Late-stage Product Development and Approvals by Biotechnology Companies After Initial Public Offering, 1997–2016

This work describes the late-stage product portfolios of the biotechnology companies that completed initial public offerings (IPOs) from 1997 to 2016. We asked whether these emerging companies continue to develop innovative, biologic products and produce the innovation promised by the early biotechn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical therapeutics 2021-01, Vol.43 (1), p.156-171.e15
Hauptverfasser: McNamee, Laura M., Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina, Zhang, Sunyi, Salim, Usama, Ledley, Fred D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 171.e15
container_issue 1
container_start_page 156
container_title Clinical therapeutics
container_volume 43
creator McNamee, Laura M.
Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina
Zhang, Sunyi
Salim, Usama
Ledley, Fred D.
description This work describes the late-stage product portfolios of the biotechnology companies that completed initial public offerings (IPOs) from 1997 to 2016. We asked whether these emerging companies continue to develop innovative, biologic products and produce the innovation promised by the early biotechnology industry. We identified therapeutic products that reached Phase III development from 1997 to 2016, the characteristics of the products, the dates of the initiation of Phase III and product approval, proxy indicators of the innovativeness of each product, and the contribution of each biotechnology company. Companies were characterized by IPO window and clinical status of the most advanced product at IPO. Time from IPO to Phase III or approval, and the estimated probability of a company having a product advance to these milestones, were examined using Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 319 biotechnology companies completed IPOs from 1997 to 2016. These companies contributed to the development of 367 products that progressed to Phase III, and of 144 new drug approvals, through 2016. The estimated probability of a company having a product reach Phase III was 78%, and the estimated probability of a company receiving at least 1 product approval was 52%, with most approvals occurring >5 years after IPO. Small-molecule drugs represented 74% of products reaching Phase III and 78% of approvals. Reformulations represented 36% of Phase III products and 46% of approvals. The estimated probability of product approval was significantly higher for reformulations than new molecular entities (NMEs) and slightly higher for small molecules than biologics. The estimated probability of a company receiving product approval varied significantly by IPO window and was greater for companies with Phase III products at IPO (74%). These companies contributed to the development of 78 NMEs, 44% of which were classified as first in class, initiating development of 69% and contributing to the clinical development of 96%. These products represented 16% of all NMEs and 28% of biologics approved between 1997 and 2016. Seven products achieved per-annum sales of >$1 billion during the study period. The majority of emerging publicly owned biotechnology companies contribute to products that advance to Phase III development and approval, although these companies are no longer distinctively focused on biologic products. •Biotech companies with IPOs from 1997–2016 contributed to 367 phase 3 products
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.11.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474464891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149291820305221</els_id><sourcerecordid>2474464891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9682e2d5b9c4d4168fbe213d234cc84b24b7fc08862be0065091bcc32a5946293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEURi0EomnhFcASGxad4L_M2MsQoFSK1C5AYmd5PHdSRzP2YHsiZcc78IZ9ElyldMGG1ZWsc7_7yQeht5QsKaH1h_3SDs7nO4hmyQgrr3RJKHuGFlQ2qqJU_HiOFoQKVTFF5Rk6T2lPCOFqxV6iM865JLzmCxS3JkOVstkBvo2hm23Gn-AAQ5hG8Bkb3-H1NMVwMEPC7RF_dCGDvfNhCLsj3oRxMt5Bwus-Q8TX3mVnBnw7t4Oz-KbvITq_u8RUqeb-129Wyr9CL_oSBq8f5wX6_uXzt83Xantzdb1ZbyvLlcqVqiUD1q1aZUUnaC37FhjlHePCWilaJtqmt0TKmrVASL0iirbWcmZWStRM8Qv0_pRb2v-cIWU9umRhGIyHMCfNRCNELaSiBX33D7oPc_SlXaEUIbIWqilUc6JsDClF6PUU3WjiUVOiH7TovX7Soh-0aEp10VI23zzmz-0I3dPeXw8FWJ8AKB9ycBB1sg68hc5FsFl3wf33yB9v0qHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490086497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Late-stage Product Development and Approvals by Biotechnology Companies After Initial Public Offering, 1997–2016</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>McNamee, Laura M. ; Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina ; Zhang, Sunyi ; Salim, Usama ; Ledley, Fred D.</creator><creatorcontrib>McNamee, Laura M. ; Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina ; Zhang, Sunyi ; Salim, Usama ; Ledley, Fred D.