Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in situs inversus dextrocardia: Challenge, improved procedure, outcomes, and literature review

Introduction Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF‐CA) in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia (SID) can be challenging because of the contrary anatomy and associated anomalies. Cases and literature regarding AF‐CA in SID are rare and provide little information. Our study aims to presen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2021-02, Vol.44 (2), p.293-305
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Xin, Su, Xin, Long, De‐Yong, Sang, Cai‐Hua, Bai, Rong, Tang, Ri‐Bo, Liu, Nian, Jiang, Chen‐Xi, Li, Song‐Nan, Guo, Xue‐Yuan, Wang, Wei, Xin, Du, Dong, Jian‐Zeng, Yu, Rong‐Hui, Ma, Chang‐Sheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 305
container_issue 2
container_start_page 293
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 44
creator Zhao, Xin
Su, Xin
Long, De‐Yong
Sang, Cai‐Hua
Bai, Rong
Tang, Ri‐Bo
Liu, Nian
Jiang, Chen‐Xi
Li, Song‐Nan
Guo, Xue‐Yuan
Wang, Wei
Xin, Du
Dong, Jian‐Zeng
Yu, Rong‐Hui
Ma, Chang‐Sheng
description Introduction Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF‐CA) in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia (SID) can be challenging because of the contrary anatomy and associated anomalies. Cases and literature regarding AF‐CA in SID are rare and provide little information. Our study aims to present an improved procedure, ablation strategies, and evaluate the safety and outcomes of AF‐CA in patients with AF and SID. Methods A total of 10 patients with AF‐SID (mean age, 60.4 ± 15.7 years; six paroxysmal AF, four persistent atrial fibrillation [PeAF]) were enrolled. For the improved procedure, images obtained by preacquired computed tomography and three‐dimensional electroanatomical mapping, integrating intracardiac echocardiography, and x‐ray imaging data are necessary to optimize the transseptal puncture and ablation procedure. Results All patients successfully underwent 13 AF‐CA procedures without complications, including three patients received repeat procedures. However, two PeAF patients presented sick sinus syndrome (SSS) after the AF‐CA procedure, and one underwent permanent pacemaker implantation therapy during hospitalization. During the follow‐up period (6‐72 months), the outcomes were not favorable: three patients (30%) maintained sinus rhythm (SR) after the initial procedure; after repeated procedures, the overall SR rate was 40% (four patients). Conclusion With the improved strategy, AF‐CA can be safely and effectively performed with low radiation exposure in patients with SID. However, the long‐term outcomes were not favorable, even when managed at a tertiary center by a team of specialists. Moreover, patients with PeAF might also have masked SSS, which should be carefully considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/pace.14144
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473749805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473749805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4234-36e4615e74c312d3e9892cdebd50b5d974b4d5d487421d1e9f5c0b02e5feb5ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9O3DAQxq2Kqiy0lz5AZYkLQoTa8XjjcEMR_ySk9tCeI8eeFKMk3trOAk_Aa2PYLQcOncuMZn76ZkYfIV85O-E5vq-0wRMOHOADWXAJrFBc1jtkwThUhRKq3iV7Md4xxpYM5CeyK4SoylLxBXlqdLrFhIHqbtDJ-Yn6nuoUnB5o77rghm3bTTS6NMdcrDHEXFh8SMEbHazTp7S51cOA0x88pm5cBb9GS3MyaOeQe35Oxo8Yj6meLB1cXqlTntCAa4f3n8nHXg8Rv2zzPvl9cf6ruSpuflxeN2c3hYFSQCGWCEsusQIjeGkF1qoujcXOStZJW1fQgZUWVAUltxzrXhrWsRJlj500WuyTw41uPu3vjDG1o4sG85MT-jm2JVSigloxmdGDd-idn8OUr8uUUhxqJlmmjjaUCT7GgH27Cm7U4bHlrH2xp32xp321J8PftpJzN6J9Q__5kQG-Ae7dgI__kWp_njXnG9Fn7f2cfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2488149050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in situs inversus dextrocardia: Challenge, improved procedure, outcomes, and literature review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Xin ; Su, Xin ; Long, De‐Yong ; Sang, Cai‐Hua ; Bai, Rong ; Tang, Ri‐Bo ; Liu, Nian ; Jiang, Chen‐Xi ; Li, Song‐Nan ; Guo, Xue‐Yuan ; Wang, Wei ; Xin, Du ; Dong, Jian‐Zeng ; Yu, Rong‐Hui ; Ma, Chang‐Sheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xin ; Su, Xin ; Long, De‐Yong ; Sang, Cai‐Hua ; Bai, Rong ; Tang, Ri‐Bo ; Liu, Nian ; Jiang, Chen‐Xi ; Li, Song‐Nan ; Guo, Xue‐Yuan ; Wang, Wei ; Xin, Du ; Dong, Jian‐Zeng ; Yu, Rong‐Hui ; Ma, Chang‐Sheng</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF‐CA) in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia (SID) can be challenging because of the contrary anatomy and associated anomalies. Cases and literature regarding AF‐CA in SID are rare and provide little information. Our study aims to present an improved procedure, ablation strategies, and evaluate the safety and outcomes of AF‐CA in patients with AF and SID. Methods A total of 10 patients with AF‐SID (mean age, 60.4 ± 15.7 years; six paroxysmal AF, four persistent atrial fibrillation [PeAF]) were enrolled. For the improved procedure, images obtained by preacquired computed tomography and three‐dimensional electroanatomical mapping, integrating intracardiac echocardiography, and x‐ray imaging data are necessary to optimize the transseptal puncture and ablation procedure. Results All patients successfully underwent 13 AF‐CA procedures without complications, including three patients received repeat procedures. However, two PeAF patients presented sick sinus syndrome (SSS) after the AF‐CA procedure, and one underwent permanent pacemaker implantation therapy during hospitalization. During the follow‐up period (6‐72 months), the outcomes were not favorable: three patients (30%) maintained sinus rhythm (SR) after the initial procedure; after repeated procedures, the overall SR rate was 40% (four patients). Conclusion With the improved strategy, AF‐CA can be