressive soil. Moreover,
norank_o_Gaiellales
and
unclassified_f_Trichocomaceae
had a critical role in suppressive soil in the process of inhibiting root rot, which was obvious in the mature stage. Overall, the results indicated that the composition and structure of the microbial community significantly altered between suppressive and conducive soil along with the growth of tobacco, and suppressive soil could inhibit the occurrence of soil-borne diseases by boosting beneficial bacteria and inhibiting the potential pathogens. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00284-020-02318-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475095974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2475095974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ab279a23fe50c9ae551ec65642ae7aca88edee758ada4e797ca905bbc872203d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhonR2Gv1D7gwk7hxM3r4GmCpV6tNaprUuiYMc8bQzMAIMzX993K9VRMXLoATeM4L4SHkOYXXFEC9KQBMixYY1MGpbvkDsqOCsxaMoQ_JDrjgre4kPSFPSrkBoMwAfUxOOOdGgJY7srwP44gZo8fShNh8SWFqPgefUx_c1OzTPG8xrHeHakklrCHF5h2uPxArvC1LxlLCLTYuDs1VSmud1naf4rD5w3aNvE698z41ZwGnoTwlj0Y3FXx2v56Sr2cfrvef2ovLj-f7txet50qureuZMo7xESV441BKir6TnWAOlfNOaxwQldRucAKVUd4ZkH3vtWIM-MBPyatj7pLT9w3LaudQPE6Ti5i2YplQEow0SlT05T_oTdpyrK-rlO46JphUlWJHqv5NKRlHu-Qwu3xnKdiDD3v0YasP-8uH5bXpxX301s84_Gn5LaAC_AiUehS_Yf57939ifwL3QZa0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486624257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in Soil Microbial Community Composition Between Suppressive and Root Rot-Conducive in Tobacco Fields</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer journals</source><creator>Ding, Yaru ; Chen, Yulan ; Lin, Zhengquan ; Tuo, Yangyang ; Li, Hongli ; Wang, Yan</creator><creatorcontrib>Ding, Yaru ; Chen, Yulan ; Lin, Zhengquan ; Tuo, Yangyang ; Li, Hongli ; Wang, Yan</creatorcontrib><description>Soil microorganism has a profound influence on planting growth and disease suppression. However, the difference in microbial community structure between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil and the mechanism of controlling soil-borne diseases by microorganisms in suppressive soil were not clear. To provide a theoretical foundation for prevention and control of root rot, this paper investigated the change of community structure in rhizosphere soil between suppressive and root rot-conducive tobacco fields. Soil samples were collected during before transplanting, vigorous growing period, and mature period of the tobacco, and bacteria and fungi were analyzed using 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA gene sequencing, respectively. Results showed that bacteria were more sensitive to the change between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil, and fungi were more sensitive to the change of different tobacco growth periods. Compared with conducive soil, tobacco suppressive soil can resist the invasion of pathogens, especially fungi, by regulating soil microbial community structure, and the potential pathogen
Boeremia
was always lower.
Fusarium,
the root rot pathogen, decreased rapidly in the mature period in suppressive soil. Moreover,
norank_o_Gaiellales
and
unclassified_f_Trichocomaceae
had a critical role in suppressive soil in the process of inhibiting root rot, which was obvious in the mature stage. Overall, the results indicated that the composition and structure of the microbial community significantly altered between suppressive and conducive soil along with the growth of tobacco, and suppressive soil could inhibit the occurrence of soil-borne diseases by boosting beneficial bacteria and inhibiting the potential pathogens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0343-8651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00284-020-02318-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33394085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology ; Community composition ; Community structure ; Composition ; Fungi ; Gene sequencing ; Life Sciences ; Microbiology ; Microbiomes ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Nicotiana ; Pathogens ; Plant Diseases - prevention & control ; Plant Roots ; Probiotics ; Rhizosphere ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Root rot ; rRNA 16S ; rRNA 18S ; Soil ; Soil investigations ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil structure ; Soil-borne diseases ; Soils ; Tobacco</subject><ispartof>Current microbiology, 2021-02, Vol.78 (2), p.624-633</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ab279a23fe50c9ae551ec65642ae7aca88edee758ada4e797ca905bbc872203d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ab279a23fe50c9ae551ec65642ae7aca88edee758ada4e797ca905bbc872203d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00284-020-02318-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00284-020-02318-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33394085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ding, Yaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yulan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Zhengquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuo, Yangyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hongli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yan</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in Soil Microbial Community Composition Between Suppressive and Root Rot-Conducive in Tobacco Fields</title><title>Current microbiology</title><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><description>Soil microorganism has a profound influence on planting growth and disease suppression. However, the difference in microbial community structure between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil and the mechanism of controlling soil-borne diseases by microorganisms in suppressive soil were not clear. To provide a theoretical foundation for prevention and control of root rot, this paper investigated the change of community structure in rhizosphere soil between suppressive and root rot-conducive tobacco fields. Soil samples were collected during before transplanting, vigorous growing period, and mature period of the tobacco, and bacteria and fungi were analyzed using 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA gene sequencing, respectively. Results showed that bacteria were more sensitive to the change between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil, and fungi were more sensitive to the change of different tobacco growth periods. Compared with conducive soil, tobacco suppressive soil can resist the invasion of pathogens, especially fungi, by regulating soil microbial community structure, and the potential pathogen
Boeremia
was always lower.