</creatorcontrib><description>This work describes the late-stage product portfolios of the biotechnology companies that completed initial public offerings (IPOs) from 1997 to 2016. We asked whether these emerging companies continue to develop innovative, biologic products and produce the innovation promised by the early biotechnology industry. We identified therapeutic products that reached Phase III development from 1997 to 2016, the characteristics of the products, the dates of the initiation of Phase III and product approval, proxy indicators of the innovativeness of each product, and the contribution of each biotechnology company. Companies were characterized by IPO window and clinical status of the most advanced product at IPO. Time from IPO to Phase III or approval, and the estimated probability of a company having a product advance to these milestones, were examined using Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 319 biotechnology companies completed IPOs from 1997 to 2016. These companies contributed to the development of 367 products that progressed to Phase III, and of 144 new drug approvals, through 2016. The estimated probability of a company having a product reach Phase III was 78%, and the estimated probability of a company receiving at least 1 product approval was 52%, with most approvals occurring &gt;5 years after IPO. Small-molecule drugs represented 74% of products reaching Phase III and 78% of approvals. Reformulations represented 36% of Phase III products and 46% of approvals. The estimated probability of product approval was significantly higher for reformulations than new molecular entities (NMEs) and slightly higher for small molecules than biologics. The estimated probability of a company receiving product approval varied significantly by IPO window and was greater for companies with Phase III products at IPO (74%). These companies contributed to the development of 78 NMEs, 44% of which were classified as first in class, initiating development of 69% and contributing to the clinical development of 96%. These products represented 16% of all NMEs and 28% of biologics approved between 1997 and 2016. Seven products achieved per-annum sales of &gt;$1 billion during the study period. The majority of emerging publicly owned biotechnology companies contribute to products that advance to Phase III development and approval, although these companies are no longer distinctively focused on biologic products. •Biotech companies with IPOs from 1997–2016 contributed to 367 phase 3 products and 144 approvals.•Small molecules represented 74% of phase 3 products and 78% of approvals.•Reformulations represented 36% of phase 3 products and 46% of approvals.•Approvals included 78 new molecular entities, of which 44% were first-in-class.•Companies had an 78% probability of a product reaching phase 3 and 52% probability of approval.•Public biotech companies contribute to initiating drug development with wide range of technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.11.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33380363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Annual reports ; Biological Products ; Biotechnology ; biotechnology company ; Biotechnology industry ; clinical trials ; Drug Development ; FDA approval ; Genomics ; initial public offering ; Initial public offerings ; Intellectual property ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Probability ; Product development ; Registration</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2021-01, Vol.43 (1), p.156-171.e15</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9682e2d5b9c4d4168fbe213d234cc84b24b7fc08862be0065091bcc32a5946293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9682e2d5b9c4d4168fbe213d234cc84b24b7fc08862be0065091bcc32a5946293</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1917-7933</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149291820305221$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33380363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McNamee, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Sunyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salim, Usama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledley, Fred D.