Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research

Nearly half of Americans live with chronic disease. Many have multiple chronic conditions that often present as a combination of physical and mental health conditions. Aligning stakeholder-driven, patient-centered outcomes research with population health strategies such as innovative ways to deliver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary clinical trials 2021-02, Vol.101, p.106256-106256, Article 106256
Hauptverfasser: Kearney, Shannon M., Williams, Kelly, Nikolajski, Cara, Park, Margaret J., Kraemer, Kevin L., Landsittel, Doug, Kang, Chaeryon, Malito, Adelina, Schuster, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 106256
container_issue
container_start_page 106256
container_title Contemporary clinical trials
container_volume 101
creator Kearney, Shannon M.
Williams, Kelly
Nikolajski, Cara
Park, Margaret J.
Kraemer, Kevin L.
Landsittel, Doug
Kang, Chaeryon
Malito, Adelina
Schuster, James
description Nearly half of Americans live with chronic disease. Many have multiple chronic conditions that often present as a combination of physical and mental health conditions. Aligning stakeholder-driven, patient-centered outcomes research with population health strategies such as innovative ways to deliver care management can reduce the burden of multiple chronic conditions. In addition, successfully creating meaningful, inclusive research requires actively engaging stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of a study. This study integrates stakeholder engagement, using a large health plan in western Pennsylvania, to conduct a randomized controlled trial. Three care management strategies, High-Touch, High-Tech, and Usual Care, are compared for effectiveness among members with multiple chronic conditions. Care strategies are delivered via the Community Team, a multidisciplinary community-based team, offering in-person (High-Touch) and digital (High-Tech) care management in 14 counties across Pennsylvania. Participants are followed for 12months, with repeated measurements of self-reported health status and activation in care, while tracking administrative measurements of primary and specialty health service utilization. Quality of life, care satisfaction, engagement in care, and service utilization will be compared using generalized mixed models. Additionally, semi-structured interviews are conducted for both participants and care managers over the course of the study to evaluate feasibility. This manuscript presents implementation strategies, while noting that the implementation of patient-centered outcomes research in a real-world setting requires rapid evaluation, redesign of workflow, and tailored approaches for success.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106256
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474501306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1551714420303347</els_id><sourcerecordid>2474501306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-934b81ad6ac46e77fe6ffee88cdbd56242c4afdafa95b904c2ecdd028310396e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL2O1DAUhS0EYpeFB6BBLmky-H8SqNCKP2mlLYDa8lxfMx6SONjOShS8Ow6zUNLYvtZ3jnQ_Qp5ztuOMm1enHUDdCSa22QhtHpBLrvXQCSbZwz9v3u25UhfkSSknxqTRRj8mF1LKXgoxXJJfn6v7jsc0esw0TouDStNM6xG3acQJ5-pqbF8p0DhX_JZdRU_BZXxNb5cl5brOsUYstCYKaS5xqwop06UFW7yDdmBuobRWSFMjMxZ0GY5PyaPgxoLP7u8r8vX9uy_XH7ub2w-frt_edCC1rN0g1aHnzhsHyuB-H9CEgNj34A9eG6EEKBe8C27Qh4EpEAjeM9FLzuRgUF6Rl-feJacfK5Zqp1gAx9HNmNZihdorzbhkpqH8jEJOpWQMdslxcvmn5cxu1u3JNut2s27P1lvmxX39epjQ_0v81dyAN2cA25J3EbMt0NQA-pixlfkU_1P_G73Xlg8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474501306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kearney, Shannon M. ; Williams, Kelly ; Nikolajski, Cara ; Park, Margaret J. ; Kraemer, Kevin L. ; Landsittel, Doug ; Kang, Chaeryon ; Malito, Adelina ; Schuster, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Kearney, Shannon M. ; Williams, Kelly ; Nikolajski, Cara ; Park, Margaret J. ; Kraemer, Kevin L. ; Landsittel, Doug ; Kang, Chaeryon ; Malito, Adelina ; Schuster, James</creatorcontrib><description>Nearly half of Americans live with chronic disease. Many have multiple chronic conditions that often present as a combination of physical and mental health conditions. Aligning stakeholder-driven, patient-centered outcomes research with population health strategies such as innovative ways to deliver care management can reduce the burden of multiple chronic conditions. In addition, successfully creating meaningful, inclusive research requires actively engaging stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of a study. This study integrates stakeholder engagement, using a large health plan in western Pennsylvania, to conduct a randomized controlled trial. Three care management strategies, High-Touch, High-Tech, and Usual Care, are compared for effectiveness among members with multiple chronic conditions. Care strategies are delivered via the Community Team, a multidisciplinary community-based team, offering in-person (High-Touch) and digital (High-Tech) care management in 14 counties across Pennsylvania. Participants are followed for 12months, with repeated measurements of self-reported health status and activation in care, while tracking administrative measurements of primary and specialty health service utilization. Quality of life, care satisfaction, engagement in care, and service utilization will be compared using generalized mixed models. Additionally, semi-structured interviews are conducted for both participants and care managers over the course of the study to evaluate feasibility. This manuscript presents implementation strategies, while noting that the implementation of patient-centered outcomes research in a real-world setting requires rapid evaluation, redesign of workflow, and tailored approaches for success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106256</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33383229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Care management ; Comparative effectiveness research ; Multiple chronic conditions ; Patient-centered ; Patient-centered outcome research ; Randomized controlled trial ; Stakeholder engagement ; Telehealth</subject><ispartof>Contemporary clinical trials, 2021-02, Vol.101, p.106256-106256, Article 106256</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-934b81ad6ac46e77fe6ffee88cdbd56242c4afdafa95b904c2ecdd028310396e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-934b81ad6ac46e77fe6ffee88cdbd56242c4afdafa95b904c2ecdd028310396e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106256$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33383229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kearney, Shannon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolajski, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Margaret J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraemer, Kevin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landsittel, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Chaeryon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malito, Adelina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, James</creatorcontrib><title>Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research</title><title>Contemporary clinical trials</title><addtitle>Contemp Clin Trials</addtitle><description>Nearly half of Americans live with chronic disease. Many have multiple chronic conditions that often present as a combination of physical and mental health conditions. Aligning stakeholder-driven, patient-centered outcomes research with population health strategies such as innovative ways to deliver care management can reduce the burden of multiple chronic conditions. In addition, successfully creating meaningful, inclusive research requires actively engaging stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of a study. This study integrates stakeholder engagement, using a large health plan in western Pennsylvania, to conduct a randomized controlled trial. Three care management strategies, High-Touch, High-Tech, and Usual Care, are compared for effectiveness among members with multiple chronic conditions. Care strategies are delivered via the Community Team, a multidisciplinary community-based team, offering in-person (High-Touch) and digital (High-Tech) care management in 14 counties across Pennsylvania. Participants are followed for 12months, with repeated measurements of self-reported health status and activation in care, while tracking administrative measurements of primary and specialty health service utilization. Quality of life, care satisfaction, engagement in care, and service utilization will be compared using generalized mixed models. Additionally, semi-structured interviews are conducted for both participants and care managers over the course of the study to evaluate feasibility. This manuscript presents implementation strategies, while noting that the implementation of patient-centered outcomes research in a real-world setting requires rapid evaluation, redesign of workflow, and tailored approaches for success.</description><subject>Care management</subject><subject>Comparative effectiveness research</subject><subject>Multiple chronic conditions</subject><subject>Patient-centered</subject><subject>Patient-centered outcome research</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Stakeholder engagement</subject><subject>Telehealth</subject><issn>1551-7144</issn><issn>1559-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL2O1DAUhS0EYpeFB6BBLmky-H8SqNCKP2mlLYDa8lxfMx6SONjOShS8Ow6zUNLYvtZ3jnQ_Qp5ztuOMm1enHUDdCSa22QhtHpBLrvXQCSbZwz9v3u25UhfkSSknxqTRRj8mF1LKXgoxXJJfn6v7jsc0esw0TouDStNM6xG3acQJ5-pqbF8p0DhX_JZdRU_BZXxNb5cl5brOsUYstCYKaS5xqwop06UFW7yDdmBuobRWSFMjMxZ0GY5PyaPgxoLP7u8r8vX9uy_XH7ub2w-frt_edCC1rN0g1aHnzhsHyuB-H9CEgNj34A9eG6EEKBe8C27Qh4EpEAjeM9FLzuRgUF6Rl-feJacfK5Zqp1gAx9HNmNZihdorzbhkpqH8jEJOpWQMdslxcvmn5cxu1u3JNut2s27P1lvmxX39epjQ_0v81dyAN2cA25J3EbMt0NQA-pixlfkU_1P_G73Xlg8</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Kearney, Shannon M.</creator><creator>Williams, Kelly</creator><creator>Nikolajski, Cara</creator><creator>Park, Margaret J.