Student pacing in a master's level course: Procrastination, preference, and performance
Previous research has shown that many students procrastinate, but wish that they did not do so. The current study replicated research that compared distribution of studying under contingent access to study materials and noncontingent access to study materials in a graduate‐level course (Perrin et al...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied behavior analysis 2021-06, Vol.54 (3), p.1220-1234 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1234 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1220 |
| container_title | Journal of applied behavior analysis |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Bird, Zachary Chase, Philip N. |
| description | Previous research has shown that many students procrastinate, but wish that they did not do so. The current study replicated research that compared distribution of studying under contingent access to study materials and noncontingent access to study materials in a graduate‐level course (Perrin et al., 2011). It extended Perrin et al. (2011) in three ways. First, it evaluated preference for the treatment using a choice procedure; second, the choice procedure allowed for the elimination of an order confound; and third, different measures were used to evaluate performance results. Although contingent access to study materials was successful at reducing procrastination, students typically chose the noncontingent access condition. Preference on the end‐of‐semester survey aligned with choices made throughout the semester. The data are discussed in terms of implications and recommendations for future research regarding the design of graduate coursework to address student pacing along with student and professor preference. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jaba.806 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474498276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1305589</ericid><sourcerecordid>2552117106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3716-dd9bb58fa68ee10dce6136bf735836dfcff00ab0074511bac82802d705b0eb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1rFDEUhoNY7LYK_oFKwIt60aknk8nH9m4t1XZZULDgZUgyZ2SWmcw0mVH67826tQWhV4HzPLwn5yXkLYNzBlB-3FpnzzXIF2TBllwXXAF_SRYZsUJrIQ7JUUpbAFaCFK_IIedcaSGrBfnxfZprDBMdrW_DT9oGamlv04TxNNEOf2FH_TDHhBf0Wxx8zKgNdmqHcEbHiA1GDB7PqA01HTE2Q-xtHrwmB43tEr55eI_J7eer28vrYvP1y83lalN4rpgs6nrpnNCNlRqRQe1RMi5do7jQXNaNbxoA6wBUJRhz1utSQ1krEA7QAT8mH_axYxzuZkyT6dvksetswGFOpqxUVS11qWRW3_-nbvNdIX_OlEKUjCkG8inQxyGlfJ8ZY9vbeG8YmF3XZte10X_Vdw-Bs-uxfhT_lZuFk72AsfWP-GrNOAihl5kXe_677fD-2UVmvfq02i38A2jdkQ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2552117106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student pacing in a master's level course: Procrastination, preference, and performance</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bird, Zachary ; Chase, Philip N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bird, Zachary ; Chase, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has shown that many students procrastinate, but wish that they did not do so. The current study replicated research that compared distribution of studying under contingent access to study materials and noncontingent access to study materials in a graduate‐level course (Perrin et al., 2011). It extended Perrin et al. (2011) in three ways. First, it evaluated preference for the treatment using a choice procedure; second, the choice procedure allowed for the elimination of an order confound; and third, different measures were used to evaluate performance results. Although contingent access to study materials was successful at reducing procrastination, students typically chose the noncontingent access condition. Preference on the end‐of‐semester survey aligned with choices made throughout the semester. The data are discussed in terms of implications and recommendations for future research regarding the design of graduate coursework to address student pacing along with student and professor preference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8855</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jaba.806</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33378564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>choice ; contingency ; graduate student ; Graduate Students ; Instructional Materials ; online learning ; Pacing ; Performance Factors ; Preferences ; procrastination ; student pacing ; Study Habits ; Time Management</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2021-06, Vol.54 (3), p.1220-1234</ispartof><rights>2020 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (SEAB)</rights><rights>2020 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2021 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3716-dd9bb58fa68ee10dce6136bf735836dfcff00ab0074511bac82802d705b0eb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3716-dd9bb58fa68ee10dce6136bf735836dfcff00ab0074511bac82802d705b0eb03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7008-8621 ; 0000-0001-9388-544X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjaba.806$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjaba.806$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1305589$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33378564$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bird, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><title>Student pacing in a master's level course: Procrastination, preference, and performance</title><title>Journal of applied behavior analysis</title><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><description>Previous research has shown that many students procrastinate, but wish that they did not do so. The current study replicated research that compared