</creatorcontrib><title>Late-stage Product Development and Approvals by Biotechnology Companies After Initial Public Offering, 1997–2016</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>This work describes the late-stage product portfolios of the biotechnology companies that completed initial public offerings (IPOs) from 1997 to 2016. We asked whether these emerging companies continue to develop innovative, biologic products and produce the innovation promised by the early biotechnology industry. We identified therapeutic products that reached Phase III development from 1997 to 2016, the characteristics of the products, the dates of the initiation of Phase III and product approval, proxy indicators of the innovativeness of each product, and the contribution of each biotechnology company. Companies were characterized by IPO window and clinical status of the most advanced product at IPO. Time from IPO to Phase III or approval, and the estimated probability of a company having a product advance to these milestones, were examined using Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 319 biotechnology companies completed IPOs from 1997 to 2016. These companies contributed to the development of 367 products that progressed to Phase III, and of 144 new drug approvals, through 2016. The estimated probability of a company having a product reach Phase III was 78%, and the estimated probability of a company receiving at least 1 product approval was 52%, with most approvals occurring &gt;5 years after IPO. Small-molecule drugs represented 74% of products reaching Phase III and 78% of approvals. Reformulations represented 36% of Phase III products and 46% of approvals. The estimated probability of product approval was significantly higher for reformulations than new molecular entities (NMEs) and slightly higher for small molecules than biologics. The estimated probability of a company receiving product approval varied significantly by IPO window and was greater for companies with Phase III products at IPO (74%). These companies contributed to the development of 78 NMEs, 44% of which were classified as first in class, initiating development of 69% and contributing to the clinical development of 96%. These products represented 16% of all NMEs and 28% of biologics approved between 1997 and 2016. Seven products achieved per-annum sales of &gt;$1 billion during the study period. The majority of emerging publicly owned biotechnology companies contribute to products that advance to Phase III development and approval, although these companies are no longer distinctively focused on biologic products. •Biotech companies with IPOs from 1997–2016 contributed to 367 phase 3 products and 144 approvals.•Small molecules represented 74% of phase 3 products and 78% of approvals.•Reformulations represented 36% of phase 3 products and 46% of approvals.•Approvals included 78 new molecular entities, of which 44% were first-in-class.•Companies had an 78% probability of a product reaching phase 3 and 52% probability of approval.•Public biotech companies contribute to initiating drug development with wide range of technology.</description><subject>Annual reports</subject><subject>Biological Products</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>biotechnology company</subject><subject>Biotechnology industry</subject><subject>clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug Development</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>initial public offering</subject><subject>Initial public offerings</subject><subject>Intellectual property</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Registration</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEURi0EomnhFcASGxad4L_M2MsQoFSK1C5AYmd5PHdSRzP2YHsiZcc78IZ9ElyldMGG1ZWsc7_7yQeht5QsKaH1h_3SDs7nO4hmyQgrr3RJKHuGFlQ2qqJU_HiOFoQKVTFF5Rk6T2lPCOFqxV6iM865JLzmCxS3JkOVstkBvo2hm23Gn-AAQ5hG8Bkb3-H1NMVwMEPC7RF_dCGDvfNhCLsj3oRxMt5Bwus-Q8TX3mVnBnw7t4Oz-KbvITq_u8RUqeb-129Wyr9CL_oSBq8f5wX6_uXzt83Xantzdb1ZbyvLlcqVqiUD1q1aZUUnaC37FhjlHePCWilaJtqmt0TKmrVASL0iirbWcmZWStRM8Qv0_pRb2v-cIWU9umRhGIyHMCfNRCNELaSiBX33D7oPc_SlXaEUIbIWqilUc6JsDClF6PUU3WjiUVOiH7TovX7Soh-0aEp10VI23zzmz-0I3dPeXw8FWJ8AKB9ycBB1sg68hc5FsFl3wf33yB9v0qHA</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>McNamee, Laura M.</creator><creator>Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina</creator><creator>Zhang, Sunyi</creator><creator>Salim, Usama</creator><creator>Ledley, Fred D.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-7933</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Late-stage Product Development and Approvals by Biotechnology Companies After Initial Public Offering, 1997–2016</title><author>McNamee, Laura M. ; Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina ; Zhang, Sunyi ; Salim, Usama ; Ledley, Fred D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-9682e2d5b9c4d4168fbe213d234cc84b24b7fc08862be0065091bcc32a5946293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Annual reports</topic><topic>Biological Products</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>biotechnology company</topic><topic>Biotechnology industry</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug Development</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>initial public offering</topic><topic>Initial public offerings</topic><topic>Intellectual property</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Registration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McNamee, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Sunyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salim, Usama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ledley, Fred D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McNamee, Laura M.