Utility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Histopathologic Validation Study
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate in patients with suspected active unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) using histopathology as the reference sta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2021-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1083.e1-1083.e10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1083.e10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1083.e1 |
container_title | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Mostafa, Nadia M. Moustafa, Shaimaa Hussien, Marwa T. Ali, Wageeh A. Osman, Mohammed H. Shahine, Mohammed S. Abdelhafez, Yasser G. |
description | The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate in patients with suspected active unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) using histopathology as the reference standard.
Twenty-four patients with suspected active UCH prospectively underwent technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate planar bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT of the mandible. Qualitative and quantitative readings for growth activity were performed by 3 nuclear medicine physicians and the final diagnosis was derived from postoperative histopathological examination. Readings were reported as positive, equivocal, or negative. Total, maximum, and mean counts were recorded for each condyle on SPECT/CT images. The uptake of the index (suspected) condyle was expressed as a count ratio (Rtotal, Rmean, Rmax), a percentage uptake (Ptotal, Pmean, Pmax), background-corrected counts (Btotal, Bmean, Bmax), as well as CT-based condylar diameters (RCT,PCT) relative to the contralateral condyle.
Interobserver agreement was 0.79 and 0.83 for planar bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT, respectively, with a total of 5 and 1 equivocal readings from the respective modalities. Surgery was performed in 22 patients; all of them had pathologically proven UCH. SPECT/CT was slightly more sensitive than planar bone scintigraphy (91 vs 78%) with identical specificity (96%). Rtotal, Rmean, Ptotal, and Pmean demonstrated area under the curve between 84% and 86%. Metrics based on CT diameters and background-corrected counts were not associated with UCH diagnosis.
Quantitative approaches based on total or mean count ratio or relative count percentage were equally predictive for UCH diagnosis; however, they were slightly less sensitive compared with qualitative technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate SPECT/CT evaluation. SPECT/CT evaluation has the potential to decrease the equivocal readings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473416887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278239120314105</els_id><sourcerecordid>2473416887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-591c91fd9e35cb069c5faa6a684909e3541e50d3088ecd7d4a787fe7c67417b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcGO0zAUtBCILQs_wAH5yCVdO47jBHFZVQtdaSWQuuVqufZL68qJg-0g5Vf4Whx12RPiNE-jmXl6bxB6T8maElrfnNdn38d1ScpM0HWGF2hFOaMFJ5y9RCtSiqYoWUuv0JsYz4RQykX9Gl0xxngjKFmh3_tknU0z9h3e2eHooPh-8skP-K63Mdo8bHw_TgkMfvS9PwY1nuabf3DYDng3xRH0wu8H61SCoFz2D2Z2KuDtPEIYnYpWfcK3eGtj8qNKJ-_80Wr8QzlrVFpW7tJk5rfoVadchHdPeI32X-4eN9vi4dvX-83tQ6EZr1PBW6pb2pkWGNcHUread0rVqm6qlixkRYETw0jTgDbCVEo0ogOha1FRcajYNfp4yR2D_zlBTDJfrsE5NYCfoiwrwSpaN43I0vIi1cHHGKCTY7C9CrOkRC6dyLNcOpFLJ5JSmSGbPjzlT4cezLPlbwlZ8PkigHzlLwtBRm1h0GBsyN-Uxtv_5f8BnAihFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473416887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Histopathologic Validation Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mostafa, Nadia M. ; Moustafa, Shaimaa ; Hussien, Marwa T. ; Ali, Wageeh A. ; Osman, Mohammed H. ; Shahine, Mohammed S. ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mostafa, Nadia M. ; Moustafa, Shaimaa ; Hussien, Marwa T. ; Ali, Wageeh A. ; Osman, Mohammed H. ; Shahine, Mohammed S. ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate in patients with suspected active unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) using histopathology as the reference standard.
Twenty-four patients with suspected active UCH prospectively underwent technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate planar bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT of the mandible. Qualitative and quantitative readings for growth activity were performed by 3 nuclear medicine physicians and the final diagnosis was derived from postoperative histopathological examination. Readings were reported as positive, equivocal, or negative. Total, maximum, and mean counts were recorded for each condyle on SPECT/CT images. The uptake of the index (suspected) condyle was expressed as a count ratio (Rtotal, Rmean, Rmax), a percentage uptake (Ptotal, Pmean, Pmax), background-corrected counts (Btotal, Bmean, Bmax), as well as CT-based condylar diameters (RCT,PCT) relative to the contralateral condyle.
