Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective
•Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty. Medical therapy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2021-03, Vol.30 (3), p.105556-105556, Article 105556 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 105556 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 105556 |
container_title | Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Jafari, Mostafa Nguyen, Thanh N. Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago Hussain, Muhammad Shazam Hassan, Ameer E. Ikram, Asad Eliyas, Javed Khader Rodriguez, Gustavo J. Divani, Afshin A. |
description | •Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty.
Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect.
We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language.
Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques.
There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473413555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1052305720309745</els_id><sourcerecordid>2473413555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-7171dc2786ab6866feb7a38b6d42953c22a5c267e3ff18e1aef5576d4c481a983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhLyAfEVIWf8ROely2La20Untoz9bEnggv2WQZOyvx73G0hROXXjyW5tE7Mw9jX6RYSSHt191qlzJNP9EjYUfTEVKIaaWEWgBjjH3DLqTRqmqNlG_LXxhVaWGac_Y-pZ0QUprWvGPnWmsrlFEXLG5mIhwzX4cjjB4TjyO_GcMS7ucBiD8RQt4vyNTz-zETeIIxwsDX-QfSlPxQ3hw9v44JISGHMfDbOc-E_LH0D-hzPOIHdtbDkPDjS71kz7c3T5u7avvw_X6z3la-FnWuGtnI4FXTWuhsa22PXQO67Wyo1ZXRXikwXtkGdd_LFiVgb0xTur5uJVy1-pJ9PuUeaPo1Y8puH5PHYYARpzk5VTe6lrroKui3E-rLmomwdweKe6DfTgq3KHc79z_lblHuTspLyKeXeXO3x_Av4q_jAmxPAJarjxHJJR-xuA6RihoXpviaeX8A4Riicg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2473413555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jafari, Mostafa ; Nguyen, Thanh N. ; Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago ; Hussain, Muhammad Shazam ; Hassan, Ameer E. ; Ikram, Asad ; Eliyas, Javed Khader ; Rodriguez, Gustavo J. ; Divani, Afshin A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Mostafa ; Nguyen, Thanh N. ; Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago ; Hussain, Muhammad Shazam ; Hassan, Ameer E. ; Ikram, Asad ; Eliyas, Javed Khader ; Rodriguez, Gustavo J. ; Divani, Afshin A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty.
Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect.
We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language.
Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques.
There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-3057</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33360252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Angioplasty ; Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects ; Angioplasty, Balloon - instrumentation ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Diffusion of Innovation ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; In-stent stenosis ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - physiopathology ; Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - therapy ; Intracranial atherosclerotic disease ; Intracranial stenting ; Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging ; Ischemic Stroke - physiopathology ; Ischemic Stroke - therapy ; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Prosthesis Design ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Stroke ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases, 2021-03, Vol.30 (3), p.105556-105556, Article 105556</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-7171dc2786ab6866feb7a38b6d42953c22a5c267e3ff18e1aef5576d4c481a983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-7171dc2786ab6866feb7a38b6d42953c22a5c267e3ff18e1aef5576d4c481a983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7148-7616 ; 0000-0003-2781-5034 ; 0000-0001-8448-0758 ; 0000-0001-6473-9638</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33360252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Thanh N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Muhammad Shazam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Ameer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikram, Asad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliyas, Javed Khader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Gustavo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divani, Afshin A.</creatorcontrib><title>Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective</title><title>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases</title><addtitle>J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis</addtitle><description>•Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty.
Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect.
We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language.
Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques.