safely and effectively performed with low radiation exposure in patients with SID. However, the long‐term outcomes were not favorable, even when managed at a tertiary center by a team of specialists. Moreover, patients with PeAF might also have masked SSS, which should be carefully considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pace.14144</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33372281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Abnormalities, Multiple ; Aged ; atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - complications ; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods ; Catheter Ablation ; Catheters ; Computed tomography ; Dextrocardia - complications ; Echocardiography ; Female ; Fibrillation ; Heart ; Humans ; Inversion ; Literature reviews ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pacemakers ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Retrospective Studies ; sick sinus syndrome ; Situs Inversus - complications ; situs inversus dextrocardia ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2021-02, Vol.44 (2), p.293-305</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4234-36e4615e74c312d3e9892cdebd50b5d974b4d5d487421d1e9f5c0b02e5feb5ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4234-36e4615e74c312d3e9892cdebd50b5d974b4d5d487421d1e9f5c0b02e5feb5ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4604-5346 ; 0000-0001-7299-7805 ; 0000-0002-3106-7318</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpace.14144$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpace.14144$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33372281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, De‐Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang, Cai‐Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Ri‐Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Nian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Chen‐Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Song‐Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xue‐Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Du</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Jian‐Zeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Rong‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chang‐Sheng</creatorcontrib><title>Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in situs inversus dextrocardia: Challenge, improved procedure, outcomes, and literature review</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Introduction Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF‐CA) in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia (SID) can be challenging because of the contrary anatomy and associated anomalies. Cases and literature regarding AF‐CA in SID are rare and provide little information. Our study aims to present an improved procedure, ablation strategies, and evaluate the safety and outcomes of AF‐CA in patients with AF and SID. Methods A total of 10 patients with AF‐SID (mean age, 60.4 ± 15.7 years; six paroxysmal AF, four persistent atrial fibrillation [PeAF]) were enrolled. For the improved procedure, images obtained by preacquired computed tomography and three‐dimensional electroanatomical mapping, integrating intracardiac echocardiography, and x‐ray imaging data are necessary to optimize the transseptal puncture and ablation procedure. Results All patients successfully underwent 13 AF‐CA procedures without complications, including three patients received repeat procedures. However, two PeAF patients presented sick sinus syndrome (SSS) after the AF‐CA procedure, and one underwent permanent pacemaker implantation therapy during hospitalization. During the follow‐up period (6‐72 months), the outcomes were not favorable: three patients (30%) maintained sinus rhythm (SR) after the initial procedure; after repeated procedures, the overall SR rate was 40% (four patients). Conclusion With the improved strategy, AF‐CA can be safely and effectively performed with low radiation exposure in patients with SID. However, the long‐term outcomes were not favorable, even when managed at a tertiary center by a team of specialists. Moreover, patients with PeAF might also have masked SSS, which should be carefully considered.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Abnormalities, Multiple</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dextrocardia - complications</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibrillation</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inversion</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pacemakers</subject><subject>Radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>sick sinus syndrome</subject><subject>Situs Inversus - complications</subject><subject>situs inversus dextrocardia</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9O3DAQxq2Kqiy0lz5AZYkLQoTa8XjjcEMR_ySk9tCeI8eeFKMk3trOAk_Aa2PYLQcOncuMZn76ZkYfIV85O-E5vq-0wRMOHOADWXAJrFBc1jtkwThUhRKq3iV7Md4xxpYM5CeyK4SoylLxBXlqdLrFhIHqbtDJ-Yn6nuoUnB5o77rghm3bTTS6NMdcrDHEXFh8SMEbHazTp7S51cOA0x88pm5cBb9GS3MyaOeQe35Oxo8Yj6meLB1cXqlTntCAa4f3n8nHXg8Rv2zzPvl9cf6ruSpuflxeN2c3hYFSQCGWCEsusQIjeGkF1qoujcXOStZJW1fQgZUWVAUltxzrXhrWsRJlj500WuyTw41uPu3vjDG1o4sG85MT-jm2JVSigloxmdGDd-idn8OUr8uUUhxqJlmmjjaUCT7GgH27Cm7U4bHlrH2xp32xp321J8PftpJzN6J9Q__5kQG-Ae7dgI__kWp_njXnG9Fn7f2cfQ</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Zhao, Xin</creator><creator>Su, Xin</creator><creator>Long, De‐Yong</creator><creator>Sang, Cai‐Hua</creator><creator>Bai, Rong</creator><creator>Tang, Ri‐Bo</creator><creator>Liu, Nian</creator><creator>Jiang, Chen‐Xi</creator><creator>Li, Song‐Nan</creator><creator>Guo, Xue‐Yuan</creator><creator>Wang, Wei</creator><creator>Xin, Du</creator><creator>Dong, Jian‐Zeng</creator><creator>Yu, Rong‐Hui</creator><creator>Ma, Chang‐Sheng</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-5346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-7805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-7318</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in