Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective

•Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty. Medical therapy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2021-03, Vol.30 (3), p.105556-105556, Article 105556
Hauptverfasser: Jafari, Mostafa, Nguyen, Thanh N., Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago, Hussain, Muhammad Shazam, Hassan, Ameer E., Ikram, Asad, Eliyas, Javed Khader, Rodriguez, Gustavo J., Divani, Afshin A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105556
container_issue 3
container_start_page 105556
container_title Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases
container_volume 30
creator Jafari, Mostafa
Nguyen, Thanh N.
Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago
Hussain, Muhammad Shazam
Hassan, Ameer E.
Ikram, Asad
Eliyas, Javed Khader
Rodriguez, Gustavo J.
Divani, Afshin A.
description •Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty. Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect. We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language. Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques. There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473413555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1052305720309745</els_id><sourcerecordid>2473413555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-7171dc2786ab6866feb7a38b6d42953c22a5c267e3ff18e1aef5576d4c481a983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhLyAfEVIWf8ROely2La20Untoz9bEnggv2WQZOyvx73G0hROXXjyW5tE7Mw9jX6RYSSHt191qlzJNP9EjYUfTEVKIaaWEWgBjjH3DLqTRqmqNlG_LXxhVaWGac_Y-pZ0QUprWvGPnWmsrlFEXLG5mIhwzX4cjjB4TjyO_GcMS7ucBiD8RQt4vyNTz-zETeIIxwsDX-QfSlPxQ3hw9v44JISGHMfDbOc-E_LH0D-hzPOIHdtbDkPDjS71kz7c3T5u7avvw_X6z3la-FnWuGtnI4FXTWuhsa22PXQO67Wyo1ZXRXikwXtkGdd_LFiVgb0xTur5uJVy1-pJ9PuUeaPo1Y8puH5PHYYARpzk5VTe6lrroKui3E-rLmomwdweKe6DfTgq3KHc79z_lblHuTspLyKeXeXO3x_Av4q_jAmxPAJarjxHJJR-xuA6RihoXpviaeX8A4Riicg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473413555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jafari, Mostafa ; Nguyen, Thanh N. ; Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago ; Hussain, Muhammad Shazam ; Hassan, Ameer E. ; Ikram, Asad ; Eliyas, Javed Khader ; Rodriguez, Gustavo J. ; Divani, Afshin A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Mostafa ; Nguyen, Thanh N. ; Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago ; Hussain, Muhammad Shazam ; Hassan, Ameer E. ; Ikram, Asad ; Eliyas, Javed Khader ; Rodriguez, Gustavo J. ; Divani, Afshin A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty. Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect. We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language. Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques. There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-3057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33360252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Angioplasty ; Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects ; Angioplasty, Balloon - instrumentation ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; In-stent stenosis ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - physiopathology ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - therapy ; Intracranial atherosclerotic disease ; Intracranial stenting ; Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging ; Ischemic Stroke - physiopathology ; Ischemic Stroke - therapy ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Prosthesis Design ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Stroke ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases, 2021-03, Vol.30 (3), p.105556-105556, Article 105556</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-7171dc2786ab6866feb7a38b6d42953c22a5c267e3ff18e1aef5576d4c481a983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-7171dc2786ab6866feb7a38b6d42953c22a5c267e3ff18e1aef5576d4c481a983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7148-7616 ; 0000-0003-2781-5034 ; 0000-0001-8448-0758 ; 0000-0001-6473-9638</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33360252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Thanh N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Muhammad Shazam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Ameer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikram, Asad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliyas, Javed Khader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Gustavo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divani, Afshin A.</creatorcontrib><title>Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective</title><title>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases</title><addtitle>J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis</addtitle><description>•Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty. Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect. We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language. Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques. There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.