</au><au>Cleary, Ekaterina Galkina</au><au>Zhang, Sunyi</au><au>Salim, Usama</au><au>Ledley, Fred D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Late-stage Product Development and Approvals by Biotechnology Companies After Initial Public Offering, 1997–2016</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>171.e15</epage><pages>156-171.e15</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>This work describes the late-stage product portfolios of the biotechnology companies that completed initial public offerings (IPOs) from 1997 to 2016. We asked whether these emerging companies continue to develop innovative, biologic products and produce the innovation promised by the early biotechnology industry. We identified therapeutic products that reached Phase III development from 1997 to 2016, the characteristics of the products, the dates of the initiation of Phase III and product approval, proxy indicators of the innovativeness of each product, and the contribution of each biotechnology company. Companies were characterized by IPO window and clinical status of the most advanced product at IPO. Time from IPO to Phase III or approval, and the estimated probability of a company having a product advance to these milestones, were examined using Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 319 biotechnology companies completed IPOs from 1997 to 2016. These companies contributed to the development of 367 products that progressed to Phase III, and of 144 new drug approvals, through 2016. The estimated probability of a company having a product reach Phase III was 78%, and the estimated probability of a company receiving at least 1 product approval was 52%, with most approvals occurring &gt;5 years after IPO. Small-molecule drugs represented 74% of products reaching Phase III and 78% of approvals. Reformulations represented 36% of Phase III products and 46% of approvals. The estimated probability of product approval was significantly higher for reformulations than new molecular entities (NMEs) and slightly higher for small molecules than biologics. The estimated probability of a company receiving product approval varied significantly by IPO window and was greater for companies with Phase III products at IPO (74%). These companies contributed to the development of 78 NMEs, 44% of which were classified as first in class, initiating development of 69% and contributing to the clinical development of 96%. These products represented 16% of all NMEs and 28% of biologics approved between 1997 and 2016. Seven products achieved per-annum sales of &gt;$1 billion during the study period. The majority of emerging publicly owned biotechnology companies contribute to products that advance to Phase III development and approval, although these companies are no longer distinctively focused on biologic products. •Biotech companies with IPOs from 1997–2016 contributed to 367 phase 3 products and 144 approvals.•Small molecules represented 74% of phase 3 products and 78% of approvals.•Reformulations represented 36% of phase 3 products and 46% of approvals.•Approvals included 78 new molecular entities, of which 44% were first-in-class.•Companies had an 78% probability of a product reaching phase 3 and 52% probability of approval.•Public biotech companies contribute to initiating drug development with wide range of technology.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33380363</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.11.012</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-7933</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2918
ispartof Clinical therapeutics, 2021-01, Vol.43 (1), p.156-171.e15
issn 0149-2918
1879-114X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2474464891
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Annual reports
Biological Products
Biotechnology
biotechnology company
Biotechnology industry
clinical trials
Drug Development
FDA approval
Genomics
initial public offering
Initial public offerings
Intellectual property
Pharmaceutical industry
Probability
Product development
Registration
title Late-stage Product Development and Approvals by Biotechnology Companies After Initial Public Offering, 1997–2016
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T04%3A58%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Late-stage%20Product%20Development%20and%20Approvals%20by%20Biotechnology%20Companies%20After%20Initial%20Public%20Offering,%201997%E2%80%932016&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=McNamee,%20Laura%20M.&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=171.e15&rft.pages=156-171.e15&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2474464891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490086497&rft_id=info:pmid/33380363&rft_els_id=S0149291820305221&rfr_iscdi=true