An in vitro investigation into the release of fugitive medical aerosols into the environment during manual ventilation
During manual resuscitation, nebulizer therapy may be used to deliver therapeutics to patients in respiratory distress. However, the devices used to generate and deliver these medical aerosols have the potential to release these therapeutics into the local environment and expose caregivers to unwant...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of hospital infection 2021-02, Vol.108, p.135-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 135 |
container_title | The Journal of hospital infection |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Mac Giolla Eain, M. Joyce, M. O'Sullivan, A. McGrath, J.A. MacLoughlin, R. |
description | During manual resuscitation, nebulizer therapy may be used to deliver therapeutics to patients in respiratory distress. However, the devices used to generate and deliver these medical aerosols have the potential to release these therapeutics into the local environment and expose caregivers to unwanted medical aerosols.
To quantify the levels of fugitive medical aerosol released into the environment during aerosol drug delivery using a manual resuscitation bag with and without filtration.
Time-varying fugitive aerosol concentrations were measured using an aerodynamic particle sizer placed at a position designed to mimic a caregiver. Two nebulizer types were assessed, a vibrating mesh nebulizer and a jet nebulizer. The aerosol dose delivered to the simulated patient lung was also quantified.
Filtration of the exhalation port of the manual resuscitation bag was seen to reduce fugitive medical aerosols to ambient levels for both nebulizer types. The vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered the greatest quantity of aerosol to the simulated adult patient (18.44 ± 1.03% versus 3.64 ± 0.26% with a jet nebulizer).
The results highlight the potential for exposure to fugitive medical aerosols released during the delivery of aerosol therapy with a manual resuscitation bag and also the potential for significant variation in patient lung dose depending on nebulizer type. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.029 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2469071383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670120305545</els_id><sourcerecordid>2469071383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c08bbba9f1a95b8d4af77ab88237bd44ca807585ffd3d80b2d426b3339ad1aa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtOHDEURa0IFBrIBjKIPGRSHX_qZykThAhEQmICY8ufV41bVTbYrorYDWvJyuKmCZkxsnV13pXuQegrJWtKaPt9u94-OL9mhJWArgkTn9CKNpxVTHBxgFaEiqZqO0KP0HFKW0JIyZvP6IhzJkrertDvc4-d__OyuBxD-S2Qstuo7MIuzwHnB8ARRlAJcBjwMG9cdgvgCawzasQKYkhhTP9p8IuLwU_gM7ZzdH6DJ-Xnwi4lcuNr-Sk6HNSY4Mvbe4Luf17eXVxXN7dXvy7ObypTE5IrQ3qttRIDVaLRva3V0HVK9z3jnbZ1bVRPuqZvhsFy2xPNbM1azTkXylKlOn6Czva9jzE8zWWcnFwyMI7KQ5iTZHUrSEd5zwvK9qgpi1KEQT5GN6n4LCmRO-FyK3fC5U64pFQW4eXo21v_rIuS95N_hgvwYw9AWbk4iDIZB94UfRFMlja4j_r_ApKFlb4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2469071383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An in vitro investigation into the release of fugitive medical aerosols into the environment during manual ventilation</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Mac Giolla Eain, M. ; Joyce, M. ; O'Sullivan, A. ; McGrath, J.A. ; MacLoughlin, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mac Giolla Eain, M. ; Joyce, M. ; O'Sullivan, A. ; McGrath, J.A. ; MacLoughlin, R.</creatorcontrib><description>During manual resuscitation, nebulizer therapy may be used to deliver therapeutics to patients in respiratory distress. However, the devices used to generate and deliver these medical aerosols have the potential to release these therapeutics into the local environment and expose caregivers to unwanted medical aerosols.
To quantify the levels of fugitive medical aerosol released into the environment during aerosol drug delivery using a manual resuscitation bag with and without filtration.
Time-varying fugitive aerosol concentrations were measured using an aerodynamic particle sizer placed at a position designed to mimic a caregiver. Two nebulizer types were assessed, a vibrating mesh nebulizer and a jet nebulizer. The aerosol dose delivered to the simulated patient lung was also quantified.
Filtration of the exhalation port of the manual resuscitation bag was seen to reduce fugitive medical aerosols to ambient levels for both nebulizer types. The vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered the greatest quantity of aerosol to the simulated adult patient (18.44 ± 1.03% versus 3.64 ± 0.26% with a jet nebulizer).
The results highlight the potential for exposure to fugitive medical aerosols released during the delivery of aerosol therapy with a manual resuscitation bag and also the potential for significant variation in patient lung dose depending on nebulizer type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33296706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosol ; Fugitive medical aerosol ; Jet nebulizer ; Manual resuscitation bags ; Secondary aerosol exposure ; Vibrating mesh nebulizers</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2021-02, Vol.108, p.135-141</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c08bbba9f1a95b8d4af77ab88237bd44ca807585ffd3d80b2d426b3339ad1aa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c08bbba9f1a95b8d4af77ab88237bd44ca807585ffd3d80b2d426b3339ad1aa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33296706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mac Giolla Eain, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrath, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLoughlin, R.</creatorcontrib><title>An in vitro investigation into the release of fugitive medical aerosols into the environment during manual ventilation</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><description>During manual resuscitation, nebulizer therapy may be used to deliver therapeutics to patients in respiratory distress. However, the devices used to generate and deliver these medical aerosols have the potential to release these therapeutics into the local environment and expose caregivers to unwanted medical aerosols.