Interobserver agreement was 0.79 and 0.83 for planar bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT, respectively, with a total of 5 and 1 equivocal readings from the respective modalities. Surgery was performed in 22 patients; all of them had pathologically proven UCH. SPECT/CT was slightly more sensitive than planar bone scintigraphy (91 vs 78%) with identical specificity (96%). Rtotal, Rmean, Ptotal, and Pmean demonstrated area under the curve between 84% and 86%. Metrics based on CT diameters and background-corrected counts were not associated with UCH diagnosis.
Quantitative approaches based on total or mean count ratio or relative count percentage were equally predictive for UCH diagnosis; however, they were slightly less sensitive compared with qualitative technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate SPECT/CT evaluation. SPECT/CT evaluation has the potential to decrease the equivocal readings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33358710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Dentistry ; Humans ; Hyperplasia - diagnostic imaging ; Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging ; Mandibular Condyle - pathology ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Technetium Tc 99m Medronate ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2021-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1083.e1-1083.e10</ispartof><rights>2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-591c91fd9e35cb069c5faa6a684909e3541e50d3088ecd7d4a787fe7c67417b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-591c91fd9e35cb069c5faa6a684909e3541e50d3088ecd7d4a787fe7c67417b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33358710$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mostafa, Nadia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moustafa, Shaimaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussien, Marwa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Wageeh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohammed H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahine, Mohammed S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelhafez, Yasser G.</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Histopathologic Validation Study</title><title>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate in patients with suspected active unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) using histopathology as the reference standard.
Twenty-four patients with suspected active UCH prospectively underwent technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate planar bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT of the mandible. Qualitative and quantitative readings for growth activity were performed by 3 nuclear medicine physicians and the final diagnosis was derived from postoperative histopathological examination. Readings were reported as positive, equivocal, or negative. Total, maximum, and mean counts were recorded for each condyle on SPECT/CT images. The uptake of the index (suspected) condyle was expressed as a count ratio (Rtotal, Rmean, Rmax), a percentage uptake (Ptotal, Pmean, Pmax), background-corrected counts (Btotal, Bmean, Bmax), as well as CT-based condylar diameters (RCT,PCT) relative to the contralateral condyle.
Interobserver agreement was 0.79 and 0.83 for planar bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT, respectively, with a total of 5 and 1 equivocal readings from the respective modalities. Surgery was performed in 22 patients; all of them had pathologically proven UCH. SPECT/CT was slightly more sensitive than planar bone scintigraphy (91 vs 78%) with identical specificity (96%). Rtotal, Rmean, Ptotal, and Pmean demonstrated area under the curve between 84% and 86%. Metrics based on CT diameters and background-corrected counts were not associated with UCH diagnosis.
Quantitative approaches based on total or mean count ratio or relative count percentage were equally predictive for UCH diagnosis; however, they were slightly less sensitive compared with qualitative technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate SPECT/CT evaluation. SPECT/CT evaluation has the potential to decrease the equivocal readings.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperplasia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandibular Condyle - pathology</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Medronate</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0278-2391</issn><issn>1531-5053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcGO0zAUtBCILQs_wAH5yCVdO47jBHFZVQtdaSWQuuVqufZL68qJg-0g5Vf4Whx12RPiNE-jmXl6bxB6T8maElrfnNdn38d1ScpM0HWGF2hFOaMFJ5y9RCtSiqYoWUuv0JsYz4RQykX9Gl0xxngjKFmh3_tknU0z9h3e2eHooPh-8skP-K63Mdo8bHw_TgkMfvS9PwY1nuabf3DYDng3xRH0wu8H61SCoFz2D2Z2KuDtPEIYnYpWfcK3eGtj8qNKJ-_80Wr8QzlrVFpW7tJk5rfoVadchHdPeI32X-4eN9vi4dvX-83tQ6EZr1PBW6pb2pkWGNcHUread0rVqm6qlixkRYETw0jTgDbCVEo0ogOha1FRcajYNfp4yR2D_zlBTDJfrsE5NYCfoiwrwSpaN43I0vIi1cHHGKCTY7C9CrOkRC6dyLNcOpFLJ5JSmSGbPjzlT4cezLPlbwlZ8PkigHzlLwtBRm1h0GBsyN-Uxtv_5f8BnAihFA</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Mostafa, Nadia M.