distribution of studying under contingent access to study materials and noncontingent access to study materials in a graduate‐level course (Perrin et al., 2011). It extended Perrin et al. (2011) in three ways. First, it evaluated preference for the treatment using a choice procedure; second, the choice procedure allowed for the elimination of an order confound; and third, different measures were used to evaluate performance results. Although contingent access to study materials was successful at reducing procrastination, students typically chose the noncontingent access condition. Preference on the end‐of‐semester survey aligned with choices made throughout the semester. The data are discussed in terms of implications and recommendations for future research regarding the design of graduate coursework to address student pacing along with student and professor preference.</description><subject>choice</subject><subject>contingency</subject><subject>graduate student</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>online learning</subject><subject>Pacing</subject><subject>Performance Factors</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>procrastination</subject><subject>student pacing</subject><subject>Study Habits</subject><subject>Time Management</subject><issn>0021-8855</issn><issn>1938-3703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1rFDEUhoNY7LYK_oFKwIt60aknk8nH9m4t1XZZULDgZUgyZ2SWmcw0mVH67826tQWhV4HzPLwn5yXkLYNzBlB-3FpnzzXIF2TBllwXXAF_SRYZsUJrIQ7JUUpbAFaCFK_IIedcaSGrBfnxfZprDBMdrW_DT9oGamlv04TxNNEOf2FH_TDHhBf0Wxx8zKgNdmqHcEbHiA1GDB7PqA01HTE2Q-xtHrwmB43tEr55eI_J7eer28vrYvP1y83lalN4rpgs6nrpnNCNlRqRQe1RMi5do7jQXNaNbxoA6wBUJRhz1utSQ1krEA7QAT8mH_axYxzuZkyT6dvksetswGFOpqxUVS11qWRW3_-nbvNdIX_OlEKUjCkG8inQxyGlfJ8ZY9vbeG8YmF3XZte10X_Vdw-Bs-uxfhT_lZuFk72AsfWP-GrNOAihl5kXe_677fD-2UVmvfq02i38A2jdkQ4</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Bird, Zachary</creator><creator>Chase, Philip N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-8621</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-544X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Student pacing in a master's level course: Procrastination, preference, and performance</title><author>Bird, Zachary ; Chase, Philip N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3716-dd9bb58fa68ee10dce6136bf735836dfcff00ab0074511bac82802d705b0eb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>choice</topic><topic>contingency</topic><topic>graduate student</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>online learning</topic><topic>Pacing</topic><topic>Performance Factors</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>procrastination</topic><topic>student pacing</topic><topic>Study Habits</topic><topic>Time Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bird, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chase, Philip N.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bird, Zachary</au><au>Chase, Philip N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1305589</ericid><atitle>Student pacing in a master's level course: Procrastination, preference, and performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1220</spage><epage>1234</epage><pages>1220-1234</pages><issn>0021-8855</issn><eissn>1938-3703</eissn><abstract>Previous research has shown that many students procrastinate, but wish that they did not do so. The current study replicated research that compared distribution of studying under contingent access to study materials and noncontingent access to study materials in a graduate‐level course (Perrin et al., 2011). It extended Perrin et al. (2011) in three ways. First, it evaluated preference for the treatment using a choice procedure; second, the choice procedure allowed for the elimination of an order confound; and third, different measures were used to evaluate performance results. Although contingent access to study materials was successful at reducing procrastination, students typically chose the noncontingent access condition. Preference on the end‐of‐semester survey aligned with choices made throughout the semester. The data are discussed in terms of implications and recommendations for future research regarding the design of graduate coursework to address student pacing along with student and professor preference.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33378564</pmid><doi>10.1002/jaba.806</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7008-8621</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-544X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8855 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2021-06, Vol.54 (3), p.1220-1234 |
| issn | 0021-8855 1938-3703 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474498276 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PubMed Central |
| subjects | choice contingency graduate student Graduate Students Instructional Materials online learning Pacing Performance Factors Preferences procrastination student pacing Study Habits Time Management |
| title | Student pacing in a master's level course: Procrastination, preference, and performance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A05%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20pacing%20in%20a%20master's%20level%20course:%20Procrastination,%20preference,%20and%20performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20behavior%20analysis&rft.au=Bird,%20Zachary&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1220&rft.epage=1234&rft.pages=1220-1234&rft.issn=0021-8855&rft.eissn=1938-3703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jaba.806&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2552117106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2552117106&rft_id=info:pmid/33378564&rft_ericid=EJ1305589&rfr_iscdi=true |