There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.</description><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Diffusion of Innovation</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In-stent stenosis</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - therapy</subject><subject>Intracranial atherosclerotic disease</subject><subject>Intracranial stenting</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ischemic Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1052-3057</issn><issn>1532-8511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhLyAfEVIWf8ROely2La20Untoz9bEnggv2WQZOyvx73G0hROXXjyW5tE7Mw9jX6RYSSHt191qlzJNP9EjYUfTEVKIaaWEWgBjjH3DLqTRqmqNlG_LXxhVaWGac_Y-pZ0QUprWvGPnWmsrlFEXLG5mIhwzX4cjjB4TjyO_GcMS7ucBiD8RQt4vyNTz-zETeIIxwsDX-QfSlPxQ3hw9v44JISGHMfDbOc-E_LH0D-hzPOIHdtbDkPDjS71kz7c3T5u7avvw_X6z3la-FnWuGtnI4FXTWuhsa22PXQO67Wyo1ZXRXikwXtkGdd_LFiVgb0xTur5uJVy1-pJ9PuUeaPo1Y8puH5PHYYARpzk5VTe6lrroKui3E-rLmomwdweKe6DfTgq3KHc79z_lblHuTspLyKeXeXO3x_Av4q_jAmxPAJarjxHJJR-xuA6RihoXpviaeX8A4Riicg</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Jafari, Mostafa</creator><creator>Nguyen, Thanh N.</creator><creator>Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago</creator><creator>Hussain, Muhammad Shazam</creator><creator>Hassan, Ameer E.</creator><creator>Ikram, Asad</creator><creator>Eliyas, Javed Khader</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Gustavo J.</creator><creator>Divani, Afshin A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7148-7616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-5034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6473-9638</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective</title><author>Jafari, Mostafa ; Nguyen, Thanh N. ; Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago ; Hussain, Muhammad Shazam ; Hassan, Ameer E. ; Ikram, Asad ; Eliyas, Javed Khader ; Rodriguez, Gustavo J. ; Divani, Afshin A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-7171dc2786ab6866feb7a38b6d42953c22a5c267e3ff18e1aef5576d4c481a983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Diffusion of Innovation</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In-stent stenosis</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - therapy</topic><topic>Intracranial atherosclerotic disease</topic><topic>Intracranial stenting</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ischemic Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jafari, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Thanh N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussain, Muhammad Shazam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassan, Ameer E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikram, Asad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliyas, Javed Khader</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Gustavo J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divani, Afshin A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jafari, Mostafa</au><au>Nguyen, Thanh N.</au><au>Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago</au><au>Hussain, Muhammad Shazam</au><au>Hassan, Ameer E.</au><au>Ikram, Asad</au><au>Eliyas, Javed Khader</au><au>Rodriguez, Gustavo J.</au><au>Divani, Afshin A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases</jtitle><addtitle>J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>105556</spage><epage>105556</epage><pages>105556-105556</pages><artnum>105556</artnum><issn>1052-3057</issn><eissn>1532-8511</eissn><abstract>•Intracranial stenting, still a viable option for the treatment of ICAD in selected patients.•Operator expertise and selection criteria are critical to optimize the outcomes of intracranial stenting.•In-stent restenosis can be safely treated with stenting versus balloon angioplasty.
Medical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect.
We did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language.
Since the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques.
There exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33360252</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7148-7616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-5034</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-0758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6473-9638</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-3057 |
ispartof | Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases, 2021-03, Vol.30 (3), p.105556-105556, Article 105556 |
issn | 1052-3057 1532-8511 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2473413555 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Angioplasty Angioplasty, Balloon - adverse effects Angioplasty, Balloon - instrumentation Clinical Trials as Topic Diffusion of Innovation Evidence-Based Medicine Humans In-stent stenosis Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - diagnostic imaging Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - physiopathology Intracranial Arteriosclerosis - therapy Intracranial atherosclerotic disease Intracranial stenting Ischemic Stroke - diagnostic imaging Ischemic Stroke - physiopathology Ischemic Stroke - therapy Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - therapeutic use Prosthesis Design Risk Factors Stents Stroke Treatment Outcome |
title | Current Advances in Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease and Future Prospective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A35%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20Advances%20in%20Endovascular%20Treatment%20of%20Intracranial%20Atherosclerotic%20Disease%20and%20Future%20Prospective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20stroke%20and%20cerebrovascular%20diseases&rft.au=Jafari,%20Mostafa&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=105556&rft.epage=105556&rft.pages=105556-105556&rft.artnum=105556&rft.issn=1052-3057&rft.eissn=1532-8511&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2473413555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2473413555&rft_id=info:pmid/33360252&rft_els_id=S1052305720309745&rfr_iscdi=true |