Tracheoesophageal Diversion and Puncture for Preserving Phonation in Intractable Aspiration: A Case Series
Objective/Hypothesis Tracheoesophageal diversion (TED) can prevent damage to the respiratory system in patients with swallowing disorders and/or repetitive aspiration pneumonia; however, TED may cause the loss of phonation. Our previous study demonstrated that TED with tracheoesophageal puncture (TE...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 2021-06, Vol.131 (6), p.E1965-E1970 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | E1970 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | E1965 |
| container_title | The Laryngoscope |
| container_volume | 131 |
| creator | Adachi, Kazuo Umezaki, Toshiro Inoguchi, Takashi Matsubara, Naoko Kise, Norimoto Lee, Yogaku |
| description | Objective/Hypothesis
Tracheoesophageal diversion (TED) can prevent damage to the respiratory system in patients with swallowing disorders and/or repetitive aspiration pneumonia; however, TED may cause the loss of phonation. Our previous study demonstrated that TED with tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) prevents aspiration while retaining phonation. In this study, we aimed to further evaluate the feeding status and phonation of patients who underwent TED with TEP to verify the reproducibility of this procedure.
Study Design
Case series study.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 11 patients who underwent TED with TEP for intractable aspiration from February 2017 to August 2019 at Fukuoka Sanno Hospital. We evaluated the preoperative penetration aspiration score (PPAS), daily activities, preoperative and postoperative food intake level scale (FILS) score, nutrition route, maximum phonation time(MPT), and postoperative communication method.
Results
The study population included 10 men and 1 woman (mean age, 66 years; range, 44–81) with a PPAS of 6.8 ± 1.0. The FILS score changed from 2.1 ± 0.5 preoperatively to 7.5 ± 2.0 postoperatively (paired t‐test, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lary.29360 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473417461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2473417461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-b4a5357a2f3ece7a1d71a0fe49bb506ca164265ae439f47f1a67cc53a74a2a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVoaZy0l_yAIuilBDbR56rbm3GbDzDUpD60JzErz8Yya8mVdhPy7yvHaQ899DQD78PDMC8hZ5xdcMbEZQ_p6UI0smZHZMK15JVqGv2KTEooq09a_DgmJzlvGONGavaGHEsp68boekI2ywRujRFz3K3hHqGnX_wDpuxjoBBWdDEGN4wJaRcTXSTMmB58uKeLdQww7Ckf6G0YimaAtkc6zTufnpPPdEpnkJF-x-QxvyWvO-gzvnuZp2R59XU5u6nm365vZ9N55aQ2rGoV6LKA6CQ6NMBXhgPrUDVtq1ntgNdK1BpQyaZTpuNQG-e0BKNAgJKn5ONBu0vx14h5sFufHfY9BIxjtkIZqbhRNS_oh3_QTRxTKMdZoYVQjWkUK9T5gXIp5pyws7vkt-XnljO7L8DuC7DPBRT4_YtybLe4-ov--XgB-AF49D0-_Udl59O7nwfpb-eJkS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2522497940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracheoesophageal Diversion and Puncture for Preserving Phonation in Intractable Aspiration: A Case Series</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Adachi, Kazuo ; Umezaki, Toshiro ; Inoguchi, Takashi ; Matsubara, Naoko ; Kise, Norimoto ; Lee, Yogaku</creator><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Kazuo ; Umezaki, Toshiro ; Inoguchi, Takashi ; Matsubara, Naoko ; Kise, Norimoto ; Lee, Yogaku</creatorcontrib><description>Objective/Hypothesis
Tracheoesophageal diversion (TED) can prevent damage to the respiratory system in patients with swallowing disorders and/or repetitive aspiration pneumonia; however, TED may cause the loss of phonation. Our previous study demonstrated that TED with tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) prevents aspiration while retaining phonation. In this study, we aimed to further evaluate the feeding status and phonation of patients who underwent TED with TEP to verify the reproducibility of this procedure.
Study Design
Case series study.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 11 patients who underwent TED with TEP for intractable aspiration from February 2017 to August 2019 at Fukuoka Sanno Hospital. We evaluated the preoperative penetration aspiration score (PPAS), daily activities, preoperative and postoperative food intake level scale (FILS) score, nutrition route, maximum phonation time(MPT), and postoperative communication method.