</creator><creator>Moustafa, Shaimaa</creator><creator>Hussien, Marwa T.</creator><creator>Ali, Wageeh A.</creator><creator>Osman, Mohammed H.</creator><creator>Shahine, Mohammed S.</creator><creator>Abdelhafez, Yasser G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Utility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Histopathologic Validation Study</title><author>Mostafa, Nadia M. ; Moustafa, Shaimaa ; Hussien, Marwa T. ; Ali, Wageeh A. ; Osman, Mohammed H. ; Shahine, Mohammed S. ; Abdelhafez, Yasser G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-591c91fd9e35cb069c5faa6a684909e3541e50d3088ecd7d4a787fe7c67417b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperplasia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandibular Condyle - pathology</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Medronate</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mostafa, Nadia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moustafa, Shaimaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussien, Marwa T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Wageeh A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Mohammed H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahine, Mohammed S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelhafez, Yasser G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mostafa, Nadia M.</au><au>Moustafa, Shaimaa</au><au>Hussien, Marwa T.</au><au>Ali, Wageeh A.</au><au>Osman, Mohammed H.</au><au>Shahine, Mohammed S.</au><au>Abdelhafez, Yasser G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Histopathologic Validation Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1083.e1</spage><epage>1083.e10</epage><pages>1083.e1-1083.e10</pages><issn>0278-2391</issn><eissn>1531-5053</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate in patients with suspected active unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) using histopathology as the reference standard.
Twenty-four patients with suspected active UCH prospectively underwent technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate planar bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT of the mandible. Qualitative and quantitative readings for growth activity were performed by 3 nuclear medicine physicians and the final diagnosis was derived from postoperative histopathological examination. Readings were reported as positive, equivocal, or negative. Total, maximum, and mean counts were recorded for each condyle on SPECT/CT images. The uptake of the index (suspected) condyle was expressed as a count ratio (Rtotal, Rmean, Rmax), a percentage uptake (Ptotal, Pmean, Pmax), background-corrected counts (Btotal, Bmean, Bmax), as well as CT-based condylar diameters (RCT,PCT) relative to the contralateral condyle.
Interobserver agreement was 0.79 and 0.83 for planar bone scintigraphy and SPECT/CT, respectively, with a total of 5 and 1 equivocal readings from the respective modalities. Surgery was performed in 22 patients; all of them had pathologically proven UCH. SPECT/CT was slightly more sensitive than planar bone scintigraphy (91 vs 78%) with identical specificity (96%). Rtotal, Rmean, Ptotal, and Pmean demonstrated area under the curve between 84% and 86%. Metrics based on CT diameters and background-corrected counts were not associated with UCH diagnosis.
Quantitative approaches based on total or mean count ratio or relative count percentage were equally predictive for UCH diagnosis; however, they were slightly less sensitive compared with qualitative technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate SPECT/CT evaluation. SPECT/CT evaluation has the potential to decrease the equivocal readings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33358710</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.020</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-2391 |
ispartof | Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2021-05, Vol.79 (5), p.1083.e1-1083.e10 |
issn | 0278-2391 1531-5053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473416887 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Dentistry Humans Hyperplasia - diagnostic imaging Mandibular Condyle - diagnostic imaging Mandibular Condyle - pathology Radiopharmaceuticals Technetium Tc 99m Medronate Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Utility of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Histopathologic Validation Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T22%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20Single-Photon%20Emission%20Computed%20Tomography/Computed%20Tomography%20in%20Suspected%20Unilateral%20Condylar%20Hyperplasia:%20A%20Histopathologic%20Validation%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Mostafa,%20Nadia%20M.&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1083.e1&rft.epage=1083.e10&rft.pages=1083.e1-1083.e10&rft.issn=0278-2391&rft.eissn=1531-5053&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joms.2020.11.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473416887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473416887&rft_id=info:pmid/33358710&rft_els_id=S0278239120314105&rfr_iscdi=true |