situs inversus dextrocardia: Challenge, improved procedure, outcomes, and literature review</title><author>Zhao, Xin ; Su, Xin ; Long, De‐Yong ; Sang, Cai‐Hua ; Bai, Rong ; Tang, Ri‐Bo ; Liu, Nian ; Jiang, Chen‐Xi ; Li, Song‐Nan ; Guo, Xue‐Yuan ; Wang, Wei ; Xin, Du ; Dong, Jian‐Zeng ; Yu, Rong‐Hui ; Ma, Chang‐Sheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4234-36e4615e74c312d3e9892cdebd50b5d974b4d5d487421d1e9f5c0b02e5feb5ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Abnormalities, Multiple</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - complications</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dextrocardia - complications</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibrillation</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inversion</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pacemakers</topic><topic>Radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>sick sinus syndrome</topic><topic>Situs Inversus - complications</topic><topic>situs inversus dextrocardia</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, De‐Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang, Cai‐Hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Ri‐Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Nian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Chen‐Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Song‐Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xue‐Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin, Du</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Jian‐Zeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Rong‐Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Chang‐Sheng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Xin</au><au>Su, Xin</au><au>Long, De‐Yong</au><au>Sang, Cai‐Hua</au><au>Bai, Rong</au><au>Tang, Ri‐Bo</au><au>Liu, Nian</au><au>Jiang, Chen‐Xi</au><au>Li, Song‐Nan</au><au>Guo, Xue‐Yuan</au><au>Wang, Wei</au><au>Xin, Du</au><au>Dong, Jian‐Zeng</au><au>Yu, Rong‐Hui</au><au>Ma, Chang‐Sheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in situs inversus dextrocardia: Challenge, improved procedure, outcomes, and literature review</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>293-305</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Introduction Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF‐CA) in patients with situs inversus dextrocardia (SID) can be challenging because of the contrary anatomy and associated anomalies. Cases and literature regarding AF‐CA in SID are rare and provide little information. Our study aims to present an improved procedure, ablation strategies, and evaluate the safety and outcomes of AF‐CA in patients with AF and SID. Methods A total of 10 patients with AF‐SID (mean age, 60.4 ± 15.7 years; six paroxysmal AF, four persistent atrial fibrillation [PeAF]) were enrolled. For the improved procedure, images obtained by preacquired computed tomography and three‐dimensional electroanatomical mapping, integrating intracardiac echocardiography, and x‐ray imaging data are necessary to optimize the transseptal puncture and ablation procedure. Results All patients successfully underwent 13 AF‐CA procedures without complications, including three patients received repeat procedures. However, two PeAF patients presented sick sinus syndrome (SSS) after the AF‐CA procedure, and one underwent permanent pacemaker implantation therapy during hospitalization. During the follow‐up period (6‐72 months), the outcomes were not favorable: three patients (30%) maintained sinus rhythm (SR) after the initial procedure; after repeated procedures, the overall SR rate was 40% (four patients). Conclusion With the improved strategy, AF‐CA can be safely and effectively performed with low radiation exposure in patients with SID. However, the long‐term outcomes were not favorable, even when managed at a tertiary center by a team of specialists. Moreover, patients with PeAF might also have masked SSS, which should be carefully considered.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33372281</pmid><doi>10.1111/pace.14144</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-5346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-7805</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-7318</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 2021-02, Vol.44 (2), p.293-305
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473749805
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Ablation
Abnormalities, Multiple
Aged
atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation - complications
Atrial Fibrillation - surgery
Cardiac arrhythmia
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods
Catheter Ablation
Catheters
Computed tomography
Dextrocardia - complications
Echocardiography
Female
Fibrillation
Heart
Humans
Inversion
Literature reviews
Male
Middle Aged
Pacemakers
Radiofrequency ablation
Retrospective Studies
sick sinus syndrome
Situs Inversus - complications
situs inversus dextrocardia
Treatment Outcome
title Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in situs inversus dextrocardia: Challenge, improved procedure, outcomes, and literature review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catheter%20ablation%20of%20atrial%20fibrillation%20in%20situs%20inversus%20dextrocardia:%20Challenge,%20improved%20procedure,%20outcomes,%20and%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Zhao,%20Xin&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=293-305&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pace.14144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473749805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2488149050&rft_id=info:pmid/33372281&rfr_iscdi=true