Results
The study population included 10 men and 1 woman (mean age, 66 years; range, 44–81) with a PPAS of 6.8 ± 1.0. The FILS score changed from 2.1 ± 0.5 preoperatively to 7.5 ± 2.0 postoperatively (paired t‐test, P < .05), while the MPT changed from 7.9 ± 4.1 to 10.3 ± 4.2 s (paired t‐test, P = .9). Preoperatively, a gastric fistula (eight patients [73%]) was the main nutrition route, followed by a gastric tube (two patients [18%]). Postoperatively, the main nutritional route for eight patients (73%) was oral, while the remaining three patients (27%) used the oral route occasionally. All patients maintained laryngeal phonation function, and eight (73%) used only laryngeal phonation for communication.
Conclusions
Patients with intractable aspiration who wish to retain phonatory function should be advised to undergo TED with TEP.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1965–E1970, 2021</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.29360</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33369756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Esophagus ; Laryngoscopy ; phonatory function ; Pneumonia ; Pulmonary aspiration ; Throat ; Tracheoesophageal diversion ; tracheoesophageal puncture</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2021-06, Vol.131 (6), p.E1965-E1970</ispartof><rights>2020 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-b4a5357a2f3ece7a1d71a0fe49bb506ca164265ae439f47f1a67cc53a74a2a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-b4a5357a2f3ece7a1d71a0fe49bb506ca164265ae439f47f1a67cc53a74a2a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3553-4558</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.29360$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.29360$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33369756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umezaki, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoguchi, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsubara, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kise, Norimoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yogaku</creatorcontrib><title>Tracheoesophageal Diversion and Puncture for Preserving Phonation in Intractable Aspiration: A Case Series</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objective/Hypothesis
Tracheoesophageal diversion (TED) can prevent damage to the respiratory system in patients with swallowing disorders and/or repetitive aspiration pneumonia; however, TED may cause the loss of phonation. Our previous study demonstrated that TED with tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) prevents aspiration while retaining phonation. In this study, we aimed to further evaluate the feeding status and phonation of patients who underwent TED with TEP to verify the reproducibility of this procedure.
Study Design
Case series study.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 11 patients who underwent TED with TEP for intractable aspiration from February 2017 to August 2019 at Fukuoka Sanno Hospital. We evaluated the preoperative penetration aspiration score (PPAS), daily activities, preoperative and postoperative food intake level scale (FILS) score, nutrition route, maximum phonation time(MPT), and postoperative communication method.
Results
The study population included 10 men and 1 woman (mean age, 66 years; range, 44–81) with a PPAS of 6.8 ± 1.0. The FILS score changed from 2.1 ± 0.5 preoperatively to 7.5 ± 2.0 postoperatively (paired t‐test, P < .05), while the MPT changed from 7.9 ± 4.1 to 10.3 ± 4.2 s (paired t‐test, P = .9). Preoperatively, a gastric fistula (eight patients [73%]) was the main nutrition route, followed by a gastric tube (two patients [18%]). Postoperatively, the main nutritional route for eight patients (73%) was oral, while the remaining three patients (27%) used the oral route occasionally. All patients maintained laryngeal phonation function, and eight (73%) used only laryngeal phonation for communication.