</description><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In-stent stenosis</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - therapy</subject><subject>Intracranial atherosclerotic disease</subject><subject>Intracranial stenting</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1052-3057</issn><issn>1532-8511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhLyAfEVIWf8ROely2La20Untoz9bEnggv2WQZOyvx73G0hROXXjyW5tE7Mw9jX6RYSSHt191qlzJNP9EjYUfTEVKIaaWEWgBjjH3DLqTRqmqNlG_LXxhVaWGac_Y-pZ0QUprWvGPnWmsrlFEXLG5mIhwzX4cjjB4TjyO_GcMS7ucBiD8RQt4vyNTz-zETeIIxwsDX-QfSlPxQ3hw9v44JISGHMfDbOc-E_LH0D-hzPOIHdtbDkPDjS71kz7c3T5u7avvw_X6z3la-FnWuGtnI4FXTWuhsa22PXQO67Wyo1ZXRXikwXtkGdd_LFiVgb0xTur5uJVy1-pJ9PuUeaPo1Y8puH5PHYYARpzk5VTe6lrroKui3E-rLmomwdweKe6DfTgq3KHc79z_lblHuTspLyKeXeXO3x_Av4q_jAmxPAJarjxHJJR-xuA6RihoXpviaeX8A4Riicg</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Jafari, Mostafa</creator><creator>Nguyen, Thanh N.</creator><creator>Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago</creator><creator>Hussain, Muhammad Shazam</creator><creator>Hassan, Ameer E.</creator><creator>Ikram, Asad</creator><creator>Eliyas, Javed Khader</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Gustavo J.</creator><creator>Divani, Afshin A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7148-7616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-5034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6473-9638</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective</title><author>Jafari, Mostafa ; Nguyen, Thanh N. ; Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago ; Hussain, Muhammad Shazam ; Hassan, Ameer E. ; Ikram, Asad ; Eliyas, Javed Khader ; Rodriguez, Gustavo J. ; Divani, Afshin A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-7171dc2786ab6866feb7a38b6d42953c22a5c267e3ff18e1aef5576d4c481a983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In-stent stenosis</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - therapy</topic><topic>Intracranial atherosclerotic disease</topic><topic>Intracranial stenting</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Thanh N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Muhammad Shazam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Ameer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikram, Asad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliyas, Javed Khader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Gustavo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divani, Afshin A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jafari, Mostafa</au><au>Nguyen, Thanh N.</au><au>Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago</au><au>Hussain, Muhammad Shazam</au><au>Hassan, Ameer E.</au><au>Ikram, Asad</au><au>Eliyas, Javed Khader</au><au>Rodriguez, Gustavo J.</au><au>Divani, Afshin A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases</jtitle><addtitle>J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>105556</spage><epage>105556</epage><pages>105556-105556</pages><artnum>105556</artnum><issn>1052-3057</issn><eissn>1532-8511</eissn><abstract>•Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty. Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect. We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language. Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques. There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33360252</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7148-7616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-5034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6473-9638</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-3057
ispartof Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases, 2021-03, Vol.30 (3), p.105556-105556, Article 105556
issn 1052-3057
1532-8511
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473413555
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Angioplasty
Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects
Angioplasty, Balloon - instrumentation
Clinical Trials as Topic
Diffusion of Innovation
Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
In-stent stenosis
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - physiopathology
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - therapy
Intracranial atherosclerotic disease
Intracranial stenting
Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging
Ischemic Stroke - physiopathology
Ischemic Stroke - therapy
Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Prosthesis Design
Risk Factors
Stents
Stroke
Treatment Outcome
title Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A35%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20Advances%20in%20Endovascular%20Treatment%20of%20Intracranial%20Atherosclerotic%20Disease%20and%20Future%20Prospective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20stroke%20and%20cerebrovascular%20diseases&rft.au=Jafari,%20Mostafa&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=105556&rft.epage=105556&rft.pages=105556-105556&rft.artnum=105556&rft.issn=1052-3057&rft.eissn=1532-8511&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473413555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473413555&rft_id=info:pmid/33360252&rft_els_id=S1052305720309745&rfr_iscdi=true