Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions

Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wound repair and regeneration 2021-03, Vol.29 (2), p.280-283
Hauptverfasser: Sprigle, Stephen, Caminiti, Riley, Varenberg, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 283
container_issue 2
container_start_page 280
container_title Wound repair and regeneration
container_volume 29
creator Sprigle, Stephen
Caminiti, Riley
Varenberg, Michael
description Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333‐0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333‐0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin‐linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/wrr.12880
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474499616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2474499616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3910-e0000529f9e54fdbb5f783ee703d7d2b80ef2323c184e09e06298404abe0a9753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1KwzAUgIMobk4vfAHJpV50y1_b5FKGU2EgiKJ3IU1PNdK1M2k3ducj-Iw-iZ2d3pmbkwMfH4cPoVNKxrR7k7X3Y8qkJHtoSGMmIpHGz_vdnyRpRBVLB-gohDdCSBwreYgGnHPJY8WHSM-8s42rK2xfjTe2Ae9C42zAdYGXHlZQNaZxK8Druq1ynHsIwVUvAXcbeGxLVzlrynLz9fHpoYSVqRps6yp3W2s4RgeFKQOc7OYIPc6uHqY30fzu-nZ6OY8sV5REQLbHMVUoiEWRZ1lcpJIDpITnac4ySaBgnHFLpQCigCRMSUGEyYAYlcZ8hM5779LX7y2ERi9csFCWpoK6DZqJVAilEpp06EWPWl-H4KHQS-8Wxm80JXrbU3c99U_Pjj3badtsAfkf-RuwAyY9sHYlbP436af7-175DZK0gnY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474499616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sprigle, Stephen ; Caminiti, Riley ; Varenberg, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Sprigle, Stephen ; Caminiti, Riley ; Varenberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333‐0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333‐0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin‐linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-1927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-475X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12880</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33383593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bandages ; Friction ; Humans ; Pressure Ulcer - prevention &amp; control ; Skin ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Wound repair and regeneration, 2021-03, Vol.29 (2), p.280-283</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Wound Healing Society</rights><rights>2020 by the Wound Healing Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3910-e0000529f9e54fdbb5f783ee703d7d2b80ef2323c184e09e06298404abe0a9753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3910-e0000529f9e54fdbb5f783ee703d7d2b80ef2323c184e09e06298404abe0a9753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0462-0138</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwrr.12880$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwrr.12880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33383593$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sprigle, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caminiti, Riley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varenberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions</title><title>Wound repair and regeneration</title><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><description>Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333‐0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333‐0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin‐linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen.</description><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>1067-1927</issn><issn>1524-475X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1KwzAUgIMobk4vfAHJpV50y1_b5FKGU2EgiKJ3IU1PNdK1M2k3ducj-Iw-iZ2d3pmbkwMfH4cPoVNKxrR7k7X3Y8qkJHtoSGMmIpHGz_vdnyRpRBVLB-gohDdCSBwreYgGnHPJY8WHSM-8s42rK2xfjTe2Ae9C42zAdYGXHlZQNaZxK8Druq1ynHsIwVUvAXcbeGxLVzlrynLz9fHpoYSVqRps6yp3W2s4RgeFKQOc7OYIPc6uHqY30fzu-nZ6OY8sV5REQLbHMVUoiEWRZ1lcpJIDpITnac4ySaBgnHFLpQCigCRMSUGEyYAYlcZ8hM5779LX7y2ERi9csFCWpoK6DZqJVAilEpp06EWPWl-H4KHQS-8Wxm80JXrbU3c99U_Pjj3badtsAfkf-RuwAyY9sHYlbP436af7-175DZK0gnY</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Sprigle, Stephen</creator><creator>Caminiti, Riley</creator><creator>Varenberg, Michael</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-0138</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions</title><author>Sprigle, Stephen ; Caminiti, Riley ; Varenberg, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3910-e0000529f9e54fdbb5f783ee703d7d2b80ef2323c184e09e06298404abe0a9753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sprigle, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caminiti, Riley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varenberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sprigle, Stephen</au><au>Caminiti, Riley</au><au>Varenberg, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions</atitle><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>280-283</pages><issn>1067-1927</issn><eissn>1524-475X</eissn><abstract>Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333‐0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333‐0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin‐linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33383593</pmid><doi>10.1111/wrr.12880</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-0138</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-1927
ispartof Wound repair and regeneration, 2021-03, Vol.29 (2), p.280-283
issn 1067-1927
1524-475X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474499616
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Bandages
Friction
Humans
Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control
Skin
Wound Healing
title Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T13%3A20%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Friction%20characteristics%20of%20preventative%20wound%20dressings%20under%20clinically%E2%80%90relevant%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Wound%20repair%20and%20regeneration&rft.au=Sprigle,%20Stephen&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=280-283&rft.issn=1067-1927&rft.eissn=1524-475X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wrr.12880&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2474499616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474499616&rft_id=info:pmid/33383593&rfr_iscdi=true