Conclusions
Patients with intractable aspiration who wish to retain phonatory function should be advised to undergo TED with TEP.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1965–E1970, 2021</description><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Laryngoscopy</subject><subject>phonatory function</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Pulmonary aspiration</subject><subject>Throat</subject><subject>Tracheoesophageal diversion</subject><subject>tracheoesophageal puncture</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1rGzEQhkVoaZy0l_yAIuilBDbR56rbm3GbDzDUpD60JzErz8Yya8mVdhPy7yvHaQ899DQD78PDMC8hZ5xdcMbEZQ_p6UI0smZHZMK15JVqGv2KTEooq09a_DgmJzlvGONGavaGHEsp68boekI2ywRujRFz3K3hHqGnX_wDpuxjoBBWdDEGN4wJaRcTXSTMmB58uKeLdQww7Ckf6G0YimaAtkc6zTufnpPPdEpnkJF-x-QxvyWvO-gzvnuZp2R59XU5u6nm365vZ9N55aQ2rGoV6LKA6CQ6NMBXhgPrUDVtq1ntgNdK1BpQyaZTpuNQG-e0BKNAgJKn5ONBu0vx14h5sFufHfY9BIxjtkIZqbhRNS_oh3_QTRxTKMdZoYVQjWkUK9T5gXIp5pyws7vkt-XnljO7L8DuC7DPBRT4_YtybLe4-ov--XgB-AF49D0-_Udl59O7nwfpb-eJkS0</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Adachi, Kazuo</creator><creator>Umezaki, Toshiro</creator><creator>Inoguchi, Takashi</creator><creator>Matsubara, Naoko</creator><creator>Kise, Norimoto</creator><creator>Lee, Yogaku</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4558</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Tracheoesophageal Diversion and Puncture for Preserving Phonation in Intractable Aspiration: A Case Series</title><author>Adachi, Kazuo ; Umezaki, Toshiro ; Inoguchi, Takashi ; Matsubara, Naoko ; Kise, Norimoto ; Lee, Yogaku</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-b4a5357a2f3ece7a1d71a0fe49bb506ca164265ae439f47f1a67cc53a74a2a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Laryngoscopy</topic><topic>phonatory function</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Pulmonary aspiration</topic><topic>Throat</topic><topic>Tracheoesophageal diversion</topic><topic>tracheoesophageal puncture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umezaki, Toshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoguchi, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsubara, Naoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kise, Norimoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yogaku</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adachi, Kazuo</au><au>Umezaki, Toshiro</au><au>Inoguchi, Takashi</au><au>Matsubara, Naoko</au><au>Kise, Norimoto</au><au>Lee, Yogaku</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tracheoesophageal Diversion and Puncture for Preserving Phonation in Intractable Aspiration: A Case Series</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>E1965</spage><epage>E1970</epage><pages>E1965-E1970</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objective/Hypothesis
Tracheoesophageal diversion (TED) can prevent damage to the respiratory system in patients with swallowing disorders and/or repetitive aspiration pneumonia; however, TED may cause the loss of phonation. Our previous study demonstrated that TED with tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) prevents aspiration while retaining phonation. In this study, we aimed to further evaluate the feeding status and phonation of patients who underwent TED with TEP to verify the reproducibility of this procedure.
Study Design
Case series study.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 11 patients who underwent TED with TEP for intractable aspiration from February 2017 to August 2019 at Fukuoka Sanno Hospital. We evaluated the preoperative penetration aspiration score (PPAS), daily activities, preoperative and postoperative food intake level scale (FILS) score, nutrition route, maximum phonation time(MPT), and postoperative communication method.
Results
The study population included 10 men and 1 woman (mean age, 66 years; range, 44–81) with a PPAS of 6.8 ± 1.0. The FILS score changed from 2.1 ± 0.5 preoperatively to 7.5 ± 2.0 postoperatively (paired t‐test, P < .05), while the MPT changed from 7.9 ± 4.1 to 10.3 ± 4.2 s (paired t‐test, P = .9). Preoperatively, a gastric fistula (eight patients [73%]) was the main nutrition route, followed by a gastric tube (two patients [18%]). Postoperatively, the main nutritional route for eight patients (73%) was oral, while the remaining three patients (27%) used the oral route occasionally. All patients maintained laryngeal phonation function, and eight (73%) used only laryngeal phonation for communication.
Conclusions
Patients with intractable aspiration who wish to retain phonatory function should be advised to undergo TED with TEP.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 131:E1965–E1970, 2021</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33369756</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.29360</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-4558</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
| ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2021-06, Vol.131 (6), p.E1965-E1970 |
| issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473417461 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Esophagus Laryngoscopy phonatory function Pneumonia Pulmonary aspiration Throat Tracheoesophageal diversion tracheoesophageal puncture |
| title | Tracheoesophageal Diversion and Puncture for Preserving Phonation in Intractable Aspiration: A Case Series |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A49%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracheoesophageal%20Diversion%20and%20Puncture%20for%20Preserving%20Phonation%20in%20Intractable%20Aspiration:%20A%20Case%20Series&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Adachi,%20Kazuo&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=E1965&rft.epage=E1970&rft.pages=E1965-E1970&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.29360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473417461%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2522497940&rft_id=info:pmid/33369756&rfr_iscdi=true |