To quantify the levels of fugitive medical aerosol released into the environment during aerosol drug delivery using a manual resuscitation bag with and without filtration.
Time-varying fugitive aerosol concentrations were measured using an aerodynamic particle sizer placed at a position designed to mimic a caregiver. Two nebulizer types were assessed, a vibrating mesh nebulizer and a jet nebulizer. The aerosol dose delivered to the simulated patient lung was also quantified.
Filtration of the exhalation port of the manual resuscitation bag was seen to reduce fugitive medical aerosols to ambient levels for both nebulizer types. The vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered the greatest quantity of aerosol to the simulated adult patient (18.44 ± 1.03% versus 3.64 ± 0.26% with a jet nebulizer).
The results highlight the potential for exposure to fugitive medical aerosols released during the delivery of aerosol therapy with a manual resuscitation bag and also the potential for significant variation in patient lung dose depending on nebulizer type.</description><subject>Aerosol</subject><subject>Fugitive medical aerosol</subject><subject>Jet nebulizer</subject><subject>Manual resuscitation bags</subject><subject>Secondary aerosol exposure</subject><subject>Vibrating mesh nebulizers</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtOHDEURa0IFBrIBjKIPGRSHX_qZykThAhEQmICY8ufV41bVTbYrorYDWvJyuKmCZkxsnV13pXuQegrJWtKaPt9u94-OL9mhJWArgkTn9CKNpxVTHBxgFaEiqZqO0KP0HFKW0JIyZvP6IhzJkrertDvc4-d__OyuBxD-S2Qstuo7MIuzwHnB8ARRlAJcBjwMG9cdgvgCawzasQKYkhhTP9p8IuLwU_gM7ZzdH6DJ-Xnwi4lcuNr-Sk6HNSY4Mvbe4Luf17eXVxXN7dXvy7ObypTE5IrQ3qttRIDVaLRva3V0HVK9z3jnbZ1bVRPuqZvhsFy2xPNbM1azTkXylKlOn6Czva9jzE8zWWcnFwyMI7KQ5iTZHUrSEd5zwvK9qgpi1KEQT5GN6n4LCmRO-FyK3fC5U64pFQW4eXo21v_rIuS95N_hgvwYw9AWbk4iDIZB94UfRFMlja4j_r_ApKFlb4</recordid><startdate>202102</startdate><enddate>202102</enddate><creator>Mac Giolla Eain, M.</creator><creator>Joyce, M.</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, A.</creator><creator>McGrath, J.A.</creator><creator>MacLoughlin, R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202102</creationdate><title>An in vitro investigation into the release of fugitive medical aerosols into the environment during manual ventilation</title><author>Mac Giolla Eain, M. ; Joyce, M. ; O'Sullivan, A. ; McGrath, J.A. ; MacLoughlin, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-c08bbba9f1a95b8d4af77ab88237bd44ca807585ffd3d80b2d426b3339ad1aa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aerosol</topic><topic>Fugitive medical aerosol</topic><topic>Jet nebulizer</topic><topic>Manual resuscitation bags</topic><topic>Secondary aerosol exposure</topic><topic>Vibrating mesh nebulizers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mac Giolla Eain, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGrath, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLoughlin, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mac Giolla Eain, M.</au><au>Joyce, M.</au><au>O'Sullivan, A.</au><au>McGrath, J.A.</au><au>MacLoughlin, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An in vitro investigation into the release of fugitive medical aerosols into the environment during manual ventilation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Hosp Infect</addtitle><date>2021-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>108</volume><spage>135</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>135-141</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>During manual resuscitation, nebulizer therapy may be used to deliver therapeutics to patients in respiratory distress. However, the devices used to generate and deliver these medical aerosols have the potential to release these therapeutics into the local environment and expose caregivers to unwanted medical aerosols.
To quantify the levels of fugitive medical aerosol released into the environment during aerosol drug delivery using a manual resuscitation bag with and without filtration.
Time-varying fugitive aerosol concentrations were measured using an aerodynamic particle sizer placed at a position designed to mimic a caregiver. Two nebulizer types were assessed, a vibrating mesh nebulizer and a jet nebulizer. The aerosol dose delivered to the simulated patient lung was also quantified.
Filtration of the exhalation port of the manual resuscitation bag was seen to reduce fugitive medical aerosols to ambient levels for both nebulizer types. The vibrating mesh nebulizer delivered the greatest quantity of aerosol to the simulated adult patient (18.44 ± 1.03% versus 3.64 ± 0.26% with a jet nebulizer).
The results highlight the potential for exposure to fugitive medical aerosols released during the delivery of aerosol therapy with a manual resuscitation bag and also the potential for significant variation in patient lung dose depending on nebulizer type.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33296706</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.029</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6701 |
ispartof | The Journal of hospital infection, 2021-02, Vol.108, p.135-141 |
issn | 0195-6701 1532-2939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2469071383 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aerosol Fugitive medical aerosol Jet nebulizer Manual resuscitation bags Secondary aerosol exposure Vibrating mesh nebulizers |
title | An in vitro investigation into the release of fugitive medical aerosols into the environment during manual ventilation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T02%3A13%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20in%C2%A0vitro%20investigation%20into%20the%20release%20of%20fugitive%20medical%20aerosols%20into%20the%20environment%20during%20manual%20ventilation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Mac%20Giolla%20Eain,%20M.&rft.date=2021-02&rft.volume=108&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=135-141&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.11.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2469071383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2469071383&rft_id=info:pmid/33296706&rft_els_id=S0195670120305545&rfr_iscdi=true |