Fusarium,
the root rot pathogen, decreased rapidly in the mature period in suppressive soil. Moreover,
norank_o_Gaiellales
and
unclassified_f_Trichocomaceae
had a critical role in suppressive soil in the process of inhibiting root rot, which was obvious in the mature stage. Overall, the results indicated that the composition and structure of the microbial community significantly altered between suppressive and conducive soil along with the growth of tobacco, and suppressive soil could inhibit the occurrence of soil-borne diseases by boosting beneficial bacteria and inhibiting the potential pathogens.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiomes</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nicotiana</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Plant Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Plant Roots</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Rhizosphere</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Root rot</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>rRNA 18S</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil investigations</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil structure</subject><subject>Soil-borne diseases</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><issn>0343-8651</issn><issn>1432-0991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vFSEUhonR2Gv1D7gwk7hxM3r4GmCpV6tNaprUuiYMc8bQzMAIMzX993K9VRMXLoATeM4L4SHkOYXXFEC9KQBMixYY1MGpbvkDsqOCsxaMoQ_JDrjgre4kPSFPSrkBoMwAfUxOOOdGgJY7srwP44gZo8fShNh8SWFqPgefUx_c1OzTPG8xrHeHakklrCHF5h2uPxArvC1LxlLCLTYuDs1VSmud1naf4rD5w3aNvE698z41ZwGnoTwlj0Y3FXx2v56Sr2cfrvef2ovLj-f7txet50qureuZMo7xESV441BKir6TnWAOlfNOaxwQldRucAKVUd4ZkH3vtWIM-MBPyatj7pLT9w3LaudQPE6Ti5i2YplQEow0SlT05T_oTdpyrK-rlO46JphUlWJHqv5NKRlHu-Qwu3xnKdiDD3v0YasP-8uH5bXpxX301s84_Gn5LaAC_AiUehS_Yf57939ifwL3QZa0</recordid><startdate>20210201</startdate><enddate>20210201</enddate><creator>Ding, Yaru</creator><creator>Chen, Yulan</creator><creator>Lin, Zhengquan</creator><creator>Tuo, Yangyang</creator><creator>Li, Hongli</creator><creator>Wang, Yan</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210201</creationdate><title>Differences in Soil Microbial Community Composition Between Suppressive and Root Rot-Conducive in Tobacco Fields</title><author>Ding, Yaru ; Chen, Yulan ; Lin, Zhengquan ; Tuo, Yangyang ; Li, Hongli ; Wang, Yan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-ab279a23fe50c9ae551ec65642ae7aca88edee758ada4e797ca905bbc872203d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiomes</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nicotiana</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Plant Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Plant Roots</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Rhizosphere</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Root rot</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>rRNA 18S</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil investigations</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil structure</topic><topic>Soil-borne diseases</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ding, Yaru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yulan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Zhengquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuo, Yangyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hongli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ding, Yaru</au><au>Chen, Yulan</au><au>Lin, Zhengquan</au><au>Tuo, Yangyang</au><au>Li, Hongli</au><au>Wang, Yan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in Soil Microbial Community Composition Between Suppressive and Root Rot-Conducive in Tobacco Fields</atitle><jtitle>Current microbiology</jtitle><stitle>Curr Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>Curr Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-02-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>624</spage><epage>633</epage><pages>624-633</pages><issn>0343-8651</issn><eissn>1432-0991</eissn><abstract>Soil microorganism has a profound influence on planting growth and disease suppression. However, the difference in microbial community structure between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil and the mechanism of controlling soil-borne diseases by microorganisms in suppressive soil were not clear. To provide a theoretical foundation for prevention and control of root rot, this paper investigated the change of community structure in rhizosphere soil between suppressive and root rot-conducive tobacco fields. Soil samples were collected during before transplanting, vigorous growing period, and mature period of the tobacco, and bacteria and fungi were analyzed using 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA gene sequencing, respectively. Results showed that bacteria were more sensitive to the change between suppressive and root rot-conducive soil, and fungi were more sensitive to the change of different tobacco growth periods. Compared with conducive soil, tobacco suppressive soil can resist the invasion of pathogens, especially fungi, by regulating soil microbial community structure, and the potential pathogen
Boeremia
was always lower.
Fusarium,
the root rot pathogen, decreased rapidly in the mature period in suppressive soil. Moreover,
norank_o_Gaiellales
and
unclassified_f_Trichocomaceae
had a critical role in suppressive soil in the process of inhibiting root rot, which was obvious in the mature stage. Overall, the results indicated that the composition and structure of the microbial community significantly altered between suppressive and conducive soil along with the growth of tobacco, and suppressive soil could inhibit the occurrence of soil-borne diseases by boosting beneficial bacteria and inhibiting the potential pathogens.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>33394085</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00284-020-02318-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0343-8651 |
| ispartof | Current microbiology, 2021-02, Vol.78 (2), p.624-633 |
| issn | 0343-8651 1432-0991 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2475095974 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer journals |
| subjects | Bacteria Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotechnology Community composition Community structure Composition Fungi Gene sequencing Life Sciences Microbiology Microbiomes Microbiota Microorganisms Nicotiana Pathogens Plant Diseases - prevention & control Plant Roots Probiotics Rhizosphere RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Root rot rRNA 16S rRNA 18S Soil Soil investigations Soil Microbiology Soil microorganisms Soil structure Soil-borne diseases Soils Tobacco |
| title | Differences in Soil Microbial Community Composition Between Suppressive and Root Rot-Conducive in Tobacco Fields |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A30%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20Soil%20Microbial%20Community%20Composition%20Between%20Suppressive%20and%20Root%20Rot-Conducive%20in%20Tobacco%20Fields&rft.jtitle=Current%20microbiology&rft.au=Ding,%20Yaru&rft.date=2021-02-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=624&rft.epage=633&rft.pages=624-633&rft.issn=0343-8651&rft.eissn=1432-0991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00284-020-02318-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2475095974%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486624257&rft_id=info:pmid/33394085&rfr_iscdi=true |