</creator><creator>Kraemer, Kevin L.</creator><creator>Landsittel, Doug</creator><creator>Kang, Chaeryon</creator><creator>Malito, Adelina</creator><creator>Schuster, James</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research</title><author>Kearney, Shannon M. ; Williams, Kelly ; Nikolajski, Cara ; Park, Margaret J. ; Kraemer, Kevin L. ; Landsittel, Doug ; Kang, Chaeryon ; Malito, Adelina ; Schuster, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-934b81ad6ac46e77fe6ffee88cdbd56242c4afdafa95b904c2ecdd028310396e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Care management</topic><topic>Comparative effectiveness research</topic><topic>Multiple chronic conditions</topic><topic>Patient-centered</topic><topic>Patient-centered outcome research</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Stakeholder engagement</topic><topic>Telehealth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kearney, Shannon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolajski, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Margaret J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraemer, Kevin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landsittel, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Chaeryon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malito, Adelina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, James</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kearney, Shannon M.</au><au>Williams, Kelly</au><au>Nikolajski, Cara</au><au>Park, Margaret J.</au><au>Kraemer, Kevin L.</au><au>Landsittel, Doug</au><au>Kang, Chaeryon</au><au>Malito, Adelina</au><au>Schuster, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle><addtitle>Contemp Clin Trials</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>106256</spage><epage>106256</epage><pages>106256-106256</pages><artnum>106256</artnum><issn>1551-7144</issn><eissn>1559-2030</eissn><abstract>Nearly half of Americans live with chronic disease. Many have multiple chronic conditions that often present as a combination of physical and mental health conditions. Aligning stakeholder-driven, patient-centered outcomes research with population health strategies such as innovative ways to deliver care management can reduce the burden of multiple chronic conditions. In addition, successfully creating meaningful, inclusive research requires actively engaging stakeholders throughout the lifecycle of a study. This study integrates stakeholder engagement, using a large health plan in western Pennsylvania, to conduct a randomized controlled trial. Three care management strategies, High-Touch, High-Tech, and Usual Care, are compared for effectiveness among members with multiple chronic conditions. Care strategies are delivered via the Community Team, a multidisciplinary community-based team, offering in-person (High-Touch) and digital (High-Tech) care management in 14 counties across Pennsylvania. Participants are followed for 12months, with repeated measurements of self-reported health status and activation in care, while tracking administrative measurements of primary and specialty health service utilization. Quality of life, care satisfaction, engagement in care, and service utilization will be compared using generalized mixed models. Additionally, semi-structured interviews are conducted for both participants and care managers over the course of the study to evaluate feasibility. This manuscript presents implementation strategies, while noting that the implementation of patient-centered outcomes research in a real-world setting requires rapid evaluation, redesign of workflow, and tailored approaches for success.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33383229</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cct.2020.106256</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-7144
ispartof Contemporary clinical trials, 2021-02, Vol.101, p.106256-106256, Article 106256
issn 1551-7144
1559-2030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474501306
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Care management
Comparative effectiveness research
Multiple chronic conditions
Patient-centered
Patient-centered outcome research
Randomized controlled trial
Stakeholder engagement
Telehealth
title Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T16%3A10%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stakeholder%20impact%20on%20the%20implementation%20of%20integrated%20care:%20Opportunities%20to%20consider%20for%20patient-centered%20outcomes%20research&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20clinical%20trials&rft.au=Kearney,%20Shannon%20M.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=106256&rft.epage=106256&rft.pages=106256-106256&rft.artnum=106256&rft.issn=1551-7144&rft.eissn=1559-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106256&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2474501306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474501306&rft_id=info:pmid/33383229&rft_els_id=S1551714420303347&rfr_iscdi=true