Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions
Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wound repair and regeneration 2021-03, Vol.29 (2), p.280-283 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 283 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 280 |
container_title | Wound repair and regeneration |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Sprigle, Stephen Caminiti, Riley Varenberg, Michael |
description | Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333‐0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333‐0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin‐linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/wrr.12880 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474499616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2474499616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3910-e0000529f9e54fdbb5f783ee703d7d2b80ef2323c184e09e06298404abe0a9753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kN1KwzAUgIMobk4vfAHJpV50y1_b5FKGU2EgiKJ3IU1PNdK1M2k3ducj-Iw-iZ2d3pmbkwMfH4cPoVNKxrR7k7X3Y8qkJHtoSGMmIpHGz_vdnyRpRBVLB-gohDdCSBwreYgGnHPJY8WHSM-8s42rK2xfjTe2Ae9C42zAdYGXHlZQNaZxK8Druq1ynHsIwVUvAXcbeGxLVzlrynLz9fHpoYSVqRps6yp3W2s4RgeFKQOc7OYIPc6uHqY30fzu-nZ6OY8sV5REQLbHMVUoiEWRZ1lcpJIDpITnac4ySaBgnHFLpQCigCRMSUGEyYAYlcZ8hM5779LX7y2ERi9csFCWpoK6DZqJVAilEpp06EWPWl-H4KHQS-8Wxm80JXrbU3c99U_Pjj3badtsAfkf-RuwAyY9sHYlbP436af7-175DZK0gnY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2474499616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Sprigle, Stephen ; Caminiti, Riley ; Varenberg, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Sprigle, Stephen ; Caminiti, Riley ; Varenberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333‐0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333‐0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin‐linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-1927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-475X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12880</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33383593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bandages ; Friction ; Humans ; Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control ; Skin ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Wound repair and regeneration, 2021-03, Vol.29 (2), p.280-283</ispartof><rights>2020 by the Wound Healing Society</rights><rights>2020 by the Wound Healing Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3910-e0000529f9e54fdbb5f783ee703d7d2b80ef2323c184e09e06298404abe0a9753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3910-e0000529f9e54fdbb5f783ee703d7d2b80ef2323c184e09e06298404abe0a9753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0462-0138</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fwrr.12880$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fwrr.12880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33383593$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sprigle, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caminiti, Riley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varenberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions</title><title>Wound repair and regeneration</title><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><description>Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333‐0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333‐0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin‐linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen.</description><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>1067-1927</issn><issn>1524-475X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kN1KwzAUgIMobk4vfAHJpV50y1_b5FKGU2EgiKJ3IU1PNdK1M2k3ducj-Iw-iZ2d3pmbkwMfH4cPoVNKxrR7k7X3Y8qkJHtoSGMmIpHGz_vdnyRpRBVLB-gohDdCSBwreYgGnHPJY8WHSM-8s42rK2xfjTe2Ae9C42zAdYGXHlZQNaZxK8Druq1ynHsIwVUvAXcbeGxLVzlrynLz9fHpoYSVqRps6yp3W2s4RgeFKQOc7OYIPc6uHqY30fzu-nZ6OY8sV5REQLbHMVUoiEWRZ1lcpJIDpITnac4ySaBgnHFLpQCigCRMSUGEyYAYlcZ8hM5779LX7y2ERi9csFCWpoK6DZqJVAilEpp06EWPWl-H4KHQS-8Wxm80JXrbU3c99U_Pjj3badtsAfkf-RuwAyY9sHYlbP436af7-175DZK0gnY</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Sprigle, Stephen</creator><creator>Caminiti, Riley</creator><creator>Varenberg, Michael</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-0138</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions</title><author>Sprigle, Stephen ; Caminiti, Riley ; Varenberg, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3910-e0000529f9e54fdbb5f783ee703d7d2b80ef2323c184e09e06298404abe0a9753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sprigle, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caminiti, Riley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varenberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sprigle, Stephen</au><au>Caminiti, Riley</au><au>Varenberg, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions</atitle><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>280</spage><epage>283</epage><pages>280-283</pages><issn>1067-1927</issn><eissn>1524-475X</eissn><abstract>Wound dressings can be used prophylactically or during actual treatment. Preventative dressings have become a standard of care to prevent pressure ulcers in patients while in bed. While the mechanism of the preventative benefit has not been completely explained, the friction between the dressing and linen is hypothesized as being a key performance factor. The objective of this project was to quantify the static and kinetic coefficients of friction (COF) of various brands of prophylactic dressings under the stresses experienced in situ, while the dressings are in contact with bed linen materials. The COF of six commercial dressings were calculated using tribometer measurements. The ranges of static COF were 0.333‐0.542 and kinetic COF were 0.333‐0.513. Four dressings exhibited COF that were consistent with skin‐linen values reported in the literature and all dressing COF appear to be lower than the COF of moist skin against linen.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33383593</pmid><doi>10.1111/wrr.12880</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-0138</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1067-1927 |
ispartof | Wound repair and regeneration, 2021-03, Vol.29 (2), p.280-283 |
issn | 1067-1927 1524-475X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474499616 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Bandages Friction Humans Pressure Ulcer - prevention & control Skin Wound Healing |
title | Friction characteristics of preventative wound dressings under clinically‐relevant conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T13%3A20%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Friction%20characteristics%20of%20preventative%20wound%20dressings%20under%20clinically%E2%80%90relevant%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Wound%20repair%20and%20regeneration&rft.au=Sprigle,%20Stephen&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=280&rft.epage=283&rft.pages=280-283&rft.issn=1067-1927&rft.eissn=1524-475X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wrr.12880&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2474499616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2474499616&rft_id=info:pmid/33383593&rfr_iscdi=true |